View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 3:51 am Post subject: 1491... a book you HAVE to read |
|
|
I posted on another forum about this book a few days ago, to complete silence. I'm back here on this forum ('cause I finished it) and want to say that this one is as worthy of attention as 'Guns, Germs, and Steel'.
You may end up quibbling with details here and there, like critics do with 'Guns', but the underlying thesis is not really refutable. Just as Diamond stood outside and looked at all the various fields and pulled things together, Charles Mann did with this one. (He has less credibility because he is a journalist, but there is no doubt he fairly represented the views of the people in the fields he writes about. I felt it could have been more 'academic' in tone without hurting it's readability, but that was his style and choice.)
He writes only about North and South America and the recent research in the fields (anthropology, archeology, biology, ethnobiology etc). His contention is that the pre-Columbian population was considerably larger than previously thought. But that isn't the main thrust of the book, as I thought in the first section.
He demonstrates the effect the Indians had on their environment. The most remarkable one for me was that story we've all heard about a flock of passenger pigeons taking 3 days to fly over. Why? It turns out that the Indians in the eastern half of the US had had a few thousand years to alter the forest into a giant 'garden' of fruit and nut trees, which is what the passenger pigeons lived on. When Christopher and his horny boys landed with their diseases and wiped out up to 95% of the native population which had competed with the pigeons for food, the pigeon population boomed.
He also says that notable people in their fields are saying that the Amazon used to support a whole lot more people than it does today because of the way the Indians had learned to manage their environment.
Anyway, provocative and very readable. Highly recommended.
PS: There is no Noble Savage nonsense to the book at all. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ddeubel

Joined: 20 Jul 2005
|
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 4:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
I certain think of Diamond's book as a "classic" and stand by his thesis. So thanks, I will look for this book pronto.
We need more insightful people like these two authors who call for us to look beyond our assumptions and to look at human life in a more "scientific" and meaningful way . Not just the same ethnocentric fashion. But see the similarities and challenges common to all societies.
We have too manywho would label people like this as "cultural relativists". I say bullocks, it is just wisdom. That seeing beyond the smoke and mirrors, there is the light of human creativity and adaptation everywhere....
Have you read any of the translated stuff of the priest Bartolom�de Las Casas? He wrote at the time of the Spanish conquest and it is startling stuff....
DD |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
gang ah jee

Joined: 14 Jan 2003 Location: city of paper
|
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 4:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
There's a copy in at my university library. I'll check it out. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 4:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think specialists are necessary to do the scut work, but it takes a special kind of specialist who can also write for the general, popular (in the best sense of that word) writer to get the word out. When there isn't a specialist with that kind of skill, then we need journalists who can fill in till a specialist can do it.
I 'promise' that you won't be disappointed with the book. You may not agree with him in detail, he will make you think about your assumptions. And that ain't a bad thing.
Enjoy. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ddeubel

Joined: 20 Jul 2005
|
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 4:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ya-ta,
I'm just glad to know there are still people out there who are passionate about the written word.
Too often the phrase, "a book you must read!" is over run by "A movie you must see!". And I think the world a little less because of it..............
By the way -- although old, it is an extremely good read along the same road, "Cultural Materialism" by Marvin Harris. Shows concretely how most of human behaviour is due to the material conditions of their daily lives.
DD |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
endo

