|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
blaseblasphemener
Joined: 01 Jun 2006 Location: There's a voice, keeps on calling me, down the road, that's where I'll always be
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 8:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"This theory was sent to Albert Einstein, which answered to Hapgood in very enthusiastic terms."
Einstein was a geologist?
http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/PSEUDOSC/PiriRies.HTM
Quote: |
Rule #1 For Interpreting Ancient Maps (If You Want A Best Seller)
Anything that matches (or can be made to seem like a match to) existing cartography is proof that the cartographer had access to secret knowledge. Anything that doesn't match, doesn't count.
* Omission of major land masses, bodies of water, etc., doesn't count.
* Failure to draw your home country accurately doesn't count.
* Inclusion of non-existent features doesn't count, except if you want to claim the map actually shows geography as it was in the Pleistocene, Cretaceous, Precambrian, etc. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
blaseblasphemener
Joined: 01 Jun 2006 Location: There's a voice, keeps on calling me, down the road, that's where I'll always be
|
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 9:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mindmetoo wrote: |
"This theory was sent to Albert Einstein, which answered to Hapgood in very enthusiastic terms."
Einstein was a geologist?
http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/PSEUDOSC/PiriRies.HTM
Quote: |
Rule #1 For Interpreting Ancient Maps (If You Want A Best Seller)
Anything that matches (or can be made to seem like a match to) existing cartography is proof that the cartographer had access to secret knowledge. Anything that doesn't match, doesn't count.
* Omission of major land masses, bodies of water, etc., doesn't count.
* Failure to draw your home country accurately doesn't count.
* Inclusion of non-existent features doesn't count, except if you want to claim the map actually shows geography as it was in the Pleistocene, Cretaceous, Precambrian, etc. |
|
So you disagree with the article's thesis? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 9:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
blaseblasphemener wrote: |
mindmetoo wrote: |
"This theory was sent to Albert Einstein, which answered to Hapgood in very enthusiastic terms."
Einstein was a geologist?
http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/PSEUDOSC/PiriRies.HTM
Quote: |
Rule #1 For Interpreting Ancient Maps (If You Want A Best Seller)
Anything that matches (or can be made to seem like a match to) existing cartography is proof that the cartographer had access to secret knowledge. Anything that doesn't match, doesn't count.
* Omission of major land masses, bodies of water, etc., doesn't count.
* Failure to draw your home country accurately doesn't count.
* Inclusion of non-existent features doesn't count, except if you want to claim the map actually shows geography as it was in the Pleistocene, Cretaceous, Precambrian, etc. |
|
So you disagree with the article's thesis? |
Yes.
"The earliest known civilization, the Sumerians in Mesopotamia, appear out of nowhere around 4,000 B.C. "
What bizarre loaded language.
Last edited by mindmetoo on Sun Nov 04, 2007 9:23 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
blaseblasphemener
Joined: 01 Jun 2006 Location: There's a voice, keeps on calling me, down the road, that's where I'll always be
|
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 9:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mindmetoo wrote: |
blaseblasphemener wrote: |
mindmetoo wrote: |
"This theory was sent to Albert Einstein, which answered to Hapgood in very enthusiastic terms."
Einstein was a geologist?
http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/PSEUDOSC/PiriRies.HTM
Quote: |
Rule #1 For Interpreting Ancient Maps (If You Want A Best Seller)
Anything that matches (or can be made to seem like a match to) existing cartography is proof that the cartographer had access to secret knowledge. Anything that doesn't match, doesn't count.
* Omission of major land masses, bodies of water, etc., doesn't count.
* Failure to draw your home country accurately doesn't count.
* Inclusion of non-existent features doesn't count, except if you want to claim the map actually shows geography as it was in the Pleistocene, Cretaceous, Precambrian, etc. |
|
So you disagree with the article's thesis? |
Yes. |
Specifically, 2 points you dispute. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ernie
Joined: 05 Aug 2006 Location: asdfghjk
|
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 9:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
is it possible that the map maker deduced that since the east coast of s. america and the west coast of africa fit together like a jigsaw puzzle, the southern continent would as well? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 9:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
1) That it depicts the northern coast of antartica.
