Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Second-class western women
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Big_Bird



Joined: 31 Jan 2003
Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...

PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 5:13 am    Post subject: Second-class western women Reply with quote

Since 911 I've been somewhat amused by how many smug western men like to point out that unlike in 'muslim cultures,' western women are treated equally. Yeah. Right.

Second-Class Women

Quote:
More women than men are graduating from college these days, generally with better grades. And more women are earning advanced degrees and more going into professional occupations. Yet, as two new studies point out, women in the professions are still paid much less than their male counterparts.

It's clear evidence that, despite years of attempts to win true equality for women, even those at the higher economic levels -- one-fourth of all working women -- continue to suffer from blatant discrimination.

The studies, by the AFL-CIO and the American Association of University Women, show that within a year after graduating, women are earning an average of 20 percent less than men holding the same jobs in education, law, medicine, science and other professional fields. Those out of school for 10 years or more are getting at least 30 percent less.

Whatever the occupation, no matter how well-prepared the women, no matter whether they outnumber or out perform their male co-workers, no matter how creative, talented or hard-working they may be, it's the same: Their median pay is sure to be anywhere from $16,000 to $34,000 a year less than that of men holding the same positions.

That amounts to about 40 percent less for female physicians and surgeons, for example, 30 percent less for lawyers, 25 percent less for college and university teachers.

You might think women would at least get more than men in the traditionally female occupations that they dominate. But though more than 80 percent of pre-school, kindergarten, elementary and middle school teachers and registered nurses are women, for instance, they are paid about 10 percent less than men who work beside them at identical tasks.

Since retirement benefits are based on earnings, the women's employer-financed pensions, Social Security payments and other retirement earnings also are invariably below those of the men. Only about two-thirds of professional women get any pension at all, and the median amount for those who do is barely $6,500 a year. Almost half of professional men get retirement benefits, with a median yearly payment of $12,000.

Despite the second-class treatment they face, increasing numbers of women are expected to enter college to prepare for professional jobs, which increasing numbers of them will fill. It's predicted that there'll be at least 20 percent more female professionals by 2014. And that means that more than half of those who hold some of the nation's most important jobs will continue to be victimized by discrimination.

Professionals aren't the only ones, of course. Most other working women are treated much the same, whatever their jobs. Despite the 44-year-old Equal Pay Act, which promises women "equal pay for equal work," their pay overall stands at 23 percent less than that of men -- currently 77 cents for every dollar earned by men.


To read full article, click on the link above
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blaseblasphemener



Joined: 01 Jun 2006
Location: There's a voice, keeps on calling me, down the road, that's where I'll always be

PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 5:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's easy to look at statistics and say something is so and so. Personal experience usually gives us a good idea of things that statistics can't. I worked in many workplaces back in Canada. Here are some observations:

a) women work their butts off in their twenties, but then start having kids in their late twenties or early thirties, and most become the secondary bread-winners in the family. Employers know this when hiring, so women are at a disadvantage. Unfair to the women for whom this is not the case, but still true.

b) women tend to defer to men in leadership positions. Men just naturally command more authority, generally.

c) It's often not what you know, but who you know. Men are generally better at schmoozing with men, and women. Women tend to be catty with each other, and don't have the same sense of team that men tend to have. This hurts women when it comes to forming alliances and networking.

That said, I've known women who don't fit this mold, but in general, I've seen this play out time and time again. What it comes down to in general is basic biology. The need to reproduce, the changes a baby brings in one's priorities, and the different roles men and women play. I don't see that fundamentally changing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 1:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Big Bird, if your intention was to humiliate all the anti-Muslims on the board, I urge you to try again in some other way.

Quote:
The studies, by the AFL-CIO and the American Association of University Women, show that within a year after graduating, women are earning an average of 20 percent less than men holding the same jobs in education, law, medicine, science and other professional fields. Those out of school for 10 years or more are getting at least 30 percent less.


The problem is, these statistics only establish correlation between being a woman (on average) and getting paid less (on average). Such a study cannot discern why women make less, unless it goes further.

A lot of the reason for this is women are, just like men, not entirely career-driven. And being a mother is a time-consuming activity. There's no shame in earning less so that you can be there for your son or daughter. One might call it sacrifice. Considering that men cannot be mothers, i.e., men cannot have children and do not have the same maternal drives, it is understandable that they can commit themselves more to their careers.

I also want to point out that a lot of this is already changing. A lot of women of my generation (mid-20s, even early 30s) ARE making more than their sig. others/spouses. Its just that the Baby Boomers are so many and their habits a bit more patriachal, and the revolution hasn't kicked in, at least not yet in America. I know in my law school class in KY, a red state, half the class is female. Some of them are mothers and some of them have stay-at-home-dads.

If you're trying to make the point that the West can go further, I think I'd agree. If you're trying to make the point that the West hasn't done enough, I'd say that particularly in the past few decades it has. The studies are not representative of the progress.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Tony_Balony



Joined: 12 Apr 2007

PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 2:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Women aren't naturally aggressive and if they are, they are less aggressive than men. In the protected and artificial world of education, women do well because the system is structured that way.

But when A earning Western woman vs Japanese corporations, Al- Queda, Communist China Mafia, MS-13 or the Russian Mob, the women are usually left complaining about fairness there too after they get creamed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
just4u



Joined: 30 May 2007
Location: Georgia, USA

PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 2:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

blaseblasphemener wrote:

c) It's often not what you know, but who you know. Men are generally better at schmoozing with men, and women. Women tend to be catty with each other, and don't have the same sense of team that men tend to have. This hurts women when it comes to forming alliances and networking.



