Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

YIKES! KOREAN TEXTBOOK GOES WAY OF JAPANESE TEXTBOOKS
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Demonicat



Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Location: Suwon

PostPosted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 7:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thats not my point. My point is that we as a world have become waaaay to sensitive, especially in regards to the jews. What happened to free speech? Does that only apply to PC statements? I say let them say what in the hell they want, god knows we do. Ever been slipped a "mickey"? Ever been gyped?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Alyallen



Joined: 29 Mar 2004
Location: The 4th Greatest Place on Earth = Jeonju!!!

PostPosted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 9:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="stevemcgarrett"]Dean Martin:

Quote:

Demonicat:

Thanks for the rant warning but it doesn't absolve you from responsibility for clueless posting. Name me one American publisher nowadays that prints blatantly racist material. Among Mexican Americans, the "debate" is unresolved over whether Speedy Gonzales is a racial slur, I might add. Regardless, to accept your point means to acknowledge that Korean society is far behind the times.


Tada!
http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/02/27/racist.column.ap/index.html

It was removed from the Asianweek site but I found the text of the article here
http://board.okayplayer.com/okp.php?az=show_topic&forum=4&topic_id=4056917&mesg_id=4056917&page=

Why I Hate Blacks

Kenneth Eng, Feb 23, 2007

Here is a list of reasons why we should discriminate against blacks, starting from the most obvious down to the least obvious:

� Blacks hate us. Every Asian who has ever come across them knows that they take almost every opportunity to hurl racist remarks at us.

In my experience, I would say about 90 percent of blacks I have met, regardless of age or environment, poke fun at the very sight of an Asian. Furthermore, their activity in the media proves their hatred: Rush Hour, Exit Wounds, Hot 97, etc.

� Contrary to media depictions, I would argue that blacks are weak-willed. They are the only race that has been enslaved for 300 years. It's unbelievable that it took them that long to fight back.

On the other hand, we slaughtered the Russians in the Japanese-Russo War.

� Blacks are easy to coerce. This is proven by the fact that so many of them, including Reverend Al Sharpton, tend to be Christians.

Yet, at the same time, they spend much of their time whining about how much they hate "the whites that oppressed them."

Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't Christianity the religion that the whites forced upon them?

� Blacks don't get it. I know it's a blunt and crass comment, but it's true. When I was in high school, I recall a class debate in which one half of the class was chosen to defend black slavery and the other half was chosen to defend liberation.

Disturbingly, blacks on the prior side viciously defended slavery as well as Christianity. They say if you don't study history, you're condemned to repeat it.

In high school, I only remember one black student ever attending any of my honors and AP courses. And that student was caught cheating.

It is rather troubling that they are treated as heroes, but then again, whites will do anything to defend them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Sod_em_and_begorrah



Joined: 20 Nov 2006

PostPosted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 9:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

stevemcgarrett wrote:
Smee:

Thanks for the heads-up. Didn't notice it had been threaded. Apologies to YuBumsik and JeJitSu. Didn't mean to usurp their posts.

Let me take a different angle on this sordid affair.

How could a South Korean professor put his name to this sort of rubbish? Moreover, how could the editorial board ignore it?

Jingoism is on the rise throughout East Asia, I'm afraid. Korean claims to civilization demonstrate their insecurity; it is well established that Chinese civilization not only predates it but contributed to it. But then the Japanese are in denial on that score too. Well, then again, as my thread title hints at, there is a coterie of rightwing professors in Japan who are still whitewashing Japanese wartime atrocities in China.

Of course, the French and Russian press slips on this issue from time to time too. Anti-semitism is alive and well it would seem. Small surprise then that Israeli foreign policy is so quick to be called into question in Europe and elsewhere. The Israelis still do not have a real embassy in Beijing either. They operate from an office in the World Trade Center. Pathetic.


Israel deserves to be treated with the same contempt as apartheid-era South Africa.

There is a huge difference between being against the Israeli government and being anti-Jewish. People who try to confuse the two seem to have an agenda.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Zolt



Joined: 18 May 2006

PostPosted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Alyallen wrote:

Why I Hate Blacks

Kenneth Eng, Feb 23, 2007

Here is a list of reasons why we should discriminate against blacks, starting from the most obvious down to the least obvious:


Lol that Kenneth Eng is one real nutjob. I actually thought for a second that you pulled that article from the Yangpa.

http://theyangpa.wordpress.com/2007/01/08/its-time-to-end-the-prejudice-against-discrimination/

Is it possible that Kenny Kim and Kenneth Eng are the same person?

Edit: no, the yangpa version has more class.


