View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 5:34 pm Post subject: Guantanamo Bay Detainees Returning to the Fight... |
|
|
Quote: |
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A Kuwaiti man released from U.S. custody at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base in 2005 blew himself up in a suicide attack in Iraq last month, Pentagon officials said Wednesday....
[Abdullah Saleh al-Ajmi] is not the first former Guantanamo detainee to reportedly return to the battlefield after being released. Pentagon officials say there are more than 10 people once held by the U.S. at Guantanamo who have been killed or captured in fighting after being released from the detention facility.
"Our reports indicate that a number of former [Guantanamo Bay] detainees have taken part in anti-coalition militant activities after leaving U.S. detention. Some have subsequently been killed in combat," said Cmdr. Jeff Gordon, a Pentagon spokesman. |
One should never release pows in war.
CNN Reports |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Big_Bird

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...
|
Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 5:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Even if I wasn't a terrorist before I went into that bloody place, I'd probably be by the time I got out. The stuff that's happened in that place is just horrific. I would no doubt be totally f***ed up in the head after a few years in there, and I would want my revenge. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Manner of Speaking

Joined: 09 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 6:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm not surprised.
If I'd been cooped up in Guantanamo and treated the way those "detainees" are treated, I'd be ready for some payback too. The message here is that Guantanamo is probably doing more to psychologically train and motivate terrorists than anything else. Cause and effect. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
yawarakaijin
Joined: 08 Aug 2006
|
Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 6:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No suprises there really. If the hardcore ones every got out they would merely continue their work. If one had gone in innocent he surely would have come out with a chip on his shoulder.
I feel sad for any innocents caught in a revenge attack for what an innocent detainee might do but I say American troops would be a fair game.
Does anyone else find it peculiar the NO ONE is allowed to kill an American soldier anymore? Must be one of the safest militaries in the world to be a part of thesedays. (No one emoticon really fits that previous statment.) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
khyber
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Compunction Junction
|
Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 7:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
One should never release pows in war.
CNN Reports |
One should not create fighters. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 7:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
khyber wrote: |
One should not create fighters. |
Ha. The wagging finger.
Oh I have no doubt that the war may have landed at least some innocents in Guatanamo. On the other hand, you seem a little too content in your Ron-Paul-style analysis that the only reason al-Ajmi and those ex-detainees like him, not to mention the militant Arab Middle East generally, fight is because American foreign policies create fighters out of nothing.
In any case, however fighters become fighters, it remains bad policy to release pows in war. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 7:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
khyber wrote: |
Quote: |
One should never release pows in war.
CNN Reports |
One should not create fighters. |
You got that right. Mideast regimes and elties incite violence and teach hate as a military tactic. That is the main cause of terror
Quote: |
Al-Qaeda camps 'trained 70,000'
Thousands are said to have joined al-Qaeda camps in Afghanistan
Some 70,000 people received weapons training and religious instruction in al-Qaeda camps, German police say.
The claim came at the retrial of Mounir al-Motassadek, a Moroccan man accused of involvement in the 9/11 attacks, which were partly planned in Germany.
A German police officer told the court recruits at the camps were taught they had a duty to kill US citizens.
|
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4146969.stm
What was the problem then? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 7:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
khyber wrote: |
One should not create fighters. |
By the way, how do you know al-Ajmi was innocently captured and wrongfully imprisoned and thus "created" at Guantanamo? How have you sorted all of this out and reached that conclusion?
Quote: |
[Pentagon] records said al-Ajmi, 29, was picked up in Afghanistan as he tried to enter Pakistan after the 2001 U.S. invasion. He claimed to have fought for the Taliban, the records show, and said he fought in a number of battles against the Northern Alliance.
Though he was never charged with any crime, al-Ajmi was held at Guantanamo through 2005. Military documents show he later claimed that his statements about fighting for the Taliban were made after he was threatened while in U.S. custody. He asserted that he was in Afghanistan to study the Quran.
Al-Ajmi was transferred to the custody of Kuwaiti authorities in November 2005, with four other Kuwaitis, and was released after a trial there, according to Pentagon officials. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
catman

