|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
julian_w

Joined: 08 Sep 2003 Location: Somewhere beyond Middle Peak Hotel, north of Middle Earth, and well away from the Middle of the Road
|
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 3:10 pm Post subject: Choi Hong-man vs Mighty Mo - rematch |
|
|
Question #1: Why did the ref. not either deduct a point, or at least warn Choi about kicking below the belt?
Question #2: Is it 'legal' to kick below the belt in K1?
Question #3: Where was the ref. from?
Question #4: If two thirds of the judges thought Choi had such a distinct edge over Mo by the end, how come all his initially noisy supporters were again silenced by the end of the fight?
Question #5: What's your opinion? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ilsanman

Joined: 15 Aug 2003 Location: Bucheon, Korea
|
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have not watched the whole match, so I can not judge well. But if the crowd is silenced, it tells you something.
I am pretty sure low blows are illegal. Hmmm
The ref....no idea.
I guess a 3rd match is in order. Outside of Korea. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Donkey Beer

Joined: 20 Jul 2006
|
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This Korean judges/referee do this every time Choi fights in Korea. The very same thing happened when he fought Semmy Schilt; most Koreans have no problem with dishonesty so this was really no surprise.
In all other event locations the referee will call a timeout after a groin shot. In Korea, a groin shot is viewed as a count down.
Choi won the same way as before- push-kick-jab bullsh�t that does no damage.
The ref must be a very rich man now. This is the same guy who took Leko out of the fight when he was ready to go.
Quote: |
"I feel I was robbed. I should have won," said a disappointed Mo after the fight. "He must have picked up a new technique -- the kick below the belt! I really think that there should be a third fight. There was a lot of favoritism here, next time I want to fight somewhere else." |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
doggyji

Joined: 21 Feb 2006 Location: Toronto - Hamilton - Vineland - St. Catherines
|
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 6:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Donkey Beer wrote: |
This Korean judges/referee do this every time Choi fights in Korea. The very same thing happened when he fought Semmy Schilt; most Koreans have no problem with dishonesty so this was really no surprise.
In all other event locations the referee will call a timeout after a groin shot. In Korea, a groin shot is viewed as a count down.
Choi won the same way as before- push-kick-jab bullsh�t that does no damage.
The ref must be a very rich man now. This is the same guy who took Leko out of the fight when he was ready to go. |
According to this source, one judge was Korean and the other two were Japanese. I'm not sure about the referee.
The Korean judge gave 29-29.
One Japanese judge gave 30-28.
The other Japanese judge also gave 30-28.
Hence, CHM won.
Remember the whole thing is planned and managed by the K-1 company, Fighting and Entertainment Group (FEG) and its employees. I think they tend to give "home advantages". It's a show biz. The more audience, fans and fire, the better. Speaking of partial decisions, you must be well aware of Musashi's fame, right? By the way, K-1 producer Tanigawa Sadaharu acknowledged there was a problem with the decision. Just keep riding on your shaky bandwagon. Safe trip.
Quote: |
most Koreans have no problem with dishonesty so this was really no surprise. |
Pfff... First, check all Korean news about the match and come back if you can find one that doesn't shed a critical light.
And nobody mentioned Kim Young-hyun, the other giant? How was he?
Last edited by doggyji on Sat Sep 29, 2007 6:30 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
gwhitey09
Joined: 26 Jun 2007 Location: seoul
|
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 6:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i was at the fight and it was a joke. That circus animal barely landed anything at all. Mighty Mo actually landed several good punches. The whole crowd was silent at the end because they were sure their prize fighter lost. It is just disgraceful that the judges actually let that retard win. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
anyway

Joined: 22 Oct 2005
|
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 8:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
However bad it was, it couldn't match the screw job they gave the little Thai when he fought Choi in Seoul a while back. The little man kicked Choi in every part of his body, yes even the head, which had the Thai literally upside down in mid-air. Bad azz! It was a classic David and Goliath, but they gave the prize to the hometown hero. The Thai, usually a gracious loser, just walked out of the ring. KOREA BITING!! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
NQtropics

Joined: 19 Apr 2007
|
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 9:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That was one of the most disgraceful decisions I've ever seen. Favoratism is rampant in K-1. And it doesn't just happen in Korea - Musashi's been helped along a number of times.
Also, in a Bonjasky v Le Banner fight in Holland the THREE dutch judges ruled slightly in favour in Bonjasky when Le Banner was clearly the winner. After the fight, Le Banner then made official complaints to K-1 Japan and K-1 USA who reviewed the fight and prombtly reversed the decision.
Had it up to here with K-1. It's time for something new and fair. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ilsanman

Joined: 15 Aug 2003 Location: Bucheon, Korea
|
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 10:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I just finished watching the match in full.
I would have to say this is quite a disgraceful and lopsided decision.
1st round: Fairly even, as neither fighter did much. I'd award it to Mo for superior aggression.
2nd round: Certainly Mo's round. He landed many clear shots on Choi, and though Choi landed some back, Mo showed no signs of being hurt. However, the nut kick puts it over the top.
3rd round: I'd also award this to Mo, as he has superior aggression and landed more good blows on his opponent. A little closer, though.
Choi was clearly scared of Mo. H esure showed it. Even that's a good reason to award it to the other guy. For a guy of his size and power, I'd expect a lot more out of him. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Cheonmunka

Joined: 04 Jun 2004
|
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 10:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Doggi for those figures.
So it was the Japs who were paid-off?
NQTropics: When I scrolled down your avatar brought instant cheer to me. Especially just after reading about Choi the 'Moron,' then seeing that avatar. Wow.
Last edited by Cheonmunka on Sat Sep 29, 2007 10:55 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mr Crowley
Joined: 23 Mar 2006 Location: Suwon
|
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 10:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Is it on-line? I want to watch it, I missed it last night. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rteacher

