|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
wfh
Joined: 10 Nov 2006 Posts: 30
|
Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 6:17 pm Post subject: Rejected due to lack of assessed teaching practice cert |
|
|
Oh dear.
I didn't dream I'd ever be in this position.
I am about to return to my home country, and duly applied to a language school in the area. I thought my CV was good. I've been teaching for five years, just finishing up two years in the English Language dept of a Middle Eastern university. I have an MA.
After a few back and forth emails it transpires I'm not going to get hired (no final rejection, but strong hints) because my TEFL cert (which I did 18 months ago, by distance, at the behest of an interested employer who wanted me to be "certified") didn't involve any observed lessons.
So this is a warning. And a question - is there anything I can do to appease my potential employer? I would dearly love this job. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
naturegirl321

Joined: 04 May 2003 Posts: 9041 Location: home sweet home
|
Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 6:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, you seem to have lots of experience. What's your MA in? Maybe that can count, if you can convince the institute of it.
IS there anyway that you can get observed now by your uni in the ME? Or try doing a demo lesson at the institute? Try to be persistent, just don't go overboard. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
spiral78

Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 11534 Location: On a Short Leash
|
Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 6:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry, wfh. This won't be helpful to you!
But, we say on an almost-daily basis that a minimum newbie TEFL/TESL cert MUST include that all-important supervised teaching practice.
You've unfortunately become a living case in point (though I'm truly sorry that you've got problems with this).
Would-be newbie teachers - don't bother with any cert that doesn't include the teaching practice!!
wfh, I don't know where you want to teach. But I can say from personal experience, that, in Canada, even private language schools won't touch anyone with an on-line cert. Likely it's the same in the States, though it may depend on how much the region needs teachers (and how little schools there can get by with so far as salaries are concerned). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Justin Trullinger

Joined: 28 Jan 2005 Posts: 3110 Location: Seoul, South Korea and Myanmar for a bit
|
Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 8:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Do you have any other teacher training which did involve observed teaching?
If so, tell them now. If not, sorry to hear it. But if you don't have any training that involved practice teaching, then you don't have any training.
Try to sell the experience. But it very well may not work. (Probably wouldn't with me, to tell the truth.)
Best,
Justin |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Glenski

Joined: 15 Jan 2003 Posts: 12844 Location: Hokkaido, JAPAN
|
Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2009 10:01 pm Post subject: Re: Rejected due to lack of assessed teaching practice cert |
|
|
wfh wrote: |
After a few back and forth emails... |
Does this mean 2 or 3 employers? One employer? A dozen?
If you are depending on just a few messages telling you you aren't qualified, up the percentages. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wfh
Joined: 10 Nov 2006 Posts: 30
|
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 3:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the replies.
I'm looking into getting an assessed teaching add-on certificate. I really don't have the time/spare cash to do a whole new certificate. I'm seriously depressed because my way into teaching didn't start with a certificate, and I simply never had the time/need to do one (After graduating I was trained by an independent ESOL organisation, and I progressed from there, this is my first bump). That was on my CV, but the lack of certificate connected to this seems to be a major sticking point.
Looks like this job isn't going to work out though, so it'll be a few months of administrative work for me.
I admit I'm perplexed that my experience counts for absolutely nothing, compared to someone who has the cert + observed teaching + zero experience. Does on-the-job training count for nothing?
Now to wallow in self-pity for a while. Yes, it's just one employer, but they're the only employer in the area! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Justin Trullinger