Joined: 18 Jul 2004
|
Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 8:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
We've been told that everyone at Gitmos is not only guilty but also the "worst of the worst", yet they keep releasing prisoners. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
yawarakaijin
Joined: 08 Aug 2006
|
Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 9:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
catman wrote: |
We've been told that everyone at Gitmos is not only guilty but also the "worst of the worst", yet they keep releasing prisoners. |
Which leaves only one of two options. There were/are mostly all innocent or the government is releasing the very terrorists it claims to be fighting. Ahh, now I can see why this facility MUST be kept running.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Big_Bird

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...
|
Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 10:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I was watching a relevant documentary the other night: Taxi to the Dark Side. I started watching it part way through, but still saw enough to find myself really disturbed. It was awful. Absolutley awful. It focussed mostly on the story of an innocent taxi driver who had the misfortune to be turned into the American military. He was turned in by Afghan fighters, who claimed he had fired rockets at US forces. Later it transpired that the cunning fighters who turned him in had probably been responsible for the attack themselves and wanted to throw US forces off their scent. Anyway, witnesses (including the US soldiers responsible for his horrific treatment and murder) described his last days. Absolutely horrible. I could barely watch it. I winced and looked away at some of it, and forced myself not to think too much about how intensely he must have suffered. Reports of his screams for his mother and father particularly upset me. The soldiers thought it was funny when he screamed and enjoyed the effect of their forceful kicks and blows. Young soldiers with no proper training and a deliberate lack of proper guidelines from their superiors. They admitted they didn't have the first clue about what they were doing.
But the documentary used the unfortunate taxi driver as an example to highlight the plight of others. A British man who was imprisoned in the same camp as the taxi driver and was later sent to Guantanamo on the flimsiest basis described the treatment there. He was obviously educated and articulate and described the abuses he had suffered and witnessed. What he and others described made you want to put your hands over your ears. I think I would have gone quite mad in similar circumstances.
It transpired that only 7% of the prisoners were picked up by US military or intelligence. The rest were rounded up by locals. Got a score to settle? Drag your hated neighbour to the Americans and pretend he is a Taliban fighter. Want to make 5000 dollars? Round up some poor tourist or beggar off the street and claim the bounty. Imagine how tempting a 5000 dollar reward is to a criminal in a third world country like Afghanistan or Pakistan. Heck, that's enough reward to turn even an honest guy into a criminal! It was so utterly farcical that I just didn't know whether to laugh or cry. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Adventurer

Joined: 28 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 10:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Big Bird, the Kuwaiti national committed a hateful act. He was not an Iraqi defending Iraq. He was a Kuwaiti national fighting on foreign soil fighting what he believed to be infidels in the country of Iraq. You are assuming that Guantanamo turned him into what he was before he died.
He was picked up in Afghanistan. Jordanians, Kuwaitis, and Saudis who went to Afghanistan were generally zealots who went to fight the infidel Soviets with the blessing of Uncle Sam. On another note, if they cannot prove that certain Arab fighters were purposely looking to fight the United States and weren't people who just stayed behind in Afghanistan, then it is hard to hold them, because someone being a religious zealot and in Afghanistan is not a crime in itself. So, there is a problem in simply detaining people indefinitely. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Big_Bird

Joined: 31 Jan 2003 Location: Sometimes here sometimes there...
|
Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 10:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No, I didn't assume he was innocent. I said that even if you were innocent, you would probably come out a terrorist after a few years in there. And if you were a terrorist in the first place, you would come out with your hatred and bitterness and need for revenge magnified a thousand fold. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 10:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Big_Bird: you and "the documentary" you cite make it far worse than it is. You seize on this or that negative aspect, present the entire thing in that light, and then dramatically condemn it.
I know people on the ground. I know the selection and training they undergo before they arrive. I know they are frustrated with the press around them, who, they reaffirm, do exactly what I outline in the paragraph above.
It is neither the rosy picture you might accuse me of wishing to present here nor the unmitigated, twisted, and macabre death and destruction you describe above, where evil locals dupe misguided, rapacious Americans to settle their personal scores with impunity. It is the fog of war and all of its chaos. No more no less. And you have apparently and uncritically bought into propaganda that presents the Americans as the enemy. This is disappointing.
Finally, regards your last post, immediately above this: at what point does this theoretical terrorist bear any responsibility for his being a terrorist, in your view? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|