As the uwgb shows, it's just the way SA was drawn.
Quote: |
Above is a map of South America and Antarctica with the Piri Reis coastline in magenta. Southern South America and Antarctica are in the orthographic projection - in other words they do look like they would as seen from space. We can see the Piri Reis Map bears no resemblance at all to Antarctica. The 600-mile wide Drake Passage is not shown, nor are the large islands in the Weddell Sea. The latitude is thousands of miles off.
So in response to people who ask how to explain why the Piri Reis Map shows the coastline of Antarctica accurately, the answer is - it doesn't. It especially doesn't show the subglacial coastline of Antarctica, which corresponds to the existing coastline of Antarctica around most of the continent anyway. |
2) That the US Navy used the map to correct its own maps.
Quote: |
"In 1953 ... the U.S. Navy Hydrographic Bureau ... Arlington H. Mallery, an authority on ancient maps ... Mallery discovered the projection method used. ... the map was totally accurate. ... The Hydrographic Office ... were ... able to correct ... errors in the present days maps" <http://www.world-mysteries.com/sar_1.htm>
Yes, they are totally wrong. Certainly the people who created the web page he cites did absolutely no original work of their own but are merely parroting older pseudoscience works.
Reality check here. In 1953, we had just fought a major war in the Atlantic, where errors in maps could lead to ships being sunk and battles being lost. We're to believe a 16th century map was more accurate than charts used to fight naval warfare in World War II when ships and lives depended on cartographic accuracy? And what specific errors were found and corrected? Where's the documentation that any of this ever actually happened?
Searching for Arlington H Mallery on line is revealing. He was a prolific author of cult archeological theories, and at least a couple of times he got into professional journals, only to get smacked down soundly for his errors. |
As the professor notes, lots of claims from your original page, not a lot of peer reviewed documentation to support it. The author has just cobbled together some interesting little stories from other sources. The Navy claim of particular note. It's a bit like Bermuda Triangle books that always take their research from older Bermuda Triangle books, simply repeating claims without actually checking the source. "X ship disappeared in the Bermuda Triangle" when it turns out the ship went down off the coast of Newfoundland.
Last edited by mindmetoo on Sun Nov 04, 2007 10:11 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
igotthisguitar

Joined: 08 Apr 2003 Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)
|
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 9:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Is that the Piri Reis Map?
The Piri Reis map is a famous pre-modern world map created by 16th century Ottoman-Turkish admiral and cartographer Piri Reis. The map shows part of the western coasts of Europe and North Africa with reasonable accuracy, and the coast of Brazil is also easily recognizable. Various Atlantic islands including the Azores and Canary Islands are depicted, as is the mythical island of Antillia.
The map is noteworthy for its depiction of a southern landmass that some controversially claim is evidence for early awareness of the existence of Antarctica.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piri_Reis_map |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
yawarakaijin
Joined: 08 Aug 2006
|
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 10:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Very interesing article. Not sure why people get so people just straight to the extremes. One thinks its evidence of some ancient space aliens and the others dismiss it as an outright hoax or absurdity.
I also get confused as to all the talk regarding civilization this or civilization that. Is it absolutely imperative to achieve "civilization" before one goes off adventuring around the globe? Is it so unbelievable that a group of humans could build a boat and stock it with the supplies necessary for such a journey? For chrissakes, we have been to the MOON! but a group of people couldn't have possibly built a boat and gone across the ocean? I mean it isn't inconceivable is it? If it is, please demonstrate how. I think we don't give early humans enough credit. The pyramids, machu pichu no problem. A boat and some mathematics...nahhhh.
Either way, Man it would have been so cool to live in an age when you literally didn't know what was around the next corner. What a sense of adventure and excitement must have been instilled in people living in that era. I remember as a kid being so excited about exploring the woods outside my house. Would have been so cool to live in a time when that sense of wonder would never have subsided.