Last edited by Zolt on Tue Feb 27, 2007 11:10 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Troll_Bait



Joined: 04 Jan 2006
Location: [T]eaching experience doesn't matter much. -Lee Young-chan (pictured)

PostPosted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I just re-read my CNN link again more carefully, and noted this:

Quote:
The author of a best-selling comic book series intended to teach children about other countries said Monday he would change a chapter on Jews that has been called anti-Semitic and similar to Nazi propaganda.

Rhie Won-bok maintained, however, that his depiction of Jewish control of American media and politics was based on fact and "commonly believed."

"The Jews are the invisible force that controls the U.S.," Rhie, a professor of visual arts at Duksung Women's University in Seoul, told The Associated Press.
"I wrote the chapter to let people know that you can't understand the U.S. without knowing the Jewish community."


What a tool. I also took another look at my International Herald Tribune link:

Quote:
The series, authored by Lee Won Bok, a visual arts professor at Duksung Women's University in Seoul, has sold more than 12 million copies since it began publishing in the 1980s.


Yeah, he's really qualified to talk about history, culture, and religion, isn't he? What a total knob.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stevemcgarrett



Joined: 24 Mar 2006

PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Troll Bait:

Bravo. Not only is he ignorant but as you have revealed he's not even in the field of American cultural studies. And for him to infer fact from a popularly held belief (in this case about Jews in the media) is ridiculous and doesn't reflect well on his university. Shame on them too.

Sodem:

Quote:
Israel deserves to be treated with the same contempt as apartheid-era South Africa.


To equate Israel with South Africa is to demonstrate a severe lack of portionality at the very least. Israel has tried in vain for decades to make peace with the Palestinians but Arafat (and now Hamas) have always resisted their overtures for their own selfish agendas. Apartheid-era South Africa did not do the same until its last president took office. So your comparison is flawed and wishful.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
doggyji



Joined: 21 Feb 2006
Location: Toronto - Hamilton - Vineland - St. Catherines

PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 10:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The notion of the "Jew control" is just some idiot's wildest wet dream? I don't know much about it. Where is it coming from? Some individual's imagination? Please enlighten me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hater Depot



Joined: 29 Mar 2005

PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 5:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

doggyji wrote:
The notion of the "Jew control" is just some idiot's wildest wet dream? I don't know much about it. Where is it coming from? Some individual's imagination? Please enlighten me.


It's fairly ancient. The history of anti-Semitism is a centuries, if not millenia-old one. In the Middle Ages they thought we ate baby Christian's blood. Etc.

Modern anti-semitism says that Jews run all the world's media, banks, etc. If only they could watch a group of real Jews try to decide what bagels to order for the meeting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stevemcgarrett



Joined: 24 Mar 2006

PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 8:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hater Depot:

Quote:
Modern anti-semitism says that Jews run all the world's media, banks, etc. If only they could watch a group of real Jews try to decide what bagels to order for the meeting.


Laughing Laughing

On a more sober note, Shimon Peres once quipped that if the Arabs would just leave the Jews to their own devices they would soon argue each other into the ground (my paraphrase).

Although I'm not Jewish, I have great respect for the tradition of learning and following one's imagination in Jewish culture.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mervsdamun



Joined: 06 Jun 2006
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 11:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

stevemcgarrett wrote:

To equate Israel with South Africa is to demonstrate a severe lack of portionality at the very least. Israel has tried in vain for decades to make peace with the Palestinians but Arafat (and now Hamas) have always resisted their overtures for their own selfish agendas. Apartheid-era South Africa did not do the same until its last president took office. So your comparison is flawed and wishful.


While Israel is not as bad as South Africa was, not everything should be blamed on the Palestinians.

Interesting article which I just finished reading�
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6405799.stm

Couple quotes from it:
Quote:

She is a 26-year-old Jewish Israeli. Her name is Jasmine Avissar. He is a 27-year-old Palestinian Muslim, Osama Zaatar.
Jasmine and Osama's is a love story, and it tells you so much about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

---
First they tried to live in Israel, but the Israeli authorities would not allow Osama to join his wife there.
Then they tried living in the occupied West Bank, but some Palestinians made life difficult for them.
---

On Jasmine's Israeli passport, it still says her marital status is "under investigation".

"I feel like a refugee. The moment I decided not to be part of the mainstream I was told that I was not a part of my country anymore."
"Even here in Osama's homeland I am superior as an Israeli," says Jasmine, as she looks out the window.
"It's easier for me to move around. The soldiers let me through checkpoints. They don't arrest me like they might arrest Osama."

Jasmine has given up on her own country.
"Jewish people were abused for thousands of years, but my nation has switched from being victims to being abusers.
"That's hard for me to acknowledge. The Jewish people are occupiers now, and we are racist."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stevenpa



Joined: 24 Aug 2006

PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

stevemcgarrett wrote:

Israel has tried in vain for decades to make peace with the Palestinians


Myopic, Steve, and you should know better.

