|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
jinju
Joined: 22 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 4:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| cosmo wrote: |
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/enemywithin/reality/al-banna.html
THE MAN TURNED AWAY
Charlotte Buchen is a student at the UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism.
To his family in Jordan, Raed Mansour al-Banna was a beloved son who wanted to make it in America. To his American friends, he was a sweet guy with a charming smile who loved to party. To the families of the 166 people he killed in Hilla, Iraq, he was a murderer.
On June 14, 2003, a U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officer at Chicago's O'Hare International Airport was interviewing dozens of passengers off KLM flight 611 from Amsterdam whom had been selected for additional questioning based on pre-flight intelligence.
One of her interviewees was a young lawyer from Jordan named Raed Mansour al-Banna, who claimed to be visiting an uncle in nearby Oak Lawn. Al-Banna, says the CBP officer, was calm and polite. His documents were in order. They showed that he had lived in Los Angeles for about 18 months, starting in 2001. He was on a legitimate B1/B2 tourist visa to take English classes.
Al-Banna had received an extension to his visa and had traveled back and forth between the United States and Jordan several times. But after failing to explain to the officer how he had supported himself during his lengthy stay in America, al-Banna finally admitted that he'd held numerous petty jobs while in Los Angeles.
"Of course, that's not allowed," the officer said, referring to his working without a green card. The visa violation was grounds for removal, so she took a mug shot, fingerprinted al-Banna and deported him on the next KLM flight.
A year and a half later, in February 2005 a suicide bomber drove a car full of explosives into a crowded bazaar outside a health clinic in Hilla, Iraq, killing 166 people and wounding 146. It remains the deadliest suicide-attack in the country since the U.S. invasion, according to the latest statistics from the Department of Defense press office in Baghdad.
Inside the charred vehicle, an Iraqi fireman found the driver's hand chained to the steering wheel. According to former CBP Commissioner Robert Bonner, the fingerprints taken from the hand matched al-Banna's. |
And there tou have it. The leftists will ofcourse claim that he became a terrorist because the US took away his visa. Sane people will realize he was a terrorist all along. Enough to tar all muslims? No. Another piece in a rapidly growing puzzle that proves that profiling based on being a muslim is correct and prudent? YOU BET. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alyallen

Joined: 29 Mar 2004 Location: The 4th Greatest Place on Earth = Jeonju!!!
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 4:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
| jinju wrote: |
| cosmo wrote: |
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/enemywithin/reality/al-banna.html
THE MAN TURNED AWAY
Charlotte Buchen is a student at the UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism.
To his family in Jordan, Raed Mansour al-Banna was a beloved son who wanted to make it in America. To his American friends, he was a sweet guy with a charming smile who loved to party. To the families of the 166 people he killed in Hilla, Iraq, he was a murderer.
On June 14, 2003, a U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officer at Chicago's O'Hare International Airport was interviewing dozens of passengers off KLM flight 611 from Amsterdam whom had been selected for additional questioning based on pre-flight intelligence.
One of her interviewees was a young lawyer from Jordan named Raed Mansour al-Banna, who claimed to be visiting an uncle in nearby Oak Lawn. Al-Banna, says the CBP officer, was calm and polite. His documents were in order. They showed that he had lived in Los Angeles for about 18 months, starting in 2001. He was on a legitimate B1/B2 tourist visa to take English classes.
Al-Banna had received an extension to his visa and had traveled back and forth between the United States and Jordan several times. But after failing to explain to the officer how he had supported himself during his lengthy stay in America, al-Banna finally admitted that he'd held numerous petty jobs while in Los Angeles.
"Of course, that's not allowed," the officer said, referring to his working without a green card. The visa violation was grounds for removal, so she took a mug shot, fingerprinted al-Banna and deported him on the next KLM flight.
A year and a half later, in February 2005 a suicide bomber drove a car full of explosives into a crowded bazaar outside a health clinic in Hilla, Iraq, killing 166 people and wounding 146. It remains the deadliest suicide-attack in the country since the U.S. invasion, according to the latest statistics from the Department of Defense press office in Baghdad.
Inside the charred vehicle, an Iraqi fireman found the driver's hand chained to the steering wheel. According to former CBP Commissioner Robert Bonner, the fingerprints taken from the hand matched al-Banna's. |
And there tou have it. The leftists will ofcourse claim that he became a terrorist because the US took away his visa. Sane people will realize he was a terrorist all along. Enough to tar all muslims? No. Another piece in a rapidly growing puzzle that proves that profiling based on being a muslim is correct and prudent? YOU BET. |
He got deported for a legitimate reason.
What does that have to do with the original story? Please tell me what the man in the first story did to receive such treatment time and time again?
| Quote: |
Roses are red
Violets are blue
Its unfair to suspect muslims of terrorism
even if nearly all terrorists are muslims. |
That is quite delightful but I'm still waiting to hear that all Muslims are terrorists so they should all be treated as much. And on top of that, I'm still waiting for the significant number necessary that warrants this type of profiling. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cosmo

