View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
chris_J2

Joined: 17 Apr 2006 Location: From Brisbane, Au.
|
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 9:04 pm Post subject: Least / Most corrupt countries |
|
|
Least corrupt country and CPI score
Denmark: 9.4
Finland: 9.4
New Zealand: 9.4
Singapore: 9.3
Sweden: 9.3
Iceland: 9.2
Netherlands: 9.0
Switzerland: 9.0
Canada / Norway: 8.7
Most corrupt country and CPI score
Somalia: 1.4
Myanmar: 1.4
Iraq: 1.5
Haiti: 1.6
Uzbekistan: 1.7
Tonga: 1.7
Sudan: 1.8
Chad: 1.8
Afghanistan: 1.8
Laos: 1.9
Source: http://www.gulfnews.com/world/General/10185179.html |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CentralCali
Joined: 17 May 2007
|
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 9:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
How on Earth did the Republika ng Pilipinas not clinch the title of Most Corrupt Government on the Face of the Planet? Their embassies and consulates don't even make a pretense of hiding the corruption--they flat out demand the bribes up front. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
chris_J2

Joined: 17 Apr 2006 Location: From Brisbane, Au.
|
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 10:00 pm Post subject: Corruption |
|
|
Quote: |
Furthermore, there does seem to have been some improvement in anti-corruption mechanisms in many nations, particularly the more developed countries. In the past year, such nations as Indonesia, China, the Philippines, Sri Lanka and Australia have ratified the United Nations Convention Against Corruption. Ironically, Japan, the 17th least corrupt country in the world, and South Korea, the 42nd least corrupt, have failed to ratify the U.N. document. |
(04.03.2007) http://www.forbes.com/home/2007/04/03/corruption-countries-nations-biz-07caphosp-cx_da_0403corrupt.html
Country 2008 CPI score Confidence range:
#11? Australia* 8.8 8.4
#124 *Philippines* 2.5 2.3
http://www.xboard.us/showthread.php?p=6896701 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
oldfatfarang
Joined: 19 May 2005 Location: On the road to somewhere.
|
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 3:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Something wrong here?
Denmark: 9.4
Finland: 9.4
New Zealand: 9.4
Singapore: 9.3
Sweden: 9.3
Iceland: 9.2
Netherlands: 9.0
Switzerland: 9.0
Canada / Norway: 8.7
How does Singapore (an Asian country) rank up with these Northern/European countries?
I can understand NZ's place, being modelled on Euruope and the Scandanavian welfare ethic - but Singapore. Any ideas? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
chris_J2

Joined: 17 Apr 2006 Location: From Brisbane, Au.
|
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 4:43 pm Post subject: Corruption |
|
|
* Singapore is modelled on the British system, as is HK
* Lee Kuan Yew is no longer in charge, & was no Marcos or Suharto
Allegations of nepotism, because his son Lim Boon Heng is PM, have been made, but Lim Boon Heng WAS elected by the people of Singapore.
* free & open elections, not marred by riots or violence
* The Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) can, & does act.
* 'authoritarian' does not equal corruption
* the government has a clean, corruption-free image. & Singapore has consistently been rated as the least-corrupt country in Asia
* a transparent free market |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ajgeddes

Joined: 28 Apr 2004 Location: Yongsan
|
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 4:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think I can shed some light on corruption in Singapore, as I wrote a 30 page paper on it during university. It really has nothing to do with being under the British system. Singapore was one of the most corrupt places in Asia up until the early 70's. Basically, through stronger gov't and actually paying it's public servants good wages, they were gradually able to cut out a huge proportion of corruption within their gov't, and is now one of the least corrupt countries in the world. Indonesia and Hong Kong tried to do similar things around the same time with Hong Kong having reasonable success while Indonesia failing miserably. There is more to it than that, but you get the jist. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
chris_J2

Joined: 17 Apr 2006 Location: From Brisbane, Au.
|
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 4:56 pm Post subject: Singapore |
|
|
Indonesia was Dutch, Indo-China was French, & the Philippines was initially Spanish (& later annexed by the US).
But point taken. Myanmar, India, & Malaysia were also originally modelled on British systems. So were Australia & NZ, for that matter. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ajgeddes

Joined: 28 Apr 2004 Location: Yongsan
|
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 5:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oh, I agree that it is based somewhat on the British system. I'm just saying that it has nothing to do with it's corruption level. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
chris_J2

Joined: 17 Apr 2006 Location: From Brisbane, Au.
|
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 5:21 pm Post subject: Singapore |
|
|
My point was, that there would be less likelihood of Singapore enjoying corruption free status, if Raffles had been Dutch, French or Spanish.
The Westminster system, is arguably superior, to other political models, such as Presidential elections. But like all systems, is still open to abuse. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ajgeddes

Joined: 28 Apr 2004 Location: Yongsan
|
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 5:36 pm Post subject: Re: Singapore |
|
|
chris_J2 wrote: |
My point was, that there would be less likelihood of Singapore enjoying corruption free status, if Raffles had been Dutch, French or Spanish.
The Westminster system, is arguably superior, to other political models, such as Presidential elections. But like all systems, is still open to abuse. |
I definitely do not agree with that.
The UK, Canada, New Zealand and Australia should be the 4 least corrupt systems in the world if that's the case. Singapore was ultra-corrupt before, and it has nothing to do with Raffles being British that brought about their change. It has to do with Singaporeans, creating change in their own style, regardless of who their colonial masters were. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
chris_J2

Joined: 17 Apr 2006 Location: From Brisbane, Au.
|
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 5:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
The UK, Canada, New Zealand and Australia should be the 4 least corrupt systems in the world if that's the case. |
But all 4 of the above are in the top 11!
Quote: |
It has to do with Singaporeans, creating change in their own style, regardless of who their colonial masters were. |
Agreed. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RACETRAITOR
Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Location: Seoul, South Korea
|
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Singaporeans are descended from pirates, aren't they? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ajgeddes

Joined: 28 Apr 2004 Location: Yongsan
|
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
RACETRAITOR wrote: |
Singaporeans are descended from pirates, aren't they? |
How much does a pirate pay to get his ears pierced?
A Buccaneer. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
agentX
Joined: 12 Oct 2007 Location: Jeolla province
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 8:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
#20. USA
Gee thanks Blackwater. If that crapola of an organization weren't around we'd be #17 at least.
#38 Botswana
#41 Italy
#43 South Korea
#67 El Salvador
#72 Mexico
Botswana is less corrupt than Italy and South Korea? Well, go Botswana!
Italy, South Korea, you gotta a lotta work to do.
How in the heck is El Salvador less corrupt than Mexico? I mean come on!
#172 Afghanistan
The government we installed was supposed to be better than the Taliban, right?
#178 Iraq
Your tax dollars at work, folks. All those billions of dollars and the only difference between Iraq and Somalia is pirates. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cunning_stunt

Joined: 16 Dec 2007
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 1:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Botswana is less corrupt than Italy and South Korea? Well, go Botswana!
Italy, South Korea, you gotta a lotta work to do.
|
Botswana is a sorted place man . Wealthy and beautiful too and on the up. Don't be fooled by your ignorance and the "exotic" name . Next to South Africa , Botswana is subsaharan Africa's success story . |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|