|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
sainthood
Joined: 15 Nov 2010 Posts: 175 Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
|
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 12:22 pm Post subject: Contracts and lawyers |
|
|
Hey.
Quick question - has anyone here had the need to go to a Chinese lawyer because their employer decided not to honour a contract?
What was the result, what was the end cost, how effective was it, was there a need to take things further after your lawyer made the initial contact?
Mine is trying to dodge the return airfare, even though the contract is incredibly specific and explicit - even my first year students could understand it!!
Thanks! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tacoeater
Joined: 03 Jun 2011 Posts: 45
|
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 12:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Why are you discussing your contract, conditions of employment, relationship with management, etc. with your students? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
xjgirl
Joined: 02 Feb 2010 Posts: 242
|
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 2:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
unless u have huge reserves of cash, and a great desire to seek justice
i'd just keep turning up at your bosses office looking dissapointed and generally making his life difficult
if u do wanna take this all the way, then check out the chinalawblog
Last edited by xjgirl on Thu Jun 23, 2011 12:19 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mister Al

Joined: 28 Jun 2004 Posts: 840 Location: In there
|
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 3:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think he has a point there. Contract/students?WTF? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
choudoufu

Joined: 25 May 2010 Posts: 3325 Location: Mao-berry, PRC
|
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 4:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hey, hey, hey!
y'all be engrish techr's ain't ya?
him sayded 'could'.
him dinna sayded 'was ablded tuh'.
jeepers, i bets his first year studends coulda unnerstanded that. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The Great Wall of Whiner

Joined: 29 Jan 2003 Posts: 4946 Location: Blabbing
|
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 5:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tacoeater wrote: |
Why are you discussing your contract, conditions of employment, relationship with management, etc. with your students? |
I think that after a year he is aware of the English abilities of his students.
Where does he say that he discussed his contract, conditions of employment, relationship with management, etc. with his students? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The Great Wall of Whiner

Joined: 29 Jan 2003 Posts: 4946 Location: Blabbing
|
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 5:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
To be helpful...
Spending your airfare to get your airfare back sounds unproductive, unless you sue them for expenses having to sue them additionally.
Personally, I would go full out.
Have they given you a reason why they have decided to be liars and make a promise that they are not keeping in the contract? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sainthood
Joined: 15 Nov 2010 Posts: 175 Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
|
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2011 7:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Firstly, yeah, I haven't actually discussed it with students - just saying that the English is pretty plain and simple!
BTW, FTR, this is at the end of my second year!
GWOW - yeah, that's what I was thinking - especially since I can find some very expensive flights Thus, they can either pay me about 4000RBM quickly and painlessly (relatively), or I'll start finding flights that are over 12000RMB (which I can then cancel and get a refund! )
Their reasoning (faulty, as it is) is that there are 2 sections regarding this - first part says that I can be reimbursed either a return flight, or 2 one-way tickets (no limits). Second section says that if a flight isn't needed, then they can pay up to 75% of the cheapest ticket they can buy online, to a maximum of 8000RMB.
I presented my 1-way ticket (inbound) which is worth about 8000, to be reimbursed. They seem to think that because that's 8000, section 2 applies... thus, no need to pay for the return trip.
Oh, part of their 'reasoning' is that no-one's done this before....
XJ - thanks for the link!  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
7969

Joined: 26 Mar 2003 Posts: 5782 Location: Coastal Guangdong
|
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2011 8:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
The Great Wall of Whiner wrote: |
To be helpful...
Spending your airfare to get your airfare back sounds unproductive, unless you sue them for expenses having to sue them additionally.
Have they given you a reason why they have decided to be liars and make a promise that they are not keeping in the contract? |
Have you read a contract recently? The section of the appendix on airfare usually goes something like this:
Quote: |
Party A shall provide Party B with round trip airfare as airfare subsidy from Shenzhen to Chicago, America to leave China, and the airfare subsidy can be reimbursed on handing in the plane ticket. Should Party B not present the plane ticket, he or she can get 60% of the exact airfare from Shenzhen to his or her hometown as airfare subsidy without being requested to hand in the plane ticket. |
"Spending your airfare to get your airfare back" is exactly what reimbursement means - To pay back or compensate (another party) for money spent or losses incurred. If you want the full airfare reimbursement, then spend the money on the return ticket. If the contract says "return ticket" then buy and present a return ticket, otherwise it's open to interpretation. If you don't then take a smaller amount of cash. People on this forum often complain about schools not honouring the contract, doesn't seem to be the case here.
The Great Wall of Whiner wrote: |
Personally, I would go full out. |
Meaning what? You'd hire a lawyer for RMB5000 so you can get back an extra 4000?
sainthood wrote: |
Their reasoning (faulty, as it is) is that there are 2 sections regarding this - first part says that I can be reimbursed either a return flight, or 2 one-way tickets (no limits). Second section says that if a flight isn't needed, then they can pay up to 75% of the cheapest ticket they can buy online, to a maximum of 8000RMB.
I presented my 1-way ticket (inbound) which is worth about 8000, to be reimbursed. They seem to think that because that's 8000, section 2 applies... thus, no need to pay for the return trip. |
I think you've already answered your own question. As stupid as it may sound just go and buy a return ticket for RMBXXXXX, present it to your school, and once you get the money, cancel the ticket, pay a small penalty, and keep the rest. However since you've already shown them the other ticket you might be out of luck now. Unless you're leaving China then forget about the lawyer. It'll cost you more than it's worth and it'll create nothing but ill will. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sainthood
Joined: 15 Nov 2010 Posts: 175 Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
|
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2011 12:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hey 7969.
You're close, but not quite!
My contract is written somewhat differently to yours. And I acknowledge that I haven't presented the full relevant contract sections in detail, which will lead to not getting a clear picture. But I think my summary is fair - which is:
I'm permitted a reimbursement on EITHER a RETURN ticket, or TWO 1-WAY tickets. I presented to them my inbound (1-way) ticket. They want to ignore that second 1-way ticket (ie, pretend I don't really need to go home sometime in the future!).
So, yes, you're right, it would have been much easier to have just purchased that ticket beforehand... I thought this would be very simple and easy.. and fair. But I didn't, and now they're trying to get out of it - hence this thread.. they only want to pay the equivalent of my inbound flight only.
As for your last bit - I'm quite happy to have ill-will - the FAO is a constant liar, who says 'no' just because he can. So, yes, to me, it would be worth the expense - even just to come out even.
Anyway, I still haven't had anyone answer the original question, and only had opinion and conjecture. So, has anyone had to deal with a lawyer due to breach of employment contract in this country on here?? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
7969

