|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
bassexpander
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Location: Someplace you'd rather be.
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 8:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
agoodmouse wrote: |
1. Why did you even ask me for photographs in the first place? You want me to drop this simple question because you look foolish for having asked me in the first place.
You just throw out questions and inquiries for evidence never expecting in your wildest dreams that you'll be proven wrong. It's simple as that. My question to you is absolutely a civil one: why did you even ask me for photographs of that online certificate in the first place, if you were already going to say (upon my demonstrating them) they were borrowed. |
No, I fully expected you to produce photographs. I just wanted to see your sexy fingers.
Do you feel as if you've won something here? What was the prize? I'm having fun watching you hyperventilate over it all.
Why don't you go back and read what I've said about the CELTA time and time again. I've stated that it's a worthy course. I have also stated that it's far too expensive, and not needed here to advance to the university teaching level, and that it is not even considered a certification worth of teaching in the USA. So what? Why are you going ape when I point these things out?
As for KEI -- SMOE (the Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education) approves of KEI's course. It gets teachers the certification they need to get a raise at their public school job, and does it at a low price point. It offers on-site training, which you admit you never took.
In any case, I'm not knocking your current public school position, or your interest in bettering your teacher credentials. That's fine. In all honesty, as many of my friends on here know, I often think about ditching my uni job for two PT public school jobs paying on an hourly basis. My salary would double.
The sad fact is, however, that getting a CELTA won't raise my pay at my uni. The uni jobs out there which pay considerably more (on average) require an MA/TESOL, and are at a few top institutions like PRragic talked about in another thread.
So why bother?
If Korea wants teachers to get better qualifications, then they need to compensate teachers for those credentials. As it stands now, other than the public schools giving you another 100,000 to 200,000 per month for having a TEFL certification FROM ABOUT ANYONE that's 100+ hours, there is no compelling reason to invest a great deal of time and money into one.
If Korea were to come out and say, "Only TEFL certified teachers can teach here" then their industry would be in an uproar. This would hardly fly with the desperate campaign of the incoming administration, which is struggling to find enough of anybody to fill teaching positions.
Korea needs to pay teachers more money if they expect them to up their credentials -- we need an incentive. They shouldn't whine about "unqualified teachers" when that is all they are willing to pay for. Korea also needs to offer teachers more job protection and end the slave-like "Letter of Release" requirement, among other things.
Perhaps a nationwide free TEFL program/camp required of incoming people would be the answer. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
agoodmouse

