| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
jinju
Joined: 22 Jan 2006
|
 Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 9:07 pm Post subject: Ron Paul the new Jimmy Carter? |
 |
|
If Ron paul is ever elected he will embrace the biggest scum in this world. As is plain to any one with atlast 50 or more IQ points, Paul is a friend of the Burmese junta. He just voted against passing a resolution that condemned the Burmese junta's killing, torture, impisonment of pro-democracy activists in Burma. A resolution that would cost the US absolutely nothing. It shows Ron Paul's moral stance: He likes killers and dictators.
This man would allow dictators to murder and oppress people the world over. Much like Jimmy Carter, Paul would be the best friend a dictator coule ever hope for. While America may sometime go too far it is basically a force for good. They stood up to the USSR and contributed significantly to bringing down the Evil Empire. The US stood up to Hitler, to the Japanese. The US is the only country in the world with the balls to go to war when it is very necessary. Debate Iraq all you want, maybe it was a mistake, but the Iraqi war isnt a true representation of American foreign policy. The facts are that this world is a bad place and sometimes it takes a country like the US to stand up to some of the scum that is running countries like Burma.
Ron Paul would disagree. Infact, like Jimmy Carter, Ron Paul supports the worst of the worst. Foreign policy under Ron Paul would resemble the pathetic shambles under that antisemitic scumbag Jimmy Carter. Ron Paul would cozy up to killers and murderers, oppressors and abusers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jinju
Joined: 22 Jan 2006
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 9:12 pm Post subject: Re: Ron Paul the new Jimmy Carter? |
|
|
| partick thistle wrote: |
| jinju wrote: |
If Ron paul is ever elected he will embrace the biggest scum in this world. As is plain to any one with atlast 50 or more IQ points, Paul is a friend of the Burmese junta. He just voted against passing a resolution that condemned the Burmese junta's killing, torture, impisonment of pro-democracy activists in Burma. A resolution that would cost the US absolutely nothing. It shows Ron Paul's moral stance: He likes killers and dictators.
This man would allow dictators to murder and oppress people the world over. Much like Jimmy Carter, Paul would be the best friend a dictator coule ever hope for. While America may sometime go too far it is basically a force for good. They stood up to the USSR and contributed significantly to bringing down the Evil Empire. The US stood up to Hitler, to the Japanese. The US is the only country in the world with the balls to go to war when it is very necessary. Debate Iraq all you want, maybe it was a mistake, but the Iraqi war isnt a true representation of American foreign policy. The facts are that this world is a bad place and sometimes it takes a country like the US to stand up to some of the scum that is running countries like Burma.
Ron Paul would disagree. Infact, like Jimmy Carter, Ron Paul supports the worst of the worst. Foreign policy under Ron Paul would resemble the pathetic shambles under that antisemitic scumbag Jimmy Carter. Ron Paul would cozy up to killers and murderers, oppressors and abusers. |
Again, you are so wrong.
What was wrong with Jimmy Carter? |
1. he is a terrible antisemite. Walking scumbag.
2. He was the worst president in the modern era. Absolute garbage. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JMO
Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Location: Daegu
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 9:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I thought he was a non interventionist, maybe thats why he didn't sign. I'm not sure how not signing=friend of junta. As far as I know he also didn't vote for the war bill. Does that make him friend of Saddamn?
| Quote: |
| A resolution that would cost the US absolutely nothing |
Then it means nothing. America has nothing to do with Burma and whether he wants to sign a meaningless paper doesn't really matter. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Masta_Don
Joined: 17 Aug 2006
Location: Hyehwa-dong, Seoul
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 9:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I'd say the number of dictators that would be allowed to continue doing as they wish would balance out the number of dictators that America wouldn't be putting into power by adopting a non-interventionalist agenda. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee
Joined: 25 May 2003
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 10:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Masta_Don wrote: |
| I'd say the number of dictators that would be allowed to continue doing as they wish would balance out the number of dictators that America wouldn't be putting into power by adopting a non-interventionalist agenda. |
What dictators are you talking about?
When you explain more the difference will be clear. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee
Joined: 25 May 2003
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 10:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| JMO wrote: |
I thought he was a non interventionist, maybe thats why he didn't sign. I'm not sure how not signing=friend of junta. As far as I know he also didn't vote for the war bill. Does that make him friend of Saddamn?
| Quote: |
| A resolution that would cost the US absolutely nothing |
Then it means nothing. America has nothing to do with Burma and whether he wants to sign a meaningless paper doesn't really matter. |
That is not so . See how Turkey gets so upset about possible resolution by the US.
It does matter and in this case it is also free.
You should have said doesn't matter very much. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JMO
Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Location: Daegu
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 10:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
| JMO wrote: |
I thought he was a non interventionist, maybe thats why he didn't sign. I'm not sure how not signing=friend of junta. As far as I know he also didn't vote for the war bill. Does that make him friend of Saddamn?
| Quote: |
| A resolution that would cost the US absolutely nothing |
Then it means nothing. America has nothing to do with Burma and whether he wants to sign a meaningless paper doesn't really matter. |
That is not so . See how Turkey gets so upset about possible resolution by the US.
It does matter and in this case it is also free.
You should have said doesn't matter very much. |
Turkey...mmm...why a resolution there, they are planning to invade a terrorist harboring country and make them give up their war, or so i heard.
