View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Tretyakovskii
Joined: 14 Aug 2009 Posts: 462 Location: Cancun, Mexico
|
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 12:42 pm Post subject: Mexico, the common good |
|
|
[From the thread, "Blow to Tourism"]
Guy wrote: Tret, you might enjoy this article at cracked.com on a vaguely tangential line to this thread (I'm indulging a bit as we're in the off topic forum). http://www.cracked.com/blog/6-things-rich-people-need-to-stop-saying_p2/ The crux being "we're all in this together" might ring true for some of us here, the 99% or otherwise.
______________________
Great article, Guy. Thanks. It makes a tremendous amount of good sense, and does it in a clever and persuasive way. [By the way, anytime you're worried about topic drift, opening a new topic eliminates that issue.]
The notion that the worker ants are essential, both to the production and to the consumption cycle that can make others rich is not lost on the rich, they just don't see much beyond the importance of keeping as many of the rest of society busy performing those two tasks as possible- without which they couldn't have become nor have stayed rich.
When I ask my students to rate Mexican society by degree to which it is "individualistic" vs. "collectivistic", they move the dial far towards the individualistic end of the scale, many feeling "every man for himself" is an apt description. If Mexico is 90% individualistic, then the U.S. must be 99% individualistic, I tell them. The article focuses on the attitudes of the rich towards others, but they can't do what they do without the society being supportive, or at least tolerant of them.
It has always struck me as odd that there are any number of countries where the public conception of collective good doesn't even reach to the other citizens of that nation, the Nordic Countries- where the standard of living is the highest; the income inequality index the lowest, and one of them, Denmark, consistently polls as having the happiest people in the world- being the notable exception. [A search of videos available on line will quickly lead the reader to interviews in which Danes try to explain why they're happy: their answers are not surprising, but will be unsettling to some.] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Prof.Gringo

Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 2236 Location: Dang Cong San Viet Nam Quang Vinh Muon Nam!
|
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 6:10 pm Post subject: Re: Mexico, the common good |
|
|
Tretyakovskii wrote: |
[From the thread, "Blow to Tourism"]
Guy wrote: Tret, you might enjoy this article at cracked.com on a vaguely tangential line to this thread (I'm indulging a bit as we're in the off topic forum). http://www.cracked.com/blog/6-things-rich-people-need-to-stop-saying_p2/ The crux being "we're all in this together" might ring true for some of us here, the 99% or otherwise.
______________________
When I ask my students to rate Mexican society by degree to which it is "individualistic" vs. "collectivistic", they move the dial far towards the individualistic end of the scale, many feeling "every man for himself" is an apt description. If Mexico is 90% individualistic, then the U.S. must be 99% individualistic, I tell them. The article focuses on the attitudes of the rich towards others, but they can't do what they do without the society being supportive, or at least tolerant of them. |
Americans are some of the most charitable people on the planet.
Mexico ranks right between Uganda and Botswana.
http://www.nptrends.com/nonprofit-trends/giving-usa-2011-report.htm
http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2010/sep/08/charitable-giving-country
Americans are far more caring about the less fortunate than most others. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Isla Guapa
Joined: 19 Apr 2010 Posts: 1520 Location: Mexico City o sea La Gran Manzana Mexicana
|
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 6:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Could some of the generosity of Americans come from the fact that charitable contributions are tax deductible. ? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guy Courchesne

