View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Ju99
Joined: 09 Jan 2011 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 8:24 pm Post subject: Apply to recruiter or directly to Hong Kong Education Bureau |
|
|
I saw an advertisement for the Net program. Is it better to apply through a recuiter such as Footprints or send my appluication to the Hong Kong Education Bureau? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Joshua2006
Joined: 04 Jan 2010 Posts: 342
|
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Why would you use a recruiter? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
oxi
Joined: 16 Apr 2007 Posts: 347 Location: elsewhere
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
outkasted_3000
Joined: 18 Aug 2010 Posts: 20
|
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 12:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i just applied directly to the EDB today. i faxed everything so i got a quick response from them telling me i'll know by february if i'll be interviewed. not holdin' my breath though.
i was going to go through footprints, being canadian and all, but i'm in korea and it'd be impossible to head back out to toronto/vancouver for interviews. much easier to hop on a flight to hk. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ikki
Joined: 31 Jan 2011 Posts: 58
|
Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2011 5:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, here's my tale of woe from last year.
Footprints(who already had my CV)contacted me & invited me to apply to NET via them. I was given the impression that Canadians HAD to go through Footprints in order to apply for NET(a dubious assertion, in retrospect). I was tickled pink, given NET's reputation as one of the best paying EFL gigs in E. Asia(albeit one with a rep for admin., etc., unpleasantries). So I had an interview with a Footprints rep. Fine. They asked for a swack of scanned docs. OK, fine.
A couple of weeks go by. Then, all of a sudden, I get an email that I need hard copies of all my docs sent to the powers that be in HK. When, I asked. "Yesterday!" Footprints said. My radar shoulda been beeping then. So I sent them by courier. Another week or so goes by. Then Footprints(I was feeling their footprints all over my downtrodden bod by this point)tells me I have to go to Vancouver(I live in mid-Western Canada)for an interview with actual officials from the HK Ed. Bureau. At this point I should've said you know what this popsicle stand but the Footprints guy said I was practically a "shoo in". I'm not one for snake oil, but I bought it this time! After I got the ad hoc last minute interview time/date, I booked a flight. THEN I get an email the next day telling me the time and date were changed!
What a difference from Japan's superb JET Programme's precise & organized application procedure!
So, I go to the interview. I go through the most illogically grueling, rude and pointless interview of my EFL career. No "warm and fuzzies" coming outta that! Not even a 'thank you' for the shy** I went through to grace them with my presence.
Wait three weeks! Get a frigging FORM letter(from Footprints!)saying I don't get a contract...no explanation, no apology...no respect(unlike JET applicants who are unsuccessful).
Why in the hell did the HK powers that be use a recruiter when the final decisions were up to them? In other words,(insert Basil Fawlty voice) "What is the bloody point?".
In all, I got screwed out of 500 bucks for... snake oil.
Applicants(at least Canuck ones), learn from my experience. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Perilla

Joined: 09 Jul 2010 Posts: 792 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2011 10:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sounds about right ... a process riddled with bureaucracy, illogicality and nonsense. But if you get in it can be a very good gig. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jlam21
Joined: 12 Oct 2010 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 5:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hello!
This may not be perfectly fitting for this topic and may be a silly question, but i was wondering if there are any negative repercussions to applying to both NET through the Education Bureau and to ESF (English Schools Foundation).
I believe the schools that you'd be assigned to would be different, but just wondering if applying to both could be considered a conflict of interest or anything. Anyone else have experience with this? Appreciate your help with this! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Joshua2006
Joined: 04 Jan 2010 Posts: 342
|
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 5:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
To answer your question bluntly, and forgive me if I am wrong, but that is kind of like asking if it is ok to apply to MacDonald's and Burger King.....
2 different animals.
And, if I'm wrong, I apologise...... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jlam21
Joined: 12 Oct 2010 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 5:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry, i should clarify..
I'm asking because both EDB and ESF are conducting their interviews soon and i was looking through one of ESFs policies regarding conflict of interests, so i was just worried that if i were to interview for both, that this could be considered a conflict.
I am just taking some preemptive precautions - perhaps too cautious - as i do not want to harm my chances of getting hired by either EDB or ESF. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
oxi
Joined: 16 Apr 2007 Posts: 347 Location: elsewhere
|
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 5:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
It was a reasonable question. I didn't get the difference between EDB and ESF until I'd done a fair bit of browsing - does often seem like they cross over and you could get the idea that 'conflict' could arise.
But... nope, don't worry. You can apply to both. There is no conflict.
Now what's the difference between McDonald's and Burger King? I got accepted for a job at McD and refused at BK. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sistercream
Joined: 18 Dec 2010 Posts: 497 Location: Pearl River Delta
|
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 7:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
The connection between ESF and the EDB seem increasingly tenuous: applying to both is just like applying for jobs at totally unrelated schools or companies.
But if both offered you a job, you'd be deciding between two totally different critters - not merely the difference between chalk and cheese, more like, ummmm... maybe a basket of apples and a lego set, or an ipad and a hen coop. I'm not saying one job is better or worse than the other, just that the two are so different it's hard to compare them at all. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Perilla

Joined: 09 Jul 2010 Posts: 792 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 8:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
sistercream wrote: |
I'm not saying one job is better or worse than the other, just that the two are so different it's hard to compare them at all. |
Abslooterly - but besides the two very different "systems" it also all comes down to the school you wind up at and the colleagues you work with. My guess is that most would be happier with ESF, but I know plenty of *beeps* working at ESF schools and the smarmy, spoiled ESF kids can be a pain in the butt too.
Anyone know how the salary between the two compares these days? I think top of the scale ESF used to have the edge over NET, but I'm not so sure anymore ... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
oxi
Joined: 16 Apr 2007 Posts: 347 Location: elsewhere
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Perilla

Joined: 09 Jul 2010 Posts: 792 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 10:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
NET also has a retention benefit (or somesuch), which adds a few K depending on how long you've been around ... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jlam21
Joined: 12 Oct 2010 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 10:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for all the helpful replies!
One more question, do you know if ESF Supply Teachers receive the same benefits? I am mostly concerned with the Cash Allowance that is offered in lieu of a Housing Allowance.
As someone who does not currently live in Hong Kong, i have no idea if supply teachers and full time teachers are given the same benefits...
Thanks again for your help! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|