Joined: 28 Jan 2005 Posts: 3110 Location: Seoul, South Korea and Myanmar for a bit
|
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 8:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Does on-the-job training count for nothing? |
Experience and on-the-job training both count. But they're hard to verify. When I get an application, perhaps similar to yours (perhaps yours, for all I know), I wonder who was doing the training, and if they had a clue. Sometimes I can check, by getting references, contacting previous employers, etc, but it takes a lot of time, and may be impossible.
Which leads me to rely on a truism I've seen worldwide. Most schools don't do what they should in terms of staff support. Not at all.
Everybody asks about "Why would they rather have an ineperienced cert holder than an experienced person with no cert?" Honestly, I'd rather have the person who is both trained and experienced. And these people are around. One may have gotten your job.
But in the unlikely case that I had to choose between trained and inexperienced, and experienced and untrained, I guess I hope I'd have time to investigate the individuals very carefully. It is a tough call.
If the trained newbie had done really GOOD training, though, I'd probably lean in that direction. Because on the job is fine- but I don't know what the criteria of your school, or your students, was. Many places it's just popularity and entertainment. In such circumstances, it's possible to be a "successful" teacher without anybody actually learning anything. I'm not saying that's your case- just saying that some experience is worth a lot, some is practically counter-productive, and it is very hard for a potential employer to figure out what kind you've had.
If you have a recognised qualification, it's easier to know what it was.
Which leads me to:
Quote: |
I'm looking into getting an assessed teaching add-on certificate |
This may be a very good idea- but check it out thoroughly. I don't know what cert you have, or through whom you'd do an assessed add-on. But not all cert programs are equal. One that would let you do a cert without teaching, or teaching separate from a cert, seems somewhat odd.
All the best,
Justin |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wfh
Joined: 10 Nov 2006 Posts: 30
|
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 8:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Justin Trullinger wrote: |
This may be a very good idea- but check it out thoroughly. I don't know what cert you have, or through whom you'd do an assessed add-on. But not all cert programs are equal. One that would let you do a cert without teaching, or teaching separate from a cert, seems somewhat odd.
|
Thanks for the excellent post. Very informative, and an interesting perspective (comforting too, at this time).
If I decided against the assessed add-on (the one I'm looking at right now is from the certificate provider I did the distance thing with (INTESOL), they offer one week of assessed teaching practice at various schools), what would you recommend? Do I really have no other choice than going back and doing a new certificate from scratch?
I take what you're saying about checking the certificate out thoroughly, but to be honest the impression I got from the employer I was communicating with was that ANY assessed teachng cert would be acceptable, it just had to exist as one of their hiring requisites. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Justin Trullinger

Joined: 28 Jan 2005 Posts: 3110 Location: Seoul, South Korea and Myanmar for a bit
|
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 8:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
I take what you're saying about checking the certificate out thoroughly, but to be honest the impression I got from the employer I was communicating with was that ANY assessed teachng cert would be acceptable, it just had to exist as one of their hiring requisites. |
Bureaucracy can be a pain- and some people just have to tick all the boxes.
I don't know INTESOL, and haven't got a moment for a long look right now- their claim that they are the "Best known QUALITY TEFL/TESOL course provider" seems insupportable, and makes me wonder what else they get up to. I have never heard of the OCNW, which accredits them. THeir website (filled with dead links, at least at this moment) doesnt' inspire confidence either.
If a given employer is just looking to tick a box, then no problem. But I have to say that at a glance, I wouldn't rate this as a first tier course provider. I'll have a longer look later-
Best,
Justin |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wfh
Joined: 10 Nov 2006 Posts: 30
|
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, in my defence (if they're terribly dodgy) - a prospective employer actually paid for the course, I wasn't involved in the selection, and went through the certificate at their request.
Ironically, I didn't end up working for them. Maybe that was fortunate. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Justin Trullinger

Joined: 28 Jan 2005 Posts: 3110 Location: Seoul, South Korea and Myanmar for a bit
|
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 11:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You got a potential employer to pay for training!?!?!
Clearly, you're smart and resourceful, so I'm not going to worry too much about you.
I've had a browse around INTESOL's sight, though and can't say I'm overly impressed. They keep saying that they're one of the world leaders in the field, and I can't seem to recall having heard of them before. Odd.
Maybe I've just missed this one, but I'd like to know if anyone else around here knows anything about them. It's not a reputation if they're the only ones who have heard it, after all.
Best,
Justin |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mike_2007
Joined: 24 Apr 2007 Posts: 349 Location: Bucharest, Romania
|
Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 5:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting discussion on the balance between experience and certification.
At what point do you think the experience supercedes the certification?
Let's assume I have no CELTA (I do, but for the sake of discussion let's assume I don't). I have ten years experience in the field, mostly working as a freelancer. This means I have no employers to give me references, but I could get together quite an array of companies and individuals willing to write one on my behest. Having been freelance for so long, I'm used to doing all my own prep, assessing students, arranging contracts, scheduling, invoicing and all the other administrative chores that come along with the job. Let's assume I also know the students' L1 pretty well too.
How would you view an application from such a person (considerably more than 'some' experience, but no CELTA)?
Regards,
Mike |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Justin Trullinger