Last edited by yawarakaijin on Sun Nov 04, 2007 11:31 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
blaseblasphemener
Joined: 01 Jun 2006 Location: There's a voice, keeps on calling me, down the road, that's where I'll always be
|
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 10:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yawarakaijin wrote: |
Very interesing article. Not sure why people get so people just straight to the extremes. One thinks its evidence of some ancient space aliens and the others dismiss it as an outright hoax or absurdity.
I also get confused as to all the talk regarding civilization this or civilization that. It is absolutely imperative to achieve "civilization" before one goes off adventuring around the globe. Is it so unbelievable that a group of humans could build a boat and stock it with the supplies necessary for such a journey? For chrissakes, we have been to the MOON! but a group of people couldn't have possibly built a boat and gone across the ocean? I mean it isn't inconceivable is it? If it is, please demonstrate how. I think we don't give early humans enough credit. The pyramids, machu pichu no problem. A boat and some mathematics...nahhhh.
Either way, Man it would have been so cool to live in an age when you literally didn't know what was around the next corner. What a sense of adventure and excitement must have been instilled in people living in that era. I remember as a kid being so excited about exploring the woods outside my house. Would have been so cool to live in a time when that sense of wonder would never have subsided. |
good post. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 10:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have no doubt ancient people have done more than we currently give them credit for. But we don't give them credit based on a feeling. We give them credit based on peer reviewed evidence. Ancient maps being accurate. Sure. Ancient maps being accurate in far away places but botching your local country? Errr, you need a touch of skepticism. Ancient maps with satellite like accuracy? C'mon. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wannago
Joined: 16 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 10:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yawarakaijin wrote: |
Either way, Man it would have been so cool to live in an age when you literally didn't know what was around the next corner. What a sense of adventure and excitement must have been instilled in people living in that era. I remember as a kid being so excited about exploring the woods outside my house. Would have been so cool to live in a time when that sense of wonder would never have subsided. |
I agree that, with the way we think today, back then would have been very exciting. The fact is, though, people didn't think that way. Even up through the Middle Ages life was full of danger, death, and fear. Going to explore very far from home was a terrifying thought for most.
I'm reminded of a book A World Lit Only By Fire by William Manchester. A great read. He claims that people didn't have a sense of themselves in the world or even in history until thinking changed signifying what we know as the Renaissance.
So, while it would have been cool for us 21st century people go live in that time, it was probably not-so-cool for the majority of the people actually living at that time. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
yawarakaijin
Joined: 08 Aug 2006
|
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 11:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
wannago wrote: |
yawarakaijin wrote: |
Either way, Man it would have been so cool to live in an age when you literally didn't know what was around the next corner. What a sense of adventure and excitement must have been instilled in people living in that era. I remember as a kid being so excited about exploring the woods outside my house. Would have been so cool to live in a time when that sense of wonder would never have subsided. |
I agree that, with the way we think today, back then would have been very exciting. The fact is, though, people didn't think that way. Even up through the Middle Ages life was full of danger, death, and fear. Going to explore very far from home was a terrifying thought for most.
I'm reminded of a book A World Lit Only By Fire by William Manchester. A great read. He claims that people didn't have a sense of themselves in the world or even in history until thinking changed signifying what we know as the Renaissance.
So, while it would have been cool for us 21st century people go live in that time, it was probably not-so-cool for the majority of the people actually living at that time. |
No doubt fear would have been a major factor is people's lives back then. The average Joe would have been extremely foolish to go off hiking through the wilderness but let's not forget that extreme desire humans tend to have to see whats over the next hill. The astronauts surely would have known it was dangerous to go to the moon but we did it anyways. The crusaders must have known it was no picnic heading out on a crusade. People do a lot of things that are not in their best interests if there is a good enough incentive or if they are crazy enough.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wannago
Joined: 16 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 12:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
yawarakaijin wrote: |
wannago wrote: |
yawarakaijin wrote: |
Either way, Man it would have been so cool to live in an age when you literally didn't know what was around the next corner. What a sense of adventure and excitement must have been instilled in people living in that era. I remember as a kid being so excited about exploring the woods outside my house. Would have been so cool to live in a time when that sense of wonder would never have subsided. |
I agree that, with the way we think today, back then would have been very exciting. The fact is, though, people didn't think that way. Even up through the Middle Ages life was full of danger, death, and fear. Going to explore very far from home was a terrifying thought for most.