Joined: 20 Dec 2007 Location: Anyang
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 10:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bassexpander wrote: |
Do you feel as if you've won something here? What was the prize? I'm having fun watching you hyperventilate over it all. |
Nope, I just wanted to point out what a little kid you were acting like in that accusation where when you were wrong and didn't face up to the music. I've proven I took that online course, more than you have or ever will on this board, because I detailed intimately what the course did and didn't do and how I thought it should change. For those mere reasons, and because I actually have experience it, you feign disbelief as if I haven't proven I've actually taken the course.
Bassexpander wrote: |
Why don't you go back and read what I've said about the CELTA time and time again. I've stated that it's a worthy course. I have also stated that it's far too expensive, and not needed here to advance to the university teaching level, and that it is not even considered a certification worth of teaching in the USA. So what? Why are you going ape when I point these things out? |
a. Why don't you realize those are not even points I disagree with you on, and yet you bring them up everything to dodge the real meat of what you and I disagree on: online TEFL vs. on-site TEFL. Dodge is your method, as evidenced in your refusal to own up to why you avoided answering why you'd asked me for photos. (You asked me this asinine question because you think just because you say/post something, anything, you think it's worth saying.)
b. I've never said: CELTA is needed to advance to a university position in Korea (i.e. I've actually said kindergarten B.A. teachers can and that's the way Korea is) and it's considered certification for teaching in the U.S.A (e.g. another dodge).
c. Please, spare me your attempts to color me as going wild. I've been civil throughout.
d. You've made yourself look foolish writing/lying about the CELTA:
(1) You haven't taken it
(2) Numerous people have and when they respond, you resort not to rhetoric but petty name-calling.
(3) In the face of my detailed KEI-TEFL review, you stupefy others at your childish attempt to undermine my opinion of CELTA and KEI-TEFL because you don't like it when someone has actually taken a non-online course but doesn't have absolute praise for your online course. I said my pros (yes, I did) and cons about yours.
e. Calling someone names doesn't undermine the content of what someone says about an issue. It actually undermines the name-caller, because:
(1) It neither results in persuasion nor adds merit to anything he/she says. (e.g. 'oh, you probably work for CELTA', 'these are just CELTA cult members') and
(2) Name calling means you have, in fact, little to say other than that. That is, to be brief, your "thesis" every time you post.
Bassexpander wrote: |
In any case, I'm not knocking your current public school position,
Bassexpander wrote: |
By the way, I'm sure my credentials are embarrassing to you and mouse... what are you? Public school teachers who still can't get hired by unis, despite your shiny CELTAs? Or are you stuck in an adult hagwon, whistle? |
|
a. You were, but okay, Bassexpander.
Bassexpander wrote: |
The sad fact is, however, that getting a CELTA won't raise my pay at my uni. The uni jobs out there which pay considerably more (on average) require an MA/TESOL, and are at a few top institutions like PRragic talked about in another thread.
So why bother? |
a.This is a basic values argument, so it's weighed by individuals and what they feel is worth doing or not doing.
(1) I did the CELTA because I felt lacking in my teaching skills.
(2) Now, yes, I spent more money than I did on the online TEFL program, but it was infinitely worth it because in the end it fundamentally changed my teaching.
(3) My CELTA didn't raise my pay at my public high school in Gyeonggi-do. However, I knew that it wouldn't. I bothered to do the CELTA, because I don't spend my money on the myriad of distractions outside leisure reading material and day hikes. So what I spent on the CELTA would've been spent by others on those things young people my age do and value more than I myself, a young man, do.
Bassexpander wrote: |
If Korea wants teachers to get better qualifications, then they need to compensate teachers for those credentials. As it stands now, other than the public schools giving you another 100,000 to 200,000 per month for having a TEFL certification FROM ABOUT ANYONE that's 100+ hours, there is no compelling reason to invest a great deal of time and money into one.
If Korea were to come out and say, "Only TEFL certified teachers can teach here" then their industry would be in an uproar. This would hardly fly with the desperate campaign of the incoming administration, which is struggling to find enough of anybody to fill teaching positions.
Korea needs to pay teachers more money if they expect them to up their credentials -- we need an incentive. They shouldn't whine about "unqualified teachers" when that is all they are willing to pay for. Korea also needs to offer teachers more job protection and end the slave-like "Letter of Release" requirement, among other things.
Perhaps a nationwide free TEFL program/camp required of incoming people would be the answer. |
Finally, something. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bassexpander
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Location: Someplace you'd rather be.
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 10:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oh, mouse... how good of a teacher can you be if you spend so much time obsessing over CELTA posts like this?
I'm on vacation. I have an excuse.
Now let's recap:
As I've stated before, not one waygook teacher at my university has a CELTA. Most uni teachers in Korea don't have one (nor do they need it). The aren't accepted in the USA, and if you'd try to get a public school job with one there, they'd laugh at you.
Newbees, as I always post to counter the above posters trying to sell their course, please read the following and save yourself some money:
I have a BA.
I didn't need a TEFL/TESOL certificate, or a CELTA for my university job.
The same goes for my public school job before this. Or my hagwon job before that.
I didn't need ANY certification.
You don't need a CELTA (or a certificate from a company like American TESOL or TEFL International) in Korea -- especially if you are going to teach kids, because the CELTA is training for adult students. Can you learn something taking one of these courses? You bet. I knock the CELTA a lot, but I like the British Council's website for Task-Based Learning activities.
The rule of thumb I tell people to follow goes something like this:
If you are....
... in Korea for just a year or two, and have no plans to teach elsewhere after, don't bother with any TEFL certification.
... in Korea for 3 to 4 years, plan to move on and teach in another country, or stay working a public school job, get a low-cost, approved TEFL course (many are below $400, and can be done via distance. Just make sure they are over 100 hours). If you plan to move around the world and teach in countries that respect the British system, then get a CELTA. All of these certifications (including the CELTA) are useless in the USA.
... in Korea for 5 or more years, you should get, or make plans to get, some kind of teaching certification or an MA in Education/TESOL. You could get a CELTA, but if you've been teaching for more than 4 years, I'd say it's a waste of money.
Remember, the CELTA costs about US $1,500 to $2,500, depending on where you take it. The full TEFL International course is going to be similiar in price (it was last I checked). Korea is naturally much more expensive for the CELTA. One could almost say they gouge you here (when they even offer it), but maybe it's the extra cost of buildings or something -- who knows. Don't forget to factor in flight costs, housing costs, and lost work costs for up to 5 weeks. Any flight costs you'd save by taking it in Korea are squashed by the high price of taking it here (unless prices have changed that I'm not aware of).
I added it all up, and found that I'd be out over 4 million won if I took the CELTA, counting lost work time. Even at a 100,000 won per hour raise for having it, that will take you more than a few years to recoup the costs at a public school job (assuming you are at a school that gives you a meager 100,000 to 200,000 won per month raise for having one). In Korea, a low-cost (500,000 won) online course that is greater than 100 hours will get you the same raise as a CELTA. For a list of these courses, see Dave's front page at www.eslcafe.com. ITTT TEFL is a paid advertiser, and is accepted. Also, KEI-TEFL is approved by the Seoul office of Education, and you can opt to take an on-site course from them.
By the way, CELTA now has a long-term course that you can do over several months. I'm not up to speed on what that entails, so I can't comment. I'm sure you'll pay just as much for the base costs, as if you did the full 5 week CELTA.
Remember: MANY OF THESE CERTIFICATES ARE ONLY ACCREDITED BY THE COMPANIES/GROUPS THEY ARE OFFERED BY.
Would you seek medical care from a doctor who is only a doctor because he passed his own accreditation to become a doctor, and therefore certified himself? Now how about paying that doctor $1,500 to $2,500 for medical care which you don't need, and missing 5 weeks of paid work in the process?
Save your money for a course from an accredited institution -- that's my advice.
Again, I work at a university, and I didn't need a CELTA or a piece of paper from another program like TEFL International to get my job here. I didn't need to drop 2.4 million won on a CELTA. If you want the most expensive around, then 4.4 million for a TEFL from Sookmyung will get you a certification from the new incoming education boss's own school. She's gone out of her way to promote it since her nomination, and at 4.4 million won per student, I can see why.. All of those courses have their uses, but they may not prepare you for the age group you plan to teach.
You don't need one to work at a hagwon, either.
It's my personal opinion, as someone who has been teaching in Korea for over five years, that you would be better off getting an MA-TESOL from a reputable university after taking time off from school and saving some money for it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Whistleblower

