|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
DoUEnglish
Joined: 19 Aug 2012 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 3:05 pm Post subject: Crazy English! |
|
|
Often the English language can be muddled, misunderstood, or confused due to cultural differences, nuances, or colloquial expressions. This blog celebrates the craziness of English in all its forms, and shares some of the funny, witty, and amusing anecdotes that arise from its teachings. If you�re bored between classes, and would like something pithy to read, check it out!
http://douenglish.blogspot.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 5:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dear DoUEnglish,
Umm, problems here:
Gerund Pick-up Lines at the Bar (Good Luck!)
1. Do you feel like going back to my place?
2, Is there an airport nearby or is that just my heart taking off?
3. I can't help falling in love with you!
4. When God made you, he was showing off.
5. Do you have a map? I'm getting lost in your eyes.
6. Smoking is hazardous to your health... and baby, you're killing me!
7. Somebody better call God, and notify heaven there's a missing angel!
8, Wouldn't we look cute on a wedding cake together?
9. I must be dancing with the devil, because you're hot as hell.
10,Can I buy you a drink or do you just want the money? (No gerund, I just think that's funny.)
1. OK 2. "taking off" is a present participle adjective, modifying "heart" - not a gerund. 3. OK 4. "was showing off" is the past continuous tense, not a gerund 5. "am getting" is the present continuous again, not a gerund 6. "are killing is also present continuous, not a gerund (but "Smoking" is OK) 7. "missing" is a present participle adjective, modifying "angel" - not a gerund 8. "wedding' is also a present participle adjective, modifying "cake" - not a gerund. 9. "must be dancing" is the present continuous - not a gerund.
In context, gerunds must be subjects, objects of a verb, objects of a preposition, or complements.
Regards,
John |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
johntpartee
Joined: 02 Mar 2010 Posts: 3258
|
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 7:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
"must be dancing" is the present continuous - not a gerund. |
When the "ing" suffix is on the action verb in present continuous, isn't it a gerund? Or would we need the "state of being" verb? ("is" or "are")
Thrall me with your acumen. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
spiral78

Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 11534 Location: On a Short Leash
|
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 7:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ditto 'they must be dancing.' The verb ending is used in this case as a time marker to indicate that the action is going on now.
There is a significant distinction between "they must be dancing" (now) and "they must like dancing."
The major distinction is that when the 'ing' ending indicates time periods.
Last edited by spiral78 on Thu Aug 30, 2012 8:04 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
johntpartee
Joined: 02 Mar 2010 Posts: 3258
|
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 7:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I was just reading the Wikipedia entry for "gerund". Lots of wiggle room. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
spiral78

Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 11534 Location: On a Short Leash
|
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 8:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There's always lots of wiggle room in Wiki entries; that's why they're not accepted in academic writing in most situations.
Gerunds can occur in lots of contexts, but their 'ing' ending doesn't relate to time. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sashadroogie

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 11061 Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise
|
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 8:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Time. Aspect. Wiggling!!!! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
spiral78

Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 11534 Location: On a Short Leash
|
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 8:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gerund or continuous??  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
DoUEnglish
Joined: 19 Aug 2012 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 9:22 pm Post subject: Update |
|
|
Thanks for all the input! Like I mention on the blog, I'm no grammarian but enjoy a good discussion of English grammar.
Anyway, I was up late when I posted this and a bit of a zombie, but that's no excuse. So I've thrown out all the present participle adjectives, as well as the continuous, changed number 4 so that it's the subject of the sentence, added a new line that's a gerund clause, and made number 9 into the direct object.
Let me know if there are any other thoughts. And if you have any interesting quibbles about English, email me and I'll share.
Cheers!
Damn you GERUNDS!!! 
Last edited by DoUEnglish on Fri Aug 31, 2012 1:24 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Glenski

