|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Snowkr
Joined: 03 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 8:01 pm Post subject: mad cow schmad cow.. |
|
|
I usually don't pay much attention to stuff like this but lately this uproar over U.S. beef imports is getting on my last nerve.
Does anyone know any sites or links to sites for good, comprehensive and useful information about "Mad Cow Disease"?
I teach teachers and although they are professional and responsible people, most of them are only familiar with the term. They don't know what it means. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
R. S. Refugee

Joined: 29 Sep 2004 Location: Shangra La, ROK
|
Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 8:27 pm Post subject: Re: mad cow schmad cow.. |
|
|
Snowkr wrote: |
I usually don't pay much attention to stuff like this but lately this uproar over U.S. beef imports is getting on my last nerve.
Does anyone know any sites or links to sites for good, comprehensive and useful information about "Mad Cow Disease"?
I teach teachers and although they are professional and responsible people, most of them are only familiar with the term. They don't know what it means. |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mad_Cow_disease
This reading is best enjoyed after a steak dinner.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ttompatz

Joined: 05 Sep 2005 Location: Kwangju, South Korea
|
Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 10:03 pm Post subject: Re: mad cow schmad cow.. |
|
|
Snowkr wrote: |
I usually don't pay much attention to stuff like this but lately this uproar over U.S. beef imports is getting on my last nerve.
Does anyone know any sites or links to sites for good, comprehensive and useful information about "Mad Cow Disease"?
I teach teachers and although they are professional and responsible people, most of them are only familiar with the term. They don't know what it means. |
The world health organization or the agriculture department of your favorite / home country. Your home country's center for disease control will also have information on vCJV.
I intentionally left out the US sources of information like CDC, USDA, etc. just in case the Koreans thought the sources may be biased toward the US exporting beef to Korea or something equally as foolish. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Snowkr
Joined: 03 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 10:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks.
This whole thing is so ridiculous. I tend to side with Koreans when they get all worked up over certain things but this time, I just feel sorry for them. If they had any idea how foolish this stuff is... how foolish it makes them look.
I'll see if I can use some of the stuff from those sites in my classes next week. Thanks again! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bassexpander
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Location: Someplace you'd rather be.
|
Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 11:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
See here:
http://forums.eslcafe.com/korea/viewtopic.php?t=125367
A few great articles from overseas (non-US ones especially) ripping the stupidity apart.
One of my favs:
Quote: |
Political price paid in beef row
By John Sudworth
BBC News, Seoul
Many people are wondering how it could have come to this.
Not least South Korea's President, Lee Myung-bak, who, just 100 days into office has shown he has the opposite of the Midas touch.
The landslide popularity that brought him to power has evaporated, the more humiliating opinion polls put his support rating barely into double digits.
The reason?
A once seemingly mundane and long running agricultural dispute has mushroomed into one of the biggest political crises in recent memory.
It is a crisis that has taken shape on the streets.
Mass movement
What started as a series of relatively small-scale candlelit vigils against a lifting of the five-year ban on American beef imports, has now taken on the air of a mass movement.
We are creating the fear of mad cow disease in our own minds. Candlelights should be used to brighten the darkness, not burn down our own homes
Lee Sae Jin, lone pro-beef import protestor
Mothers pushing prams march alongside ranks of high-pitched school children, all carrying delicate, fluttering flames through the dark Seoul night.
The symbolism is potent. It is a picture of the nation's most cherished and vulnerable under threat from a cavalier government and the poisoned, imported produce of a foreign power.
"I am afraid of American beef," one 13-year-old protester told a US newspaper reporter. "I could study hard in school. I could get a good job and then I could eat beef and just die."
This week, the growing intensity of the protests and sporadic outbreaks of violence finally forced a government U-turn.
The lifting of the ban on US beef has been put on hold.
"The essence of the beef protests is anti-American," said Keun Park, President of the Korea-America Friendship Society.
"The left-wing media has instigated the feeling that there is a good reason to fear US beef."