Joined: 03 Feb 2007
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 1:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
bassexpander wrote: |
You still haven't answered my question, and neither has Whistleblower. |
Sorry I didn't answer your question BassEx I have been busy examining for Cambridge ESOL. What was your question again? Was it where do I work? I work freelance in Korea as a Certified English Instructor (not teacher) and Examiner. Part of the enjoyment with an F2-1 Visa, lucky me.
You should learn to develop professionally, I am just advising you but you will probably not listen.
Enjoy your day Bassexpander.
p.s. - I was never really having a go at your teaching or personality I was merely questioning your ability to teach at a university with your current qualifications and lack of certifications. There is a difference and I don't attack personally. In fact it would be interesting to observe your lessons. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Whistleblower

Joined: 03 Feb 2007
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 1:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
*Double post. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Whistleblower

Joined: 03 Feb 2007
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 2:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
bassexpander wrote: |
I have a BA.
I didn't need a TEFL/TESOL certificate, or a CELTA for my university job.
It's my personal opinion, as someone who has been teaching in Korea for over five years, that you would be better off getting an MA-TESOL from a reputable university after taking time off from school and saving some money for it. |
Seems like you are so busy that you don't even bother investing in some professional development. Just a BA and nothing to show for the past five years in Korea. I pity you.
Good luck and I hope you learn that a TEFL Course is just considered investment in your career (if you wish to call it that). Otherwise, keep on teaching. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bassexpander
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Location: Someplace you'd rather be.
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Whistleblower wrote: |
bassexpander wrote: |
I have a BA.
I didn't need a TEFL/TESOL certificate, or a CELTA for my university job.
It's my personal opinion, as someone who has been teaching in Korea for over five years, that you would be better off getting an MA-TESOL from a reputable university after taking time off from school and saving some money for it. |
Seems like you are so busy that you don't even bother investing in some professional development. Just a BA and nothing to show for the past five years in Korea. I pity you.
Good luck and I hope you learn that a TEFL Course is just considered investment in your career (if you wish to call it that). Otherwise, keep on teaching. |
Why would I? I would receive no special compensation for having it, and seeing that I will stay in this industry for less than 3 to 5 more years, there is no chance for me to recoup the high costs. If they paid me extra for getting a TEFL certification, and it was financially viable, I'd do it.
I'm working on what I'll be doing when I leave this place. Unlike you, I have a degree, and 8 years of experience, doing something else in a professional corporate environment.
We're not all here studying to be teachers for life. Some of us have higher ambitions.
The hilarious thing about it is that I'm here in a better position than you, doing the same job you have staked your future on, and I've achieved it without paying 2.4 million won and giving up a months salary for a certification that was never required.
Last edited by bassexpander on Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:19 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Whistleblower

