View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
lazycomputerkids
Joined: 22 Sep 2009 Posts: 360 Location: Tabuk
|
Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 6:50 pm Post subject: King Abdullah Rocks Some More |
|
|
http://www.arabnews.com/?page=1§ion=0&article=127055&d=5&m=10&y=2009
The action against the scholar came a few days after his controversial statement questioning co-education at King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), which was officially opened by the king on Sept. 23 in the presence of several world leaders and renowned scientists and academics. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
huntjuliehunt
Joined: 09 May 2007 Posts: 87
|
Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 7:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I disagree with the sheik, but he is discharged simply for commenting on his beliefs and being suspicious of a co-ed university? That is too bad.
Male and female roaming freely in the same space... who knows what wickedness awaits. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 7:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dear huntjuliehunt,
Among the number of freedoms not available in the Kingdom is freedom of speech. When the king decrees something, it's not a good idea to voice opposition to that publicly.
"who knows what wickedness awaits."
Why, the Shadow does - the Shadow knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men (and ladies.) And apparently, the sheik does, too. I suppose he consulted with his own heart.
Regards,
John |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
lazycomputerkids
Joined: 22 Sep 2009 Posts: 360 Location: Tabuk
|
Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 7:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
johnslat wrote: |
I suppose he consulted with his own heart. |
amen |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Never Ceased To Be Amazed

Joined: 22 Oct 2004 Posts: 3500 Location: Shhh...don't talk to me...I'm playin' dead...
|
Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 7:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
And, with the speed of light the "other thread" was locked. Thy Will be done..
NCTBA
Last edited by Never Ceased To Be Amazed on Mon Oct 05, 2009 7:56 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
007

Joined: 30 Oct 2006 Posts: 2684 Location: UK/Veteran of the Magic Kingdom
|
Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 7:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
huntjuliehunt wrote: |
I disagree with the sheik, but he is discharged simply for commenting on his beliefs and being suspicious of a co-ed university? That is too bad.
Male and female roaming freely in the same space... who knows what wickedness awaits. |
Well, as USA has good heart, also the Magic Kingdom has good heart as well (using your terminology! ), and the Sheikh represents/reflects this good heart! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 7:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dear NCTBA,
You don't have to be a weatherman to know which way the wind is blowing.
Regards,
John |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
lazycomputerkids
Joined: 22 Sep 2009 Posts: 360 Location: Tabuk
|
Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 7:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Never Ceased To Be Amazed wrote: |
And, with the speed of light the "other thread" was locked. They Will be done... |
Finally, Geesh |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
trapezius

Joined: 13 Aug 2006 Posts: 1670 Location: Land of Culture of Death & Destruction
|
Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 10:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
While I agree that disfreedom of speech triumphed in this case (and that is a 'good' thing for SA in this case), it must be pointed out that what he said was self-contradictory:
Quote: |
Al-Shethri said mixing of sexes in the land of the Two Holy Mosques was unacceptable. |
As shrewdly pointed out by a columnist:
Quote: |
�If the sheikh views it immoral then we have to shut down [...] the Two Holy Mosques,� |
(and hospitals and shopping malls as well) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
trapezius

Joined: 13 Aug 2006 Posts: 1670 Location: Land of Culture of Death & Destruction
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Cleopatra

Joined: 28 Jun 2003 Posts: 3657 Location: Tuamago Archipelago
|
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 9:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
they would have two separate flights to single destinations: one for men and another �with shaded windows� for women. Such suggestions are unreasonable |
Actually, in the Saudi context they're not that far out of line. After all, schools, government offices - even banks - are gender segregated here, though you'd never guess that from reading this rather self congratulatory article. Even the genuine hard liners have to accept that, from a financial and logistic point of view, it's simply impossible to have segregated airplanes. However, if it were at all possible, quite a few people in KSA would be in favour. Same goes for hospitals. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
veiledsentiments

Joined: 20 Feb 2003 Posts: 17644 Location: USA
|
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 3:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That has to rank up there with some of the most bizarre little essays I've read. I went into writing teacher mode immediately... talk about free range supports. I kept being stopped in mid paragraph to wonder about his point. Malaysia vs Afghanistan? Huh? Weekend marriages? Getting acid on one's thobe?
Thanks for the laugh, trap...
VS |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 3:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have to wonder - in what universe was THIS true about Afghanistan:
"About half a century ago, Malaysia was a backward, poor and disunited country while Afghanistan was a civilized, rich and united nation."
Regards,
John |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
InterRick
Joined: 18 Jul 2009 Posts: 86
|
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 3:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, it was, at least, one of the United Nations. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 4:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dear InterRick,
As is North Korea today. But I really don't think that half a century ago, Afghanistan could be described as being "civilized, rich and united." Back then, as today, it was/is feudal, tribal, clannish, and dirt-poor (well, except for the drug money, that is.)
Regards,
John |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|