Joined: 28 Jan 2005 Posts: 3110 Location: Seoul, South Korea and Myanmar for a bit
|
Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 3:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Mike,
This is what I meant when I said "it is a tough call."
In an ideal world, I'd want to sit down and talk to all individuals in question. Long talk.
I'd want to probe your ideas about language teaching and learning. I'd want to know how you'd react in given classroom situations. I'd ask you for advice about problem students. I'd ask you to respond to difficult grammar questions that students ask me. I'd ask about your favorite resources, and what makes them favorite.
I'd bother the heck out of you with questions, in fact.
Because in the case of the hypothetical you (10 years, no training) it would sort of fall to me to assess what you'd gotten out of your experience. Experience can, no doubt, be the best teacher. But it can also mis-teach, and not everybody is good at learning from experience.
And I wouldn't know which one you were. I might be able to get something out of a good interview- if you're either in country or somewhere that a longish phone interview is feasible. But if this isn't possible...then you may not be a good risk as a new hire.
I guess I get a little tired of all the "I don't have any training, but I have experience!" apps that I get. Sometimes the experience isn't even checkable. Even if it is, though- it presents quite a job to figure out what they got out of it. I am certainly not just going to take the applicants word for it.
I'd also ask what the decision to work without training, or not to get further training as the years go by, says about an applicant.
Best,
Justin |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Chancellor
Joined: 31 Oct 2005 Posts: 1337 Location: Ji'an, China - if you're willing to send me cigars, I accept donations :)
|
Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 4:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Justin Trullinger wrote: |
Hi Mike,
This is what I meant when I said "it is a tough call."
In an ideal world, I'd want to sit down and talk to all individuals in question. Long talk.
I'd want to probe your ideas about language teaching and learning. I'd want to know how you'd react in given classroom situations. I'd ask you for advice about problem students. I'd ask you to respond to difficult grammar questions that students ask me. I'd ask about your favorite resources, and what makes them favorite.
I'd bother the heck out of you with questions, in fact.
Because in the case of the hypothetical you (10 years, no training) it would sort of fall to me to assess what you'd gotten out of your experience. Experience can, no doubt, be the best teacher. But it can also mis-teach, and not everybody is good at learning from experience.
And I wouldn't know which one you were. I might be able to get something out of a good interview- if you're either in country or somewhere that a longish phone interview is feasible. But if this isn't possible...then you may not be a good risk as a new hire.
I guess I get a little tired of all the "I don't have any training, but I have experience!" apps that I get. Sometimes the experience isn't even checkable. Even if it is, though- it presents quite a job to figure out what they got out of it. I am certainly not just going to take the applicants word for it.
I'd also ask what the decision to work without training, or not to get further training as the years go by, says about an applicant.
Best,
Justin |
Yeah, the old-fashioned notion of people actually working their way into a job is pretty much gone. Thanks, in no small part, to universities in America trying to keep young people out of the Viet Nam War, having that piece of paper showing you've been properly indoctrinated by the university system seems to be more important these days than actually having done the work.
However, when it comes to a profession like teaching then you really do need some sort of supervised practical testing that shows you know how to teach; hence observed teaching practice. One wonders, though, if an employer would be able to "certify" that one of their employees does, indeed, know how to teach. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mike_2007
Joined: 24 Apr 2007 Posts: 349 Location: Bucharest, Romania
|
Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 4:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In my example case, I mentioned having references from students. Wouldn't that in itself be evidence enough of the capacity to teach? After all, if you can call a potential employee's ex-students and speak to them (assuming they aren't all fake references) that would be proof enough of the candidate's abilty to teach (or to at least please potential students).
Which do you consider more reliable as evidence of ability? A teaching certificate, a reference from a past employer, or references from ex-students? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|