View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
crazy_arcade
Joined: 05 Nov 2006
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 5:00 pm Post subject: Grammer--That and Which |
|
|
Just want to double check on this rule.
That
"I like music that is loud."
--I only like loud music. I don't like music that isn't loud.
Which
"I like music, which is fun."
--I think all music is fun.
So "that" will denote some information that is of more importance, right? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
yawarakaijin
Joined: 08 Aug 2006
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 6:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bascially what we are talking about is which adjective clause marker is correct.
I have a dog that likes to play
This is an example of an adjective clause. That likes to play is only describing this one particular dog. It's therefore called a RESTRICTED ADJECTIVE CLAUSE. THAT is the correct choice of adjective clause markers for restricted adjective clauses.
Families, which are the basic unit of society, are spending more time separated.
Here the adjective clause is non-restricted as it is not describing any one family in particular. For a non-restricted clause WHICH is the correct marker to use.
For restricted adjective clauses the use of that is generally accepted in every situation.
I have a dog that likes people
People that hit dogs are bad
Joe is a man that likes dogs
NOTE: For People and Joe, you could use WHO but THAT is also commonly used
To create a non-strictive clause you should never use THAT because merely by using THAT you restrict the clause.
Elephants that live in Africa are dangerous. = African elephants are dangerous and only African elephants are dangerous.
Elephants, which live in Africa, are dangerous. = Elephants (some of which are found in Africa) are dangerous. All elephants are dangerous.
I don't have the actual meta-language but I find another difference in how we percieve the use of which and that.
I have a boss that is crazy.
That is crazy is only describing your boss.
I have a boss, which is crazy, because I usually work alone.
Which is crazy describes the entire situation of having a boss, not merely the boss himself. The boss is NOT CRAZY just because YOU are use to working alone.
Complex sentences:
I have a boss that is crazy because I put drugs in his coffee when he is not looking.
In a comlex sentence if you were to remove the restricted adjective clause the entire sentence would fail to make sense or lose it's intended meaning.
example: I have a boss because I put drugs in his coffee when he is not looking.
In a complex sentence the non-restrictive clause can be removed without affecting comprehension.
Australian dingos, which are known to eat small children, are often feared by the local populace.
Australian dingos are often feared by the local populace.
So basically just ask your students is the adjective clause necessary to understand the gist of the sentence. If it is..use THAT.
If its "bonus" information they should use WHICH.
Last edited by yawarakaijin on Mon Jun 18, 2007 6:54 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Wangja

Joined: 17 May 2004 Location: Seoul, Yongsan
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 6:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Isn't "which" normally preceded by a comma? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
icnelly
Joined: 25 Jan 2006 Location: Bucheon
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 7:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wangja wrote: |
Isn't "which" normally preceded by a comma? |
Yeah, the prescriptive rule is to use a comma before which. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
indytrucks

Joined: 09 Apr 2003 Location: The Shelf
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 7:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
G-R-A-M-M-A-R
For Christ's sake. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
crazy_arcade
Joined: 05 Nov 2006
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 7:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
indytrucks wrote: |
G-R-A-M-M-A-R
For Christ's sake. |
Sorry. These things happen when you're short on time. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
littlelisa
Joined: 12 Jun 2007 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 11:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
At first I thought the misspelling in the title was a joke.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The Cosmic Hum

Joined: 09 May 2003 Location: Sonic Space
|
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 1:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
hmm...for what it is worth...it is not a prescriptive rule to use a comma with which... which can be used in both restrictive and non restrictive clauses...which is deemed more formal than that...that is far more common...and as mentioned above...more often used in restrictive clauses.
It is the comma that indicates restrictiveness.
I like music which is loud. - restrictive - (I only like loud music)
I like music, which is loud. (..all music is loud)
For some writers...that is too common...and prefer which...even in restictive clauses.
As for me...it's all good.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Freaka

Joined: 05 Jun 2007
|
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 4:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yawarakaijin, thanks for the mini grammar lesson! Appreciate it!  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
robot

Joined: 07 Mar 2006
|
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 4:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
put simply:
1. use "which" before a comma
2. use "that" any other time
3. use nothing if possible -- "that" is a boring bridge word can be eliminated 90% of the time. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
yawarakaijin
Joined: 08 Aug 2006
|
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 4:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Can you tell I have a lot of free time on my hands?  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
insam
Joined: 17 May 2007
|
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 4:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yawarakaijin wrote: |
NOTE: For People and Joe, you could use WHO but THAT is also commonly used. |
It is true that 'that' is commonly used in practice to refer to a person, but according to most standardized tests 'who' is the correct usage. Make sure students understand that using 'that' in this context can lead to lower scores. The use of 'their' to refer to a singular antecedent is also common in practice, but it is not correct usage by rule. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|