Age issue
Some of the claims made about the risks of mad cow disease are certainly difficult to substantiate.
South Korea's marching citizens have been worried onto the streets by widely circulated rumours that American consumers do not eat beef from cattle aged over 30 months, and that large quantities of this more dangerous, older meat will flood into Korea.
It was with reference to these fears that the South Korean government suspended the import agreement this week, saying it wanted 30-month and older cattle removed from the deal.
But according to statistics from the US beef industry, 18% of cattle slaughtered in the US for human consumption is above, in many cases well above, 30 months of age.
The meat from these animals, considered perfectly safe, is ground into beef for burgers and other such delights.
Americans, it seems, do not just eat 30-month-old cows, they eat them in vast quantities.
And according to Joe Schuele from the US National Cattlemen's Beef Association, "research shows that before exports were stopped in 2003, less than 2% of the total beef we sent to South Korea came from cattle aged over 30 months".
It is hardly a flood.
American interests
Among the more hysterical claims, of course, the fears of many South Koreans about the safety of imported beef are genuinely held.
After all, there are those in the US, both producers and consumers, who argue that there should be much more testing of slaughtered cattle than there is at present.
But central to the South Korean government's willingness to open its ports is the certification of US beef hygiene standards by the World Organisation for Animal Health.
According to this intergovernmental food-safety body, the US removes risky material from slaughtered animals, conducts adequate testing and has feed policies that control the risk and make its meat safe for export.
I am afraid of American beef. I could study hard in school. I could get a good job and then I could eat beef and just die
Young girl protesting, 13
South Korea has yet to supply enough information to the World Organisation for Animal Health to allow an assessment of its own mad cow risk to be carried out.
Hahm Sung-deuk, professor of presidential studies at Korea University, did not agree that the beef protests were motivated by anti-American sentiment, but he admitted that outsiders may well be baffled as to why it has become such a serious issue.
"People have become gradually disappointed with President Lee," he said. "There have been a series of errors."
One of the biggest ones, he said, was to give the appearance of capitulating to American political interests.
Free-trade deal risked
Politicians in Washington were threatening to scupper a US-South Korea free-trade deal - one that President Lee is championing - unless he gave them back what used to be America's third largest market for beef exports.
That he duly obliged, seemingly without consultation and with the agreement to include almost all beef products, of all ages, may have proved the catalyst for the rising public anger.
"People felt that this guy was just out of touch," Professor Hahm added. "Now the US needs to come to his assistance."
The Americans however seem reluctant to drop cattle aged over 30 months from the agreement, although some might ask why, given that these older animals make up such a small share of the export market.
Not all South Koreans agree with the candlelit protesters who continue to march through the streets of Seoul each night.
Lee Sae Jin, a 25-year-old university student, bravely held his own, one-man protest in favour of US beef imports.
He was soon shepherded away by a policeman, led off through the rather angry crowd that had gathered to read his posters.
"We are an exporting nation," he had written.
"We are creating the fear of mad cow disease in our own minds. Candlelights should be used to brighten the darkness, not burn down our own homes."
Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/asia-pacific/7436914.stm
Published: 2008/06/05 01:31:14 GMT
� BBC MMVIII |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
R. S. Refugee

Joined: 29 Sep 2004 Location: Shangra La, ROK
|
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 4:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Published on Friday, June 13, 2008 by The New York Times
Bad Cow Disease
by Paul Krugman
�Mary had a little lamb / And when she saw it sicken / She shipped it off to Packingtown / And now it�s labeled chicken.�
That little ditty famously summarized the message of �The Jungle,� Upton Sinclair�s 1906 expos� of conditions in America�s meat-packing industry. Sinclair�s muckraking helped Theodore Roosevelt pass the Pure Food and Drug Act and the Meat Inspection Act - and for most of the next century, Americans trusted government inspectors to keep their food safe.
