|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
freewill
Joined: 10 Jun 2003
|
Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 1:52 am Post subject: Why English Literature? |
|
|
Here's something from the currently popular "Freakiest job applicant thread ..."
Ya-ta Boy
Quote: |
I did not recommend for hiring the woman who wrote a 4 or 5 pager detailing how growing up in a log cabin in the backwoods of Ontario had led her to read a lot of 'good literature' and made her qualified to teach English. |
Alright, we don't need the 4 or 5 pager, but here's a question that's been puzzling me for several years:
Many Korean EFL job advertisements specify "English" or "English literature" as a preferable major, especially universities (as well as TESOL and applied linguistics). I don't want to put down English literature in any way. I studied some and it is interesting and important, but:
How on Earth is a degree in English literature better qualification for teaching EFL than any other arts degree?
I imagine that maybe it starts with some Korean teachers who don't think past "English", and assume that the English that native speakers study in western universities is the same, or similar, to the English that goes on in Korean universities (Korean English departments do teach English literature, but I've never heard of a native speaker being invited to teach it). The situation might then be inflated by the newly hired English majors, who naturally assume that their major is more relevant. I don't know. Opinions and insights welcome. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gamecock

Joined: 26 Nov 2003
|
Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 4:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
As a person with a B.A. in English (writing emphasis, not lit), I pretty much agree with you. At my university all English majors did have to take 2 required grammar classes and a linguistics class that almost no other majors voluntarily jumped into. I have found this knowledge to be of definite help as a teacher here. However, I think for most Korean employers it's all about style over substance and the fact that one's degree says "English" looks good. At the hogwans I worked at, the boss was quick to make my major known to all the parents and prospective customers.
I once worked with a great teacher who was a sculpture major. To be honest, if I were an employer and I saw that on a resume before meeting him, I'd probably shy away too. It's a harder sell in the increasingly competitive Korean ESL market... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Missile Command Kid
Joined: 17 Jul 2006 Location: Daegu
|
Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 5:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Gamecock wrote: |
As a person with a B.A. in English (writing emphasis, not lit), I pretty much agree with you. At my university all English majors did have to take 2 required grammar classes and a linguistics class that almost no other majors voluntarily jumped into. |
And that's two more grammar courses and one more linguistics class than any other BAs or BScs took while attending university. Isn't that enough?
I tutored students one-on-one for five years. Comparing fourth-year students from any other discipline to fourth-year students from English literature was like night and day: there was one polisci student whose grammar and spelling was so atrocious I thought that they were a first year student. Same thing with students in psych, engineering (oh, the horror!), and social work. Now, granted, I was *tutoring* these folks, which means that they knew they needed help (and the good kids probably didn't seek me out), but one thing that was constantly emphasised during my BA was how to write properly. This was not consistently emphasised in any other discipline.
I guess it's also a question of what you're teaching here in Korea. I just finished off a class on how to write an introductory and concluding paragraph. My co-worker, whose field is psychology, has absolutely no idea how to teach this. If you're working in a kindie hagwon, you're right: you probably don't need to know the difference between an independent and dependent clause. But if you're teaching college-bound Korean kids who actually care about how to write, an English degree is somewhat useful. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jajdude
Joined: 18 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 5:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't know how people get degrees without learning to write adequately. I suppose a lot of students really don't need to learn to write well. It's a bit sad to have a degree and not be able to write a decent page or two on a given subject.
There's a stereotype that English majors are not good at math or science, and that those in the sciences do not write well. Someone with a half-decent education should know a good bit of both, or be able to learn without too much trouble. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gamecock

Joined: 26 Nov 2003
|
Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 7:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
I actually found, even after sitting through grammar classes, that I really learned and truly understood the mechanics of grammar by studying Latin in University. Because basic grammar comes naturally to native speakers, at least those who are active readers, the rules and "why's" of grammar are rarely understood to them.
I believe one of the greatest weaknesses in American education is the lack of emphasis on learning a foreign language. As well, more than even having a knowlege of writing and linguistics (although important), I think that not having studied a foreign language is one of the greatest weaknesses of many ESL teachers in Korea. If you have never SERIOUSLY studied another language you are limited in your ability to teach English to non-native speakers, at least on more than an introductory level. As well, understanding the work and processes involved in learning a language helps give you perspective, empathy, and patience. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bosintang

Joined: 01 Dec 2003 Location: In the pot with the rest of the mutts
|
Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 7:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Gamecock wrote: |
I believe one of the greatest weaknesses in American education is the lack of emphasis on learning a foreign language. As well, more than even having a knowlege of writing and linguistics (although important), I think that not having studied a foreign language is one of the greatest weaknesses of many ESL teachers in Korea. If you have never SERIOUSLY studied another language you are limited in your ability to teach English to non-native speakers, at least on more than an introductory level. As well, understanding the work and processes involved in learning a language helps give you perspective, empathy, and patience. |
I agree with this. I think backgrounds in foreign languages, lingustics, communication, and education are much more valuable than backgrounds in English literature. Everything else being equal, someone with a background in English literature would be no different than someone with a background in any other humanities field. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Omkara