In 1967, following a war between Israel and the countries of Syria, Jordan, and Egypt, the Israeli military occupied the West Bank, Gaza Strip, and East Jerusalem.

That year, the United Nations Security Council passed Resolution 242 calling on Israel to withdraw from the Occupied Territories.

http://www.un.org/documents/sc/res/1967/scres67.htm

Israel has yet to comply.

Today, 3 million Palestinians live under illegal occupation.

In the occupied territories, Amnesty International has regularly documented serious human rights violations by Israeli military forces including the "deliberate destruction of the Gaza Strip�s only electricity power station, water networks, bridges, roads and other infrastructure", even going so far as to label these activities "war crimes".

http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGMDE150612006?open&of=ENG-332

stevemcgarrett wrote:

...but Arafat (and now Hamas) have always resisted their overtures for their own selfish agendas.


Come on, Steve, there are agendas on both sides, both of which damage the potential for a "fair" peace, and you are intelligent enough to know so.

As one example, CNN caved to pressure from the Israeli government over the use of the word "settlement" to describe Gilo, an area of east Jerusalem. The Israeli government's preference? "Neighbourhood". As you think about the distinction between these two words, please keep in mind that, according to United Nations Security Council Resolution 242, Gilo is illegally occupied.

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article213374.ece

I recommend more research on this topic.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stevemcgarrett



Joined: 24 Mar 2006

PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 4:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

stevenpa:

I'm not without concern for the antics of the Likud Party's right wing nor do I condone settlements in the West Bank. But in recent years there has been an effort to limit the number.

Call it the spoils of war if one must, but it was Israel that was attacked in each instance. After the Pacific war, the U.S. retained control of several Japanese archipelagos (most of which have subsequently been relinquished) and Russia still stubbornly retains the Kuril Islands and part of Sakhalin.

Surrounded by hostile neighbors in narrow corridors of territory, some of whom called for the destruction of Israel until very recently, it shouldn't surprise critics in the West that Israel clung to these occupied territories.

Arafat lost sight of the big prize in his petty power grab. Even Clinton and his ever-so-patient liberal foreign policy advisors could not sway him to accept what amounted to a very reasonable peace deal.

The bombs and missiles have been hurled intermittently for decades from southern Lebanon and now Gaza and yet when the Israeli forces go in to clean out these areas they're accused of provocation. No other nation would tolerate such relentless intrusions, not to mention the acts of outright terrorism. No other nation would be able to withstand developing something of a siege mentality. And with Hamas, Hizbollah, and Iran refusing to acknowledge Israel's right to exist that mentality isn't likely to disappear any time soon. The new wall is literally a concrete indication of that fear.

On my recent trip to Thailand (and Nepal) I befriended a middle-aged Israeli couple, both highly educated members of the Labor Party and very reasonable people. Both genuinely worried that Israel might not be around a decade from now, that the forces of ill will in the Arab world would eventually have their way. I found myself in the uncomfortable position of trying to reassure them that the U.S. would never allow that to happen. While they were grateful for the support, they still doubted the outcome. Imagine how much worse this sentiment must be among the less informed.

Yes, both sides have their agendas but I don't here a majority of Israelis calling for Palestinians to be wiped off the map or giving tacit approval to terrorist acts. I hear a lot of soul-searching and debate, sometimes even condemnation in the Knesset but nothing even remotely on the same scale in Arab legislatures.

Let's keep a sense of perspective here, shall we?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rteacher



Joined: 23 May 2005
Location: Western MA, USA

PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 6:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The reaction to the comic strip partly proves the assertion that Jews have had inordinate influence on mass media. (Of course, the Internet has countered that to a large degree ...)

When Muhammad was portrayed in a way considered offensive by many Muslims in cartoons printed in western publications, there was a massive outcry - about the assault on free speech and freedom of the press...

Free speech or press apparently doesn't apply if Jews are offended - even mildly...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Demonicat



Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Location: Suwon

PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 6:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

thank you for saying so much more eloquently what I was trying to get at.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
stevemcgarrett



Joined: 24 Mar 2006

PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

RTeacher:

Quote:
The reaction to the comic strip partly proves the assertion that Jews have had inordinate influence on mass media. (Of course, the Internet has countered that to a large degree ...) When Muhammad was portrayed in a way considered offensive by many Muslims in cartoons printed in western publications, there was a massive outcry - about the assault on free speech and freedom of the press... Free speech or press apparently doesn't apply if Jews are offended - even mildly...


Sorry, but this is a feeble analogy. The Jews didn't take to the streets in protest or pass religious edicts to condemn those who wrote and published the comic strip. Nor did they threaten the lives of those involved or condemn the faith as a whole. The outcry in the West was to the disproportionate (re: alarmist) reaction in the Muslim world to the cartoons.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International