Korean Job Discussion Forums

[regicide]

[yawarakaijin]

So. If it is impossible for this one bullet to have done all that damage. If this IS the actual bullet that the archives say it is. Why is it so hard to believe there was a cover up?

Is there something I'm missing? Can someone out there say, "hold on a minute, this isn't the bullet archives has."? Are people out there simply arguing because it's a "conspiracy" theory? Or has it been proven scientifically that everything the autopsy says is plausible?

[regicide]

[huffdaddy]

[huffdaddy]

Some amazing coincidences. Too many to be mere coincidence, IMO.

Kennedy - Lincoln Similarities

Abraham Lincoln was elected to Congress in 1846.
John F. Kennedy was elected to Congress in 1946.

Abraham Lincoln was elected President in 1860.
John F. Kennedy was elected President in 1960.

The names Lincoln and Kennedy each contain seven letters.

Both were particularly concerned with civil rights.

Both wives lost their children while living in the White House.

Both Presidents were shot on a Friday.

Both were shot in the head.

Lincoln's secretary was named Kennedy.
Kennedy's secretary was named Lincoln.

Both were assassinated by Southerners.

Both were succeeded by Southerners.

Both successors were named Johnson.

Andrew Johnson, who succeeded Lincoln, was born in 1808.
Lyndon Johnson, who succeeded Kennedy, was born in 1908.

John Wilkes Booth,was born in 1839.
Lee Harvey Oswald,was born in 1939.

Both assassins were known by their three names.
Both names are comprised of fifteen letters.

Booth ran from the theater and was caught in a warehouse.
Oswald ran from a warehouse and was caught in a theater.

Booth and Oswald were assassinated before their trials.

And here's the kicker;

A week before Lincoln was shot, he was in Monroe, Maryland.
A week before Kennedy was shot, he was ___ Marilyn Monroe.

[regicide]

[yawarakaijin]

[regicide]

[quote="yawarakaijin"]

[JMO]

[huffdaddy]

[regicide]

Trajectory of a Lie

By Milicent Cranor

Part I. The Palindrome
Part II. Neck and Torso X-Rays: Selectivity in Reporting
Part III. Big Lie About a Small Wound in Connally's Back


Part III. Big Lie About a Small Wound in Connally's Back
Background




There is no evidence, hard or soft, that supports the single bullet theory (SBT). Its defenders have spent a lot of time proving that it could have happened that way, which is not the same as proving that it did, a distinction they don't make. But the can't even prove it hypothetically because the sniper's nest and the various wounds of Kennedy and Connally do not line up. In addition, witnesses say the men reacted at two different times to two different bullets, and the Zapruder film seems to prove them right. To solve the problems of geometry and timing, promoters of the SBT have resorted to the use of junk science and chicanery. (See especially the crudely fraudulent computerized animation of the Zapruder film by Dale Myers: www.abclies.com/dale.html) But even these tricks do nothing more than give the appearance of proving the theory as opposed to proving the reality. There is still no evidence whatsoever for the SBT. But since when has that been a problem? Evidence can always be manufactured, especially when it involves the written word.

http://www.history-matters.com/essays/jfkmed/BigLieSmallWound/BigLieSmallWound.htm

[SuperFly]

OP: You're banned.

[mindmetoo]

I know our evolution thread sometimes spills over to other threads, but the principles don't go starting whole new threads every time some new little bit pops into one of our minds. Could not, like the ron paul and 911 types, the OP create ONE JFK thread and just post new developments there?