|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Jack Walker

Joined: 23 Oct 2008 Posts: 412
|
Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 4:27 pm Post subject: Random chatter thread |
|
|
This thread is for all discussions concerning the Polish language,questions,answers,daily life in Poland etc,etc.
The customwer service thread is gone way off mark and hopefully this will clear it up.
Have fun.
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bje
Joined: 19 Jun 2005 Posts: 527
|
Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 1:06 am Post subject: Re: Random chatter thread |
|
|
Jack Walker wrote: |
This thread is for all discussions concerning the Polish language,questions,answers,daily life in Poland etc,etc.
The customwer service thread is gone way off mark and hopefully this will clear it up.
Have fun.
 |
Good idea; the CS thread was funny, and then it swerved into banal and anal language chatter.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jack Walker

Joined: 23 Oct 2008 Posts: 412
|
Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 9:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes,you're right.
Let me begin:kogo/co...what's up with that?  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dynow
Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 1080
|
Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 1:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
well, if this is the polish langauge thread, i have a question:
as far as I know, or knew rather, when using "jako", there is no conjugation.
so, for example:
Chcialbym pracowac jako lekarz.
but, i recently read a sentence like this:
Czy wynik dobrze charakteryzuje pana jako przyjaciela?
why przyjaciela, and not przyjaciel?
also, and this one continually plagues me:
i see many instances in polish where "with" is omitted, and only the conjugation follows.
for example, "Ide z Marcinem".
but
here's a sentence without "with" (z), but conjugates accordingly:
"Prosze uzupelnic zdania odpowiedną formą czasownika.........."
My question is, quite simply, how do I know when to use "z", and when to omit it, and simply use the appropriate conjugations that follow "z"? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jack Walker

Joined: 23 Oct 2008 Posts: 412
|
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 10:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's interesting how the Polish language discussion dried up as soon as the other thread was cleaned up.
Goes to show how you can't categorize spontaneity sometimes!  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dynow
Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 1080
|
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 11:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
it's even more interesting how my questions still haven't been answered....this post is 4 days old. not one bite.
i'm starting to get a slightly better grasp, or shall i say "feeling" for komu/czemu, but not from a Polish teacher's explination, simply from seeing it over and over and noticing patterns.
I wish i could spend all of my English lessons telling my students, "it's kogo/co guys! There, now you have it." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jack Walker

Joined: 23 Oct 2008 Posts: 412
|
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 4:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes Mr.Dynow,I think your question stumped some of the Polish experts on here.
It would be great if we could all throw the old kogo/co act at students when they ask a grammar question in English class.
Unfortunately,most of them expect the grammar rules of English to come nicely wrapped in a box which can be opened and closed at any time to reveal all the answers to all their queries. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
citizen X
Joined: 18 Oct 2008 Posts: 22
|
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 8:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dynow wrote: |
Chcialbym pracowac jako lekarz.
but, i recently read a sentence like this:
Czy wynik dobrze charakteryzuje pana jako przyjaciela?
why przyjaciela, and not przyjaciel?
Well, it's again all about asking the appropriate questions
---Chcialbym pracowac jako (kto) lekarz.
---Czy wynik dobrze charakteryzuje pana jako (kogo) przyjaciela?
Chcialbym pracowac jako (kto) barman/lekarz/dentysta/alfons etc.
Czy to przedstawia cie w dobrym swietle jako (kogo) barmana/lekarza/dentyste/alfonsa etc. (Does it present you in a good light as a ...)
also, and this one continually plagues me:
i see many instances in polish where "with" is omitted, and only the conjugation follows.
for example, "Ide z Marcinem".
Ide (with whom, with...)z Marcinem/ kotem/psem/ but with babcia/mama/siostra
As I said before, what you put at the end of the word, in my opinion, depends on the noun that you use, that's why you say "Ide (with whom) z psem BUT "Ide (with whom) z babcia NOT babciem"
but
here's a sentence without "with" (z), but conjugates accordingly:
"Prosze uzupelnic zdania odpowiedną formą czasownika.........."
In the examples above you asked "with whom" and you had to use "z," here you ask "with what" and that's why "z" is omitted. You "uzupełniasz zdania" (complete sentences) with something NOT with somebody as in the examples above.
I'm not sure it's clear, but that's just the way it is, I guess
My question is, quite simply, how do I know when to use "z", and when to omit it, and simply use the appropriate conjugations that follow "z"? |
[/b] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jack Walker

