Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Which sentence is correct and why? - Updated.
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
ilovebdt



Joined: 03 Jun 2005
Location: Nr Seoul

PostPosted: Mon May 07, 2007 3:37 pm    Post subject: Which sentence is correct and why? - Updated. Reply with quote

Hi

One of my co-teachers asked me about this and I am not sure of the answer.

What does "is" refer to in this sentence?

My co-teacher thinks "the standards". But, then "standards" are plural, so in theory it should be "are necessary" and not "is necessary". But, "are necessary" doesn't sound right to me.

Does the "is" refer to "necessary?

Here is the beginning of the sentence: Parents must impose standards of behavior on their children to keep them safe and to teach them values.

A) However, the standards should not be any more strict than is necessary.

B) However, the standards should not be any more strict than are necessary.

Any ideas folks?

ilovebdt


Last edited by ilovebdt on Mon May 07, 2007 4:16 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
spliff



Joined: 19 Jan 2004
Location: Khon Kaen, Thailand

PostPosted: Mon May 07, 2007 3:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

standards, plural so are....is is blatantly incorrect and doesn't sound right either.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
faster



Joined: 03 Sep 2006

PostPosted: Mon May 07, 2007 3:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

"Is" is correct because the verb doesn't refer to "standards." It's something like a passive construction, and "is" refers to a dummy/implied subject, like "it".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ChuckECheese



Joined: 20 Jul 2006

PostPosted: Mon May 07, 2007 3:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

faster wrote:
"Is" is correct because the verb doesn't refer to "standards." It's something like a passive construction, and "is" refers to a dummy/implied subject, like "it".


The standardS implies "they" but not "it".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
faster



Joined: 03 Sep 2006

PostPosted: Mon May 07, 2007 4:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ChuckECheese wrote:
faster wrote:
"Is" is correct because the verb doesn't refer to "standards." It's something like a passive construction, and "is" refers to a dummy/implied subject, like "it".


The standardS implies "they" but not "it".


no, no, more like "the situation requires" or something like that. The standards don't require themselves to be strict or lenient.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ddeubel



Joined: 20 Jul 2005

PostPosted: Mon May 07, 2007 4:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
"Is" is correct because the verb doesn't refer to "standards." It's something like a passive construction, and "is" refers to a dummy/implied subject, like "it".


I don't follow you at all.......probably just me and my lack of morning coffee.....

I think both are correct. Depends on if you are using 'standards" as a countable noun or uncountable. Some nouns have this double jointed ability.

Put "than that/those which is/are" [necessary] into the sentence and you will see the clarification. Is/Are refer to the noun unstated in the phrase (that/those) which is a pronoun refering to "standards"....

Now, I'm confused. Smile

DD
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
ilovebdt



Joined: 03 Jun 2005
Location: Nr Seoul

PostPosted: Mon May 07, 2007 4:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Question

ilovebdt
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Pyongshin Sangja



Joined: 20 Apr 2003
Location: I love baby!

PostPosted: Mon May 07, 2007 4:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

1) It has to be A). The sentence should read "...than it is necessary for them to be" but the subject there is implied and uses the indicator "it" so you still use the singular verb. "Are necessary" is just retarded.

2) I would take out the verb all together, ie. "no more strict than necessary." That would be a more normal usage. Sounds like it was written like a Korean, otherwise.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
ilovebdt



Joined: 03 Jun 2005
Location: Nr Seoul

PostPosted: Mon May 07, 2007 4:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

What does the "is" refer to though?

ilovebdt
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
faster



Joined: 03 Sep 2006

PostPosted: Mon May 07, 2007 4:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pyongshin Sangja wrote:
1) It has to be A). The sentence should read "...than it is necessary for them to be" but the subject there is implied and uses the indicator "it" so you still use the singular verb. "Are necessary" is just retarded.


exactly

Pyongshin Sangja wrote:
2) I would take out the verb all together, ie. "no more strict than necessary." That would be a more normal usage. Sounds like it was written like a Korean, otherwise.


That works too - but the original omission is pretty common, as you'll see in a simple google usage search.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kimchi story



Joined: 23 Nov 2006

PostPosted: Mon May 07, 2007 4:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pyongshin Sangja wrote:
1) It has to be A). The sentence should read "...than it is necessary for them to be" but the subject there is implied and uses the indicator "it" so you still use the singular verb. "Are necessary" is just retarded.

2) I would take out the verb all together, ie. "no more strict than necessary." That would be a more normal usage. Sounds like it was written like a Korean, otherwise.


Seconded with nothing to add.

(ddeuble - you got me thinking and I haven't come to a conclusion yet. Post again if you come to one, please.)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Been There, Taught That



Joined: 10 Apr 2007
Location: Mungyeong: not a village, not yet a metroplex.

PostPosted: Mon May 07, 2007 5:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, I definitely agree with the "is" theory, and the "eliminate the 'is'" theory, too.

Alternatively, a positively-worded sentence is always good:...only as strict as necessary" to paraphrase.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
tzechuk



Joined: 20 Dec 2004

PostPosted: Mon May 07, 2007 6:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ilovebdt:

the *is* refers to a situation or a system or a circumstance.

So rewriting it would be:

The situation does not require the standards to be stricter than necessary.

Or

The system does not require the standards to be stricter than necessary.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
faster



Joined: 03 Sep 2006

PostPosted: Mon May 07, 2007 6:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

tzechuk wrote:
ilovebdt:

the *is* refers to a situation or a system or a circumstance.

So rewriting it would be:

The situation does not require the standards to be stricter than necessary.

Or

The system does not require the standards to be stricter than necessary.


Precisely - it's a passive construction, in which it's common to lose the subject. To make it active again, you need to supply one.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ilovebdt



Joined: 03 Jun 2005
Location: Nr Seoul

PostPosted: Mon May 07, 2007 6:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Got ya! Cheers people Very Happy

My co-worker is now happy.

ilovebdt
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International