Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The Hezbollah Homophobic Dichotomy Thread
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
cbclark4



Joined: 20 Aug 2006
Location: Masan

PostPosted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 5:57 pm    Post subject: The Hezbollah Homophobic Dichotomy Thread Reply with quote

This thread is to discuss those who support Hezbollah
(Iranian backed terror organization that promotes the ideals of the Sharia)
while condemning homophobia.

I am looking for some serious heartfelt responses.


Sharia Law:

"Homosexuality, moreover, is considered a grave sin. In Hadith, Muhammad clarifies the gravity of this by saying: "Allah curses the one who does the actions (homosexual practices) of the people of Lut," repeating it three times; saying in another Hadith: "If a man comes upon a man then they are both adulterers." Here, he considered homosexuality tantamount to adultery in relation to the Shari�ah punishments because it is an abomination on the one hand, and the definition of adultery applies to it on the other hand.....As for lesbians, Muhammad said about them: "If a woman comes upon a woman, they are both adulteresses." The homosexual receives the same punishment as an adulterer. This means, that if the homosexual is married, he/she is stoned to death, while if single, he/she is whipped 100 times.

International controversy came about when two gay teenagers were publicly executed (following lashings in prison) in Iran, 19 July 2005, for homosexual relations. The youths were hanged in Edalat Square in the city of Mashhad, in north east Iran. The youths were believed to have been 16 years old at the time they had had relations. Under the Iranian penal code, girls as young as nine and boys as young as 15 can be hanged. Three other boys have gone into hiding due to the incident. Gay men have been publicly executed in Saudi Arabia, where beheading is the primary method, and in Taliban Afghanistan, where men were crushed with large boulders. It's debated how many gay men have been executed in Saudi Arabia, with some estimates placing the number of executions in the thousands in the last 15 years, while other estimates are much smaller. Critics have noted that, in countries where it is punishable by death to be homosexual, men are accused of homosexuality for political reasons. This accusation has been made regarding Nigeria. It has also been suggested that there is dissonance between the capital illegality of homosexuality in many Muslim nations and the frequency of homosexual sex and desire for it, and that arrests and executions are done primarily for political reasons. The Iranian teens argued that they didn't deserve to die because, being culturally denied interactions with women, homosexual sex was common among the boys they know and they didn't know it was illegal.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharia#Illegal_sexual_relations
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
On the other hand



Joined: 19 Apr 2003
Location: I walk along the avenue

PostPosted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 6:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I guess you could also ask conservatives of a certain age if they supported the Afghan resistance against the USSR. Because we all know how enlightened those guys turned out to be.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Big_Bird



Joined: 31 Jan 2003
Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...

PostPosted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 7:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It seems, from the question you posed on another thread, that this nonsense was aimed (at least partly) at me.

What do you mean by 'those who support Hezbollah?' There is nobody who regularly posts on this forum (at least that I have seen) who is what I would call a supporter of Hezbollah.

There are a few posters, DD and Adventurer (off the top of my head), who are able to hear the name Hezbollah without frothing at the mouth and having apoleptic fits. This does not make us 'Hezbollah lovers' as jinju would call us. It simply means that we are able to examine the reasons for Hezbollah's existence, and understand their motives. It means we are able to see Hezbollah as a group of human beings, with the same kind of desires, goals and motivations that human beings have shared for millenia. Just because we try to understand their position, does not mean we buy into everything that Hezbollah supposedly stands for.

I imagine that DD and Adventurer, like me, wish that Hezbollah did not espouse the chauvenistic version of Islam they have chosen. However, this does not mean I do not understand the reasons this group came into being, and why Hezbollah was so effective when other resistence groups were not. Nor does it mean I have no sympathy for the experiences and conditions the Shiite Lebanese have suffered, and which ultimately gave rise to this group.

I think you need to do some homework, cbc, and stop being so silly, naive and mindlessly simplistic.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 10:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Big_Bird wrote:


What do you mean by 'those who support Hezbollah?' There is nobody who regularly posts on this forum (at least that I have seen) who is what I would call a supporter of Hezbollah.

There are a few posters, DD and Adventurer (off the top of my head), who are able to hear the name Hezbollah without frothing at the mouth and having apoleptic fits. This does not make us 'Hezbollah lovers' as jinju would call us. It simply means that we are able to examine the reasons for Hezbollah's existence, and understand their motives. It means we are able to see Hezbollah as a group of human beings, with the same kind of desires, goals and motivations that human beings have shared for millenia. Just because we try to understand their position, does not mean we buy into everything that Hezbollah supposedly stands for.

