|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
jajdude
Joined: 18 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 7:07 pm Post subject: What is genius? |
|
|
Does genius exist in categories, or does the term belong to the truly exceptional, the 1 in a 1000000 or such a big number? I don't know so I thought I would ask. And who decides? History can give us a few amazing people who may deserve the term. We can all think of examples. No arguments if you say Shakespeare or Da Vinci. I laugh when I hear once in while on TV a fashion designer called a genius. Karl Flagerfeld or whatever his name is. Genius. He made some clothes no person actually ever wears.
Can a great athlete be called a genius? Was Babe Ruth the genius of baseball? I think not. Not a big enough contribution. So what are the categories? No comedian deserves the term. Perhaps no musician. It's too limited and not beneficial enough to the rest of us. Philosophers? Some may be, but have they helped us much? Have they changed our world enough?
I believe the term must be held for the few, the 1 in a million or more, who change the world. Not the brilliant who are great in a field, but the very few who really make a mark. And that list is short. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
manlyboy

Joined: 01 Aug 2004 Location: Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
|
Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 7:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I equate genius with "inexhaustability". Shakespeare for example, studying his works is like being in a house with an infinite number of rooms. You can spend your whole life in the house, yet there will always be doors you haven't gone through or didn't know of. If it were say, Stephen King, you'd eventually run out of material.
Euclid, Newton, Einstein; there are applications for their theories that haven't been imagined yet. Beethoven, Mozart; you can listen to the same piece 1000 times and always get something new out of it. Charlie Chaplain, Groucho Marx; they could make people laugh at any time in any place. Their jokes are funny no matter how many times you hear them. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mashimaro

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: location, location
|
Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 8:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
borat is genius |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jajdude
Joined: 18 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for replies so far, it's nice, I like, I like sex, in my country we have to pay 3 goats for sexy time with sister.
No, Borat is not a genius. No comedian is a genius. Maybe a few musicians like Beethoven or Bach are close because they truly changed the world. Shakespeare is obvious. Einstein too. Some people we do not even know may qualify. Some unknown may have made the world a good bit different.
I'd like to hear some serious replies. Maybe Gandhii and Nelson Mandela are geniuses? Not for intellect but for world changing effect. I'm interested in what that special term is supposed to mean.
"manlyboy" your reply was excellent but I cannot accept that the Marx brothers fit the bill. I really liked your 'inexhaustibility' idea though.
Euclid, Newton, Aristotle, Plato, Thomas Edison, Mother Theresa, I say genius.
Last edited by jajdude on Fri Dec 29, 2006 8:32 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Muramasa blade
Joined: 26 Sep 2006
|
Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 8:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My concept of genius is pretty simple. Geniuses are madmen, or people that society considers "crazy". If you can go against convention, or think outside the box, you're halfway there.
Benjamin Franklin? What kind of person flies a kite in a thunderstorm? Galileo, defied the church, and printed some crazy stuff about the earth not being the centre of the universe. Heliocentric as opposed to the earth being the centre of the universe.
I believe that genius can exist in categories. For example, a man may be a mathematical genius, but be completely inept when it comes to keeping accounts. Simply because a person is not an expert in all fields does not make them less of a genius.
Leonardo was remarkable because he was a renaissance man, gifted in many fields. The sciences, arts and other fields of endeavour, have become far more complex and rich since Leonardo's time. Therefore, being an expert, much less a genius in multiple fields has become very difficult. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jajdude
Joined: 18 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 8:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Good post. Of course Galileo was a genius. Am I shortsighted in thinking the term should only apply to world changers? Some world changers could have been dummies. I'm thinking about a redefintion of the term. What is genius? I'm thinking it's a person who creates a good influence for the world, or at least millions, for a long time.
Interestingly, some very famous people get no vote from me, but some unknowns deserve the term.
Example: Karl Marx. Brilliant, not a genius. No great lasting influence. (Oh, I know others will say what are you talking about? I'm saying did he really influence the world in a good way? I don't think so.)
Joe Schmo, designed a piece of technology we all now take for granted and use every day and depend on. (genius) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Muramasa blade
Joined: 26 Sep 2006
|
Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 9:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jajdude wrote: |
Good post. Of course Galileo was a genius. Am I shortsighted in thinking the term should only apply to world changers? Some world changers could have been dummies. I'm thinking about a redefintion of the term. What is genius? I'm thinking it's a person who creates a good influence for the world, or at least millions, for a long time.
Interestingly, some very famous people get no vote from me, but some unknowns deserve the term.
Example: Karl Marx. Brilliant, not a genius. No great lasting influence. (Oh, I know others will say what are you talking about? I'm saying did he really influence the world in a good way? I don't think so.)
Joe Schmo, designed a piece of technology we all now take for granted and use every day and depend on. (genius) |
I'm not sure that your definition of genius, would be exhaustive or definitive, in part because you use the subjective term "good". If you left good out, I might be more inclined to agree. After all, there are "evil" geniuses, correct?
To further complicate the matter, it's difficult if not impossible to find an invention, idea or change that has been purely "good". Let's use the example of fire, simply because splitting the atom has been done to death. Fire: it can warm you, cook your food, is useful for forging tools and sterilizing.
On the other hand, fire can burn, destroy and kill. For every beneficial idea, invention or philosophy, there's usually a negative application or drawback. Just my two cents. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Grimalkin