Lately, however, there always seems to be at least one food-safety crisis in the headlines - tainted spinach, poisonous peanut butter and, currently, the attack of the killer tomatoes. The declining credibility of U.S. food regulation has even led to a foreign-policy crisis: there have been mass demonstrations in South Korea protesting the pro-American prime minister�s decision to allow imports of U.S. beef, banned after mad cow disease was detected in 2003.
How did America find itself back in The Jungle?
It started with ideology. Hard-core American conservatives have long idealized the Gilded Age, regarding everything that followed - not just the New Deal, but even the Progressive Era - as a great diversion from the true path of capitalism.
Thus, when Grover Norquist, the anti-tax advocate, was asked about his ultimate goal, he replied that he wanted a restoration of the way America was �up until Teddy Roosevelt, when the socialists took over. The income tax, the death tax, regulation, all that.�
The late Milton Friedman agreed, calling for the abolition of the Food and Drug Administration. It was unnecessary, he argued: private companies would avoid taking risks with public health to safeguard their reputations and to avoid damaging class-action lawsuits. (Friedman, unlike almost every other conservative I can think of, viewed lawyers as the guardians of free-market capitalism.)
Such hard-core opponents of regulation were once part of the political fringe, but with the rise of modern movement conservatism they moved into the corridors of power. They never had enough votes to abolish the F.D.A. or eliminate meat inspections, but they could and did set about making the agencies charged with ensuring food safety ineffective.
They did this in part by simply denying these agencies enough resources to do the job. For example, the work of the F.D.A. has become vastly more complex over time thanks to the combination of scientific advances and globalization. Yet the agency has a substantially smaller work force now than it did in 1994, the year Republicans took over Congress.
Perhaps even more important, however, was the systematic appointment of foxes to guard henhouses.
Thus, when mad cow disease was detected in the U.S. in 2003, the Department of Agriculture was headed by Ann M. Veneman, a former food-industry lobbyist. And the department�s response to the crisis - which amounted to consistently downplaying the threat and rejecting calls for more extensive testing - seemed driven by the industry�s agenda.
One amazing decision came in 2004, when a Kansas producer asked for permission to test its own cows, so that it could resume exports to Japan. You might have expected the Bush administration to applaud this example of self-regulation. But permission was denied, because other beef producers feared consumer demands that they follow suit.
When push comes to shove, it seems, the imperatives of crony capitalism trump professed faith in free markets.
Eventually, the department did expand its testing, and at this point most countries that initially banned U.S. beef have allowed it back into their markets. But the South Koreans still don�t trust us. And while some of that distrust may be irrational - the beef issue has become entangled with questions of Korean national pride, which has been insulted by clumsy American diplomacy - it�s hard to blame them.
The ironic thing is that the Agriculture Department�s deference to the beef industry actually ended up backfiring: because potential foreign buyers didn�t trust our safety measures, beef producers spent years excluded from their most important overseas markets.
But then, the same thing can be said of other cases in which the administration stood in the way of effective regulation. Most notably, the administration�s refusal to countenance any restraints on predatory lending helped prepare the ground for the subprime crisis, which has cost the financial industry far more than it ever made on overpriced loans.
The moral of this story is that failure to regulate effectively isn�t just bad for consumers, it�s bad for business.
And in the case of food, what we need to do now - for the sake of both our health and our export markets - is to go back to the way it was after Teddy Roosevelt, when the Socialists took over. It�s time to get back to the business of ensuring that American food is safe.
Paul Krugman is Professor of Economics at Princeton University and a regular New York Times columnist. His most recent book is The Conscience of a Liberal. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Zaria32
Joined: 04 Dec 2007
|
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 6:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Earlier this week a 6th grade girl in one of my classes informed me that the US is "sending all your infected meat to Korea and Japan to make us sick."
I did not react with the maturity one would hope to find in an experienced teacher, but did enjoy the enlarging eyes of the class when I said that if we wanted to kill Koreans and Japanese, we had much quicker, more certain methods |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
aka Dave
Joined: 02 May 2008 Location: Down by the river
|
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 7:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm a big Paul Krugman fan. What he's commenting on really isn't mad cow, but the Bush administration's deregulatory ideology.
