| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
MollyBloom

Joined: 21 Jul 2006 Location: James Joyce's pants
|
Posted: Mon Jan 01, 2007 11:34 pm Post subject: Anglo-Saxon English |
|
|
I was wondering if anyone ever incorporated any Old English into their lessons.
I am working with my students on phonology because their pronunciation is horrible. I am thinking of doing some fun activities using the IPA chart. They are bright kids that have studied abroad, many of them even multi-lingual (besides English and Korean).
I obviously don't want to introduce any ancient language if they can't use the modern one properly, but teaching them Old English is not my goal.
I know exercises can be used in grammar/sentence structure lessons where in which words that make no sense are used in a sentence just to teach identifying parts of speech:
"The quarks quibbled quinly, and banly baled the yar."
The voiced and unvoiced "th" is definitely a problem (as I saw with the French I taught), and that dipthong, "eth" is also seen in Old English. Many sounds from OE are the same modern sounds used nowadays. I was wondering if I could kind of do the same thing as the aforementioned "quarks" sentence, but using OE.
I know it would be challenging, but is it appropriate? Comments? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SPINOZA
Joined: 10 Jun 2005 Location: $eoul
|
Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2007 5:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Anything that interests your students is good in my book.
If I thought pre-Norman English would interest my adults, I'd do it. I don't think it would though in my case.
Anglo-Saxon and Norman synonyms is a good thing to do, however. They are rarely totally synonymous, so the different shades of meaning generate some thought and discussion. It's good. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MollyBloom

Joined: 21 Jul 2006 Location: James Joyce's pants
|
Posted: Tue Jan 02, 2007 9:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks a lot! I am thinking about it. I recently translated Beowulf for grad school, so that is in my memory. I was thinking of using that because reading it aloud might sound really funny to them and might make it fun.
Wouldn't you laugh if you were a foreign student and heard:
Hw�t! We Gardena in geardagum,
�eodcyninga, �rym gefrunon,
hu �a ��elingas ellen fremedon.
I would. But then again, I am one of the weird people in the world that likes Beowulf. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
confuzed
Joined: 01 May 2006
|
Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2007 12:35 am Post subject: |
|
|

Last edited by confuzed on Sun Apr 15, 2007 2:17 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MollyBloom

Joined: 21 Jul 2006 Location: James Joyce's pants
|
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 3:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Nah...I got it good at my work. One of the reasons why my director hired me was to teach an 8th grade lit class, and it's awesome. The school lets me, and all the teachers, do what they want. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hotpants
Joined: 27 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 3:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
How about some poetry? Anything from Shakespeare to 19th century poetry has a lot of archaic terms in them, and I think students will appreciate it if they can be made to recognize some of the intense creativity found in some of these writings. I once did a lesson like this and explained words like 'thou' and 'thee' and pointed out how it's also common to see these forms in many biblical contexts - songs, prayers, bibles, for example.
What about the witches spell at the beginning of Macbeth? There are lots of extension activities that you could do with that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mithridates

Joined: 03 Mar 2003 Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency
|
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:30 am Post subject: Re: Anglo-Saxon English |
|
|
| MollyBloom wrote: |
I was wondering if anyone ever incorporated any Old English into their lessons.
I am working with my students on phonology because their pronunciation is horrible. I am thinking of doing some fun activities using the IPA chart. They are bright kids that have studied abroad, many of them even multi-lingual (besides English and Korean).
I obviously don't want to introduce any ancient language if they can't use the modern one properly, but teaching them Old English is not my goal.
I know exercises can be used in grammar/sentence structure lessons where in which words that make no sense are used in a sentence just to teach identifying parts of speech:
"The quarks quibbled quinly, and banly baled the yar."
The voiced and unvoiced "th" is definitely a problem (as I saw with the French I taught), and that dipthong, "eth" is also seen in Old English. Many sounds from OE are the same modern sounds used nowadays. I was wondering if I could kind of do the same thing as the aforementioned "quarks" sentence, but using OE.
I know it would be challenging, but is it appropriate? Comments? |
I have the perfect thread for you:
http://forums.galbijim.com/index.php?showtopic=1913
What English might look like if all the Norman, Latin etc. influence had been taken out. It's not OE of course, but if you're going to get into that subject your students might find it interesting. Of course, it might go completely over their heads. I can't not chuckle a little when I try to read that out loud though.
| Quote: |
Nor are stuff and work unakin. Rather, they are groundwise the
same, and one can be shifted into the other. The kinship between
them is that work is like unto weight manifolded by the fourside
of the haste of light.
By shooting motes into kernels, worldken folk have shifted
samesteads of one firststuff into samesteads of another. Thus did
they make ymirstuff into aegirstuff and helstuff, and they have
afterward gone beyond these. The heavier firststuffs are all
highly lightrottish and therefore are not found in the
greenworld. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
confuzed
Joined: 01 May 2006
|
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|

