Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Will the new regulations affect the number of people coming?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Would you stay away because of the regulations?
Yes
64%
 64%  [ 53 ]
No
25%
 25%  [ 21 ]
Other (specify your conditions)
9%
 9%  [ 8 ]
Total Votes : 82

Author Message
Summer Wine



Joined: 20 Mar 2005
Location: Next to a River

PostPosted: Tue Nov 06, 2007 5:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have to say as a longer term resident than some, if I had to apply as a new teacher knowing as much as I knew when I first applied.

No, the new changes wouldn't have an impact, because I knew next to nothing when I first arrived and so an extra amount of effort wouldn't register as being different.

Would I try? No, because the effort required would have put me off before I even bothered trying or someone would have put me off, because they would have told me I need to adopt an american accent, "can you do one?"

Now, knowing what I know. Would I apply again?

Only if it had no impact on my job. If I didn't have to do a trip to Japan or my home country. If I didn't have to reapply for the same documents I have handed in 7 times before. If I didn't have to convince them that the papers are legit again. Yes, I would stay with the same school, if not then:

Would I force myself to re-do the same issues again for a new job? No, I have had enough and will only stay in Korea if I don't have to rehash it all over again.

I had the fun of having to find my transcripts online today, just to discover its impossible and I am trusting that others can understand that.

Though my co-teachers told me that they have been told to implement a new educational system next year and when they said they didn't have the infrastructure to handle it, they were ignored.

So if the K teachers get ignored then I am not holding my breath about my own situation in regards to the education department. If the E. D doesn't accept my situation then some one else will have my job and I move on.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Julius



Joined: 27 Jul 2006

PostPosted: Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

People won't want to fly home for a consulate interview. This will stop some people already here from signing on for new jobs.

Some people cannot get police checks easily -eg if they've been away from their home country for many years. They will head elsewhere.

Some people will not have the time to wait for all their documents to get processed. They will head elsewhere.

And of course all the crims or fakers will be barred from the E2, although they might simply stay on with tourist visas. But my guess is that legislation will be brought in to combat this.

Ultimately yes, there will be fewer teachers coming out, or renewing here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SirFink



Joined: 05 Mar 2006

PostPosted: Tue Nov 06, 2007 9:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Besides the inconvenience, there's the cost to consider. Will medical checks be required? And just what sorts of checks? Chest X-rays to check for TB? Medical could be hundreds of dollars. Add to that the cost of flying to the nearest consulate for the interview plus a stay in a hotel overnight. That could add up to nearly $1000 just to try and get employment in Korea. You could catch the consulate interviewer on a bad day and get rejected. Oh well, at least you got a short vacation to Chicago and you can sleep soundly knowing you're not dying from TB.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
diablo3



Joined: 11 Sep 2004

PostPosted: Tue Nov 06, 2007 9:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The costs are the employers.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 4:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

(At this posting: 23 Yes-18 No)

Conclusion: (based on rather shaky research data) Come January, competition for jobs is going to start plummeting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hotpants



Joined: 27 Jan 2006

PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 5:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree with Summer Wine that to a newbie, they wouldn't notice any difference and would probably still come on over in droves.

However, I reckon that Hagwons will start to impose very lengthy notice periods which will cause great disgruntlement among the newbies. In turn this could either:
a) Make newbies even more determined to jump the hoops to climb up on the job ladder in Korea, or
b) Make newbies highly disillusioned with Korea and jump ship never to return

I'm still waiting to see Hagwon reaction to the proposed changes.

Also, I wonder if unis will drop their salaries even further at the increased competition for these 'nice' jobs which would be prefered for the long term, and in order to fund a teacher's round trip back home to get the new visa.

Personally, I had planned to return to Korea in the not too distant future, but am seriously re-considering this plan if this new policy persists. If it wasn't for the fact that my particular hobby only existed in Korea, I don't see any particular attraction to Korea over the neighbors of Japan, China, Hong Kong and Taiwan. Why else should I pay up to 2 months Korean salary in flights, medicals, hotel expenses, runs to embassies and pay further personal expense in terms of jet-lag and stress.

After Japan made its visa conditions much easier for English teachers, it seems odd that Korea is taking this very backward step of increased bureacracy which doesn't seem to particularly aide the progress of English teaching in Korea. Why on earth doesn't the Korean Government focus on increasing the qualifications of English teachers in Korea rather than increasing paperwork? This is lunacy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SirFink



Joined: 05 Mar 2006

PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 1:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

diablo3 wrote:
The costs are the employers.