And if the Korean protests stiffen U.S. beef regulations, that will be a good thing.
American policy needs to change, we need to be more accomodating to our allies, we need to act less arrogantly and allow our allies more dignity. I know that sounds vague and touchy feely, but it actually has practical consequences in diplomacy.
It's absurd that Bush forbade companies to conduct their own mad cow tests. Just absurd. That's the free market at work.
However, I also found this whole mad cow thing absurd as well, simply because *I ate that same beef*. My family eats it, every day, having no idea and caring not how old the beef is. If we honestly thought it were dangerous, would we (all 300 million of us) be eating beef every day (and proudly eating and preferring *American* beef).
Are we a nation of suicidal maniacs?
It just doesn't make any sense whatsoever. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hugekebab

Joined: 05 Jan 2008
|
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 8:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
aka Dave wrote: |
I'm a big Paul Krugman fan. What he's commenting on really isn't mad cow, but the Bush administration's deregulatory ideology.
And if the Korean protests stiffen U.S. beef regulations, that will be a good thing.
American policy needs to change, we need to be more accomodating to our allies, we need to act less arrogantly and allow our allies more dignity. I know that sounds vague and touchy feely, but it actually has practical consequences in diplomacy.
It's absurd that Bush forbade companies to conduct their own mad cow tests. Just absurd. That's the free market at work.
However, I also found this whole mad cow thing absurd as well, simply because *I ate that same beef*. My family eats it, every day, having no idea and caring not how old the beef is. If we honestly thought it were dangerous, would we (all 300 million of us) be eating beef every day (and proudly eating and preferring *American* beef).
Are we a nation of suicidal maniacs?
It just doesn't make any sense whatsoever. |
Haha I'm sorry but this is priceless, an American saying
"I ate American beef and so did everyone else in the US and what harm did it do us?"
I have 2 Americans at my school; how many of them do you think believe that 9/11 was a conspiracy and that DARPA likely caused the Chinese earthquakes? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
lorenchristopher

Joined: 25 Dec 2007
|
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 9:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Snowkr wrote: |
Thanks.
This whole thing is so ridiculous. I tend to side with Koreans when they get all worked up over certain things but this time, I just feel sorry for them. If they had any idea how foolish this stuff is... how foolish it makes them look.
I'll see if I can use some of the stuff from those sites in my classes next week. Thanks again! |
I feel the same way! I really like Korea and its people, but this is so embarrassing! Please let me know how it goes in your classes....I was thinking about bringing it up with some of my more advanced kids, but am a little weary. I highly doubt I could change their minds, but it would be more entertaining for me, maybe. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JMO

Joined: 18 Jul 2006 Location: Daegu
|
Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 12:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
I did this is a class as a debate. The good thing about it was that even though virtually the entire class agreed with the protests, half of them(one team) had to argue the other side. They came up with the exact same points we are making here. I didn;t give my opinion and as another student was moderator, I didn't even pick the winner. I just picked who was for and against via a coin toss and the format.(only one point at a time..one student should be spokesperson for team etc). Pretty fun class in the end.
It did show me, that koreans know the western viewpoint and arguments, they just don't agree. I have no idea why, because it sounded like they are more logical to me. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
moosehead

Joined: 05 May 2007
|
Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 12:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
I had to stand in for an absent teacher - an upper level class. The students tried to sidetrack me talking about crazy cow, etc. and I got really angry. I told them I don't even eat beef, haven't for many years, and they all know I don't eat lunch in the cafeteria. The room was silent.
I went on and said if you don't like it, then don't eat it, no one is forcing you to.
Then we went on to the textbook. No more interruptions. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
aka Dave
Joined: 02 May 2008 Location: Down by the river
|
Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 6:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
hugekebab wrote: |
aka Dave wrote: |
I'm a big Paul Krugman fan. What he's commenting on really isn't mad cow, but the Bush administration's deregulatory ideology.
