View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Glenski

Joined: 15 Jan 2003 Posts: 12844 Location: Hokkaido, JAPAN
|
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 9:39 pm Post subject: Union report on "The ALT Scam" |
|
|
http://fukuoka.generalunion.org/
Whether you are an ALT now or plan to be one, you might want to read this feature article by the general union, Fukuoka branch. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stillnosheep

Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 2068 Location: eslcafe
|
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 11:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bump |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ShioriEigoKyoushi
Joined: 21 Aug 2009 Posts: 364 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 1:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
--
Last edited by ShioriEigoKyoushi on Tue Jun 08, 2010 3:31 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Inflames
Joined: 02 Apr 2006 Posts: 486
|
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 4:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
ShioriEigoKyoushi wrote: |
Those margins are mindblowing.
Are the figures from the BOE cited representative across the country?
Shiori |
Yes, they are. Here's a link from Kasai in Hyogo I found last year. The city's budget is 5,300,000 yen for 2 ALTs for 6 months. Interac got the contract and paid the ALTs 260,000 yen a month (plus transport). That 260,000 is probably unrealistic, as Interac usually deducts days that aren't weekends/holidays that the school doesn't want you there (hence your unpaid winter vacation). I remember being told during my Interac training that we were fortunate they didn't deduct us for the two or three days the school didn't need us to work (they did deduct people in other years though).
http://www.city.kasai.hyogo.jp/04sise/11osir/osir0906/pdf/090625b01.pdf |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ShioriEigoKyoushi
Joined: 21 Aug 2009 Posts: 364 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 1:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
--
Last edited by ShioriEigoKyoushi on Tue Jun 08, 2010 3:31 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
starteacher
Joined: 25 Feb 2009 Posts: 237
|
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 2:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I mentioned elsewhere that some BOEs are hiring directly. This trend, I think, will continue. BOEs have been in the business for years, and they know where to cut their costs too.
So if you're gonna be an ALT, you may have only a few good years left frankly. Then your contracts will definitely never be certain.
There is also a good reason for this.. as more foriegners settle in Japan, there will be an increasing pool of teachers with less visa hassle and other stuffs. In addition, as they are preparing mandatory english in Elementary schools nationwide, they would want teachers to be more permanent. At some stage, they will not even need to hire from abroad, or the numbers needed will be limited. A lot of Japanese people are just as competent, if not better, in teaching English as native speakers.
So the ALT Scam, as any other scam, will get over.
But whilst the Union asks for BOEs to directly hire, the BOEs can also set their own salaries and that may not necessarily be higher than what dispatch companies are offering nowadays even with the scams.
So the only stable ALT job the Union is asking is that for a foreigner living permanently in Japan. And who is part of that union ?
Out with the JET, then out with the Dispatch companies. If you were to cut costs, as it seems common everywhere now, you cut as many middle people and layers as possible, |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hakushoon
Joined: 21 Jan 2010 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 8:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Glenski! Very interesting and definately gave me some ideas. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Glenski

