Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Eliminate the Fed?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 10, 11, 12 ... 23, 24, 25  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
huffdaddy



Joined: 25 Nov 2005

PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 2:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

igotthisguitar wrote:
Which presidential candidate would most likely fix the U.S. economy?


You're citing DESLC polls now? Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
thepeel



Joined: 08 Aug 2004

PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 2:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

52 trillion in debt/liabilities. 7 trillion in $assets in the hands of foreigners.

Yes. Ron Paul is the one who could fix it. To fix it, you have to end the entitlements, and stop the wars. Nothing else will work.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
igotthisguitar



Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)

PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

huffdaddy wrote:
igotthisguitar wrote:
Which presidential candidate would most likely fix the U.S. economy?


You're citing DESLC polls now? Rolling Eyes


Sample survey.

Sure, why not? Wink

igotthisguitar wrote:
RON PAUL ... CENSORED AGAIN
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Jqz3QbAaTQ&NR=1

CNBC Censors Oct 9th Landslide (75%) Victory Shocked Confused
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=45mmY7giY4s&feature=related


Which presidential candidate would most likely fix the U.S. economy?

Hillary Clinton
21%
[ 6 ]

Barack Obama
10% [ 3 ]
John Edwards
0% [ 0 ]
Mitt Romney
14% [ 4 ]

Ron Paul
46%
[ 13 ]


John McCain
0% [ 0 ]
Mike Huckabee
3% [ 1 ]
Rudy Giuliani
0% [ 0 ]
Dennis Kucinich
3% [ 1 ]
Fred Thompson
0% [ 0 ]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
ontheway



Joined: 24 Aug 2005
Location: Somewhere under the rainbow...

PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 9:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Today gold futures broke $1000 for the first time.

This documents the continued fall of the dollar. Concomitantly, oil hit $111 per barrel.

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/crude-his-new-high-111/story.aspx?guid=%7B6F37A54C-D191-475C-997C-99BAFB93CBBB%7D


Remember, all the fiat currencies are on the way to zero. Some experts have predicted that the dollar will fall to the $2000 per ounce level by the end of 2008.

To understand, you need to reverse the fractions:

When the Federal Reserve was established, it cost 100 ounces of gold to buy $2000. Due to the failure of this socialist institution, it now costs only 2 ounces of gold to buy $2000 dollars, and by the end of the year it may only cost 1 ounce of gold to buy that same $2000.

The Fed has stolen 98% of your cash money. The dollar has lost 98% of its value. It could be 99% by the end of the year.

Congratulations to all the statists, socialists, fascists, Keynesians and other fans of Fiat money: social security, national health care and fiat money are the most successful financial frauds ever committed against mankind.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pluto



Joined: 19 Dec 2006

PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 7:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ontheway wrote:


Congratulations to all the statists, socialists, fascists, Keynesians and other fans of Fiat money: social security, national health care and fiat money are the most successful financial frauds ever committed against mankind.


Where does this line up on the list of crimes? Also, don't think that expats are safe! Somehow, someway, some Member of Congress will figure out how to steal, excuse me, tax income earned overseas -- Bet on it!

Dear Lord, $3,035 a year. That's a nice full entertainment center for my living room, but apparently the government thinks it knows how to spend my money better than I can. Confused
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 7:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gold is less than it was in 1980 after adjustments for inflation.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ernie



Joined: 05 Aug 2006
Location: asdfghjk

PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 7:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i've had this discussion with a friend of mine who keeps making the same mistake as this ^

i realize you're talking about the value of gold (which DID hit a high in 1980, and is peaking right now), but you're confusing the issue, which is the value of the dollar wrt gold...

when you're measuring the value of the dollar, it makes no sense to adjust for inflation wrt to the dollar, because your result will always be 1! when we measure something, we must adjust for changes in the UNIT OF MEASUREMENT, not the thing we're measuring, because the change is what we're measuring!

when measuring the value of the dollar you must adjust for inflation, but you must adjust according to the inflation in the supply of gold (or whatever other commodity you're using to measure the value of the dollar)... since the worldwide supply of gold is (relatively) constant (i.e. we don't find that much new gold every year), gold is a good measure of value over the long term... currently gold is overvalued because of the volatility of the USD, because it's not tied to gold in any way...


Last edited by ernie on Thu Mar 13, 2008 7:53 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee



Joined: 25 May 2003

PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 7:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok I buy my girlfriend a gold necklace in 1980.

