|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Gtomas
Joined: 03 Jun 2010 Posts: 100
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gtomas
Joined: 03 Jun 2010 Posts: 100
|
Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2011 4:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Frankly, I think these new taxes would make me stop teaching here. The new taxes also mean the employer will have to pay 10% of the employees wages into a program.
Strange... if you lose your job, you lose your visa, you need to leave. How would you ever collect unemployment insurance?
Does anyone think this will actually be enforced? What are you going to do about it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cyberkada
Joined: 04 Dec 2011 Posts: 306 Location: Xi'an, China
|
Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2011 4:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Any new taxes will be a definite deal killer as my contract salary here is NET of taxes. The Yahoo article was wrong at least in one respect - At least in the Netherlands, foreign experts had a 30% rule - exempting them from 30% of Dutch Taxes, but EU benefits such as insurance were real, not like the scam medical insurance most of us are provided here.
Oh well, back to the Philippines. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gtomas
Joined: 03 Jun 2010 Posts: 100
|
Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2011 5:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Cyberkada wrote: |
Oh well, back to the Philippines. |
I'm making an effort to learn Chinese, so I'm thinking Taiwan or some city in Korea with a Chinese school. Wonder if I can study simplified characters in Taiwan... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guerciotti

Joined: 13 Feb 2009 Posts: 842 Location: In a sleazy bar killing all the bad guys.
|
Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2011 5:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Gtomas wrote: |
Frankly, I think these new taxes would make me stop teaching here. The new taxes also mean the employer will have to pay 10% of the employees wages into a program.
Strange... if you lose your job, you lose your visa, you need to leave. How would you ever collect unemployment insurance? |
You won't. I think a few FTs with families might possibly collect, but the occurrences would, in my estimation, be few.
| Gtomas wrote: |
| Does anyone think this will actually be enforced? What are you going to do about it? |
No. Nothing. In the event it is enforced I would simply leave, but I doubt it will.
Last edited by Guerciotti on Sat Dec 10, 2011 4:52 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
w.melon56
Joined: 11 Aug 2011 Posts: 31
|
Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I'm curious as to why these posters, who are so DESPERATE for money (clearly) would even, ever come to a foreign country, let alone China. Why? Certainly in America you could make much more money and not be in such a desperate situation that the equivalent of a hundred buck or more forces you to ditch the country and find another. I find it sort of interesting really in the big picture sort of way. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cyberkada
Joined: 04 Dec 2011 Posts: 306 Location: Xi'an, China
|
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 12:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
A contract should be a contract. A few hundred bucks off an already low salary along with all the other bullsh we put up with on a daily basis here would make paying an additional 10% is a show-stopper.
Not all FTs are here teaching on retirement or pensions.
An additional example, while my contract stipulates that the company/ school would pay the apartment rent, I was told to pay the landlord 800+ RMB in miscellaneous fees. No accounting/ bill at all, I was expected just to pay for management and security fees - and given that day to pay it. I do understand consumables such as water, gas and power are my responsibility but miscellaneous fees should be part of the rent Another FT was told to pay 829 RMB for the same thing - THE DAY SHE ARRIVED. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
askiptochina
Joined: 26 Feb 2010 Posts: 488 Location: Beijing
|
Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 1:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Please explain how this will be enforced. The school has to be affected in some way compared to the way they are paying now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
roadwalker

Joined: 24 Aug 2005 Posts: 1750 Location: Ch
|
Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 12:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Don't be surprised if 50 EFL teachers get 50 explanations of what the law means by their school FAOs. And don't be surprised if teachers A & B, earning the same salary, get a different monthly pay net of the new law's withholding. Even in the same department in the same school.
It will come down to an economic decision: is it worth teaching in China for the new amount? Will it be a new amount? One could certainly argue with their employer that it appears very unlikely that a foreign teacher would be able to collect their benefits either at retirement or before retirement. One could argue....and if they really want you at that school they might listen.
Unless it becomes somehow easier to retire in China, or possible to collect Chinese Social Security/other benefits from abroad, this move might put off a lot of teachers. I don't have any plans to retire in China, so unless those questions are answered to my satisfaction, I would likely leave if I couldn't make a reasonable net salary. I don't care whether it is fair or not, I care whether I receive a reasonable net salary. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
roadwalker