Joined: 14 Mar 2004 Location: Seoul...my home
|
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 10:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ddeubel wrote: |
Ya-ta,
I'm just glad to know there are still people out there who are passionate about the written word.
Too often the phrase, "a book you must read!" is over run by "A movie you must see!". And I think the world a little less because of it..............
By the way -- although old, it is an extremely good read along the same road, "Cultural Materialism" by Marvin Harris. Shows concretely how most of human behaviour is due to the material conditions of their daily lives.
DD |
shut up nerd!
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 10:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ddeubel wrote: |
I certain think of Diamond's book as a "classic" and stand by his thesis... |
It is not his thesis. He plagiarized Crosby. Professional historians consider Crosby's work on the Columbian Exchange and "ecological imperialism" the classic ones. Diamond is just the guy who plagiarized and restated Crosby's thesis in a mass-market press -- W. W. Norton & Co. -- to respond to the so-called Bell-Curve Theory in the late-1990s.
Also, Las Casas exaggerated his emotionally-driven "Black-Legend" allegations for his own political purposes; he advised the Council of the Indies; he aimed to undermine the ecomenderos' power-base while strengthening the Church's; and no one takes him at face-value. I do not mean to suggest that his account is worthless, either. It is not. In any case, for an excellent look at the Church's politics, agendas, and their own human-rights violations vis-a-vis Latin American Indian peoples and cultures, see the Australian ethnohistorian Inga Clendinnen's Ambivalent Conquests. First-rate ethnohistory.
Ya-ta: first, you might like to know that Mann lost no credibility because of his status as a journalist and not an academic. I just read two reviews of this book by leading professional geographers -- one of them writing from Univ. of Texas, Austin. They accepted his work as a useful synthesis of the knowledge that they had produced -- even though they each took issue with one thing or another where they believed he erred or exceeded the evidence and scholarship. This notwithstanding, Mann apparently cited multiple geographers in his reportedly large bibliography (according to the reviews I just read). Professional geographers were happy enough about that. "He will likely make much money from this; but he cited all of us and exposed our work to larger audiences. Good for him; good for us," they more or less said.
Second, there are multiple population estimates on prehispanic peoples and cultures. Geographer Linda Newson reviewed this problematic issue in laymen's terms in a Cambridge Encyclopedia of Latin America and the Caribbean article a while back, called "Pre-Columbian Settlement and Population." As Newson explains, population estimates range from 7.5 to 100 million -- Alfred Kroeber estimated the former; Henry F. Dobyns estimated the latter. Most scholars accept an estimate that ranges somewhere between 7.5 and 100 million -- and, of course, these vary considerably. The data remain inconclusive, and indeed, heavily contested.
Where does Mann weigh in on this and how does he explain his choice?
Also, ever read McNeill's Plagues and Peoples? By far the best look at the disease issue yet written. Indeed, I understand that McNeill's methodology is somehow linked with "medical history's" emergence -- a very new field.
Last edited by Gopher on Thu Apr 26, 2007 3:24 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
igotthisguitar

Joined: 08 Apr 2003 Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)
|
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 12:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
There's history, then there's the past 
Last edited by igotthisguitar on Thu Apr 26, 2007 1:18 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
gang ah jee

Joined: 14 Jan 2003 Location: city of paper
|
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 1:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Gopher wrote: |
It is not his thesis. He plagerized Crosby. Professional historians consider Crosby's work on the Columbian Exchange and "ecological imperialism" the classic ones. Diamond is just the guy who plagerized and restated Crosby's thesis in a mass-market press -- W. W. Norton & Co. -- to respond to the so-called Bell-Curve Theory in the late-1990s. |
Are you sure you mean to allege plagiarism here, Gopher? Even Crosby doesn't seem to agree with you; indeed, he gave Guns, Germs and Steel a very favourable review in the LA Times. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Big_Bird

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...
|
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 1:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Bah! I'm extremely jealous of those who are still able to read books. About the only books I'm able to get through nowadays are Thomas the Tank Engine and Bob the Builder. You don't realise quite how wonderful it is to sit and read a whole (adult) book, until you are not able to do it anymore. Enjoy. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 8:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
gang ah jee wrote: |
Are you sure...? |
Crosby's magnanimity notwithstanding, yes, Diamond plagiarizes Crosby's thesis -- especially where he gets into "spacious skies and tilted axes" without explicitly citing Crosby.
Let me clarify, Gang ah jee: Diamond's Guns is useful and good reading; indeed, Diamond and Crosby make an excellent pair. But speaking of "Diamond's thesis" makes about as much sense to me as speaking of "Vanilla Ice's baseline." And calling Diamond and not Crosby's work "the classic" strikes me as particularly appalling.
By the way, why not compare Diamond's chapter on Easter Island in Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed (2005) with Ponting's chapter on Easter Island in Green History of the World: The Environment and the Collapse of Great Civilizations (1993)?  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|