I imagine that DD and Adventurer, like me, wish that Hezbollah did not espouse the chauvenistic version of Islam they have chosen. However, this does not mean I do not understand the reasons this group came into being, and why Hezbollah was so effective when other resistence groups were not. Nor does it mean I have no sympathy for the experiences and conditions the Shiite Lebanese have suffered, and which ultimately gave rise to this group.


BB is right. There is a difference between being a 'Hezbollah lover' or 'someone who supports Hezbollah' and being merely a 'Hezbollah-sympathizer.'
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 10:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

On the other hand wrote:
I guess you could also ask conservatives of a certain age if they supported the Afghan resistance against the USSR. Because we all know how enlightened those guys turned out to be.


I thought 'the enemy of my enemy is my friend' philosophy is a clearly right-wing trait? I thought that's how it was classified by the political compass site that was used in that thread?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
On the other hand



Joined: 19 Apr 2003
Location: I walk along the avenue

PostPosted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 10:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kuros wrote:
On the other hand wrote:
I guess you could also ask conservatives of a certain age if they supported the Afghan resistance against the USSR. Because we all know how enlightened those guys turned out to be.


I thought 'the enemy of my enemy is my friend' philosophy is a clearly right-wing trait? I thought that's how it was classified by the political compass site that was used in that thread?


If the political compass said that, then I wouldn't put a lot of stock in that polticial compass.

"The enemy of my enemy is my friend" might fall into what I would call realpolitik, which I suppose has more currency on the right than the left. But even then, it would only be certain types of right-wingers who subscribe to that worldview.

Anyway, thanks for confirming that I made the right choice by not participating in those "rate yourself politically" threads.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cbclark4



Joined: 20 Aug 2006
Location: Masan

PostPosted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 5:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Big_Bird wrote:
It seems, from the question you posed on another thread, that this nonsense was aimed (at least partly) at me....

....It simply means that we are able to examine the reasons for Hezbollah's existence, and understand their motives. It means we are able to see Hezbollah as a group of human beings, with the same kind of desires, goals and motivations that human beings have shared for millenia. Just because we try to understand their position, does not mean we buy into everything that Hezbollah supposedly stands for.

I imagine that DD and Adventurer, like me, wish that Hezbollah did not espouse the chauvenistic version of Islam they have chosen. However, this does not mean I do not understand the reasons this group came into being, and why Hezbollah was so effective when other resistence groups were not. Nor does it mean I have no sympathy for the experiences and conditions the Shiite Lebanese have suffered, and which ultimately gave rise to this group.

I think you need to do some homework, cbc, and stop being so silly, naive and mindlessly simplistic.


Let me first simply thank you for clarifying your position.

Seems you have an ability to see justification in the existence of organizations which promote abhorrent behavior such as Hezbollah's sharia law including the oppression of women and execution of homosexuals.

Would you have also had the same understanding for let's say Hitler's Nazis, after all they did make the trains run on time. They had been oppressed by the punitive nature of the Treaty of Versailles.

After all "Mein Kampf" does translate almost directly as "My Jihad" and Hitler hated the Jews almost as much as Hezbollah does.

Certainly I would not expect you to hold sympathy for the Nazi ideals,
but to be able to examine the reasons for the Nazi's existence, and understand their motives or understand the reasons this group came into being. Would you have no sympathy for the experiences and conditions the Germans had suffered, and which ultimately gave rise to this group.

Today Hezbollah calls for this same Genocide, this same Nazi ideal, this same Jihadist concept, it's in their language and their literature, taught in the Mosque and in the schools, and broadcast on their TVs.

Please don't take any of my response as support for Israel's behavior in all of this. I don't think that the Genocide perpetrated against them by Hitler's Jihad is enough of an oppression to Justify the actions against the Palestinians or aggression against their neighbors. I think the policies of Zionism are racist.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Mosley



Joined: 15 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 7:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

BB is clearly an apologist for Islamofascism.

OTOH: You have a definite MO, don't you? Always ignore the nitty-gritty of the topic(in which case you would have to expose your support-or not- of the type of vile hatred put forth by "freedom fighters" like Hezbollah). Instead, bring up something out of left-field(pardon the pun) and try to point the finger at the "right".

I can tell you that as a LIBERTARIAN of "a certain age" I certainly did support the support of Afghans fighting the Soviets. If the Taliban hadn't emerged as the "victors" of post-Soviet puppet regime Afghanistan, there might not have been a training ground for Al-Qaeda and therefore, no need for Western intervention.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Saxiif



Joined: 15 May 2003
Location: Seongnam

PostPosted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 8:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I can tell you that as a LIBERTARIAN of "a certain age" I certainly did support the support of Afghans fighting the Soviets.