Joined: 10 Mar 2003 Posts: 9650 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 6:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Isla Guapa wrote: |
Could some of the generosity of Americans come from the fact that charitable contributions are tax deductible. ? |
It's hard to compare generosity statistically...the US ranks very low when you count it by percentage of GDP but then those numbers only count government aid. Americans tend to give more as individuals through charities or religious groups. Europeans are touted as giving large, but most of that is counted as government managed aid.
The 2004 tsunami event is a good example to go by...Bush caught serious flak by announcing a mere 35 million in aid in the days following the disaster, then quickly raised it to $350 million (it eventually reached about 900 million). But away from government aid, private donors and NGOs raised near 2 billion dollars.
The ratio is reversed for nearly every other country...such as Australia, giving over a billion in government aid, and only about a fifth of that in private donations. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tretyakovskii
Joined: 14 Aug 2009 Posts: 462 Location: Cancun, Mexico
|
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 10:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Most of the private charitable giving in the U.S. goes to support the giver's own church, financially.
The data in this article doesn't support the claim made earlier on this thread that Americans are extremely caring of the less fortunate: I'll quote from it-
Quote: |
The human services subsector includes organizations that received donations in order to respond to those affected by the economic crisis, especially by providing emergency basic needs services. This subsector also includes 75% of the organizations that received donations for relief and support efforts following the Haitian earthquake in January 2010. Despite donations given for these purposes, this subsector is estimated to have received the same share of all donations as in 2009, at [a mere] 9%.
|
Not only do Americans not give much to help others in need, suggest that the government do more for the less fortunate and you'll hear a hue and cry like you won't believe.
http://www.nptrends.com/nonprofit-trends/giving-usa-2011-report.htm |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
EFLeducator

Joined: 16 Dec 2011 Posts: 595 Location: NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BadBeagleBad

Joined: 23 Aug 2010 Posts: 1186 Location: 24.18105,-103.25185
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 4:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I suspect that in Mexico it is a lot more informal and person to person. I know in my neighborhood there are a number of people who have been helping a neighbor since she was widowed a few months ago. But those won't show up on any survey. And my husband and I financially supported his brother for many years, and contribute to the support of an elderly "aunt" - no blood relation, just a long time friend of the family. There is also an older woman who sells second hand clothes in the market near our house, and everyone in the neighborhood regularly donates things to her for her to sell. Those are just the ones I know about personally. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
EFLeducator

Joined: 16 Dec 2011 Posts: 595 Location: NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 4:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BadBeagleBad wrote: |
I suspect that in Mexico it is a lot more informal and person to person. I know in my neighborhood there are a number of people who have been helping a neighbor since she was widowed a few months ago. But those won't show up on any survey. And my husband and I financially supported his brother for many years, and contribute to the support of an elderly "aunt" - no blood relation, just a long time friend of the family. There is also an older woman who sells second hand clothes in the market near our house, and everyone in the neighborhood regularly donates things to her for her to sell. Those are just the ones I know about personally. |
The same could be said for the United States. I know some people here who donate money and time to homeless shelters for example but that neither will show up on statistics.
I stopped looking for full-time employment back in 06 so I could work part-time at a community college so I would have more time to take care of my wifes mother. My wife is Mexican and she has a sister and two brothers. I guess they didn't have the time to clean, feed, bathe, and change the diapers of their own mother even though two of them are retired and the other one never comes around.
Guess it was a good thing for my wifes mother that one of those non charitable Americans were around to take care of her.
FAIR...& BALANCED. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MotherF
Joined: 07 Jun 2010 Posts: 1450 Location: 17�48'N 97�46'W
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 5:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't know many Mexicans who have a surplus of money which they could give to a charity--but every Mexican I know will cut out extra spending for several months before their niece's 15 a�os so they will have 3,000 to 5,000 to contribute to part of the party.
My husband's family all took turns taking care of their grandfather when he broke his hip for the second time and was bedridden for the rest of his life. They had no choice--institutionalized care was not an option. How many Americans opt for the institution?
I'm sorry your in-laws are not charitable--but you should know you can't judge an entire culture by the actions of individuals (we will always find examples to support any side of the argument.) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
EFLeducator

Joined: 16 Dec 2011 Posts: 595 Location: NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 5:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
MotherF wrote: |
you can't judge an entire culture by the actions of individuals |
GREAT point my fellow professional TEFLer.
Nor should others.
FAIR....& BALANCED. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|