View previous topic :: View next topic |
I think this essay . . . . |
1. is completely on the mark |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
2. is entirely wrong in its assumptions |
|
4% |
[ 1 ] |
3. is a good example of post-graduate claptrap |
|
52% |
[ 12 ] |
4. is . . . duh, huh? What's he talking about? |
|
43% |
[ 10 ] |
|
Total Votes : 23 |
|
Author |
Message |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Fri Apr 16, 2004 9:39 pm Post subject: Generating controversy: Part 1 |
|
|
So, what do you think of this essay?
Reinventing Modernism: Expressionism in the works of Spelling
Stephen Parry
Department of Gender Politics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
1. Expressionism and the posttextual paradigm of narrative
"Class is dead," says Lacan. Thus, cultural feminism implies that the goal of the poet is social comment.
If the posttextual paradigm of narrative holds, the works of Spelling are not postmodern. Therefore, several deappropriations concerning capitalist sublimation exist.
The main theme of Wilson's[1] critique of the posttextual paradigm of narrative is the role of the artist as observer. In a sense, Marx promotes the use of cultural feminism to challenge archaic perceptions of sexual identity. The subject is contextualised into a expressionism that includes sexuality as a reality. Thus, Derrida suggests the use of the posttextual paradigm of narrative to modify class.
2. Contexts of economy
If one examines Lyotardist narrative, one is faced with a choice: either reject expressionism or conclude that art is intrinsically responsible for the status quo, given that the premise of subpatriarchialist dematerialism is invalid. A number of discourses concerning not narrative, as Lacan would have it, but neonarrative may be found. In a sense, the characteristic theme of the works of Spelling is the common ground between sexual identity and reality.
In The Heights, Spelling examines cultural feminism; in Robin's Hoods, however, he deconstructs expressionism. It could be said that Sartre promotes the use of the posttextual paradigm of narrative to attack hierarchy.
Debord uses the term 'cultural feminism' to denote a self-fulfilling totality. In a sense, any number of desituationisms concerning expressionism exist.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Wilson, Z. ed. (1988) Expressionism and cultural feminism. University of California Press |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Numpty Honnis

Joined: 15 Apr 2004 Posts: 5 Location: This side of the burnt stump
|
Posted: Fri Apr 16, 2004 9:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Umm...pass. Complete gobbledy-gook (sp?) to me. But then again I am a bit of a Luddite, so my opinion hardly counts. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ls650

Joined: 10 May 2003 Posts: 3484 Location: British Columbia
|
Posted: Fri Apr 16, 2004 11:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Look at all them thar big ten-dollar words. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fat_chris
Joined: 10 Sep 2003 Posts: 3198 Location: Beijing
|
Posted: Fri Apr 16, 2004 11:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ls650 wrote: |
Look at all them thar big ten-dollar words. |
Caulfield. Is that you Holden? You know they are all phonies anyway.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Shaman

Joined: 06 Apr 2003 Posts: 446 Location: Hammertown
|
Posted: Fri Apr 16, 2004 11:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Anyone have an advanced class that needs an attitude tune-up?
Shaman |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Aramas
Joined: 13 Feb 2004 Posts: 874 Location: Slightly left of Centre
|
Posted: Sat Apr 17, 2004 12:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Actually that seems to be quite a good example of literary w@#king. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
FGT

Joined: 14 Sep 2003 Posts: 762 Location: Turkey
|
Posted: Sat Apr 17, 2004 12:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's not an essay, it's just name dropping.
How many times do we teach students to restate the topic, give an introductory paragraph, give a personal opinion and back it up with evidence/examples etc? He does none of that.
I wouldn't have been able to get away with something like that as an undergraduate. It's ****ing awful!!! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Sat Apr 17, 2004 2:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dear FTG,
Check out Part 2
Regards,
John |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Wonky Piano
Joined: 23 Feb 2004 Posts: 13
|
Posted: Sat Apr 17, 2004 2:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Um... well, it's rather late at night, but is this essay supposed to mean something? Do you think the author actually has a first language? Amazing!!!! Thanks for sharing (I think). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
yaramaz

Joined: 05 Mar 2003 Posts: 2384 Location: Not where I was before
|
Posted: Sat Apr 17, 2004 6:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sheer drivel. Academisis pomposis to the nth degree. Has this w*nker never heard of clarity and well-laid out arguments? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
khmerhit
Joined: 31 May 2003 Posts: 1874 Location: Reverse Culture Shock Unit
|
Posted: Sat Apr 17, 2004 7:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Class is dead." HMMMMMMmmmmm. I agree with that. wholeheartedly.
I t never really came alive in my country, the country to the North of your country.
Despite the numerous attempts of classsy fashionplate women such as my grandmother, it has never taken root in canuckistan. Maybe you could ask Capergirl--she will know more about class than I ever will.
Yours, sadly, from a classless society
khmerhit
P.s. I dont have time for goobbledegooks like that anymore.
PPS--aaaaaahhhhh!!!!!!---the works of Spelling!! Do you know, when i was about thireten or fourteen I remarked to a friend that I thought it shock ing that Farah F should be presenting her nipples to the western world on charlies Angles-so blatantly. His reply, astute as he was, was that "TV reflects reality". (well, yes and no I wshould have replied. Today I woule=d say that Aaron spelliing IS reality--along with Dickhead clark and co). Pretty heady stuff for a fourteen year old. But then my friend was very slver, and went on to be a diplomat in china. I became a mere ESL instructor......
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
latefordinner
Joined: 19 Aug 2003 Posts: 973
|
Posted: Sat Apr 17, 2004 1:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
FGT has it dead on. A series of unsubstantiated (and dubious) claims is not an argument. I would never have gotten away with that as an undergrad. I remember a prof who had a rubber stamp made, and he used it liberally when marking: "Bullsh!t". |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Sat Apr 17, 2004 1:51 pm Post subject: Guys and gals - you gotta read Part 2, too |
|
|
Dear latefordinner et al,
I repeat - please check out the following thread:
"Generating controversy: Part 2"
Regards,
John |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kurochan

Joined: 01 Mar 2003 Posts: 944 Location: China
|
Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2004 2:37 pm Post subject: Lacan, shmakan |
|
|
I quit reading something whenever I see the word "Lacan." Of course, that's probably why I didn't do so well in grad school. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|