And they differed from Hezbollah how?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
Mosley



Joined: 15 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 8:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There were many factions fighting the Soviets(and fighting the Soviets was a good thing-self-evident to me) and after the Soviet withdrawl they took to fighting each other. Unfortunately, Taliban emerged as the strongest group. There is little difference between Taliban and Hezbollah in terms of vile hatred.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Saxiif



Joined: 15 May 2003
Location: Seongnam

PostPosted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 8:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mosley wrote:
There were many factions fighting the Soviets(and fighting the Soviets was a good thing-self-evident to me) and after the Soviet withdrawl they took to fighting each other. Unfortunately, Taliban emerged as the strongest group. There is little difference between Taliban and Hezbollah in terms of vile hatred.

Not just the Taliban either, most of the anti-Soviet Afghanis were like that the Taliban was just a bit more crazy and a bit less corrupt. You get into all kinds of fun places with the-enemy-of-my-enemy-is-my-friend kind of thinking.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
Mosley



Joined: 15 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 2:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Saxiif: I can't really quibble w/your basic assertion-the details maybe-but not your basic point.

Call me an old "Cold Warrior" if you like but Western support(such as it was) for the Afghans fighting the Soviets was justified. Hindsight is always 20/20.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Saxiif



Joined: 15 May 2003
Location: Seongnam

PostPosted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 6:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mosley wrote:
Saxiif: I can't really quibble w/your basic assertion-the details maybe-but not your basic point.

Call me an old "Cold Warrior" if you like but Western support(such as it was) for the Afghans fighting the Soviets was justified. Hindsight is always 20/20.


In theory maybe, but the exact way it was done (funnelled through an Islamist-dominated Pakistani intelligence service with no strings attached) and then virtually all aid being yanked after the Soviet withdrawl was criminally stupid and did more harm than good.

Also its a bit silly to rant about people who don't denounce the evil of Hezbollah when supporting past giving of aid to similar groups.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
Mosley



Joined: 15 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 3:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nothing "silly" about it at all. The Soviet Union was the chief enemy of the West c.1979 and it was right to oppose them. The Western Allies had to accept the Soviet Union as an ally in 1941 in order to fight the Nazis. Unpleasant to accept a scumbag like Uncle Joe as an ally? You bet but after the German invasion of Russia it had to be done. The Soviets proved it was an alliance of convenience for them even before the German surrender.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Big_Bird



Joined: 31 Jan 2003
Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...

PostPosted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 8:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

cbclark4 wrote:
Big_Bird wrote:
It seems, from the question you posed on another thread, that this nonsense was aimed (at least partly) at me....

....It simply means that we are able to examine the reasons for Hezbollah's existence, and understand their motives. It means we are able to see Hezbollah as a group of human beings, with the same kind of desires, goals and motivations that human beings have shared for millenia. Just because we try to understand their position, does not mean we buy into everything that Hezbollah supposedly stands for.

I imagine that DD and Adventurer, like me, wish that Hezbollah did not espouse the chauvenistic version of Islam they have chosen. However, this does not mean I do not understand the reasons this group came into being, and why Hezbollah was so effective when other resistence groups were not. Nor does it mean I have no sympathy for the experiences and conditions the Shiite Lebanese have suffered, and which ultimately gave rise to this group.

I think you need to do some homework, cbc, and stop being so silly, naive and mindlessly simplistic.


Let me first simply thank you for clarifying your position.

Seems you have an ability to see justification in the existence of organizations which promote abhorrent behavior such as Hezbollah's sharia law including the oppression of women and execution of homosexuals.


Sigh. cbc, do you think I am happy about the rise of radical political Islam? It dismays me, probably more than it does you I suspect. It is rearing its head in places where decades of secular resistence has failed, and is being embraced by people quite moderate in their religious tastes, and even by Christians (with regard to both Hamas and Hizbollah) for reasons far more complicated than a person's penchant for Sharia Law. During the occupation of South Lebanon, there were various groups (usually secular) that worked to resist the occupiers. Hizbollah was the most successful (in part because its politcal doctrine enabled it to be the more ruthless) and eventually attracted the support of the general population. You, cbc, can sit in judgement moralising, but it means little to a person who has lived under brutal occupation.

cbc wrote:
Would you have also had the same understanding for let's say Hitler's Nazis, after all they did make the trains run on time. They had been oppressed by the punitive nature of the Treaty of Versailles.


