|
Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
EFLtrainer
Joined: 04 May 2005
|
 Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 3:35 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| RachaelRoo wrote: |
| It's not a matter of good or bad - the issue is that this claim is entirely fictional. |
What's stupid, rachelroo, is that you didn't even TRY to find out if it was bull or not.
Sheep. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
EFLtrainer
Joined: 04 May 2005
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 3:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
The following owe an apology to IGTG, or will have shown thmselves to be Grade A assholes (at least as far as this thread is cncerned) :
JejuJitsu
rachelroo
nowhereman
red
shakuhachi
pliggy
ontheway
tigerbeer
TUM
Jinju
gooph
Any of you got the guts? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
caniff
Joined: 03 Feb 2004
Location: All over the map
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 7:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Nothing yet? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rteacher
Joined: 23 May 2005
Location: Western MA, USA
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 3:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No need for anyone to apologize to me, though - and I'm dang near always right!..  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
EFLtrainer
Joined: 04 May 2005
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 4:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, what can one expect fromthe members of DESLC? Not much, apparently. But, hey, it's still early in the morning for most.
But let's not get sidetracked: there is an issue here. Funny, when I was a kid - literally - I was all for one-world government as it seemed the only way to create equality. I still see it as a possibility, maybe even a necessity, to end the seemingly endless cycle of one nation doing the kind of crap the US is doing now, for example. (But not in the sense of the Bilderburgs/Bush Cadre/CFR New World Order bull crap.) It brings into issue cultural losses, language losses.. etc. And new forms of elite would just pop up, so... there's likely no real answer. People largely suck, basically. Or, enough people suck to make things suck for the rest of us. Etc., etc.
So, given the above, why is it this whole notion is making my skin crawl? (Rhetorical question.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 4:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| The partnership's stated goal is to protect North America from security threats such as terrorism and flu pandemics as well as economic threats from new global-market giants such as China. |
Oh what a terrible thing! Run for the hills! Leaders are brain storming and BSing on ideas in a private meeting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TheUrbanMyth
Joined: 28 Jan 2003
Location: Retired
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 5:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| EFLtrainer wrote: |
The following owe an apology to IGTG, or will have shown thmselves to be Grade A assholes (at least as far as this thread is cncerned) :
JejuJitsu
rachelroo
nowhereman
red
shakuhachi
pliggy
ontheway
tigerbeer
TUM
Jinju
gooph
Any of you got the guts? |
Bypassing the swear filter again are we?
Troll.
As for IGTG his claim is nonsense. And anyone who supports this claim can be disregarded...not that that's anything new for you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
EFLtrainer
Joined: 04 May 2005
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 5:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Cute, Urby. Too close to home, eh? Sorry, but every person in that list insulted a fellow poster for no reason whatsoever. That, my dear, dear, asswipe friend, is being an ass.
You're welcome for the definition. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
EFLtrainer
Joined: 04 May 2005
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 5:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mindmetoo wrote: |
| Quote: |
| The partnership's stated goal is to protect North America from security threats such as terrorism and flu pandemics as well as economic threats from new global-market giants such as China. |
Oh what a terrible thing! Run for the hills! Leaders are brain storming and BSing on ideas in a private meeting. |
I think you are missing the point. Perhaps you should actually read some of the articles or wwatch some of the videos. Whether you support or don't support the agenda, it wasn't a brainstorming session.
Now, where is your apology for insulting a fellow poster without cause, and being completely wrong? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TheUrbanMyth
Joined: 28 Jan 2003
Location: Retired
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 7:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| EFLtrainer wrote: |
Cute, Urby. Too close to home, eh? Sorry, but every person in that list insulted a fellow poster for no reason whatsoever. That, my dear, dear, asswipe friend, is being an ass.
You're welcome for the definition. |
Too close to home? What are you on?
I like how you whine about being insulting and then turn around and throw insults. 
Moreover, I did not insult IGTG. I asked him two questions about proof for his claims. I did not insult him or call him names. Furthermore I did not even say that his claim was "nonsense" UNTIL AFTER you called me out. (For future reference calling someone's claim nonsense is not insulting THEM. If they refuse to offer solid proof then it is just their opinion and claiming that as fact is silly)
So as everyone can now see that you are lying about me insulting him, you've just destroyed your credibility...oh wait a moment you did that a long time ago.