If he believes that intervention in other countries is a bad idea then he would be a hyprocrite to sign this bill. It being free is irrelevant. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
blaseblasphemener
Joined: 01 Jun 2006
Location: There's a voice, keeps on calling me, down the road, that's where I'll always be
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 11:51 pm Post subject: Re: Ron Paul the new Jimmy Carter? |
|
|
| jinju wrote: |
| partick thistle wrote: |
| jinju wrote: |
If Ron paul is ever elected he will embrace the biggest scum in this world. As is plain to any one with atlast 50 or more IQ points, Paul is a friend of the Burmese junta. He just voted against passing a resolution that condemned the Burmese junta's killing, torture, impisonment of pro-democracy activists in Burma. A resolution that would cost the US absolutely nothing. It shows Ron Paul's moral stance: He likes killers and dictators.
This man would allow dictators to murder and oppress people the world over. Much like Jimmy Carter, Paul would be the best friend a dictator coule ever hope for. While America may sometime go too far it is basically a force for good. They stood up to the USSR and contributed significantly to bringing down the Evil Empire. The US stood up to Hitler, to the Japanese. The US is the only country in the world with the balls to go to war when it is very necessary. Debate Iraq all you want, maybe it was a mistake, but the Iraqi war isnt a true representation of American foreign policy. The facts are that this world is a bad place and sometimes it takes a country like the US to stand up to some of the scum that is running countries like Burma.
Ron Paul would disagree. Infact, like Jimmy Carter, Ron Paul supports the worst of the worst. Foreign policy under Ron Paul would resemble the pathetic shambles under that antisemitic scumbag Jimmy Carter. Ron Paul would cozy up to killers and murderers, oppressors and abusers. |
Again, you are so wrong.
What was wrong with Jimmy Carter? |
1. he is a terrible antisemite. Walking scumbag.
2. He was the worst president in the modern era. Absolute garbage. |
Jimmy Carter would eat you up and spit you out, jinju.
I bet you didn't know that J. Carter, out of all the United States presidents besides Washington, has the longest tenure of service in the military.
Men who have been to war aren't so cavalier with other men's lives.
I know Jimmy Carter. You sir are no Jimmy Carter. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jinju
Joined: 22 Jan 2006
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 2:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| carter is a nazi scumbag. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 3:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
carter is a nazi scumbag.
|
I see that after a couple of weeks of trying to reform your image you have returned to your real self. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
igotthisguitar
Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 3:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Ya-ta Boy wrote: |
| Quote: |
carter is a nazi scumbag.
|
I see that after a couple of weeks of trying to reform your image you have returned to your real self. |
Coo-coo Ju-Joo ...
| jinju wrote: |
1. he is a terrible antisemite. Walking scumbag.
2. He was the worst president in the modern era. Absolute garbage. |
A terrible anti-semite eh? Hmmmm ... sounds pretty awful alright.
Who do you regard as a good one? 
All clowning aside, "ANTI" what? semit-ISM?
Is it at all like any other abstact ISM?
e.g. capitalISM, feminISM, communISM, marxISM, fascISM etc ...
Is it a world view or ideology of some kind?
What does this semitISM of which you refer actually stand for, aim to promote ... etc?
It presumably has something to do with semites.
What's a semite, exactly? Who's a semite?
Let's get to the bottom of things here, & see what it is we're actually left with  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bucheon bum
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 9:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| JMO wrote: |
If he believes that intervention in other countries is a bad idea then he would be a hyprocrite to sign this bill. It being free is irrelevant. |
The bill had nothing to do with intervention so no, he would not have been a hypocrite to sign the bill. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
twg
Joined: 02 Nov 2006
Location: Getting some fresh air...
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 9:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Ya-ta Boy wrote: |
| Quote: |
carter is a nazi scumbag.
|
I see that after a couple of weeks of trying to reform your image you have returned to your real self. |
My figuring is that he's not getting along well with his wife and her maturity-making powers over him are starting to fade. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
blaseblasphemener
Joined: 01 Jun 2006
Location: There's a voice, keeps on calling me, down the road, that's where I'll always be
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 1:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| twg wrote: |
| Ya-ta Boy wrote: |
| Quote: |
carter is a nazi scumbag.
|
I see that after a couple of weeks of trying to reform your image you have returned to your real self. |
My figuring is that he's not getting along well with his wife and her maturity-making powers over him are starting to fade. |
Let's not bring people's wives into our discussions, capiche? Families should be off limits. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee
Joined: 25 May 2003
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 2:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="JMO"]
| Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
| JMO wrote: |
I thought he was a non interventionist, maybe thats why he didn't sign. I'm not sure how not signing=friend of junta. As far as I know he also didn't vote for the war bill. Does that make him friend of Saddamn?
| Quote: |
| A resolution that would cost the US absolutely nothing |
Then it means nothing. America has nothing to do with Burma and whether he wants to sign a meaningless paper doesn't really matter. |
That is not so . See how Turkey gets so upset about possible resolution by the US.
It does matter and in this case it is also free.
You should have said doesn't matter very much. |
| Quote: |
| Turkey...mmm...why a resolution there, they are planning to invade a terrorist harboring country and make them give up their war, or so i heard. |
the main Kurdish leader ship does not support the PKK. In fact they may go after them within the next few weeks.
If you actually knew what you were talking about you would not have describe the situation .
But while Iran is behind acts of terror. Neither the Iraqi government nor the main Kurdish leadership supports the PKK
But yes the PKK ought to give up their war against Turkey.
| Quote: |
| If he believes that intervention in other countries is a bad idea then he would be a hyprocrite to sign this bill. It being free is irrelevant. |
It is not intervention it is making the US opinion known. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