This analogy is crap. If, in the 1930s, the Germans were living under brutal occupation, were regularly being militarily bombarded, were regularly imprisoned, beaten or raped by occupying forces, it might be more comparable. Hezbollah didn't rise up to 'make the trains run on time.' They rose up to free themselves and their families from a horrible occupation. A really horrible occupation. I have never read it, but Fisk's book 'Pity The Nation' has a very apt title.

cbc wrote:
After all "Mein Kampf" does translate almost directly as "My Jihad" and Hitler hated the Jews almost as much as Hezbollah does.


Again, you are ignoring context. Hitler and his deluded followers turned on a peaceful and defenseless minority, in one of the most sickening episodes of 'ethnic cleansing' in history. But why would the Lebanese have hated the Israelis? Just for fun? Tell me cbc, if your nation was invaded by say the Japanese, who then installed a proxy say Chinese army to occupy the corner of the world you lived in, how would you feel about the Japanese? Would you be full of love and benevolence when bombs rained down on your village, killing neighbours and friends you had known all your life? When Chinese or Japanese soldiers rounded up young men, including your 14 year old brother and incarcerated them for years and years in filthy prisons, would your heart burst with love for your occupiers. When your brother came out of prison 10 years later, broken and half-deranged, would you speak of your admiration for your occupiers? And if your beloved grandmother was disfigured by a cluster bomb? And if your cousin or sister was gang raped by the occupiers? If your father was beaten and humiliated in front of you by teenaged soldiers? Would your heart burst with love for your enemy? If you were a Lebanese Shiite, the chances are that almost certainly someone who knew or loved would have fallen foul of the kinds of things I just described. Is it any wonder there was such hatred? It may not be right, but that is the way it is. Tell me, that if you stood in their shoes, you wouldn't react so.

It is not right to hate, but it is natural. Despite never having lived under years of Arab occupation, and never having been beaten, tortured, imprisoned by organg raped by Arabs, or watched family members die horrible agonising deaths from Arab assaults, many Americans felt a great deal of hatred just from their experiences of watching (on the telly) 2 planes fly into the twin towers. Hate is a natural consequence of war and warlike methods.

For decades after WW2, many French felt great hatred towards their former German occupiers, though frankly, the average Frenchman (as long as he were not a jew of course) probably fared far better than your average Shiite. Remember the war in Lebanon lasted decades. Remember too, that the Israelis chose that war. In Israel it is often referred to as a 'war of choice.' The captive Shiite population had no choice.

Now, I would hope that this hate would slowly fade. The war of 2006 will not have helped in that respect, and old wounds will have been reopened. I understand why the population rallied around Hezbollah (and still do) .

Myself, I hoped that their influence would slowly die, as life became normalised in Lebanon, and that they became a part of the past. The 2006 war has spoiled any chance of that happening soon. The Israelis have, if anything, made Hezbollah extremely popular, even among Christians. That is not something that makes me rejoice. I do not like their chauvenistic interpretation of Islam, and I do not think they are the shining hope for the future. But I understand why they exist. And I understand why the population admires them. And, frankly, I do not see their behaviour as worse than that of the Israelis. If anything, they have often behaved slightly better.

cbc wrote:
Certainly I would not expect you to hold sympathy for the Nazi ideals, but to be able to examine the reasons for the Nazi's existence, and understand their motives or understand the reasons this group came into being. Would you have no sympathy for the experiences and conditions the Germans had suffered, and which ultimately gave rise to this group.


As I have pointed out already, this is comparing apples and pears. The Nazis were not involved in throwing of the yoke off a brutal and debilitating occupation. I appreciate that after WWI, the Germans suffered terribly. But by the time the Nazis took power, things were not so bad.

cbc wrote:
Today Hezbollah calls for this same Genocide, this same Nazi ideal, this same Jihadist concept, it's in their language and their literature, taught in the Mosque and in the schools, and broadcast on their TVs.


Haha cbc. Do you see the Lebanese wiping out the Israelis anytime soon? Laughable. They are no threat whatsoever. Also, I don't think they really spend all their days plotting to do anysuch thing. They are concerned primarily with domestic affairs. They may have been borne out of hate for Israel (not surprisingly, as I have already described) but they have evolved in their practical aims.

When I think of Hezbollah, I don't really think of wild-eyed radical mullahs and genocidal suicide warriors. I think of young men, often teenagers, joining an organisation they regard as the saviour of their population. In 2006, young (and often heroic) men fought hard and often to their deaths to defend their land, and their mothers and their fathers, and their brothers and their sisters, and sometimes their children. They fought to defend. They did not march into Israel and attack civillians in their villages. When they do that, I will heartily condemn them. But while it is still they who are primarily being attacked (or living under the real threat of devastating future attacks), I feel I am not in a position to moralise over what vehicle they use to fight for their lives and their freedom.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 1 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International