Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Moron Writes Opinion Piece
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
The_Eyeball_Kid



Joined: 20 Jun 2007

PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2007 4:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

kimchi_pizza wrote:
One thing I've realized about Steve and his articles is that there is a big difference between knowing HOW to teach and having the ABILITY to teach.

I'm not gonna join this bashing-bandwagon, 'cause surprisingly I actually agree with most of his points. A teacher does need to accept responsibility or take "ownership" of the classroom and all that it includes.
Except, I would never tell the students or others because, as others have pointed out, that would make me seem like a dictator. It's at this point the Eyeballkid's comment about a comfortable, safe and secure classroom so that they are more interested and willing to learn and develope trust and a rapore with their teacher which I whole-heartedly agree. It's too bad the kid's own self-angrandizement and ruthless bashing smeares the character of someone I would call a reasonable and good-natured poster.

Ah! Gf woke up. Now I can get this gunk outta my eyes and drink a hot cup of coffee. Looks like it's gonna a nice day, hope ya'll go out and enjoy it.

And Steve, lose the "love-stick"...PM me if you need help on classroom management. It's rarely an issue for me expect, er, except the first coupe'a weeks when ALL students test their teachers to see what they can or cannot get away with.


What self-aggrandizement? What ruthless bashing? I haven't said anything that your average man-on-the-street wouldn't believe to be absolutely fair and reasonable.


Last edited by The_Eyeball_Kid on Fri Nov 02, 2007 5:09 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
makemischief



Joined: 04 Nov 2005
Location: Traveling

PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2007 5:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

hogwonguy1979 wrote:
sounds like a typical kotesol geek who thinks they are gods gift to teaching


absolutely. why at our conference last weekend there were at least 3 workshop sessions which justified corporal punishment in the name of classroom control. you've totally got us figured out hogwonguy. Rolling Eyes

in all truth, steve's views wouldn't last 5 minutes at most KOTESOL meetings... but then again- the pusan chapter is known for being a bit peculiar Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
oldfatfarang



Joined: 19 May 2005
Location: On the road to somewhere.

PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2007 5:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pardon me if I'm wrong, but isn't this 'teacher' teaching in a Korean public middle school? If so, he will be co-teaching - in effect, sharing the responsibility for educating his students with a Korean co-teacher (who has a Korean teaching license that allows them to beat and humiliate students to attain classroom control).

And as for other Western teachers banging their 'love stick' on the blackboard to get students' attention. This is a very crude (and threatening) method that doesn't have any place in a civilised classroom. You are demeaning yourself when you this as you're threatening your students with future corporal punishment (implied or actual).

Why not use the tried-and-true method of just 'raising your hand - and whistling' - and not speaking/teaching until the class comes to attention. This works - but only if you do it religiously (everytime you need attention). After a while, students will police your classroom for you - and they'll shout-down inattentive students so their lesson can continue.

This works for me, but I'll admit that I sometimes have to tap the W/B with a marker to gain attention after an enthusiastic speaking task.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
funinthesun



Joined: 16 Jul 2007

PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2007 6:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

thegadfly wrote:
His point that to be a good teacher, you must act as if the classroom is yours, that you are responsible for all that transpires, and that you WILL take that responsibility seriously is spot on.
Whether he carries or uses the SAME KIND OF STICK THAT THE OTHER TEACHERS IN HIS SCHOOL CARRY AND USE does not diminish those points.

You are upset that his article was a few basic truisms without any real description of how to achieve those goals? I don't think it was supposed to be Teaching 090 (you know, the remedial class before 101).
I saw it as more of a vent/lament that so few "teachers" are up to their positions. If it was SUPPOSED to be something more than a rant, then yeah, pretty sparse....


these are not 'points', but statements of the bleeding obvious; akin to saying "if you want to buy a mcdonald's hamburger, you need to take enough money with you."

no, im not so much upset as able to see through the article like a sheet of glass for what it is. it serves no purpose other that to elevate the writer at the expense of other english teachers. ok, i'll make it easier for you to understand what i mean by asking a few questions:

1) you wrote that "I saw it as more of a vent/lament that so few "teachers" are up to their positions" HOW DOES HE PERSONALLY KNOW that so few teachers are up to their positions? hoes he know thousands of teachers in korea? has he seen them teach?

2) if it is just a rant, why rant in the biggest national english newspaper and put your name all over it? why reach the national audience? this blog would be better wouldnt it? he could reach most of the english teachers in korea, without damaging their name.

3) tell me one thing from the article that other teachers can actually use in the classroom.

actually, the tone of the article is quite vindictive. written purely for self interest.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GaryCooper



Joined: 10 Jun 2006

PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2007 7:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

What's the reason for this thread? Certainly the opinion piece has good comments mixed in with a little woe-unto-you-who-don't language. It's hardly something to scream at so vehemently. But rather than quote the one sentence the OP found disturbing, he quoted the whole thing, then suggested some profane comments, and left it at that. One drawback to the piece invalidates the whole thing, as far as the OP was concerned. That is a key to understanding why this thread is here.

Notice that various threadsters have taken aim at KOTESOL, a professional organization for teachers. KOTESOL and groups like it can invigorate teachers, give them ideas, help them to reflect on their practices, and so forth. This is not a bad thing by any stretch of the imagination, unless wanting to be a better teacher were a bad thing. What does it accomplish for people to suggest that KOTESOLers are dweebs?