I'm reminded of a book A World Lit Only By Fire by William Manchester. A great read. He claims that people didn't have a sense of themselves in the world or even in history until thinking changed signifying what we know as the Renaissance.
So, while it would have been cool for us 21st century people go live in that time, it was probably not-so-cool for the majority of the people actually living at that time. |
No doubt fear would have been a major factor is people's lives back then. The average Joe would have been extremely foolish to go off hiking through the wilderness but let's not forget that extreme desire humans tend to have to see whats over the next hill. The astronauts surely would have known it was dangerous to go to the moon but we did it anyways. The crusaders must have known it was no picnic heading out on a crusade. People do a lot of things that are not in their best interests if there is a good enough incentive or if they are crazy enough.  |
Agreed, but the fact is, "back then," very few people had the desire or will to go exploring. Some did and they are the stuff we read about in history books. Most didn't. Think of people going to the Americas. Few people journeyed until it was, more or less, proven that there weren't giant sea creatures ready to devour a ship or that one would fall off the edge of the earth. Even then it was a frightening prospect.
I think it would have been cool to be the first person to step on the moon. But that's because I know it has been done and done safely. I don't know if my attitude would have been the same in 1969 had they invited me then for the first walk. Some people have that "stare danger in the face" mentality. Most don't...even today. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 1:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
From Herodotus (p 253 of the Penguin Classics edition):
As for Libya [Africa], we know that it is washed on all sides by the sea except where it joins Asia, as was first demonstrated, so far as our knowledge goes, by the Egyptian king Neco, who, after calling off the construction of the canal between the Nile and the Arabian gulf, sent out a fleet manned by a Phoenician crew with orders to said round and return to Egypt and the Mediterranean by way of the Pillars of Hercules. The Phoenicians sailed from the Red Sea into the southern ocean, and every autumn put in where they were on the Libyan coast, sowed a patch of ground, and waited for next year's harvest. Then, having got in their grain, they put to sea again, and after two full years rounded the Pillars of Hercules in the course of the third, and returned to Egypt. These men made a statement which I do not myself believe, though others may, to the effect that as tehy sailed on a westerly course round teh southern end of Libya, they had the sun on their right--to northward of them. This is how Libya was first discovered to be surrounded by sea, and the next people to make a similar report were the Carthaginians; for Sataspes, son of Teaspes, the Achaemenian, though sent out for the purpose, took fright at the length and loneliness of the voyage and turned back. It was Sataspes' mother who sent him upon this venture; he had raped a daughter of Megabyzus' son Zopyrus, and was about to be impaled as a punishment by Xerxes, when his mother, who was a sister of Darius, begged him off by promising to inflict upon him a punishment even mroe severe; this was to force him to cimcumnavigate Libya, returning by way of the Arabian gulf. Xerxes agreed; and Sataspes, on his arrival in Egypt, procured a vessel and crew and sailed to the Straits of Gibraltar. Passing through the Straits, he doubled Cape Soloeis in Libya and continued on a southerly course for many months; but when he found that, far though he had sailed, there was always need to sail further yet, he put about and returned to Egypt. From Egypt he went to Xerxes' court, where he reported that at the most southerly point they had reached they found the coast occupied by small men, who wore clothes made from palm leaves. When they landed, the small men used to abandon their settlements and escape to the hills. Sataspes' men had done them no harm, beyond entering their villages and taking some of their cattle. As to his failure to complete the circumnavigation, Sataspes declared that the reason was that his ship was broughtto a standstill and was unable to make headway. Xerxes, however, refused to pardon him, and, on the ground that he had failed to accomplish his set task, exacted the original penalty and had him impaled. A eunuch in Sataspes' service, when he learned of his master's death, escaped to Samos with a great deal of money. It was all seized, however, by a certain Samian, whose name I willingly forget--though I know it well. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|