|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
sainthood
Joined: 15 Nov 2010 Posts: 175 Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
|
Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 3:13 am Post subject: Under-grad specialisations - are they really useful? |
|
|
Hello all.
I'm just curious about how useful one's under-grad has been in the ESL field.
Obviously, B.Ed. is going to be pretty handy, but is having an under-grad in Business, Finance or similar really useful (say, in teaching Business English), or can one just do Business English without it effectively?
Does having majors in literature really help with teaching it?
My major was philosophy.... so obviously is a great advantage when teaching here in China to freshmen...
But, I've considered taking some courses in business just to get some sort of idea, so that teaching BE wouldn't be so difficult...
(though, I'm more inclined to go the IELTS way instead....).
Thoughts???? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
smithrn1983
Joined: 23 Jul 2010 Posts: 320 Location: Moscow
|
Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 5:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've taught mostly business English and exam prep courses, and have a B.A. in German. I've never had a problem with either course. I don't see why having a degree, or even taking classes will help any more than being curious and reading a lot. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
naturegirl321

Joined: 04 May 2003 Posts: 9041 Location: home sweet home
|
Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 5:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
If you have experience in Business, then it shouldn't matter what your BA is in. HOnestly, many people don't study Education or TEFL at all, they just fall into it. Mine were in Art and Business Management. Havne't really been useful except for visas. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jpvanderwerf2001
Joined: 02 Oct 2003 Posts: 1117 Location: New York
|
Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 5:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Years ago, when I first started teaching Biz English, I just sat down and read some old Economist magazines. I've been an addict of the magazine ever since, and now I can hold my own in most business-related conversations.
I was an English major, so my BA does have direct relevance to ELT. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Glenski

Joined: 15 Jan 2003 Posts: 12844 Location: Hokkaido, JAPAN
|
Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 7:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Most biz English jobs are usually gotten because the teacher has had experience in that biz, therefore has lingo/jargon down, and knows something about the discourse language of the biz. Just taking some courses usually doesn't cut it. Exceptions exist.
Teaching literature is not a norm, I believe, for entry level jobs. It is usually done in L1 anyway, isn't it? Having the background in literature is great if you land a literature-teaching job, but most aren't. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Trifaro
Joined: 10 Nov 2010 Posts: 152
|
Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 7:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
It is obvious to me that "teaching" business related classes overseas isn't exactly the same as actually teaching a business related subject, such as Accounting or Finance, in the USA if the professor didn't major in the subject or doesn't have a Masters degree in the subject. I'm not sure about other countries.
If I was an undergraduate again in the USA, I would accept an English major with an MBA as an undergraduate Finance or whatever teacher, but, if all that person had was an unrelated degree and an interest in reading about the subject, I'd be skeptical. Years of work experience in the field is different.
It's been stated here on Dave's that a lot of "Business English" classes, at least in China, are in reality "Oral/Speaking Classes." In that case, I agree that someone who has a keen interest in the subject and is familiar with the relevant terminology, even though they never worked in the field but enjoy reading about it, could get the job done.
I'm sure I could "teach" Tourism English, but the fact that I've flown on planes and slept in hotels doesn't qualify me to "teach" a Tourism class.
Without having to look it up, what's the 'rack rate'? Why should a student pay tuition for a "teacher" to simply look up words for them in the dictionary?
What would you do/say if a guest was pissed? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
spiral78

Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 11534 Location: On a Short Leash
|
Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 7:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
I know exactly what the rack rate is You should pay less than it, of course, unless you're a stranded, late-night arrival with clearly no other option. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
denise

Joined: 23 Apr 2003 Posts: 3419 Location: finally home-ish
|
Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 9:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
I know what it is, too. Give me a tourism class, please!
BAs shouldn't really matter. Really, teachers who have only a BA probably aren't going to make a career of this (sure, there are exceptions, so please don't jump all over me for saying this!). The BA is a requirement established by the school and/or government, and schools that hire teachers with only BAs tend not to be the most serious/academic. My BA was in Peace and Conflict Studies. It didn't help me teach at all, but it helped me tick off that particular requirement (a BA) and get my first entry-level job. BAs are fine if you want to work for just a couple of years in language schools, or do only oral English classes or the like.
If you want to make a career of it, go for an MA in a related field. If you want the higher-tier jobs that require MAs, the MA should be in TEFL/Applied Linguistics or a related field. You're at a disadvantage with an unrelated MA (and might not even be considered for those jobs--you might as well only have a BA...).
d |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Glenski

Joined: 15 Jan 2003 Posts: 12844 Location: Hokkaido, JAPAN
|
Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 9:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Trifaro wrote: |
It's been stated here on Dave's that a lot of "Business English" classes, at least in China, are in reality "Oral/Speaking Classes." In that case, I agree that someone who has a keen interest in the subject and is familiar with the relevant terminology, even though they never worked in the field but enjoy reading about it, could get the job done. |
But it's not that way everywhere or in all cases. Yes, speaking is a major component of a business English course, but it's not just about looking up words for the students and having them chat.
Quote: |
Without having to look it up, what's the 'rack rate'? |
What does that term mean? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 9:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm guessing that "rack rate" would mean the price for something if you bought it "off the rack" without any sort of discount.
Regards,
John |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
spiral78

Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 11534 Location: On a Short Leash
|
Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 10:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's normally used primarily for nightly hotel rates, in the tourism industry. You don't want to pay what's in the brochure - it's their highest category of rates. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
artemisia

Joined: 04 Nov 2008 Posts: 875 Location: the world
|
Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 2:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Trifaro wrote:
Quote: |
It's been stated here on Dave's that a lot of "Business English" classes, at least in China, are in reality "Oral/Speaking Classes." In that case, I agree that someone who has a keen interest in the subject and is familiar with the relevant terminology, even though they never worked in the field but enjoy reading about it, could get the job done.
I'm sure I could "teach" Tourism English, but the fact that I've flown on planes and slept in hotels doesn't qualify me to "teach" a Tourism class.
Without having to look it up, what's the 'rack rate'? Why should a student pay tuition for a "teacher" to simply look up words for them in the dictionary? |
It�s a bit more involved than simply looking up words in a dictionary. I guess such classes are essentially ESP classes. You, the teacher, are supplying the students with the specific vocabulary and language structures they need to do their jobs. It�s obviously a huge advantage if you have training or experience yourself in that particular area but possible to be competent without that.
With high-level English participants I often viewed this as an exchange of information as these classes weren�t pure EFL. They taught me all about the area in which they were an expert and I supplied the English version of it (more or less). I saw myself as more a facilitator than a teacher � an approach that always worked well for me when dealing with professionals in various fields.
I learnt a lot about things I had never ever wanted to know a single thing about (!) � the intricate workings of the internal combustion engine, put and call options and the futures market, and so on. I had to do a great deal of preparation for such classes and I always acted as if I were fascinated and deeply enthusiastic .
In a way I was as I really liked this way of working and being able to tailor the content of the classes very much around the needs of the participants. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|