Joined: 22 May 2005
|
Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 9:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think a genius is a person who sees something (a truth?) that nobody else has seen before and then reveals it to us, and by doing so changes the way we look at things. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Roch
Joined: 24 Apr 2003 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2006 10:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jajdude wrote: |
Good post. Of course Galileo was a genius. Am I shortsighted in thinking the term should only apply to world changers? Some world changers could have been dummies. I'm thinking about a redefintion of the term. What is genius? I'm thinking it's a person who creates a good influence for the world, or at least millions, for a long time.
Interestingly, some very famous people get no vote from me, but some unknowns deserve the term.
Example: Karl Marx. Brilliant, not a genius. No great lasting influence. (Oh, I know others will say what are you talking about? I'm saying did he really influence the world in a good way? I don't think so.)
Joe Schmo, designed a piece of technology we all now take for granted and use every day and depend on. (genius) |
Back in the days of the Trivium and Quadrivium, philosophy was the only game in town, and they certainly did change the world: Hobbes, Locke, Bishop Berkeley, Pico, Leibnitz, et-al.
Bertrand Russell, Noam Chomsky, Nietzsche, William James, Dewy, Carnap, and Wittgenstein are some of the people who changed the world in one way or another in modern times. Bio-ethics and evolutionary biology are impacted by philosophers in a major way, eh, and most of the influential think tanks in the U.S. are stocked with people trained in philosophy. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
numazawa

Joined: 20 Mar 2005 Location: The Concrete Barnyard
|
Posted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 12:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grimalkin wrote: |
I think a genius is a person who sees something (a truth?) that nobody else has seen before and then reveals it to us, and by doing so changes the way we look at things. |
I'd like to tell you about my fantasies of tree-hanging monkey-sex with the girl who tends the wine rack (nice rack) at the local E-Mart. It would probably change your way of looking at things (well, me anyway), and would undeniably vault me into the ranks of the uber-genius types, but given the risk of getting myself expelled from the board (/bored), I will instead content myself with a life of plodding away in the foothills of proto-genius. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
three-legged dog
Joined: 28 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 12:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
numazawa wrote: |
Grimalkin wrote: |
I think a genius is a person who sees something (a truth?) that nobody else has seen before and then reveals it to us, and by doing so changes the way we look at things. |
I'd like to tell you about my fantasies of tree-hanging monkey-sex with the girl who tends the wine rack (nice rack) at the local E-Mart. It would probably change your way of looking at things (well, me anyway), and would undeniably vault me into the ranks of the uber-genius types, but given the risk of getting myself expelled from the board (/bored), I will instead content myself with a life of plodding away in the foothills of proto-genius. |
Hell no!
Eschatologize away!! Elaborate! Pictures!
Armageddon now!! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mashimaro

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: location, location
|
Posted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 12:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Grimalkin wrote: |
I think a genius is a person who sees something (a truth?) that nobody else has seen before and then reveals it to us, and by doing so changes the way we look at things. |
Good! Glad someone justified my position on Borat  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Grimalkin

Joined: 22 May 2005
|
Posted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 1:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
three-legged dog wrote: |
numazawa wrote: |
Grimalkin wrote: |
I think a genius is a person who sees something (a truth?) that nobody else has seen before and then reveals it to us, and by doing so changes the way we look at things. |
I'd like to tell you about my fantasies of tree-hanging monkey-sex with the girl who tends the wine rack (nice rack) at the local E-Mart. It would probably change your way of looking at things (well, me anyway), and would undeniably vault me into the ranks of the uber-genius types, but given the risk of getting myself expelled from the board (/bored), I will instead content myself with a life of plodding away in the foothills of proto-genius. |
Hell no!
Eschatologize away!! Elaborate! Pictures!
Armageddon now!! |
I second that! I could do with a whole new perspective on that kind of thing  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Grimalkin

Joined: 22 May 2005
|
Posted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 1:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mashimaro wrote: |
Grimalkin wrote: |
I think a genius is a person who sees something (a truth?) that nobody else has seen before and then reveals it to us, and by doing so changes the way we look at things. |
Good! Glad someone justified my position on Borat  |
I haven't seen the film but I do believe there is such a thing as comic genius!  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kimchi_pizza
Joined: 24 Jul 2006 Location: "Get back on the bus! Here it comes!"
|
Posted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 1:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mashimaro wrote: |
Grimalkin wrote: |
I think a genius is a person who sees something (a truth?) that nobody else has seen before and then reveals it to us, and by doing so changes the way we look at things. |
Good! Glad someone justified my position on Borat  |
I agree! Someone who is trully original, looks a problem or idea from a whole new perspective and is imaginative enough to present a solution or their ideas to the public. Imagination and dedication being the key.
How about "evil" genius'? Is there such a thing? Would you consider Hitler a "genius". Since he didn't present any truth, but lies upon lies, I wouldn't consider him a genius, only a talent for manipulation of the masses. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|