View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 5:42 pm Post subject: Place Your Direct Evidence re: 9/11 Here... |
|
|
This thread is for direct evidence, and direct evidence only, on that which occurred on 11 Sept. 2001 in NYC and Washington -- Osama bin Laden's attacks. Please place circumstantial evidence and speculation somewhere else.
Very well. Seven years have elapsed. What happened on 9/11 and how do we know?
Wikipedia wrote: |
Direct evidence is testimony or other proof which expressly or straight-forwardly proves the existence of a fact. It is different from circumstantial evidence, which is evidence that, without going directly to prove the existence of a fact, gives rise to a logical inference that such fact does exist.
Direct evidence is evidence which, if believed, proves the existence of the fact in issue without inference or presumption. It is evidence which comes from one who speaks directly of his or her own knowledge on the main or ultimate fact to be proved, or who saw or heard the factual matters which are the subject of the testimony. It is not necessary that this direct knowledge be gained through the senses of sight and hearing alone, but it may be obtained from any of the senses through which outside knowledge is acquired, including the senses of touch or pain.
State v Famber, 358 Mo 288, 214 SW2d 40. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
loose_ends
Joined: 23 Jul 2007
|
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 5:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
go to
ae911truth.org
all direct evidence is listed for both WTC7 and WTC1/2 for CDT.
have a nice day. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 5:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
loose_ends wrote: |
all direct evidence is listed for both WTC7 and WTC1/2 for CDT. |
Have you mastered it well enough to summarize it here? No links. No op-eds. No other allegations. No refs to other theories or other claims you wish to challenge and/or debunk.
Simply condense, summarize, and present to us, succinctly, the direct evidence you say you know all about. You want to allege or even suggest something happened...?
Very well. Tell us precisely how you know. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
loose_ends
Joined: 23 Jul 2007
|
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 6:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gopher wrote: |
loose_ends wrote: |
all direct evidence is listed for both WTC7 and WTC1/2 for CDT. |
Have you mastered it well enough to summarize it here? No links. No op-eds. No other allegations. No refs to other theories or other claims you wish to challenge and/or debunk.
Simply condense, summarize, and present to us, succinctly, the direct evidence you say you know all about. You want to allege or even suggest something happened...?
Very well. Tell us precisely how you know. |
i would be happy to.
however i am working on another thread...did you miss it?
its called "evidence for alternative threory:CDT" -reworded
when i'm finished over there, i'll come over here. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
igotthisguitar

Joined: 08 Apr 2003 Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)
|
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 6:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The "official" 9/11 conspiracy report is to Sept. 11th what the WARREN Report was to JFK murder
COMPLETE & UTTER WHITEWASH GARBAGE.
"You can fool some of the people some of the time ... " |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 6:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks to those who have responded so far. Stealing from Kuros, I take your responses to mean you have no direct evidence to cite and I accept your surrender on this issue. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
some waygug-in
Joined: 25 Jan 2003
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
loose_ends
Joined: 23 Jul 2007
|
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 6:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gopher wrote: |
Thanks to those who have responded so far. Stealing from Kuros, I take your responses to mean you have no direct evidence to cite and I accept your surrender on this issue. |
calm down. your time will come. kick you feet up and watch some streamed FOX news.
i'll be back. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 6:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
loose_ends wrote: |
go to
ae911truth.org
all direct evidence is listed for both WTC7 and WTC1/2 for CDT.
have a nice day. |
Screw loose change will defeat that site. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
igotthisguitar

Joined: 08 Apr 2003 Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)
|
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 6:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gopher wrote: |
Thanks to those who have responded so far. Stealing from Kuros, I take your responses to mean you have no direct evidence to cite and I accept your surrender on this issue. |
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
loose_ends
Joined: 23 Jul 2007
|
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 6:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
loose_ends wrote: |
go to
ae911truth.org
all direct evidence is listed for both WTC7 and WTC1/2 for CDT.
have a nice day. |
Screw loose change will defeat that site. |
we'll see. you can join in on the conversation when it starts.
you can put you r money where you mouth is. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 6:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ok Whenever you are ready |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
loose_ends
Joined: 23 Jul 2007
|
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 7:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
Ok Whenever you are ready |
ok. i will let you know. you better read those websites first...i've caught you once already. once more and bush will call you a fool. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 7:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
loose_ends wrote: |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
Ok Whenever you are ready |
ok. i will let you know. you better read those websites first...i've caught you once already. once more and bush will call you a fool. |
You caught be once? When? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
loose_ends
Joined: 23 Jul 2007
|
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 7:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
loose_ends wrote: |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
Ok Whenever you are ready |
ok. i will let you know. you better read those websites first...i've caught you once already. once more and bush will call you a fool. |
You caught be once? When? |
you said the article showed the tape WASNT a fake.
however i pointed out that the article didn't actually say that. it said although it may not be real, it isn't the obvious fake everyone thinks.
don't you remember? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|