Joined: 23 May 2005 Location: Western MA, USA
|
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 2:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
I watched it twice. In my opinion, it was a fair decision in a close fight - although I agree that it may have been arranged beforehand for the sake of the promotion.
Choi clearly won the first round by scoring more with his kicks while Mo landed like nothing. Arguably, Mighty Mo won the second round because he landed a couple glancing blows which looked a lot better than they actually were, but Choi scored more points otherwise.
The third round was close, but again I think that Choi managed to score more points, while Mo couldn't land a clean shot.
I think that the TV view is better for K-1 than the view that most fans can get at the arena. Every round, Mo would make a couple aggressive charges, and his punches look like they had mean intentions that would at least knock down Choi, but practically all missed or were effectively blocked. I don't think Mo landed even one clean punch the whole fight, and he only scored a couple glancing punches that had little effect.
Hongman was smartly cautious most of the time, choosing to jab with his feet instead of leaving a lazy left jab out there that Mo would be able to time and counter with his devastating overhand right.
However, in terms of effective aggression, Choi actually moved forward and scored with his kicks way more than Mo did with his couple of bull charges a round.
I can understand someone viewing the fight from a distance thinking that Mo's work was much more impressive with his scary roundhouse misses, but there's no way that he should have been given the decision considering how few shots he actually landed.
I disagree that Choi has been awarded grossly unfair decisions in Korea - they all were at least pretty close. I thought he got a bad decision when he lost to LeBanner...
That said, Hongman certainly didn't look very good , but (assuming that it was on the level ...) he played it safe by not trying to mix it up with hard punches against a very dangerous fighter.
The other fight I watched a couple times was the Peter Aerts - Ray Sefo match, and that one definitely looked fishy. These guys seemed a little too friendly, and although Aerts methodically mounted a steady attack, Sefo looked like he just wanted to be someplace else - and didn't act very professional at times during the match (eg; turning his back on his opponent and unexpectedly quitting after the first (or second) round. Maybe he was hurt going in, though... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cwaddell
Joined: 23 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 2:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Excellent night, I especially liked the Feitosa fight. Hong Man Choi is a waste of space, but I was happy to see him in all of his carnival freak glory. Surely a fix, Mighty Mo haded him his arse on a plate. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ilsanman

Joined: 15 Aug 2003 Location: Bucheon, Korea
|
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 4:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
I totally disagree with you. You said Mo didn't land a single good blow. Look at Choi's face after he got pounded in the corner the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd times.
Mo showed no sign of pain except when he got crotch kicked. Often judges award matches based on aggression. Choi showed none. His kicks were weak and did nothing. He acted like he was afraid of his opponent. That is not the way to win a K1 match. Mo was the real winner.
Rteacher wrote: |
I watched it twice. In my opinion, it was a fair decision in a close fight - although I agree that it may have been arranged beforehand for the sake of the promotion.
Choi clearly won the first round by scoring more with his kicks while Mo landed like nothing. Arguably, Mighty Mo won the second round because he landed a couple glancing blows which looked a lot better than they actually were, but Choi scored more points otherwise.
The third round was close, but again I think that Choi managed to score more points, while Mo couldn't land a clean shot.
I think that the TV view is better for K-1 than the view that most fans can get at the arena. Every round, Mo would make a couple aggressive charges, and his punches look like they had mean intentions that would at least knock down Choi, but practically all missed or were effectively blocked. I don't think Mo landed even one clean punch the whole fight, and he only scored a couple glancing punches that had little effect.
Hongman was smartly cautious most of the time, choosing to jab with his feet instead of leaving a lazy left jab out there that Mo would be able to time and counter with his devastating overhand right.
However, in terms of effective aggression, Choi actually moved forward and scored with his kicks way more than Mo did with his couple of bull charges a round.
I can understand someone viewing the fight from a distance thinking that Mo's work was much more impressive with his scary roundhouse misses, but there's no way that he should have been given the decision considering how few shots he actually landed.
I disagree that Choi has been awarded grossly unfair decisions in Korea - they all were at least pretty close. I thought he got a bad decision when he lost to LeBanner...
That said, Hongman certainly didn't look very good , but (assuming that it was on the level ...) he played it safe by not trying to mix it up with hard punches against a very dangerous fighter.
The other fight I watched a couple times was the Peter Aerts - Ray Sefo match, and that one definitely looked fishy. These guys seemed a little too friendly, and although Aerts methodically mounted a steady attack, Sefo looked like he just wanted to be someplace else - and didn't act very professional at times during the match (eg; turning his back on his opponent and unexpectedly quitting after the first (or second) round. Maybe he was hurt going in, though... |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Alan Partidge
Joined: 29 Nov 2005
|
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 2:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think it could've gone either way. Mo did land some fairly good glancing blows, but he was circling and backing away a lot too. As neither fighter really did much damage, you'd have to give it to the aggressor. Hong man was coming forward more often than Mo.
Hong man should be much better, but he did use his size well to keep Mo at bay. They could've gone for a tie and more rounds. I don't understand why people try to punch Hong man's head. They should just pick a leg and kick it over and over in the same place.
The Sefo v Aerts fight was a disgrace. Neither wanted to be there and Sefo was crying or puking in his corner after the first round. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
normalcyispasse

Joined: 27 Oct 2006 Location: Yeosu until the end of February WOOOOOOOO
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|