Joined: 18 Feb 2006 Location: USA
|
Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 11:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
bosintang wrote: |
I agree with this. I think backgrounds in foreign languages, lingustics, communication, and education are much more valuable than backgrounds in English literature. Everything else being equal, someone with a background in English literature would be no different than someone with a background in any other humanities field. |
I agree that having no foreign language is a handicap in this field. Having experience wrestling with another language and understanding the hurdles is a major advantage.
I often see posts which poke fun at the kinds of errors students make, etc., which shows how ignorant the teacher is of the differences in languages, of that 'lost in translation' factor.
Having a degree in Literature is no particular advantage in ESL; but having that degree tends to indicate a certain aptitude with language.
I think the one advantage a degree in Literature has over other fields in humanities is that the exposure to the great English writers is far more concentrated. Whereas other Humanities will expose the student to great ideas, etc., those ideas are often in translation. Rarely will a translator equal the power, skill and nuance of the original writer.
Again, the 'lost in translation' factor comes in. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mack
Joined: 15 Sep 2006 Location: korea
|
Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 2:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A couple of linguistics courses, including grammar/structure were compulsory with my BA English. I alo did one or two extra non-compulsory linguisics courses. I actually thought of all the Literature as linguistics rather than a separate area of study. The Literature was all about analysing the way English was used - in great detail. Doing that for three and a half years gives you a much higher level of understanding about English than before you do it. I have worked with teachers who have not been able to answer students questions or answer them inadequately or misleadingly. Not usually English majors. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
trinity24651

Joined: 05 Nov 2006
|
Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 5:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Isn't studying a foreign language a must in American colleges? I had to... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lao Wai

Joined: 01 Aug 2005 Location: East Coast Canada
|
Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 6:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hey Missile Command Kid,
I have to take a minute to defend psychology majors. I know that when I did my BA in psychology I had to write a lot of papers using APA format. My professors were nazis about grammar and with the general flow of our papers. My friends from other disciplines who took psychology courses couldn't believe how picky the profs were. When I started taking other classes and wrote papers in those classes, I always did extremely well. I did especially well in my anatomy and physiology class (which I had to get special permission to take because I was a stoopid arts student.)
A number of my friends were business students. I couldn't believe the marks they got on their crappy essays, considering their writing was not so great. But, in those cases I think the profs were marking the ideas the students put forth rather than the grammar, etc. I'm not knocking business students. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Missile Command Kid
Joined: 17 Jul 2006 Location: Daegu
|
Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 8:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lao Wai wrote: |
Hey Missile Command Kid,
I have to take a minute to defend psychology majors... |
Don't worry about it. I know that I can't speak for every single psych majors, and even at my school the students I tutored were in the bottom 25 and knew it. I'm sure there are English majors out there who can't speell... er, spell, too!  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 9:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
How on Earth is a degree in English literature better qualification for teaching EFL than any other arts degree?
|
I do think a degree in Lit would make a person more qualified than say, a Chemistry major. I guess because lit majors sometimes take linguistics courses, and they at least have some 'feeling' for language. (I'm not saying a Chem major is a cretin without feelings.)
[My complaint about that applicant was that she came across as flakey and I didn't want to have her for a co-worker.] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
freewill
Joined: 10 Jun 2003
|
Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 2:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Quote:
How on Earth is a degree in English literature better qualification for teaching EFL than any other arts degree?
I do think a degree in Lit would make a person more qualified than say, a Chemistry major. I guess because lit majors sometimes take linguistics courses, and they at least have some 'feeling' for language. (I'm not saying a Chem major is a cretin without feelings.) |
Sure, but Chemistry is a natural science, not an arts subject.
Quote: |
Gamecock wrote:
As a person with a B.A. in English (writing emphasis, not lit), I pretty much agree with you. At my university all English majors did have to take 2 required grammar classes and a linguistics class that almost no other majors voluntarily jumped into.
And that's two more grammar courses and one more linguistics class than any other BAs or BScs took while attending university. Isn't that enough? |
No. I did a lot of grammar studying philosophy and computer science (the Chomskyan TGG). I did Latin throughout high school, which is almost entirely an exercise in grammar. Any other language apart from English will give English speakers a better grounding in grammar.
I also studied psych, and we were drilled in practical grammar. In any arts or social sciences subject, students read stuff in English and learn to write (with varying degrees of success) summaries, discussions and analyses in English. The only thing about English as a major is that the reading material has greater pure literary value - but, this is not within the realm of EFL. Surely, no-one uses Shakespeare as a reader for EFL students?
Quote: |
Quote: |
I did not recommend for hiring the woman who wrote a 4 or 5 pager detailing how growing up in a log cabin in the backwoods of Ontario had led her to read a lot of 'good literature' and made her qualified to teach English. |
[My complaint about that applicant was that she came across as flakey and I didn't want to have her for a co-worker.] |
Sure. It was a good post. No-one would take seriously the woman's contention that she is a good EFL teacher because she read 'good literature' in her cabin (that's a bit of slightly strained grammar in the Chomskyan style, in case anyone missed it). Why, then, is a major in English literature a better qualification for EFL teaching? My argument is that it isn't. What I'm wondering is why it is touted as such. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rothkowitz
Joined: 27 Apr 2006
|
Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 3:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Why Women's Studies? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
PRagic

Joined: 24 Feb 2006
|
Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 4:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'd hire someone with a degree in chemistry with a foreign language background over an English Lit. major, especially for hakwon jobs. Actually, major aside, I always make it a point to look at whether or not an applicant has studied a foreign language past the sophomore level...even TESL majors. It's one thing to study the theory, but it's another to actually be on the learning end of it. They'd be better bus drivers here if they all had to ride one to work. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|