Joined: 09 Nov 2006
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 4:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/newsroom/commissioner/speeches_statements/archives/2005/bonner_asta.xml
Remarks by Commissioner Robert C. Bonner
American Society of Travel Agents Montreal, Canada
(11/07/2005)I�m delighted to be here at ASTA�s World Travel Congress.
The Al-Banna Story
Let me begin by telling you a story about a traveler named Ra�ed Mansour al-Banna.
Al-Banna was a passenger who was denied entry by U. S. Customs and Border Protection Officers at O�Hare Airport in July 2003, after arriving on a flight from Amsterdam�s Schipol Airport. He was a 30-year-old Jordanian national, who had a genuine Jordanian passport and a genuine and valid B1/B2 visa. He was not on anyone�s terrorist watch list.
He was interviewed by Customs and Border Protection�CBP�because he presented multiple terrorist risk factors, and after questioning by CBP Officers in secondary, we did not believe his stated purpose for entry. And for this passenger, we denied entry and detained him until the next flight back to the Netherlands the following day.
As is our protocol, al-Banna�s fingerprints and photo were taken, and the next day, he was escorted by armed CBP Officers onto the airplane.
This past year, CBP has denied entry into the U.S. of 493 such arriving passengers.
Often we don�t know for sure whether such an individual is actually a terrorist, but we now know that al-Banna was not only a terrorist, he was a suicidal jihadi terrorist seeking martyrdom.
After U.S. Customs and Border Protection denied him entry into the United States, he entered Iraq and joined the ranks of al Qaeda�s man in Iraq, al Zarqawi. Earlier this year, al-Banna drove a vehicle loaded with explosives into a Shi�ite City, about 60 miles from Baghdad, where he blew himself up, and murdered 132 innocent Iraqis. In terms of loss of life, that was the largest single terrorist attack perpetrated in Iraq since the fall of Saddam Hussein.
The identity of al-Banna may have gone unnoticed, except we have his hand. That�s all that�s left of him. He had one of his hands chained to the steering wheel of the vehicle. Evidently, even jihadi terrorists need to make sure they don�t change their minds.
What the Al-Banna Story Illustrates
This story illustrates what we are doing to keep terrorists out of the United States. But it also illustrates how, in the post 9/11 era�in this age of global terrorism�we are securing America�s borders without choking off the flow of legitimate international travel, so important to our economy
Last edited by cosmo on Tue May 15, 2007 4:34 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jinju
Joined: 22 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 4:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Big Bird,
you know we arent allowed to have socks on this board |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 5:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
| BJWD wrote: |
| Quote: |
| The way this has been handled shows the U.S. has not really got its act together when it comes to dealing with real terrorists. |
I'm not going to be PC. While not all muslims are terrorists, virtually all terrorists are muslim. Being muslim is part of his profile. |
The guy is an American first? No? There are lots of dangerous white supremacist terrorist groups in the USA but they don't treat every white guy like a potential member of such. Want to stop every brown skinned foreigner trying to get into the USA? No problem. Don't like the policy, give America a pass. But I think you have to assume anyone American born is American first. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mack4289