I'm a woman myself so I may get flamed, but this is absolutely true.

I know a lot of women in "high" places (pretty women, at that, thus defying the stereotypes about such a thing) and they ALL have one thing in common: they don't act catty or mean towards people in general and especially other women. (tho some have to mainly hang out with guys because of this.)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
just4u



Joined: 30 May 2007
Location: Georgia, USA

PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 2:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tony_Balony wrote:
Women aren't naturally aggressive and if they are, they are less aggressive than men. In the protected and artificial world of education, women do well because the system is structured that way.




Wrrrronnnnggg. But you're from Minnesota or somewhere where the women are more genteel Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mindmetoo



Joined: 02 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 3:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There's a great book by the woman who helped write the Japanese postwar constitution. She was always amused by the same attitude. The American occupiers were rather aghast at the status of women in Japan but couldn't see they were treating American women as less than equals.

That said, sorry but no one gives up power. If you want more power, you have to fight for it. You'll notice, for example, migrant workers in Korea have all kinds of legislators passing bills to protect them from abuse and no one working hard to protect Western hagwon teachers. Why? The migrant workers fought for their rights. We don't.

If in Western society you still feel you lack equality, well, fight for it. You're the majority population. Are you so lazy? Geez. I have to laugh every time I hear a woman complain about how expensive pantyhose is and how easily it runs, or how expensive women's clothes are and how low quality they are or how much more they have to pay for haircuts. The simple solution is boycott. Write letters. Raise a fuss. Use the power as a consumer and a voter. But they never do...

And women earn less. Well, women are also taking sick days to care for their child. Women are taking breaks to have children. There are many social factors that slow a woman's career. You want big raises you have to pull for it. You have to break eggs and make threats "I'm going to walk if I don't get more." Many women value getting along over this kind of confrontation.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dogbert



Joined: 29 Jan 2003
Location: Killbox 90210

PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 4:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, but you Western women can choose your own wardrobe (within limits, of course).

You've come a long way, baby!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stevemcgarrett



Joined: 24 Mar 2006

PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 6:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Big Bird:

Everything isn't hunky dory with Western women but compared to when I was starting college and certainly in contrast to most Muslim women, you are doing much, much better.

Problem is that many women in the West (not all, of course) want to have their cake and eat it too. They want to be treated like ladies but demand the same rights as a man. Can't have it both ways unless your bi-sexual, maybe.

Women should be paid the same as men for the same work unless through affirmative action hiring they don't perform up to snuff.

And, personally, I'd like to see more women at the helm of state.

Case in point: hat new Argentinian president is not only smart and a populist, she's hot.

In sum, Western women are still unfortunately second class citizens in some situations, but at least they're treated as citizens. The same cannot be said for the majority of Muslim women.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tony_Balony



Joined: 12 Apr 2007

PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 7:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Women in combat? Most of those Abu-Graib pics have Private England in them. Historical embarrasment of biblical proportions.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bucheon bum



Joined: 16 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 8:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kuros wrote:


I also want to point out that a lot of this is already changing. A lot of women of my generation (mid-20s, even early 30s) ARE making more than their sig. others/spouses. Its just that the Baby Boomers are so many and their habits a bit more patriachal, and the revolution hasn't kicked in, at least not yet in America. I know in my law school class in KY, a red state, half the class is female. Some of them are mothers and some of them have stay-at-home-dads.


Yeah, there have been articles on the % of women in undergrad programs being higher than the % of males. College admissions staff have commented how it is becoming more challenging to find as many qualified males as females. I believe someone on this boardd in the past year or two posted an article saying as much.

As far as my own personal anecdote, I know there are more females than males in my Master's program (by about 2%).

So yeah, give it another decade or so. Perhaps it'll be a bit more egalitarian.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Atavistic



Joined: 22 May 2006
Location: How totally stupid that Korean doesn't show in this area.

PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 8:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would LOVE to see a study that compares what men with children, men without children, women with children, and women without children make.

Children are expensive, in many ways people don't consider.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Big_Bird



Joined: 31 Jan 2003
Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...

PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 9:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

People are quick to jump up and cite children as the reason for this gap in pay. But childless women are also affected by this pay gap.

Even in the quoted part of the OP we find:
Quote:
he studies, by the AFL-CIO and the American Association of University Women, show that within a year after graduating, women are earning an average of 20 percent less than men holding the same jobs in education, law, medicine, science and other professional fields.


So within a year of graduating, women are already suffering and (on average) getting only 4/5 of what their male colleagues are getting. Can this be accounted for by most women getting straight out of uni and getting themselves knocked up in a matter of weeks and months? No. For one thing, it's well known that educated women in particular are putting off children for much longer - many put it off for so long, they find they are no longer fertile when they start trying and miss out.

My sister only had one child, and only took 6 months out. Most of those months were self-financed. Since that time she has worked the same hours (and often more) than her male colleagues. There are many women like her who only take a minimum time out of work for having children, yet they still find themselves getting the short end of the stick, as do the many childless women who are also affected.

Having children may account for some of this pay difference, but it only accounts for it in part. There's other stuff going on here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mindmetoo



Joined: 02 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 9:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Big_Bird wrote:
People are quick to jump up and cite children as the reason for this gap in pay. But childless women are also affected by this pay gap.


You'll notice that wasn't the only reason I cited.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Big_Bird



Joined: 31 Jan 2003
Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...

PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 9:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mindmetoo wrote:
Big_Bird wrote:
People are quick to jump up and cite children as the reason for this gap in pay. But childless women are also affected by this pay gap.


You'll notice that wasn't the only reason I cited.


I haven't got to you yet. Razz
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Page 1 of 7

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International