Last edited by confuzed on Sun Apr 15, 2007 2:17 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ilovebdt

Joined: 03 Jun 2005 Location: Nr Seoul
|
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 10:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you were thinking about Shakespeare, there are books you can get which have the original Shakespeare on one side and a modern English translation on the other.
I will try and find the publisher if you are interested.
ilovebdt |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
novimber

Joined: 11 Nov 2006
|
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 10:56 pm Post subject: Jabberwocky |
|
|
| Last semester I took a TESOL Methodologies class here in the States. The class was about 2/3 Korean exchange students and 1/3 Americans, and I think we were studying reading and teaching reading through extensive reading and context and stuff, and my teacher used the Jabberwocky poem by Louis Carroll, which isn't Old English of course but has a lot of nonsense words. But what he did was, he told all the Americans, speaking too quickly for the Koreans to understand, to pretend not to know the words were nonsense, and then put us in groups and got us to guess the meanings of the nonsense words. The point I guess was to teach us how students can learn vocabulary from reading things in context. So... now that I'm writing this, I'm not quite sure what my point was, but I wonder if you could adapt this poem or this strategy to an actualy ESL class |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Samantha

Joined: 20 Jul 2006 Location: Jinan-dong Hwaseong
|
Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 1:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jabberwocky is also used to teach students (native speakers and English learners) how to decode the words function based on how it's used in context.
I used the lesson with my advanced 8th grade English class here in the States. I did a review of all the parts of speech and then gave them the poem and asked them to decode all the nonsense words based on how it was functioning and the descriptions given of all the parts of speech. The kids loved it. I can dig up the lesson plan if anyone wants it to use with their students.
The same idea could be done with most of the Shakespeare poems/sonnets and even a semi-modern translation of things like Beowulf. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Woland
Joined: 10 May 2006 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 3:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
I guess someone has to say that this is bad idea, and that will have to be me. The problem with using Old English is that it's not intelligible to the students. When learners approach texts, their first focus is on meaning. When they can't get meaning out of texts, it is frustrating and makes it difficult for them to move on to aspects of form, like pronunciation, that we want them to learn. Giving them texts from which they can extract meaning and then moving their attention to form is simply more effective.
You can do things that are silly, like tongue twisters, to practice particular sounds, but the meaning, though humorous, should still be accessible. Just parroting sounds with no real meaning associated with them won't help students with their pronunciation.
If you're really interested in teaching pronunciation effectively, you may want to invest in the following book, which is the best reference available for teachers at the moment:
Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D. M., & Goodwin, J. M. (1996). Teaching pronunciation: A reference book for teachers of English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
It should be easily usable by you since you seem to already have some linguistics background.
But I do really think that instructional material should be meaningful for students. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MollyBloom

Joined: 21 Jul 2006 Location: James Joyce's pants
|
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 11:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Update:
I did Beowulf with some upper-level classes, and they loved it! Some of them even came to class the next week and memorized the first couple of lines! One student drew his rendition of Beowulf killing Grendel!
Next I'll move on to the Venerable Bede...kidding. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|