| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
lazycomputerkids
Joined: 22 Sep 2009 Posts: 360 Location: Tabuk
|
Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 5:59 pm Post subject: 10 "Laws" of the Web (the proclivities of discussi |
|
|
#1 Godwin's Law: "As a Usenet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1."
#2 Poe's Law: �Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humour, it is impossible to create a parody of fundamentalism that someone won't mistake for the real thing.�
#3 Rule 34: �If it exists, there is porn of it.�
#4 Skitt's Law: "any post correcting an error in another post will contain at least one error itself" or "the likelihood of an error in a post is directly proportional to the embarrassment it will cause the poster."
#5 Scopie's Law: �In any discussion involving science or medicine, citing Whale.to as a credible source loses the argument immediately, and gets you laughed out of the room.�
#6 Danth's/Parker's Law: �If you have to insist that you've won an internet argument, you've probably lost badly.�
#7 Pommer's Law: �A person's mind can be changed by reading information on the internet. The nature of this change will be from having no opinion to having a wrong opinion.�
#8 DeMyer's Law: �Anyone who posts an argument on the internet which is largely quotations can be very safely ignored, and is deemed to have lost the argument before it has begun.�
#9 Cohen's Law: �Whoever resorts to the argument that �whoever resorts to the argument that... �has automatically lost the debate� has automatically lost the debate.�
#10 The Law of Exclamation: "The more exclamation points used in an email (or other posting), the more likely it is a complete lie. This is also true for excessive capital letters."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/6408927/Internet-rules-and-laws-the-top-10-from-Godwin-to-Poe.html
^(^ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Stephen Jones
Joined: 21 Feb 2003 Posts: 4124
|
Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 10:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Skitt's Law is also known as Hartmann's Law of Prescriptive Retaliation, and as Muphry's Law.
Any article or statement about correct grammar, punctuation, or spelling is bound to contain at least one eror |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
eclectic
Joined: 09 Nov 2006 Posts: 1122
|
Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2009 11:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Law #11
Any law anywhere is bull, including Law #11, with the exception of Law #12.
Non-Bull Law #12
Law #11 is Non-Bull. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 1:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Breakin rocks in the hot sun
I fought the laws and the laws won
I needed money cause I had none
I fought the laws and the laws won.
Regards,
John |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
007

Joined: 30 Oct 2006 Posts: 2684 Location: UK/Veteran of the Magic Kingdom
|
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 9:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Law #0 Magic Kingdom's Law
No law is above the Magic Kingdom's laws!
Session closed!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
eclectic
Joined: 09 Nov 2006 Posts: 1122
|
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 4:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| 007 is wrong.........Sharia is above KSA law. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
007

Joined: 30 Oct 2006 Posts: 2684 Location: UK/Veteran of the Magic Kingdom
|
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 10:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| eclectic wrote: |
| 007 is wrong.........Sharia is above KSA law. |
Well, Law #0 of the Magic Kingdom = Sharia laws.
So, no contradiction in my above statement.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
eclectic
Joined: 09 Nov 2006 Posts: 1122
|
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 1:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
007 where have u been, drinking from Salsabil fountain, or Zanjabil? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dear 007,
Law No. 01: Sharia Law differs from one Islamic country to another:
"Within sharia law, there is a specific set of offences known as the Hadd offences. These are crimes punished by specific penalties, such as stoning, lashes or the severing of a hand. The penalties for Hadd offences are not universally adopted as law in Islamic countries.
Some countries, such as Saudi Arabia, claim to live under pure sharia law and enforce the penalties for Hadd offences. In others, such as Pakistan, the penalties have not been enforced. The majority of Middle Eastern countries, including Jordan, Egypt, Lebanon and Syria, have not adopted Hadd offences as part of their state laws.
Hadd offences carry specific penalties, set by the Koran and by the prophet Mohammed. These include unlawful sexual intercourse (outside marriage); false accusation of unlawful intercourse; the drinking of alcohol; theft; and highway robbery. Sexual offences carry a penalty of stoning to death or flogging while theft is punished with cutting off a hand.
"This is a system of criminal law which has become a potent symbol of Islamisicing the law," says Dr Welchman. "But there is the question of whether it's actually applied in the countries which have adopted it. There is supposed to be a very high burden of proof, but that clearly often doesn't happen in practice."
Many Islamic countries will have adultery and the drinking of alcohol defined as criminal offences in law, but they are not defined as Hadd offences because they do not carry the Hadd penalty. They are often punishable by a prison term instead."
Will the real Sharia Law please stand up?
Regards,
John |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
007

Joined: 30 Oct 2006 Posts: 2684 Location: UK/Veteran of the Magic Kingdom
|
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Law No. 02: The interpretaion of Sharia Law differs from one Islamic country to another:
Well, the problem is not with Sharia law pe se, the problem is the interpretation of the Sharia laws by different scholars in different Islamic countries. The Magic Kingdom is in the extreme spectrum of the interpretation of Sharia laws, and for them it is considered the real Sharia law regardless of the interpretation of other Islamic schools of thought. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
eclectic
Joined: 09 Nov 2006 Posts: 1122
|
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 12:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Oh how the divine words poured down unadulterated, then met with the whimisical interpretations of homo sapiens! Ahhhhh, the God/man mysteries..... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
trapezius

Joined: 13 Aug 2006 Posts: 1670 Location: Land of Culture of Death & Destruction
|
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 8:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| eclectic wrote: |
| 007 is wrong.........Sharia is above KSA law. |
False.
There are many laws and punishments for crimes in the country which are based more on culture than on Islam. Just read Arab News... sometimes the punishments given are far stricter than what Islam prescribes, and sometimes they are far more lenient. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
eclectic
Joined: 09 Nov 2006 Posts: 1122
|
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 3:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
I meant ultimately, like in the hereafter, not that those secular laws couldnt result in a severed limb!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|