I buy my girlfriend a gold necklace in 2008.

Was is more of a financial burden to buy for me in 1980 or in 2008?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ernie



Joined: 05 Aug 2006
Location: asdfghjk

PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 7:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

you're right: gold did peak slightly higher in 1980 than it is now... my point is that we're measuring the value of the dollar (not the value of gold) so we must adjust for the inflation of gold (not the dollar) in our calculation because gold (not the dollar) is the unit of measurement...

i think we are saying the same thing in a different way... it's so easy to get confused 'adjusting for inflation' because many people don't understand that 'inflation' really means an increase in the SUPPLY of something (usually we mean money because that's our unit of measurement), not an increase in price... the increase in price is (partly) a RESULT of more money being in the system...

the problem with the lack of a gold standard is that, because of inflation, saying that gold is at $1000 or oil is at $100 isn't that indicative of true VALUE because the value of the dollar is so volatile at the moment... are gold and oil more valuable or is the dollar simply less valuable? all of the other world currencies are fiat-based, so they aren't trustworthy either!

how am i supposed to measure value?!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Pluto



Joined: 19 Dec 2006

PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 8:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Glenn Beck and Ben Stein on Big Oil Multinationals and money. I found this conversation pretty insightful. I got into a debate about the 'evil' multinationals a couple days ago so it's pretty important to define who the owners are of these multinationals. It turns out it's people like you and me. ( that is, of course, if your concerned about your own wealth and financial well being) Remember, the managers act in the best interests of their owners (e.g. the stockholders); the free market forces them to do so. Also, in the interests of the shareholders, all of the stakeholders(which is pretty much everyone reading this post) the managers will do whatever possible to look out for their interests as well. Again, the free market forces them to do this.

As far as the Fed and inflation are concerned, if you're that worried then you should throw your money into hard assets like oil. Exxon-Mobile is a good choice, too. There's never been a better time Cool


Last edited by Pluto on Thu Mar 13, 2008 9:17 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ernie



Joined: 05 Aug 2006
Location: asdfghjk

PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 9:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i'm no stock trader, but imo the best companies to invest in are those in bed with whoever is president of the usa...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Pluto



Joined: 19 Dec 2006

PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 9:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ernie wrote:
i'm no stock trader, but imo the best companies to invest in are those in bed with whoever is president of the usa...


What you've just described is a phenomenon known as corporatism. Corporatism is when corporations and government interests merge. The best way to lessen this phenomenon is to reduce taxes and reduce needless and burdensome regulation.

As far as the stock market is concerned, I'd recommend you get on it as soon as you can. As an ESL teacher in Korea you should be saving at least 3,000 USD a year, though this is only a recommendation. You can start here and here.

Remember, it's your life; take ownership of it!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 9:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pluto wrote:
Glenn Beck and Ben Stein on Big Oil Multinationals and money. I found this conversation pretty insightful.


Ugh, I can't watch Glenn Beck. Its not what he says, its his accompanying mannerisms and how he says it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
huffdaddy



Joined: 25 Nov 2005

PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 1:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ernie wrote:

how am i supposed to measure value?!


Using a basket of goods that the average consumer purchases. Compare the cost of that basket over time, and you've got a fairly decent measure of the changing value of the currency used to purchase it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
ontheway



Joined: 24 Aug 2005
Location: Somewhere under the rainbow...

PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 7:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The spot price of gold is up again today: $1004 per ounce.

The dollar is now worth less than 2% of what it was in the year that the Federal Reserve was created.



The only effective way to measure the inflation of the dollar is to compare it to gold.


The CPI uses a basket of goods purchased at various locations, but it is a completely useless number. It has been politically manipulated to severely underestimate the real inflation rate in order to minimize required upward adjustments in entitlement payments which would increase government expenditures, and to reduce the CPI linked tax deductions that would reduce government income.

Even at its best, CPI misses the point about inflation. When linked to some commodity, inflation is a measure in an increase in the supply of money relative to the commodity backing it. When it comes to fiat money, the money has no real value in any case. The fact that it maintains some temporary purchasing value has to do with the fact that all change takes place over time, that some people are so ignorant that they can be fooled indefinitely, and that governments can use force and fraud without prosecution to maintain their criminal enterprises.

As a result, the only way to measure the value of the dollar is to compare it to gold.



Under the management of the Federal Reserve, the dollar has now lost more than 98% of its value.

Nice job.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 10, 11, 12 ... 23, 24, 25  Next
Page 11 of 25

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International