Age has also become an issue. One person suggested that being over 40 and teaching in Korea is proof positive of insanity. From my side north of Highway 40, it would seem like many of those south of it lack experience and maturity, although some of them are more mature than me. (Some past 40 have the same problems as well, but it's less common than in the under-40 crowd.) I know a teacher who's been here since the 1970s, and I was hired by someone who's been here since the 1980s -- and both have done extremely well in Korea. Maybe they know something that others haven't figured out.

I think the comments in the opinion piece hit a little too close to home for some people. Hangman, stickers, and the like are severely overused, and there are teachers who are poor at taking control of the classroom. People at schools in Korea will know who's pulling his weight and who's biding time between weekends and vacations.

In my opinion, many "teachers" who are Wayne and Garth know they're lousy, but, for one reason or another, have chosen not to face their inadequacies. According to their need to stay unreconstructed, the opinion writer must be misinterpreted as advocating assault in the classroom and people therefore suggest he is incapable of any worth insights. People who reach a mature age (whether or not their attitude follows suit) are to be written off, as are people who may participate in teacher development organizations. One infraction means the whole lot of them are to be discarded. This is throwing the baby out with the bath water -- and stepping on the baby.

That's my speculative impression, for what it's worth, of the vitriol in this thread. I hope I'm wrong about it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The_Eyeball_Kid



Joined: 20 Jun 2007

PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2007 9:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

GaryCooper wrote:
What's the reason for this thread? Certainly the opinion piece has good comments mixed in with a little woe-unto-you-who-don't language. It's hardly something to scream at so vehemently. But rather than quote the one sentence the OP found disturbing, he quoted the whole thing, then suggested some profane comments, and left it at that. One drawback to the piece invalidates the whole thing, as far as the OP was concerned. That is a key to understanding why this thread is here.

Notice that various threadsters have taken aim at KOTESOL, a professional organization for teachers. KOTESOL and groups like it can invigorate teachers, give them ideas, help them to reflect on their practices, and so forth. This is not a bad thing by any stretch of the imagination, unless wanting to be a better teacher were a bad thing. What does it accomplish for people to suggest that KOTESOLers are dweebs?

Age has also become an issue. One person suggested that being over 40 and teaching in Korea is proof positive of insanity. From my side north of Highway 40, it would seem like many of those south of it lack experience and maturity, although some of them are more mature than me. (Some past 40 have the same problems as well, but it's less common than in the under-40 crowd.) I know a teacher who's been here since the 1970s, and I was hired by someone who's been here since the 1980s -- and both have done extremely well in Korea. Maybe they know something that others haven't figured out.

I think the comments in the opinion piece hit a little too close to home for some people. Hangman, stickers, and the like are severely overused, and there are teachers who are poor at taking control of the classroom. People at schools in Korea will know who's pulling his weight and who's biding time between weekends and vacations.

In my opinion, many "teachers" who are Wayne and Garth know they're lousy, but, for one reason or another, have chosen not to face their inadequacies. According to their need to stay unreconstructed, the opinion writer must be misinterpreted as advocating assault in the classroom and people therefore suggest he is incapable of any worth insights. People who reach a mature age (whether or not their attitude follows suit) are to be written off, as are people who may participate in teacher development organizations. One infraction means the whole lot of them are to be discarded. This is throwing the baby out with the bath water -- and stepping on the baby.

That's my speculative impression, for what it's worth, of the vitriol in this thread. I hope I'm wrong about it.


Perhaps I was a little unclear in my disdain of the piece. It most certainly was not just one comment that I took exception too, though that one point was the quintessence of everything that is wrong with the writer's attitude and approach. The writer does not raise any good points. Any points that might be salvaged from his 800 word ego trip (that shall hopefully become his very public humiliation - a learning experience that should improve him as a person) are rendered completely invalid by the fundamental flaws.

The writer has apparently forgotten an often expressed aphorism: Those who want respect give respect. This is not quite the truism it might first seem. The relationship between teacher and student and teacher and class is not a direct parallel of the relationship between parent and child, boss and employee, master and servant, sergeant and private or any other. There is no automatic entitlement to respect a priori. Respect, like trust, has to be cultivated. Demands for respect, expressions of entitlement and outbursts of frustration when such demands aren't met are an indicator of flaws in the relationship due to failings on one side, the other or both. This is all they should be taken for. The failings should be addressed, but not the demands. Respect can't be demanded. Trust can't be demanded. You can't demand either that someone like you.

So I take the writer's article as a very public cry for help. Taking recourse to how power structures should work is desperate and futile. The writer is a bad teacher who has a lot to learn. His students will learn little from him until he does, other than distrust, resentment and the little wisdom gleaned from a cautionary example.


Last edited by The_Eyeball_Kid on Fri Nov 02, 2007 10:28 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CentralCali



Joined: 17 May 2007

PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2007 10:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gary,

You seem to be unaware of Schertzer's arrival, so to speak, here. His sole thesis then was "Schertzer is the only good foreign teacher here and that's because I use the Callan Method which you guys don't have a clue about."

Few who read his first posts will forget that attitude. Nor will they forget his defense of the "right to view kiddie porn in one's home."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GaryCooper



Joined: 10 Jun 2006

PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2007 10:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

CentralCali wrote:
Gary, You seem to be unaware of Schertzer's arrival, so to