View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
jaderedux2

Joined: 09 Jul 2007 Location: lurking just lurking
|
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 5:29 pm Post subject: Grammar God's and Goddesses please help me! |
|
|
GRAMMAR GODS HELP!!!!
After studying all summer I still have no idea how to explain if this is right or wrong. Hence another stupid email about grammar.
I made a power point slide with two cars. One was an old junker and one a Mercedes Benz
I was illustrating the word most.
The Korean Teacher WHO SIMPLY DESPISE THE IDEA OF FOREIGN TEACHERS...Gasps in horror and says you can ONLY USE most if you are comparing 3 or more objects.
The question on the slide says...
Which is the most expensive car Number 1 (the old junker) or Number 2 (the Mercedes Benz)?
Answer: The Mercedes Benz is the most expensive car.
These are middle school students. The goal is to get them talking and speaking in sentences. Grammar like language is somewhat fluid (I think). Half of these kids are afraid to utter a sentence in fear of making a grammar mistake.
I tend to prefer a Cognitive Approach to teaching. Yes grammar must be taught but it can be taught deductively. (rules and then practice)
This grammar-translation approach makes for bored students and student afraid to open their mouth lest they make a grammar mistake.
So is the sentence I am teaching completely off the mark? Is the grammar so horrific that I should be shot or at least forced to listen to Kenny G music or Little River Band both equally painful?
Please help me oh grammar gods of Dave's!
Jade |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Alyallen

Joined: 29 Mar 2004 Location: The 4th Greatest Place on Earth = Jeonju!!!
|
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 5:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I suck at grammar but my gut is telling me
Which car is more expensive car: Number 1 (the old junker) or Number 2 (the Mercedes Benz)?
Answer: The Mercedes Benz is more expensive.
But once again...I suck at grammar.... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
faster

Joined: 03 Sep 2006
|
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 6:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry to say it, but your KT is right.
Which car is more expensive?
or
Which is the more expensive car?
(Which is the more expensive of the two cars?
Which of the two cars is more expensive?
Which of the two cars is the more expensive?) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
marlow
Joined: 06 Feb 2005
|
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 6:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Technically the Korean teacher is right. But, for argument's sake, in my mother's family my mother happens to be the oldest twin, and my aunt the youngest twin. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jeffkim1972
Joined: 10 Jan 2007 Location: Mokpo
|
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 6:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In general, i'm sorry to say the Koreans are right. The only case i can see your case being applicable is when.
What is the most expensive hotel in the world?
1) The Hotel Martinez
2) President Wilson Hotel
Answer: The Hotel Martinez is the most expensive hotel in the world.
When the answer also happens to simultaneously be the "extremal" or most, least, etc as well, out of the TWO choices. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jaderedux2

Joined: 09 Jul 2007 Location: lurking just lurking
|
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 7:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you all for good explanations. I seriously hate grammar and talked to a copy editor friend and he agrees with most of you. However, also said more and most are commonly used interchangeably but that the sentence should be more not most.
I bow to all those grammarians out there! Kudos and thanks!
Jade |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Privateer
Joined: 31 Aug 2005 Location: Easy Street.
|
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 7:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Most grammar books agree with your teacher and it's a simple way to present the difference between 'more xxx than' and 'most xxx' to hapless middle-schoolers so you might want to just go with it.
However, I recently read somewhere that the 'rule' is just another legacy from the grammar prescriptivists who brought us 'no ending a sentence with a preposition!' and 'don't split infinitives!' and the like; and in fact, in ordinary speech we observe no such distinction between groups of 2 and groups of 3 or more. It's simply that 'more' is relative to something else and 'most' indicates an extreme (to borrow the words of the poster above).
That's probably a lot more difficult to get across. Do you stand up for teaching authentic English and teach them how it really is or do you take the easy option and go along with the books?... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
yawarakaijin
Joined: 08 Aug 2006
|
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 7:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Damn. Grammatically owned by your non-native co-teacher.
Just playing.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
some waygug-in
Joined: 25 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 7:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I agree with privateer. This is another hold-over from prescriptive grammar books.
It is not wrong to say, "which car is the most expensive?"
People say this kind of thing all the time when referring to only 2 items.
I would explain to your student that this is a case where grammar books and common usage dis-agree.
People don't really talk according to the rules of grammar books. (although they may agree a lot of the time on some things)
In fact, I would say that ....
"Which car is the more expensive?" sounds wrong unless you complete it with "one" or "car".
Which car is the more expensive one?
Which car is the more expensive car?
Anyhoo, thatz mai tooo sents.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jeffkim1972
Joined: 10 Jan 2007 Location: Mokpo
|
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 7:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yawarakaijin wrote: |
Damn. Grammatically owned by your non-native co-teacher.
Just playing.  |
Some of these Korean English teachers know their stuff. More than us. Unless you've been doing some grammar reading, i wouldn't be surprised if they know the rules much better than us.
They just don't know how to speak or listen as good as us.
Just as if you spent 3 good years learning Korean, had a lesson with any random person off the street, you could stump them with Korean grammar or these simple rules of word usage. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jinju
Joined: 22 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 7:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
check your subject line |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
refikaM

Joined: 06 May 2006 Location: Gangwondo
|
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 7:59 pm Post subject: grammar question |
|
|
Yes, your Korean co-teacher is right. In response to Marlow's post... You use "oldest twin" in that case because you are referring to only that group.. So, since there are only 2 twins, then one is superlative to the other... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bacasper

Joined: 26 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 8:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here in Mexico, some of the Mexican teachers of English know their grammar very well. Heck, they even knwo some archaic rules I was not even aware of (oops, of which I was not even aware).
To answer the OP's question, the KT is correct. "More " is for comparing two items, "most" for three or more. If you are talking about two cars and ask which is the most expensive, it means one of those two is the most expensive IN THE WORLD (or in the country, or on this used car lot or whatever reference group you are talking about), i.e. more than three. To compare just the two, "Which is more expensive?" is correct. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
some waygug-in
Joined: 25 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 8:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nope.
There are only 2 cars in question, therefore in that specific group of 2 cars, one car is superlative to the other (in price).
So it is perfectly correct to say, "Which car is the most expensive?" |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
faster

Joined: 03 Sep 2006
|
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 8:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Privateer wrote: |
Most grammar books agree with your teacher and it's a simple way to present the difference between 'more xxx than' and 'most xxx' to hapless middle-schoolers so you might want to just go with it.
However, I recently read somewhere that the 'rule' is just another legacy from the grammar prescriptivists who brought us 'no ending a sentence with a preposition!' and 'don't split infinitives!' and the like; and in fact, in ordinary speech we observe no such distinction between groups of 2 and groups of 3 or more. It's simply that 'more' is relative to something else and 'most' indicates an extreme (to borrow the words of the poster above).
That's probably a lot more difficult to get across. Do you stand up for teaching authentic English and teach them how it really is or do you take the easy option and go along with the books?... |
Excellent comment. I think the pragmatic solution is to teach them whatever will best prepare them for future English competency tests (the main reason most of them are studying English, to be honest). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|