|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Octavius Hite

Joined: 28 Jan 2004 Location: Househunting, looking for a new bunker from which to convert the world to homosexuality.
|
Posted: Sun May 27, 2007 3:51 pm Post subject: Crying Over Spilled Semen |
|
|
See us gay guys knew this all along.
http://psychologytoday.com/articles/pto-20021002-000009.html
Quote: |
The finding that women who do not use condoms during sex are less depressed and less likely to attempt suicide than are women who have sex with condoms and women who are not sexually active, leads one researcher to conclude that semen contains powerful-and potentially addictive-mood-altering chemicals.
Study author Gordon G. Gallup, Ph.D., a psychologist at the State University of New York in Albany, also found that women who routinely had intercourse without condoms became increasingly depressed as more time elapsed since their last sexual encounter. There was no such correlation for women whose partners regularly used condoms.
Gallup's survey of 293 college women also found that those who did not use condoms were most likely to initiate sex and to seek out new partners as soon as a relationship ended. "These women are more vulnerable to the rebound effect, which suggests that there is a chemical dependency," says Gallup.
Semen contains hormones including testosterone, estrogen, prolactin, luteinizing hormone and prostaglandins, and some of these are absorbed through the walls of the vagina and are known to elevate mood.
Gallup controlled for variables including method of contraception, frequency of sexual intercourse, as well as the women's perception of their relationship. He concedes that women who regularly have sex without condoms might share personality traits that make them less susceptible to depression. But the behavior most often associated with non-condom users is sexual risk-taking, and studies have found no correlation between high-risk sexual behavior and lower rates of depression.
Gallup's study, which he deems "the first serious attempt to investigate the effect of semen chemistry on women," titillated the public and rankled some academics upon publication in Archives of Sexual Behavior. Gallup says he has since replicated the findings with a sample of 700 women and will examine whether "semen withdrawal" places women at an increased risk for depression when they are premenstrual, menopausal or have just given birth, as many women abstain from sex during these periods.
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Sun May 27, 2007 4:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
But the behavior most often associated with non-condom users is sexual risk-taking, and studies have found no correlation between high-risk sexual behavior and lower rates of depression. |
It seems to me the opposite is true, at least of bipolar people. They tend to engage in very high risk sexual activities.
An alternate explanation is what happens after ejaculation. When you're wearing a condom, you kind of get up, remove it, throw it in the garbage. When you're not wearing a condom, there's no break, more cuddling, more continuation of intimacy, etc. So women who have condom free sex tend to get more emotional comfort. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
excitinghead

Joined: 18 Jul 2005
|
Posted: Sun May 27, 2007 7:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I read in the British magazine New Scientist last year that another benefit of sex without a condom was that for couples that wanted to conceive a child later it basically allowed the woman's body to get used to the man's sperm. This meant that there'd be less chance of a miscarraige when they were trying to conceive, because the woman's body would be less likely to reject the "foreign" object.
I think couples needed to be together and having sex for about 6 months before the woman's miscarraige potential started dropping.
I remember the article finished off by pointing out that every doctor knows that the best way to receive vaccinations etc. was orally!
Sure, it is great news for guys, but I'm not making this up! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Sun May 27, 2007 9:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
excitinghead wrote: |
I read in the British magazine New Scientist last year that another benefit of sex without a condom was that for couples that wanted to conceive a child later it basically allowed the woman's body to get used to the man's sperm. This meant that there'd be less chance of a miscarraige when they were trying to conceive, because the woman's body would be less likely to reject the "foreign" object.
I think couples needed to be together and having sex for about 6 months before the woman's miscarraige potential started dropping.
I remember the article finished off by pointing out that every doctor knows that the best way to receive vaccinations etc. was orally!
Sure, it is great news for guys, but I'm not making this up! |
There was a recent finding as well that the rhythm method actually leads to more natural abortions. About half of all pregnancies the body terminates in the first month (god kills a lot of babies). Most women never even know they're pregnant, just think it's their period a touch late. When using the rhythm method, when conception occurs on the margins of fertility, these result in a higher number of such early miscarriages. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cangel

Joined: 19 Jun 2003 Location: Jeonju, S. Korea
|
Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 6:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
When I was in uni, I read a disseration that concluded men with longer johnsons had lower IQs. This data was based on a sample of 20,000 men. Draw your won conclusions. One might say that longer johnsons give men more confidence and a more active social life and thus takes them away from the books or who knows what. Twas an interesting read though. Oh, the study was done in both the USA and Canada using college men between 18 and 26 years of age. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
some waygug-in
Joined: 25 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 9:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Could be that the men with longer Johnsons are just too "busy" to study.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|