Joined: 23 Oct 2008 Posts: 412
|
Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2009 9:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Post your ZUS rants here.Everyone knows it's the spawn of the Dark Master!  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dynow
Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 1080
|
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2009 9:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
citizen X
although I appreciate the effort, i don't think it's any more clear to me.
all you have done with "jako" is write, "well, it's kogo"....."well, it's kto".....and for me, that never ever helps me out. i could have looked up that answer in a grammar book. like i have said before, i can do most declensions in Polish without thinking to myself, "oohhhh, it's komu/czemu". I just feel it and i can use it. some things i can't feel, and the old explination of "it changes like that because it's "X" case or "Y" case never really gets me anywhere most of the time. To be honest, the example sentences you wrote made it a little more clear. It seems as though when you're writing a sentence making a more direct reference to someone, there is no conjugation. The other way is less direct, causing a different case, but i don't know.
regarding "with"........i don't think what you wrote holds true all the time.
Just to throw an example out there, using "z" when referring to what:
"Co zrobimy z tym samochodem."
This sentence uses "z", it's referring to "what", and it conjugates and operates exactly like "who".....just like "Ide z Marcinem".
so unless i'm writing that sentence wrong, which i doubt I am, it would be one example of many that would make this
Quote: |
In the examples above you asked "with whom" and you had to use "z," here you ask "with what" and that's why "z" is omitted. |
an incorrect explanation. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hrvatski
Joined: 16 Nov 2008 Posts: 270
|
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2009 9:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Czy wynik dobrze charakteryzuje pana jako przyjaciela?
Both 'pana' and 'przyjaciela' are objects of 'charakteryzuje', which is why they're both in accusative form.
You could establish the pattern [transitive verb] [object of transitive verb in corresponding case form] jako [2nd object of transitive verb in identical corresponding case form]
Other examples:
On powiedział mi jako koledze.
Nie uznawali tego jako sposobu na zdrowy tryb życia.
Mam drugi spadochron jako zapasowy.
In the following sentences the nouns following 'jako' are not objects of the preceeding verbs, so do not undergo any case changing, they are in nominative form.
Pracuję jako nauczyciel.
On rozmawia z nią jako przyjaciel.
With the 'z' enigma, you just have to learn how it is with each verb, much like learners of English have to learn if they should use gerund or infinitive verb forms after certain verbs. If you do something with someone, then you always have to use 'z' and that's about the most steadfast rule with this. Two random examples of sentences with and without 'z'.
Ugotowała obiad z najlepszymi składnikami.
Dziweczynka pokolorowała obraz kredkami. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Scawie
Joined: 24 Apr 2006 Posts: 44
|
Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 3:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hrvatski wrote: |
With the 'z' enigma, you just have to learn how it is with each verb, much like learners of English have to learn if they should use gerund or infinitive verb forms after certain verbs. If you do something with someone, then you always have to use 'z' and that's about the most steadfast rule with this. Two random examples of sentences with and without 'z'.
Ugotowała obiad z najlepszymi składnikami.
Dziweczynka pokolorowała obraz kredkami. |
In the second example you're using the crayon as a tool. In the first example you're not using the ingredients as a tool to do the cooking. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dynow
Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 1080
|
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 2:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
http://www.rosettastone.com/personal/languages/polish
i had used Rosetta Stone about 3 years ago when i first started studying polish, and I believe it helped me quite a bit. it wasn't a fantastic program, it was an old version, but it taught me how to pronounce polish words and introduced a lot of useful vocabulary. at the time, they didn't have anything beyond level 1.
i just checked on a whim the rosetta stone website, and they now have an updated version with better software with Polish levels 1, 2 and 3.
does anyone have any experience with the new versions? these new versions are between $260 and $280 per level. I'm sure there is a......."cheaper" way of getting them......
sometimes it's just nice to have a study tool that is interactive rather than just staring at the book or writing countless sentences. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hrvatski
Joined: 16 Nov 2008 Posts: 270
|
Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2009 5:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Girlfriends are very interactive  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|