| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
superacidjax

Joined: 17 Oct 2006 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 9:04 pm Post subject: Korean logic.. (Or lack of) |
|
|
Here's a story in today's Herald that just cracked me up:
https://www.koreaherald.co.kr/SITE/data/html_dir/2007/05/14/200705140044.asp
In a nutshell, it talks about the Korean government policy of removing trashcashs in order to reduce garbage. The morons in the Korean government actually think that fewer trashcans lead to less garbage.
WRONG. It just leads to more garbage ending up on the street. Idiots. They are committing the classic falacy of assuming correlation without causation.
Garbage levels are a function of consumption, not a function of trash bins.
If the country wants to reduce garbage, perhaps they should stop allowing food companies to individually package cookies when they are sold in big boxes. That's ridiculous, you buy a small cardboard box of cookies and every one of them is individually packaged. I understand that the reason is that you're supposed to share your cookies with everyone in the office right?
For being so modern, the Korean government is about as intelligent as a gnat. I'll be glad when I can move back to Paris, where street cleaning is an art. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Scotticus
Joined: 18 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 9:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| While I agree it's idiotic, that's hardly a Korean issue. If you haven't noticed, every country in the world has a squad of autistic monkies running the show. How many countries can truly say their government doesn't do stuff like this on a fairly normal basis? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
billybrobby

Joined: 09 Dec 2004
|
Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 9:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I think you're confusing two different issues. They're not trying to reduce the amount of garbage on the street, they're trying to reduce the overall amount of garbage whilst cracking down on illegal dumping. To me, removing garbage cans is not a bad idea for making illegal dumping harder, because it forces the offenders to be more blatant about it. The downside is that you ultimately end up with more garbage on the street, but perhaps less illegally dumped garbage and less garbage overall. I have no idea if the policy has been effective, but I can understand the logic. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ilsanman

Joined: 15 Aug 2003 Location: Bucheon, Korea
|
Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 9:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
All these wacky trash laws and having to buy special bags, separate it and all...totally inconvenient and not sensible for a country that just doesn't have 2 shits about garbage.
What you end up with is a bunch of trash ninjas going out at midnight to throw out garbage. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
superacidjax

Joined: 17 Oct 2006 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 10:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| billybrobby wrote: |
| They're not trying to reduce the amount of garbage on the street, they're trying to reduce the overall amount of garbage whilst cracking down on illegal dumping.... but I can understand the logic. |
There is no logic. The story states that by reducing the number of garbage cans, the Korean government says that there is a reduction of total garbage. It's talking about overall garbage, not garbage on the street. The reason that there is so much illegal dumping isn't because there are too many garbage cans, it's because there aren't enough legal places TO dump it.
The Korean government is acting like if you reduce the number of rice fields, you'll reduce the amount of rice needed by a given population. They're putting the cart before the horse. Even many Koreans fail to see the logic in it. They admit to illegally dumping MORE often due to the lack of proper bins. Read the section about the subway garbage...
To the other poster that suggests that other countries are equally moronic, that may be true, but moral relativism is still no excuse for the stupidity in THIS country. This time, it isn't the Koreans as much as the "logic magicians" in the Korean government.
The amount of garbage in a given society doesn't reduce as a function of places to put it. The amount of garbage on the streets DOES increase inversely to the amount of garbage bins.
..and still.. why individually packaged cookies? That's just wasteful. Epecially in a box of ten. I'm suprised they don't individually package Oreos yet. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JD1982
Joined: 19 Apr 2007
|
Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 10:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think it makes perfect sense.
With unemployment in Korea becoming grave social problem, they need to create more jobs. Therefore, the solution is to create one problem (more trash and dirty streets/parks) to solve other problem (high unemployment) by hiring more street cleaners and trash collectors.
Does that make sense?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
billybrobby

Joined: 09 Dec 2004
|
Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 10:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| superacidjax wrote: |
| billybrobby wrote: |
| They're not trying to reduce the amount of garbage on the street, they're trying to reduce the overall amount of garbage whilst cracking down on illegal dumping.... but I can understand the logic. |
There is no logic. The story states that by reducing the number of garbage cans, the Korean government says that there is a reduction of total garbage. It's talking about overall garbage, not garbage on the street. The reason that there is so much illegal dumping isn't because there are too many garbage cans, it's because there aren't enough legal places TO dump it.
|
They're not talking about illegal dumping as in people littering on the street. They're talking about people taking garbage from home and putting it in the public trashcans. Obviously, getting rid of the trashcans reduces this particular problem. Whether it reduces illegal dumping overall, I don't know. I imagine if you're taking your kitchen trash to the subway, you're not gonna be too ashamed to just dump it in an alleyway somewhere.
You say there aren't enough legal places to dump it. But the system works by volume (i.e. by the bags). For the average citizen, the only legal place to dump it is in one of those bags, after which you can place it almost anywhere. So I think you're misunderstanding something. They're not going after litterbugs, they're going after people who don't use the bags.
At any rate there is logic to it, and not bad logic either. Cracking down on the illegal dumping is directly related to reducing the overall amount of garbage. You seem to be misunderstand their intent. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
in_seoul_2003
Joined: 24 Nov 2003
|
Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 10:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
...
Last edited by in_seoul_2003 on Mon Aug 27, 2007 9:24 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
antoniothegreat