Joined: 24 Aug 2005 Posts: 1750 Location: Ch
|
Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 12:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Cyberkada wrote: |
A contract should be a contract. A few hundred bucks off an already low salary along with all the other bullsh we put up with on a daily basis here would make paying an additional 10% is a show-stopper.
Not all FTs are here teaching on retirement or pensions.
An additional example, while my contract stipulates that the company/ school would pay the apartment rent, I was told to pay the landlord 800+ RMB in miscellaneous fees. No accounting/ bill at all, I was expected just to pay for management and security fees - and given that day to pay it. I do understand consumables such as water, gas and power are my responsibility but miscellaneous fees should be part of the rent Another FT was told to pay 829 RMB for the same thing - THE DAY SHE ARRIVED. |
Yes, that is bullsh. If they won't reimburse you or clearly show that it is for utilities beyond any maximums in the contract and that it was your use, you should be looking for next year's school now. Who's the landlord? Someone connected to the school probably. That "fee" is not typical, in my experience. I certainly wouldn't renew with them. Please name and shame them next year after you have secured your new employment. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cyberkada
Joined: 04 Dec 2011 Posts: 306 Location: Xi'an, China
|
Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 12:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| 11% + 37% in new taxes might errr.... will... change the hiring landscape around here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cyberkada
Joined: 04 Dec 2011 Posts: 306 Location: Xi'an, China
|
Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 12:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| roadwalker wrote: |
| Cyberkada wrote: |
A contract should be a contract. A few hundred bucks off an already low salary along with all the other bullsh we put up with on a daily basis here would make paying an additional 10% is a show-stopper.
Not all FTs are here teaching on retirement or pensions.
An additional example, while my contract stipulates that the company/ school would pay the apartment rent, I was told to pay the landlord 800+ RMB in miscellaneous fees. No accounting/ bill at all, I was expected just to pay for management and security fees - and given that day to pay it. I do understand consumables such as water, gas and power are my responsibility but miscellaneous fees should be part of the rent Another FT was told to pay 829 RMB for the same thing - THE DAY SHE ARRIVED. |
Yes, that is bullsh. If they won't reimburse you or clearly show that it is for utilities beyond any maximums in the contract and that it was your use, you should be looking for next year's school now. Who's the landlord? Someone connected to the school probably. That "fee" is not typical, in my experience. I certainly wouldn't renew with them. Please name and shame them next year after you have secured your new employment. |
The FAO spent the afternoon playing with the numbers... For security, and apartment management (like HOA or condo fees). Everywhere I rented before it was part of the rent... Yes, you are correct... connected with the school... problem is unless paid, i cant buy any more power - I'm good until spring break next month, though.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cyberkada
Joined: 04 Dec 2011 Posts: 306 Location: Xi'an, China
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Miles Smiles

Joined: 07 Jun 2010 Posts: 1294 Location: Heebee Jeebee
|
Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 2:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
From: http://ph.news.yahoo.com/china-media-slams-complaints-over-foreigners-tax-060319766.html
" '...Ample opportunities exist for foreign investors who are eyeing China for future growth. Rather than airing grievances, they should simply change their China strategy and share more knowledge with their Chinese partners," it wrote...' ".
Translation: The west has given us all of their technology, so why don't they tell us how to implement government policies too.
"...The age of ultra-low labour costs is nearing its end," the Xinhua report said...."
Translation: This is the dawn of extra-low labor costs.
" '...It is likely that what foreign companies care about most are China's 1 billion consumers and stable long-term growth prospects. Regardless of their motivation, it is in their best interest to change their mentality and embrace new conditions in order to avoid missing the boat... ' "
Translation: We want you to believe that China actually engages in fair free trade with the west. The west better become accustomed to getting the ever-shortening end of the stick, because pretty soon, that stick is going to be gone, and we're going to have our hands out asking for the west's help in getting us out of the mess we're creating for ourselves.
"...China is following international norms by including foreigners in its social security net, Xinhua said. Such commentaries are a reflection of government thinking rather than an official statement of policy..."
Translation: We don't know what we're doing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gtomas
Joined: 03 Jun 2010 Posts: 100
|
Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 3:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
"...China is following international norms by including foreigners in its social security net, Xinhua said. Such commentaries are a reflection of government thinking rather than an official statement of policy..."
|
The international norm is to have a functioning healthcare system before you begin demanding foreigners, who already have healthcare plans, start paying into it.
This isn't an issue of "China isn't good enough for this or that," the system they are asking us to pay into simply doesn't exist, and it makes very little sense to ask foreigners to pay first before even asking the general population.
(I'm aware of some significant positive reform in the countryside.)
To me this looks more and more like a way to encourage foreigners to leave China. They already have the news media shining spotlights anytime a "foreign brand" runs afoul of some law--yet they fail to mention the "foreign brand" is being run by local Chinese management who directly ordered the laws to be broken.
Also the recently funding for Chinese workers to unionize and demand better wages--but only at non-state owned foreign companies. It's both a shift to raise the living standards of the Chinese so they can hopefully become a consumer based economy, along with a gentle thrust of "get out of the country, we can build the cars on our own now."
You need to admire, need to really admire what the nation of China has been able to do in just a little over thirty years. They've exploited, used, manipulated, adhered to and cooked the books of any financial legal treaty system, all in the quest of growth that will benefit China. China for the Chinese. It seems like they've done it well and are on their way to building a modern society in a few decades when it took the rest of the world a few centuries.
It seems just now the foreign teachers are becoming little pawns in the game. I wonder if this is a ploy to squeeze all but the top-tier teachers out.
Or the law may never be enforced and quietly erased from the books. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|