Joined: 15 Jan 2003 Posts: 12844 Location: Hokkaido, JAPAN
|
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 9:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
4. When God made you, he was showing off.
5. Do you have a map? I'm getting lost in your eyes.
6. Smoking is hazardous to your health... and baby, you're killing me!
9. I must be dancing with the devil, because you're hot as hell.
These 4 are not being used as nouns, so in a strict sense they are not gerunds. In fact, they are verbs here.
7. Somebody better call God, and notify heaven there's a missing angel!
8, Wouldn't we look cute on a wedding cake together?
Adjective use.
As for 1-3, it's to early in the morning to discuss them, but I believe only 1 and 3 are gerunds because of their noun usage. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 10:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wiki's not too bad, but I did spot this error:
"I am going to the swimming pool. (noun functioning adjectivally before another noun -- contrast with I saw the swimming dolphins, in which "swimming" is a participle, not a gerund)
In the phrase " . . . to the swimming pool," the word "swimming" is NOT a gerund; it's a present participle adjective telling what kind of pool.
Usually, when the present participle adjective is used, the noun that it describes is DOING the action (e.g. the running man, a confusing problem.)
It has an "active aspect/present time" This contrasts with the past participle adjective, which has a "passive aspect/past time" - the adjective was done to the noun (e.g. the stolen money, the broken window.)
However, there are some cases when the noun that the present participle adjective is describing is NOT doing the action, as with "swimming pool,"
"reading glasses," etc.
But what makes a word the part of speech that it is in context is based on the job it is doing in the sentence. Gerunds do the same jobs that nouns and pronouns do: subject, object of the verb, object of the preposition, indirect object, and complement.
If a verb form ending in -ing is doing one of those jobs, it's a gerund. Present participles ending in -ing that describe a noun are doing the same job as adjectives.
Regards,
Wiggling (present participle adjective) John |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
artemisia

Joined: 04 Nov 2008 Posts: 875 Location: the world
|
Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 12:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
johntpartee wrote: |
I was just reading the Wikipedia entry for "gerund". Lots of wiggle room. What do you think? |
Might be a better pick up line at a bar than "When God made you, he was showing off". (A lot more open to interpretation!). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 1:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dear artemisia,
Oh, nicely played .
Regards,
John |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sashadroogie

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 11061 Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise
|
Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 5:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
johnslat wrote: |
Wiki's not too bad, but I did spot this error:
"I am going to the swimming pool. (noun functioning adjectivally before another noun -- contrast with I saw the swimming dolphins, in which "swimming" is a participle, not a gerund)
In the phrase " . . . to the swimming pool," the word "swimming" is NOT a gerund; it's a present participle adjective telling what kind of pool.
Usually, when the present participle adjective is used, the noun that it describes is DOING the action (e.g. the running man, a confusing problem.)
It has an "active aspect/present time" This contrasts with the past participle adjective, which has a "passive aspect/past time" - the adjective was done to the noun (e.g. the stolen money, the broken window.)
However, there are some cases when the noun that the present participle adjective is describing is NOT doing the action, as with "swimming pool,"
"reading glasses," etc.
But what makes a word the part of speech that it is in context is based on the job it is doing in the sentence. Gerunds do the same jobs that nouns and pronouns do: subject, object of the verb, object of the preposition, indirect object, and complement.
If a verb form ending in -ing is doing one of those jobs, it's a gerund. Present participles ending in -ing that describe a noun are doing the same job as adjectives.
Regards,
Wiggling (present participle adjective) John |
Dear Johnslat
Hmmmmm. Have always wondered why there are so many differing explanations for structures such as you have mentioned above. I too am unhappy with the 'gerund+noun' model, but I am not sure your explanation is much better. It's a little too convenient that the 'doing' rule can just sometimes be set aside, as it is for 'swimming pool'. It is clear that the pool is not swimming.
And what of the structure 'noun + gerund(+noun)'? As in 'a heart-stopping moment' or a 'breath-taking lesson'? Are they really gerunds? I feel lots of wiggling coming on. Yes, a definite feeling of wiggling is coming upon me, threatening to upset those aspiring to impart an enlightening a-ha moment for those languishing in the unknowing depths.
Hic! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sashadroogie

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 11061 Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise
|
Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 5:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Anyway, I have always valued Swan's advice on this matter:
4 'participles' and 'gerunds': an unclear difference
The distinction between 'participles' and 'gerunds' is not always clear-cut, and
it can sometimes be difficult to decide which term to use. For this reason,
some grammarians prefer to avoid the terms 'participle' and 'gerund'. For a
detailed discussion of this point, see Section 17.54 of A Comprehensive
Grammar of the English Language, by Quirk, Greenbaum, Leech and Svartvik
(Longrnan 1985).
- from Practical English Usage, pp 270. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|