I really have no idea how this will all turn out, but I can't see a school shelling out hundreds of dollars to a would-be employee in their home country to get medical and criminal background checks and fly them to the nearest consulate, etc. just because they're interested in hiring that individual. What if the tests come up positive for Hep C or something? What if the candidate finds a better offer at another school and just decides he doesn't want to teach in Korea? That hagwon's out a few hundred or even a thousand dollars. Oh well, back to searching for a new teacher.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
garykasparov



Joined: 27 May 2007

PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 2:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I'm still waiting to see Hagwon reaction to the proposed changes.


I'm all for the "coke-blower" test and the criminal background checks. But the nine month standard is fucking stupid. The nine month rule favors employers who are crooks, including a majority of all hagwon owners, that will fire teachers before nine months of employment to make it extremely difficult on them.


Last edited by garykasparov on Wed Nov 07, 2007 3:10 pm; edited 12 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
diablo3



Joined: 11 Sep 2004

PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 3:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think if many people are put off by the new regulations, it would create a new squeeze, or maybe a new type of illegal recruiting to keep the balance.

It means that employers would get more desperate to hire E2 visa types, and it could put more pressure on them to pay for these fees (either immediately or reimbursed after arrival to Korea).

Just a scenario.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ttompatz



Joined: 05 Sep 2005
Location: Kwangju, South Korea

PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 3:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The_Conservative wrote:
Mr. BlackCat wrote:
[b]And, really, a year in jail? Are you serious? For teaching some kids conversational English? t.



No, for committing fraud. A year in jail is a light sentence for that kind of action.


There are lots of documented cases of people who commit fraud (up to $100,000 ) and serve less than 9 months in jail for their trouble. I have personally known people who have committed fraud and they have spent less than 4 months (real time) in the county jail (with a restitution order) and no fine (Phoenix, 2002).

Visa violations = crime, but make the punishment fit the crime.
If you want to GET TOUGH on REPEAT OFFENDERS, fill your boots.

In regards to the other requirements, as a teacher, you can hold me to the same standard that you hold your own citizen teachers to. If you do it to them, I have no problem being held to the same standard and requirements.

To treat me different just because of my country of origin or color of my skin is simply racist and has no place in a modern, developed society (UN's opinion - not mine) and by last measure, Korea was considered to be a "newly developed country".

.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Mr. BlackCat



Joined: 30 Nov 2005
Location: Insert witty remark HERE

PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 6:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Homer wrote:

Quote:
Mr. BlackCat,

The crime is not teaching kids English and you know it.

The crime here is either work visa violation or fraud (if on fake papers). We can all sugar coat as 'He/she was just teaching' but the law says you cannot do certain things....

You may disagree with that and feel it is unfair. That is your right.

But, the argument of 'I was just teaching, not selling drugs' is justa cop out that is too often used.

If the penalties for visa violation are fine and deportation (detention until you can pay the fine and your ticket out) for example then a teacher who engages in this activity is making a choice and rolling the dice. If and when the man comes calling, it will be time to pay up for the choice that was made.


No, I don't 'know' the crime is really not just teaching English. Do you guys really believe all this new visa stuff is really to 'protect' Korea? Or is it just more xenophobia? Excusing CEOs of crimes, looking the other way when a man beats a woman, allowing women to be sold in glass houses. All of this is fine. But a foreigner teaching grammar is untolerable? No, two wrongs don't make a right. My point is that why are we so gung-ho about prosecuting illegals? I say the same thing in Canada. Some controls are necessary, and punishments are needed for those that offend. But I just roll my eyes at all the self-ritcheousness. Things aren't so black and white.

What about a Filipino who has an M Ed and is much more qualified to teach than most of the people here? Should your country of birth really entitle you to more gains than his? Yeah, its still 'wrong' for this Filopino to come here and teach, but a year in jail seems a bit much. You're assuming everyone affected by these draconian laws would be some rich suburban kid from Canada. Sorry, in the real world these types of things hurt those that can least afford it the most.

I know a lot of you picked up a bucket of entitlement when you were handed you Degree. I worked my ass off for mine both academically and financially. But I'm not ignorant enough to believe everyone who doesn't have one is inferior to me, or just 'didn't work hard enough' to get it.