Joined: 28 Aug 2005 Location: Yangpyeong
|
Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 10:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
near the bottom it reads
"Despite the growing complaints from citizens, the government claims that it cannot think of a better solution to prevent illegal waste dumping.
"Frankly speaking, I think citizens should think whether they have been honoring the garbage policy properly to ask the government for more public trashcans," said an official of the Environment Ministry, asking for anonymity. "
If that is the case, shouldn't those government officials just step down, since obviously they are not doing their job? God, what would happen if Bush said to America "well honestly, I can't come up with a better solution for Iraq, so you guys should think of it for me or just shut up."
great politicing there... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BuHaoChi
Joined: 30 Jan 2007
|
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 12:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
....
Last edited by BuHaoChi on Sun Oct 28, 2007 11:04 pm; edited 9 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
babtangee
Joined: 18 Dec 2004 Location: OMG! Charlie has me surrounded!
|
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 3:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
| BuHaoChi wrote: |
It�s actually a fairly simple policy issue. If there were trashcans on the street, no one would buy the special bags. People could walk out to the nearest can and put their trash in there for free.
No special bags = no lucrative source of government revenue (assuming they do generate revenue). |
In Melbourne, Australia I was going to a Korean travel agency to see what kind of prices they were offering for flights here. As I approached, one of the Korean travel agents exited the building and dumped a box full of travel brochures and magazines into the public trash can out front. This despite the fact that she could have had them taken away with the recyclables for free. I'm not big on recycling, but I just couldn't fathom her logic, so I gave he a look of horror, turned and walked away.
I see big piles of unauthorized plastic bags full of garbage all over the place. If you see one or two against a lamp post you can pretty safely bet that there will be seven or eight there by the next day. I see them in the bins for the authorized garbage bags too. And I see plastic bags full of food just dropped in the food rubbish.
Some people are just plain lazy. I don't think Koreans are particularly special in this, it's just that the police authorities are the laziest of the lot and rarely, if ever, hand out tickets. Without the threat of punishment a certain type of people just won't uphold their end of the social contract. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
samd
Joined: 03 Jan 2007
|
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 4:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
About a year ago one of my Korean friends asked me what I disliked most about Seoul. I could have said any number of things, but figured that "not enough trash cans" was diplomatic enough.
He said they there used to be a lot more, but they were constantly overloaded by illegally dumped household waste. This seems to be backed up by information in this post.
So it seems like the problem is garbage removal. In a city as dense as Seoul, you need an efficient system for getting the waste off the streets, which doesn't exist here, trash cans or no. Where's Tony Soprano when you need him?
There are trash cans everywhere where I come from, and the streets are much cleaner. Seems to destroy the "less trash cans = less waste theory". I never litter at home - it used to be impossible for me to drop gum, but here... I do it all the time. I'm not carrying an empty can around with me for hours. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gwangjuboy
Joined: 08 Jul 2003 Location: England
|
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 5:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think there are other ways of detering would-be flytippers. Many flytippers in Korea don't actually use the litter bins that you see in the street; they drive to obscure parts of town or even into the country to dump their rubbish. Another common place to dump rubbish is on the hard shoulder of the motor way. You can often see signs there which read, (one of those sentences which is great in Korean)
쓰레기를 몰래 버리는 것은 양심을 버리는 것이다
(throwing away rubbish secretly is like throwing away your conscience)
Increasing the fines for offenders might be one detterent. The authorities could target hotspots. I personally feel that the removal of litterbins is a stupid idea. There aren't enough of them as it is. Actually targeting the places where flytippers operate sounds like a better idea. I work in the countryside and there is a quiet back road which is full of bags of rubbish and broken desks etc. There isn't a litterbin anywhere near there. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
seoulsucker

Joined: 05 Mar 2006 Location: The Land of the Hesitant Cutoff
|
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 5:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
| samd wrote: |
So it seems like the problem is garbage removal. In a city as dense as Seoul, you need an efficient system for getting the waste off the streets, which doesn't exist here, trash cans or no. Where's Tony Soprano when you need him? |
A big part of this problem is the general layout and infrastructure of the city. Ever seen a garbage truck try and squeek through an alley full of hastily parked cars? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
billybrobby

Joined: 09 Dec 2004
|
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 11:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| BuHaoChi wrote: |
It�s actually a fairly simple policy issue. If there were trashcans on the street, no one would buy the special bags. People could walk out to the nearest can and put their trash in there for free.
No special bags = no lucrative source of government revenue (assuming they do generate revenue). |
thank you. that's all i'm saying. why did it take me 10 paragraphs to explain that? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|