Carry on. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TheUrbanMyth
Joined: 28 Jan 2003
Location: Retired
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 7:35 pm Post subject: Re: Secret Agreement To Almalgamate US, Canada & Mexico |
|
|
| igotthisguitar wrote: |
Secret Agreement To Almalgamate US, Canada And Mexico
By Bob Chapman
9-19-5
. In fact, 99% of them do not know such a secret agreement exists. [/size]
|
TheUrbanMyth wrote
If 99% of them do not know it exists how does Bob Chapman?
And how do you know that Bob Chapman just isn't "blowing smoke?"
This was my sole post until YOU started to attack everyone in this thread who dared disagree with IGTG.
How is this being insulting or deserving of an apology? When he offers proof of how Bob Chapman became aware of such an agreement...AND how he knows that Bob Chapman is telling the truth....THEN I will GLADLY offer an apology.
But I will make you a bet that he won't. How's this? If he offers solid proof (as printed in a mainstream magazine (TIME, NEWSWEEK, THE ECONOMIST) about the above two points, I will apologize. If on the other hand he does not, YOU will apologize.
If you are SO sure that he is right you will take this bet. If you don't we will all see that you are just trolling, and don't really support his position as if you believed there WAS proof, you couldn't lose this bet.
Show us your "guts" why don't YOU? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
EFLtrainer
Joined: 04 May 2005
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 7:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| TheUrbanMyth wrote: |
| EFLtrainer wrote: |
Cute, Urby. Too close to home, eh? Sorry, but every person in that list insulted a fellow poster for no reason whatsoever. That, my dear, dear, asswipe friend, is being an ass.
You're welcome for the definition. |
Too close to home? What are you on?
I like how you whine about being insulting and then turn around and throw insults.
Moreover, I did not insult IGTG. I asked him two questions about proof for his claims. I did not insult him or call him names. Furthermore I did not even say that his claim was "nonsense" UNTIL AFTER you called me out. (For future reference calling someone's claim nonsense is not insulting THEM. If they refuse to offer solid proof then it is just their opinion and claiming that as fact is silly)
So as everyone can now see that you are lying about me insulting him, you've just destroyed your credibility...oh wait a moment you did that a long time ago.
Carry on. |
Your questions were rhetorical. Trying to pretend otherwise now is silly. If they were not rhetorical, you would have actually looked into the matter before questioning the logic of the OP. Since you did not, you are now, quite obviously, full of shit.
As for MY insulting anyone: show me where I have stated insulting an ass is reprehensible to me? I insult you because you insult others. You lie, you distort, etc.
I am tired of the right-wing whacko witch hunts of the last 16 years. I now fight fire with fire. You lie, I call you a liar. You insult, I insult. Etc. But, I do not do so without reason or provocation.
I have never hidden this nor preteded otherwise.
Any questions? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TheUrbanMyth
Joined: 28 Jan 2003
Location: Retired
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 7:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| EFLtrainer wrote: |
| TheUrbanMyth wrote: |
| EFLtrainer wrote: |
Cute, Urby. Too close to home, eh? Sorry, but every person in that list insulted a fellow poster for no reason whatsoever. That, my dear, dear, asswipe friend, is being an ass.
You're welcome for the definition. |
Too close to home? What are you on?
I like how you whine about being insulting and then turn around and throw insults.
Moreover, I did not insult IGTG. I asked him two questions about proof for his claims. I did not insult him or call him names. Furthermore I did not even say that his claim was "nonsense" UNTIL AFTER you called me out. (For future reference calling someone's claim nonsense is not insulting THEM. If they refuse to offer solid proof then it is just their opinion and claiming that as fact is silly)
So as everyone can now see that you are lying about me insulting him, you've just destroyed your credibility...oh wait a moment you did that a long time ago.
Carry on. |
Your questions were rhetorical. Trying to pretend otherwise now is silly.(1) If they were not rhetorical, you would have actually looked into the matter before questioning the logic of the OP. (2) Since you did not, you are now, quite obviously, full of *beep*.