Yes, a reasonable fine and deportation are expected. I was responding to the mandatory jail time. Most of the rest of us just have a BA and white skin. Get over yourselves.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The_Conservative



Joined: 15 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 3:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ttompatz wrote:
The_Conservative wrote:
Mr. BlackCat wrote:
[b]And, really, a year in jail? Are you serious? For teaching some kids conversational English? t.



No, for committing fraud. A year in jail is a light sentence for that kind of action.


There are lots of documented cases of people who commit fraud (up to $100,000 ) and serve less than 9 months in jail for their trouble. I have personally known people who have committed fraud and they have spent less than 4 months (real time) in the county jail (with a restitution order) and no fine (Phoenix, 2002).



.


True...I should have made it clearer that I was expressing an opinion. Also that a year might be more of a deterrent than a few months
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The_Conservative



Joined: 15 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 3:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mr. BlackCat wrote:
[b]
No, I don't 'know' the crime is really not just teaching English. Do you guys really believe all this new visa stuff is really to 'protect' Korea? Or is it just more xenophobia? Excusing CEOs of crimes, looking the other way when a man beats a woman, allowing women to be sold in glass houses. All of this is fine. But a foreigner teaching grammar is untolerable? No, two wrongs don't make a right. My point is that why are we so gung-ho about prosecuting illegals? s.



Because then maybe we wouldn't have to verify our degrees every time. Maybe we wouldn't have to fly back to our home countries between jobs,
Maybe we wouldn't have to submit police checks and medical reports every time as well.

Maybe teaching English might be looked at with a little more respect if people could be assured that 99% of us were legal...and perhaps we might get a little more respect as well.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Homer
Guest




PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 3:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Blackcat,

The crime people get busted for is work visa violation or fraud (fake papers). The act is teaching beyind your visa permissions or doing so on fraudulant papers.


You are debating a greater issue (why the visa rules are like this and the fact you disagree with these rules) and then using that to excuse the crime being committed (unless I missunderstood you).


Now your real debate is this:

Quote:
What about a Filipino who has an M Ed and is much more qualified to teach than most of the people here? Should your country of birth really entitle you to more gains than his?


I agree. He should be able to teach providing he passes an English proficiency test. The same should apply to Indians, Pakistanis....and so on.

For example...read this letter in the joongang ilbo...it illustrate the point pretty well I think.

The argument being made at the end I completely agree with.

http://joongangdaily.joins.com/article/view.asp?aid=2882364

The visa rules should be about qualifications and not about being a native speaker only.

But, the visa (E-2) would still (unless they change it) limit teachers to one place of employment (unless they get permission for another) and make it illegal to teach privates. Doing privates would remain a work visa violation and therefore a crime.

Working on fake papers is fraud. This is not debatable.


Now this:

Quote:
But I'm not ignorant enough to believe everyone who doesn't have one is inferior to me, or just 'didn't work hard enough' to get it.


Neither am I b-cat. I do not think a degree = better teacher.

But I do think any industry needs a common hiring standard and that a degree is the best one out there from a management standpoint.

A degree will also ensure a certain level of education and some abilities.

Anyway, again, the law requires a degree. Teaching without one, even if you think it is ok, is a crime right now and it goes with a penalty. This crime would be fraud or labour law violation.


Last edited by Homer on Thu Nov 08, 2007 4:19 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Optimus Prime



Joined: 05 Jul 2007

PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 3:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

SO what's going to happen when the next Chris Neil is busted working in Korea? And by the next Chris Neil, I mean a guy who has went through the gauntlet of all these checks and screens (and passed), and is still discovered to be a kiddie fiddler?


Because, Chris Neil would have passed every single one of these ideas that are to be implemented.

I can only imagine what they would impose then.

As an aside, regarding the document forging prison sentences many of you are proposing, I think many of you are missing the boat . Forgery wouldn't be a crime if you were back home and submitted fake docs. What I mean by that is you'd simply be denied a visa. I can't see them luring people they know submitted a fake by granting a visa for the purposes of nabbing someone, and then Immigration showing up once yuou are in-country and saying "gotcha." Perhaps the Korean Embassy could notify your local authorities and something happening, but that would be the only way I believe, and I have no idea whether they have the authority.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 2 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International