Joined: 06 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 6:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Muslims tend to have Muslim names, true. But will terrorists tend to have Muslim names if they know such names will attract attention? Probably not.
The only factor that is not easily changeable for a terrorist crossing a checkpoint is strange behavior. It has to be hard to know you're getting ready to kill a lot of people and yourself and act completely normal. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thepeel
Joined: 08 Aug 2004
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 6:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think the ultimate question for you all is this:
Are non-mulims at the same risk of committing acts of islamic terrorism as muslims?
If the answer is yes, then we treat everybody like a potential islamic nutzo. If the answer is no, then we treat young muslim men as being more likely to be an islamic nutzo.
They ought to be asked a few more questions at an airport. Ultimately, no matter how much litigation c.a.i.r. and identity warriors throw at border police and the TSA, individual agents will exercise informed judgment. We can't really hope for much more. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alyallen

Joined: 29 Mar 2004 Location: The 4th Greatest Place on Earth = Jeonju!!!
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 6:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| BJWD wrote: |
I think the ultimate question for you all is this:
Are non-mulims at the same risk of committing acts of islamic terrorism as muslims?
If the answer is yes, then we treat everybody like a potential islamic nutzo. If the answer is no, then we treat young muslim men as being more likely to be an islamic nutzo.
They ought to be asked a few more questions at an airport. Ultimately, no matter how much litigation c.a.i.r. and identity warriors throw at border police and the TSA, individual agents will exercise informed judgment. We can't really hope for much more. |
Are Muslims who have changed their name at the same risk of committing acts of Islamic terror as Muslims who haven't?
My problem is not with them asking questions. My problem is with the rationale of asking the same questions 5 times in a row when there seems to be no law enforcement related purpose to it. If he did something wrong it's one thing but what did he do wrong besides change his name?
I just think it's sad that if this guy was a risk and hadn't change his name, that he wouldn't have been so scrutinized and would have simply slipped under the radar. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mack4289

Joined: 06 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 6:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
You can only judge whether or not someone is Islamic through appearance or name. If we start targeting people based strictly on those factors, the terrorists will stop sending guys who fit that profile. I bet terrorists love reading about us doing name and appearance based profiling because it's so easy to avoid fitting that profile.
Oh, and our border control is showing some prowess in keeping out the really dangerous people: guys who took LSD 30 years ago.
http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/05/14/news/legal.php
"Andrew Feldmar, a Vancouver psychotherapist, was on his way to pick up a friend at the Seattle airport last summer when he ran into a little trouble at the border.
A guard typed Feldmar's name into an Internet search engine, which revealed that he had written about using LSD in the 1960s in an interdisciplinary journal. Feldmar was turned back and is no longer welcome in the United States, where he has been active professionally and where both of his children live."
I'm impressed by that kind of thoroughness, even if it is for a stupid reason. Now if only the CIA would tell the FBI when they know there are terrorists in the US (http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20050609-114826-5115r.htm). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ddeubel

Joined: 20 Jul 2005
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 7:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
BJWD wrote,
| Quote: |
I think the ultimate question for you all is this:
Are non-mulims at the same risk of committing acts of islamic terrorism as muslims? |
Please reread this and tell me it does not reflect the sad logic you show on this issue...... I can think of the perfect word - CONVOLUTED .
If a woodchuck could chuck wood, would a non-islamic woodchuck chuck Islamic wood?
DD |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thepeel
Joined: 08 Aug 2004
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 7:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
No, it makes perfect sense.
If you want to stop muslim terrorism, you might want to take an extra peek at the muslims.
Unless you think we should raid mosques looking for white supremacist groups... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alyallen