Joined: 15 Jan 2003 Posts: 12844 Location: Hokkaido, JAPAN
|
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 9:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
starteacher wrote: |
I mentioned elsewhere that some BOEs are hiring directly. This trend, I think, will continue. BOEs have been in the business for years, and they know where to cut their costs too. |
But the going trend now is not to hire directly. Cutting costs is perceived as one of the benefits of going with a dispatch agency, as is taking away the hassle of hiring and firing.
I don't think direct hires will increase soon.
Quote: |
There is also a good reason for this.. as more foriegners settle in Japan, there will be an increasing pool of teachers with less visa hassle and other stuffs. In addition, as they are preparing mandatory english in Elementary schools nationwide, they would want teachers to be more permanent. At some stage, they will not even need to hire from abroad, or the numbers needed will be limited. |
Japan is far from having such a pool of foreign teachers, and the government isn't making it easier for them to come.
Quote: |
So the ALT Scam, as any other scam, will get over. |
What is going to nix the dispatch scam is legal action against a large number of them so that MEXT will wake up and do something about their illegal activities (primarily the fact that most do not have licenses to operate, but also that some are still infiltrating universities). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tipo
Joined: 18 Apr 2007 Posts: 23 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 10:17 pm Post subject: Union report on the "ALT Scam" |
|
|
I'm glad that this issue has been highlighted on this forum. The General Union has for a number of years been campaigning against illegal dispatching that is sub-contracting in Osaka Prefecture. Finally, in 2008 the Osaka Board of Education cancelled all its dispatching contracts with a number of dispatching companies including INTERAC. So, now the Osaka BOE hires its English language ALT's directly. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Atlas*
Joined: 23 Jul 2006 Posts: 42 Location: Komagome, Kita-ku TOKYO
|
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 11:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What an interesting read
Does anyone have any experience or further information on this point though? It seems it could lead to a huge increase in direct hires if hired not as a sub-contractor
Quote: |
DISPATCH CONTRACT
A dispatch contract (派遣契約 haken keiyaku) is a special type of contract meant for dispatch companies to send workers out to work for companies. The dispatch company makes a DISPATCH contract with the BOE, and then the dispatch contract employs the ALT with a DISPATCH CONTRACT. In this case the BOE does have the authority to tell the ALT what to do/teach and where to go. The big advantage of a dispatch contract is that if the dispatchee (ALT) has worked at the company (BOE/school) for a certain period of time (1-3 years) the ALT has the right to demand full time (正規 seiki) employment and the company (BOE) must grant the full time direct contract of employment. The ALT or Union can negotiate with the BOE. (It is noteworthy that Interac make a point of this when promoting sub-contracted ALTs) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
gwynnie86
Joined: 27 Apr 2009 Posts: 159
|
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 11:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I believe that somebody I speak to on the Facebook Interac forum has been stationed in Osaka. So this can't be true. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ShioriEigoKyoushi
Joined: 21 Aug 2009 Posts: 364 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 1:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
--
Last edited by ShioriEigoKyoushi on Tue Jun 08, 2010 3:35 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Glenski

Joined: 15 Jan 2003 Posts: 12844 Location: Hokkaido, JAPAN
|
Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 7:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Atlas* wrote: |
What an interesting read
Does anyone have any experience or further information on this point though? It seems it could lead to a huge increase in direct hires if hired not as a sub-contractor
Quote: |
DISPATCH CONTRACT
A dispatch contract (派遣契約 haken keiyaku) is a special type of contract meant for dispatch companies to send workers out to work for companies. The dispatch company makes a DISPATCH contract with the BOE, and then the dispatch contract employs the ALT with a DISPATCH CONTRACT. In this case the BOE does have the authority to tell the ALT what to do/teach and where to go. The big advantage of a dispatch contract is that if the dispatchee (ALT) has worked at the company (BOE/school) for a certain period of time (1-3 years) the ALT has the right to demand full time (正規 seiki) employment and the company (BOE) must grant the full time direct contract of employment. The ALT or Union can negotiate with the BOE. (It is noteworthy that Interac make a point of this when promoting sub-contracted ALTs) |
|
Getting a full 3 years can be hard with some ALT disparchers. They pull the plug early enough that you can't get all the time needed. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Atlas*
Joined: 23 Jul 2006 Posts: 42 Location: Komagome, Kita-ku TOKYO
|
Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 7:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
so if the ALT dispatchers start and end dates for contracts don't line up am I right in believing that it doesn't count as continued employment towards the 3 years before you are able to request full time from the BOE?
I have been at one school now for 3 and a half years and as it is coming up on contract negotiations this is something that I would definitely be looking into. Not sure if my work will count though Even working at the same BOE for all that time the dispatcher might have dogged me by having me basically "unemployed" for roughly a week each year.
If that is true then it is certainly needing to be written up in the ALT scam.
Don't get my tone wrong though... teaching in schools and working with teachers and students has been really rewarding and it is likely to be something I will continue doing for a long time in one form or another. I've been improving my own qualifications and continually increasing effort in classes but getting some early security though through a BOE placement would help many a teacher breath a sigh of relief.
You all certainly are a helpful bunch  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
GambateBingBangBOOM
Joined: 04 Nov 2003 Posts: 2021 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 8:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
That's what dispatch companies always say: "Oh, each year is a new contract. You haven't worked for us continuously for five years, although you've been at a single school and employed by us that entire time, you've were not an employee from 5p.m., March 31 until 8:30a.m., April 1, and so that law doesn't apply".
It doesn't apply until someone brings them to court.
So since you've been basically unemployed for a week each year (does that mean they actually didn't pay you for a full month in the last month?), yes, that's very likely exactly what they'll say. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|