Joined: 03 Feb 2007
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Like I said Bass, I am not a teacher. Please don't fall in to the same trap and make another mistake. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bassexpander
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Location: Someplace you'd rather be.
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Whistleblower wrote: |
Like I said Bass, I am not a teacher. Please don't fall in to the same trap and make another mistake. |
I must have missed that. What do you do?
Ah, I see it now.. wait. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bassexpander
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Location: Someplace you'd rather be.
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Working for the same company as the CELTA, eh?
Now we're getting somewhere, and it pretty much proves everything I've said about your advertising the CELTA on here.
A little biased, are we? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hank the Iconoclast

Joined: 08 Oct 2007 Location: Busan
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
I know this may be off-topic here but I have been looking into getting a MA. Would it be better for me to get one in MA-TESOL or a MA in Applied Linguistics? I personally have been thinking about going down the Applied Linguistics direction but I want some good opportunities at unis here. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TECO

Joined: 20 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hank the Iconoclast wrote: |
I know this may be off-topic here but I have been looking into getting a MA. Would it be better for me to get one in MA-TESOL or a MA in Applied Linguistics? I personally have been thinking about going down the Applied Linguistics direction but I want some good opportunities at unis here. |
It the same thing. No difference at all. In fact, I heard of one school that asked their graduates whether they wanted "M.A. TESOL" written on their degree or "Master of Applied Linguistics" or "Master of Education."
Americans used the term "TESOL" whereas the British and Australians, until recently, have been using "Applied Linguistics."
Bullsheit baffles the brains - Bassexpandxer would know all about that.
Bass, you're a disgrace. Pony up and improve your professional skills and stop being such a deadbeat, backpacker EFL'er.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bassexpander
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Location: Someplace you'd rather be.
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
TECO wrote: |
Hank the Iconoclast wrote: |
I know this may be off-topic here but I have been looking into getting a MA. Would it be better for me to get one in MA-TESOL or a MA in Applied Linguistics? I personally have been thinking about going down the Applied Linguistics direction but I want some good opportunities at unis here. |
It the same thing. No difference at all. In fact, I heard of one school that asked their graduates whether they wanted "M.A. TESOL" written on their degree or "Master of Applied Linguistics" or "Master of Education."
Americans used the term "TESOL" whereas the British and Australians, until recently, have been using "Applied Linguistics."
Bullsheit baffles the brains - Bassexpandxer would know all about that.
Bass, you're a disgrace. Pony up and improve your professional skills and stop being such a deadbeat, backpacker EFL'er.  |
So now I'm a backpacker because I didn't spend 2.4 million on WB's company's CELTA?
Would I be a backpacker if I had another TEFL certification from a different company?
TECO... yet another CELTA cult member, who likely also has a vested interested in the program. In case any of you are curious how many pro-CELTA advertising posts he's made on Dave's, do a search on TECO and CELTA. It's quite revealing.
Again... people... if you really want to take the CELTA, then take it. It's a good course! Just highly overpriced, and obviously, over-advertised. It's not needed to be successful here, however. I'd consider an MA-TESOL a much better investment if you plan on doing this for life. As mentioned, there are far cheaper Korean gov't approved TEFL/TESOL courses available at www.eslcafe.com . Some of the offer on-site teaching, and cost 1/5 that of the CELTA. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jimskins

Joined: 07 Nov 2007
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 5:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
I never mean to cause fights, they just 'happen' around me. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
agoodmouse

Joined: 20 Dec 2007 Location: Anyang
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 7:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Bassexpander, very unartful and lazy use of the copy-and-paste function. You didn't address anything I clearly addressed to you, point by point, as always. Can you be any less original in the expository department? Is a dog operating your computer? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|