Joined: 29 Mar 2004 Location: The 4th Greatest Place on Earth = Jeonju!!!
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 8:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| BJWD wrote: |
No, it makes perfect sense.
If you want to stop muslim terrorism, you might want to take an extra peek at the suspicious muslims. |
Yes....on that we can agree....
Personal rant...feel free to ignore
Let's face it...if Muslims were mostly white, we wouldn't have this discussion. The minute you (a general you and I'm going to assume you are white) were inconvenienced, then this would be sooo wrong. Yes, a horrid assumption on my part but it's not like I'm the only one doing the assuming around here. My problem with having discussions like this, I feel as if I have to defend the minority because I certainly would be offended and pissed off if I was put in the same position. No, I'm not saying that non-minorities don't get it, but damn it I can see the slippery slope on this issue and I can imagine myself being buried by it.
And that concludes my mini rant. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thepeel
Joined: 08 Aug 2004
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 8:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, that depends on how you are going to define white. Those that tend to blow stuff up come from Arabia and Pakistan. People in Pakistan can be Caucasian, and Arabs look like Frenchmen, Spaniards and Italians. In fact, my ethnically Italian better-half is often mistaken for an Arab (she is "white Hispanic") by Arabs.
My Dutch-moroccan classmate is a spitting image of my brother who is as white as me.
Race isn't the issue.
The issue is an idea that very clearly, repeatedly and calmly instructs those who believe in it to kill those who don't. The end.
You're black, right? I understand (or try to) that you are sensitive to the idea of profiling as a police tool for a wide variety of legitimate cultural/historical reasons. This is one case in which we must use it.
If white supremacist Christians from Europe were blowing up hip hop bars in Atlanta, would you want border patrol to spend time treating a black dude from Kenya as possible a suspect for the next attack as Hans from Hamburg? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alyallen

Joined: 29 Mar 2004 Location: The 4th Greatest Place on Earth = Jeonju!!!
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 8:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
| BJWD wrote: |
Well, that depends on how you are going to define white. Those that tend to blow stuff up come from Arabia and Pakistan. People in Pakistan can be Caucasian, and Arabs look like Frenchmen, Spaniards and Italians. In fact, my ethnically Italian better-half is often mistaken for an Arab (she is "white Hispanic") by Arabs.
My Dutch-moroccan classmate is a spitting image of my brother who is as white as me.
Race isn't the issue.
The issue is an idea that very clearly, repeatedly and calmly instructs those who believe in it to kill those who don't. The end.
You're black, right? I understand (or try to) that you are sensitive to the idea of profiling as a police tool for a wide variety of legitimate cultural/historical reasons. This is one case in which we must use it.
If white supremacist Christians from Europe were blowing up hip hop bars in Atlanta, would you want border patrol to spend time treating a black dude from Kenya as possible a suspect for the next attack as Hans from Hamburg? |
As I said, personal rant. Quite aware of the quite ridiculous vagueness of racial terms but it's still true. white supremacist Christians would be white....there is no confusion there. Muslims would be ? what exactly? And that is my point, your Dutch Moroccan buddy who looks white wouldn't get the same degree of scrutiny as someone who looks "Muslim" and let's face it, ignorance is not limited to the general public. It taints those in power too and that's why I believe there needs to be a clear and logical policy in place to determine terrorist threats...
Treating people fairly and equally is supposed to be the American way....why is it so unreasonable to expect that type of treatment? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thepeel
Joined: 08 Aug 2004
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 8:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm not saying muslims should be excluded from the labour force, or lose the right to vote.
My position is that being a young muslim man is part of the profile of a terrorist. It isn't the only part, but it is an important part.
Taken to the real world.. If a muslim man from saudi signs up for flight school in Arizona and pays in cash, should the FBI give him a good once-over? I would say yes. A big YES, in fact. That is 4 flags right there. This is not unreasonable.
A 60 year old woman named ali isn't likely to fly a plane into a building. She can be treated normally by the border police. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|