Joined: 26 Mar 2003 Posts: 5782 Location: Coastal Guangdong
|
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2011 9:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
sainthood wrote: |
So, yes, you're right, it would have been much easier to have just purchased that ticket beforehand... I thought this would be very simple and easy.. and fair. But I didn't, and now they're trying to get out of it - hence this thread.. they only want to pay the equivalent of my inbound flight only. |
i had a similar problem 5 years ago. I came to my current job from another job in China, so the first part of my return ticket was a domestic flight from one city in china to another. the school was willing to cover that (RMB1500) and then a one way ticket back to my home country. I argued that the contract said reimbursement of a return ticket from China to my home. They argued that since I came to the job from within China they only have to cover one part of my journey home. Hard to argue against that since I didn't have a return air ticket to produce. In the end, I handed in my ticket from Zhengzhou to Shenzhen, AND a return ticket from Hong Kong to my hometown and back again that I had just purchased to go home that summer (thinking they'd only pay half of that one). A week later someone in the finance office decided to give me full reimbursement for BOTH tickets.
sainthood wrote: |
As for your last bit - I'm quite happy to have ill-will - the FAO is a constant liar, who says 'no' just because he can. So, yes, to me, it would be worth the expense - even just to come out even. |
If this is the end of your time in China then go for it. But if you plan on staying, ill will often comes back at you.
sainthood wrote: |
Anyway, I still haven't had anyone answer the original question, and only had opinion and conjecture. So, has anyone had to deal with a lawyer due to breach of employment contract in this country on here?? |
I had problems with an FAO trying to cheat me out of 7000 at the end of one contract. What I did was I kept meeting with that person, asking them about the money, debating and discussing it, hunting her down wherever she was, there was nowhere for her to hide. In the end, after about two weeks of frustration and hassle, I was paid in full. My colleague, who was also being cheated tried a different method. He immediately flew off the handle and made all kinds of threats (incl hiring a lawyer). He too was paid in full but three weeks after I was and after his residence permit expired (which caused him additional problems).
A lot of patience, a cool head and a bit of persistence is more likely to get positive results (not guaranteed) than hiring a lawyer. Anyway do a search on the job related forum for "lawyer" and you'll find a bit of info on other people's experiences. Good luck. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mr. English
Joined: 25 Nov 2009 Posts: 298 Location: Nakuru, Kenya
|
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2011 9:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
There is nothing wrong with discussing your contract with your students. As the possessive pronoun "your" clearly implies, it is "your" contract; you can discuss it with anyone you want to discuss it with. Unless the contract has a clause that specifically requires confidentiality, the employer, and of course no one else, has any business telling you otherwise. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lobster

Joined: 20 Jun 2006 Posts: 2040 Location: Somewhere under the Sea
|
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2011 1:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'd never discuss my contract with anyone except my employer and my wife. Certainly never with students or co-workers unless you really want to aggravate your employer! Even though I say "my" contract, it's really "our" contract.
If your contract has one of those dispute resolution clauses, you could demand third-party arbitration through the local labour bureau.
The whole affair of return airfare is a headache for many. Avoid it by insisting on a clause that provides a set, tax-free amount in lieu of airfare. You may support your claim with quotes for 3 tickets or just make it reasonable (e.g. 8-10k).
RED |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
7969

Joined: 26 Mar 2003 Posts: 5782 Location: Coastal Guangdong
|
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2011 8:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
it might just be me, but i think tacoeater was employing sarcasm when talking about discussing contract w/students. not to be taken literally. Hopefully some members of this forum are not that thick. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Non Sequitur
Joined: 23 May 2010 Posts: 4724 Location: China
|
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2011 10:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Could you mention that their lousiness will get them mucho negative coverage on teachers forums.
The school ain't saving money. That FAO guy is pocketing what he screws you for. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|