Korean Job Discussion Forums

[regicide]

I have noticed a lot of "news" in the mainstream media recently about Kennedy; promoting the "Oswald did it' nonsense. If that premise is so clear, and it "doesn't matter" anymore, why the recent propaganda campaign? Is somebody under pressure to counteract convincing evidence to the contrary?

First , the window on Ebay that never actually sold.

Now, "new" motorcade footage.

Oh, and don't forget Gopher's recent article.

Don't tell me this is an old or dead story. It has been all over the news lately.

Regarding the "proof" that Oswald did it:

"We're not a free country anymore. Because the people who are smart enough and powerful enough to take out a president 'like that' and get away with it. . . are probably involved in other areas of the government. In other words, the country is being run by people we did not vote for." - researcher Gary Mack, in The Men Who Killed Kennedy.

He is the one mentioned in the article and is now the government spokesmen at the "6th Floor Museum, the Government Propaganda facility in Dallas.


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17229693?GT1=9033

[gsxr750r]

The reason has all to do with the Clintons.

The democrats have tried to make Billary look like the next Camelot for years. Certain liberal forces are just building up steam before the elections. The same thing happens every four years.... start showing lots of Kennedy footage, movies, and videos a year or two out. Then come the media comparisons between the "heavenly" Kennedy years, and the Clinton years. Next will come the news story tie-ins and hints between Kennedy, Bill Clinton, along with implications that we can re-live this enchanted time again if we only elect Hillary.

That's what is going on here.

[caniff]

That clip only showed a recently unearthed video of the motorcade and the environs. Nothing special.

The commentator on the MSNBC link you provided claimed that there was already definitive proof that Oswald was the lone gunman. Get over it. Move on to the next crap claim. It would be much more interesting.

[caniff]

[NAVFC]

[Milwaukiedave]

Most of the news now a days is commentary or propaganda.

I happened to see the footage on the news, but I'm not sure what to think of it. I guess in the end it doesn't do much for me either way.

[regicide]

We know, NAVFC, you have proven it to us before with your "TV specials". Too bad the majority of Americans are not with you on this.

[igotthisguitar]

He WAS a "patsy".

Framing him served to make the official line story simple.

[regicide]

[daskalos]

[igotthisguitar]

Canned Tuna Exceeds Guidelines On Mercury:
CBC Investigation
Mon Feb 19, 8:25 PM

Following a CBC investigation that found mercury levels above the allowed limit, Health Canada issued new consumption guidelines on Monday for canned albacore tuna for women and children.

The tuna may routinely exceed Canada's mercury guidelines, the investigation has learned, but until Monday, Health Canada failed to warn consumers about the potential danger.

The health benefits of eating tuna have been widely established; it is a relatively inexpensive source of high-quality protein, low in saturated fat and contains omega-3 fatty acids, touted for their heart-protective benefits.

But tuna also contains mercury, a dangerous contaminant that can affect the heart, brain and immune system.

However, prior to CBC's investigation, if you read Health Canada's advice on the matter, you would have thought you had nothing to worry about.

Health Canada has established a guideline level of 0.5 parts per million (ppm) for mercury in commercial fish.

The Canadian Food Inspection Agency tests canned tuna before it gets to store shelves to ensure it meets the 0.5 ppm guideline. On average, six per cent of the albacore tuna it tests fails and is pulled before it gets to grocery stores.

"I have confidence in the program that we operate, that it continues to serve the public well in providing assurance that the products in the marketplace predominantly meet the guideline level," says CFIA spokesman Paul Mayers.

CBC put that claim to the test, conducting the first public survey of its kind to examine the mercury content in the canned tuna that makes it to store shelves.

13% exceeded guidelines

Sixty cans of albacore, or "white" tuna, were purchased at nine grocery stores in Vancouver, Winnipeg and Toronto. Studies have shown "white" tuna is typically higher in mercury content than "light" tuna, because it's generally a larger, older fish that has accumulated more mercury.

The tuna was tested at the University of Ottawa's Centre for Advanced Research in Environmental Genomics, which is internationally recognized for its work with mercury.

"I was suprised. They were a good deal higher than I'd thought," said Dr. David Lean, who supervised the testing. "Clearly these tuna should not be eaten on a regular basis," he added.

Thirteen per cent of the tuna tested exceeded Health Canada guidelines.

"This is not to say if you eat fish above 0.5 you're going to drop dead tomorrow, or if you eat fish a little bit lower you're going to be fine. It has to do a lot with how much of it you eat," Lean said.

"But we were seeing numbers as high as 0.9, which is almost double the guideline. So why are they on the shelf? Why are we not protected?"


Results no surprise to CFIA
Paul Mayers, a spokesman for the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, said the organization does the best it can.

"Our view was that the results don't represent a surprise," he told CBC.

The CFIA actually allows mercury levels up to 0.54, due to its system of rounding to one decimal point, so only eight per cent of the tuna tested should not have been for sale, officials said.

As for why so many cans that exceeded even the 0.54 guideline are on grocery-store shelves, Mayer said it's inevitable.

"I'm not saying that compliance can never improve. What I'm saying is we will not get 100 per cent when we're dealing with a ubiquitous environmental contaminant."

Other countries, such as the United States, have issued advisories to consumers about the potential dangers of canned tuna - including special advice to pregnant and nursing women, because too much mercury can cause neurological damage, especially in children and fetuses.

Safe consumption advice ranges from no more than one can of albacore tuna a week in some jurisdictions to none at all in others.

While Health Canada does warn about consumption of fresh and frozen tuna, its website, until Monday, said limiting canned tuna consumption was not necessary.

"We are making available this information right now because of the interest in canned albacore tuna in particular," Health Canada's Samuel Godefroy told CBC on Monday afternoon.

The new guidelines indicate that "Canadians can rest assured that there is no reason to stop eating canned tuna."

However, it suggests that "as a precaution":

- Pregnant or breastfeeding women can eat up to four servings of canned albacore tuna per week.

- Children between the ages of one and four years can eat up to one serving per week.

- Children between the ages of five and 11 years can eat up to two servings per week.

The Canadian Food Inspection Agency has begun an investigation based on the CBC's test results.

The agency says it will recall product, if it finds such a move is justified.

[On the other hand]

[regicide]

[Hollywoodaction]

[Hollywoodaction]

Mercury in tuna is old news. I've personally known about this for nearly 20 years.