(3) As for MY insulting anyone: show me where I have stated insulting an ass is reprehensible to me? I insult you because you insult others. You lie, you distort, etc.
I am tired of the right-wing whacko witch hunts of the last 16 years. I now fight fire with fire. You lie, I call you a liar. You insult, I insult. Etc. But, I do not do so without reason or provocation.
I have never hidden this nor preteded otherwise.
|
(numbers are mine)
1. Actually I DID look into the matter and found no proof in any of the mainstream magazines. That's why I asked him.
2. You do not know what I did or didn't do. That makes YOU the one who is full of it.
3. Whining about insults and then insulting people is hypocritical. Period.
While we are on the subjects why don't YOU provide a few links to reputable sources?
OR did you came into this thread simply to stir up trouble and not have a debate? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
EFLtrainer
Joined: 04 May 2005
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 7:44 pm Post subject: Re: Secret Agreement To Almalgamate US, Canada & Mexico |
|
|
| TheUrbanMyth wrote: |
| This was my sole post until YOU started to attack everyone in this thread who dared disagree with IGTG. |
I did not do that. I challenged all of you to come clean for insulting someone who was correct. What was galling was that not one of you even bothered to check out what he posted. Every one of you ASSUMED it was BS simply because it was IGTG that posted it.
For the record, IGTG and I have no relationship whatsoever. I look ascance at much of what he posts. But I don't deride his posts without pulling my head out my ass first, as each of you failed to do.
| Quote: |
| How is this being insulting or deserving of an apology? |
Was it a sincere inquiry? No. You were laughing at his logic, not asking an honest question. A common part of your modus operandi.
| Quote: |
When he offers proof of how Bob Chapman became aware of such an agreement...AND how he knows that Bob Chapman is telling the truth....THEN I will GLADLY offer an apology.
But I will make you a bet that he won't. How's this? If he offers solid proof (as printed in a mainstream magazine (TIME, NEWSWEEK, THE ECONOMIST) about the above two points, I will apologize. If on the other hand he does not, YOU will apologize. |
I have already provided all the support his post needed, and he has also added additional resources. You couldn't be bothered to check again? Gee, what a surprise. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TheUrbanMyth
Joined: 28 Jan 2003
Location: Retired
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 7:48 pm Post subject: Re: Secret Agreement To Almalgamate US, Canada & Mexico |
|
|
| EFLtrainer wrote: |
| TheUrbanMyth wrote: |
| This was my sole post until YOU started to attack everyone in this thread who dared disagree with IGTG. |
I did not do that. I challenged all of you to come clean for insulting someone who was correct. What was galling was that not one of you even bothered to check out what he posted. Every one of you ASSUMED it was BS simply because it was IGTG that posted it.
For the record, IGTG and I have no relationship whatsoever. I look ascance at much of what he posts. But I don't deride his posts without pulling my head out my ass first, as each of you failed to do.
| Quote: |
| How is this being insulting or deserving of an apology? |
(1) Was it a sincere inquiry? No. You were laughing at his logic, not asking an honest question. A common part of your modus operandi.
| Quote: |
When he offers proof of how Bob Chapman became aware of such an agreement...AND how he knows that Bob Chapman is telling the truth....THEN I will GLADLY offer an apology.
But I will make you a bet that he won't. How's this? If he offers solid proof (as printed in a mainstream magazine (TIME, NEWSWEEK, THE ECONOMIST) about the above two points, I will apologize. If on the other hand he does not, YOU will apologize. |
(2) I have already provided all the support his post needed, and he has also added additional resources. You couldn't be bothered to check again? Gee, what a surprise. |
(numbers are mine)
1. You have no idea whether it was a honest inquiry or not. Stop pretending you can read minds. It was a honest inquiry...I wanted to see if he could provide proof...which he has not done so.
Again and this is a honest inquiry how did Bob Chapman obtain this information? And how do we KNOW that this is true?
None of those links is reputable. YouTube? Come on sir, even for you that's reaching. I could post links on YouTube that prove UFO's exist. And where is the information I asked for ON BOB CHAPMAN? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