And if the Korean protests stiffen U.S. beef regulations, that will be a good thing.
American policy needs to change, we need to be more accomodating to our allies, we need to act less arrogantly and allow our allies more dignity. I know that sounds vague and touchy feely, but it actually has practical consequences in diplomacy.
It's absurd that Bush forbade companies to conduct their own mad cow tests. Just absurd. That's the free market at work.
However, I also found this whole mad cow thing absurd as well, simply because *I ate that same beef*. My family eats it, every day, having no idea and caring not how old the beef is. If we honestly thought it were dangerous, would we (all 300 million of us) be eating beef every day (and proudly eating and preferring *American* beef).
Are we a nation of suicidal maniacs?
It just doesn't make any sense whatsoever. |
Haha I'm sorry but this is priceless, an American saying
"I ate American beef and so did everyone else in the US and what harm did it do us?"
I have 2 Americans at my school; how many of them do you think believe that 9/11 was a conspiracy and that DARPA likely caused the Chinese earthquakes? |
I don't know. Are they retarded? The 9/11 conspiracy thing has been well debunked by several documentaries. And DARPA I have no idea what that is, but earthquakes, as far as I know, are a natural phenomenon. In a word, WTF are you talking about?
I was talking about basic stuff, like, I went to the taco stand and had tacos. And didn't die of mad cow disease. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hugekebab

Joined: 05 Jan 2008
|
Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 7:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
aka Dave wrote: |
hugekebab wrote: |
aka Dave wrote: |
I'm a big Paul Krugman fan. What he's commenting on really isn't mad cow, but the Bush administration's deregulatory ideology.
And if the Korean protests stiffen U.S. beef regulations, that will be a good thing.
American policy needs to change, we need to be more accomodating to our allies, we need to act less arrogantly and allow our allies more dignity. I know that sounds vague and touchy feely, but it actually has practical consequences in diplomacy.
It's absurd that Bush forbade companies to conduct their own mad cow tests. Just absurd. That's the free market at work.
However, I also found this whole mad cow thing absurd as well, simply because *I ate that same beef*. My family eats it, every day, having no idea and caring not how old the beef is. If we honestly thought it were dangerous, would we (all 300 million of us) be eating beef every day (and proudly eating and preferring *American* beef).
Are we a nation of suicidal maniacs?
It just doesn't make any sense whatsoever. |
Haha I'm sorry but this is priceless, an American saying
"I ate American beef and so did everyone else in the US and what harm did it do us?"
I have 2 Americans at my school; how many of them do you think believe that 9/11 was a conspiracy and that DARPA likely caused the Chinese earthquakes? |
I don't know. Are they retarded? The 9/11 conspiracy thing has been well debunked by several documentaries. And DARPA I have no idea what that is, but earthquakes, as far as I know, are a natural phenomenon. In a word, WTF are you talking about?
I was talking about basic stuff, like, I went to the taco stand and had tacos. And didn't die of mad cow disease. |
You said essentially that beef never did you any harm, and I then proceeded to explain that of the 2 Americans that work in my university both of them believe that 9/11 was a conspiracy and one of them firmly believes that DARPA caused the earthquakes in China by using an earthquake generator, hence clearly beef has been doing some Americans harm if they come up with batshit crazy ideas like that (and these are people with degrees saying this).
Anyway enough of this issue! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
agentX
Joined: 12 Oct 2007 Location: Jeolla province
|
Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 7:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
http://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200806/200806130024.html
Today we find out who's REALLY beefing over the beef, and why.
Quote: |
The Real Identity of the Mad Cow Fearmongers
The People's Association for Measures Against Mad Cow Disease on Wednesday issued an ultimatum against the Lee Myung-bak administration, demanding the scrapping of the Korea-U.S. beef accord and the start of all-out renegotiations of the accord with the U.S. by June 20. "If the government decides to ignore the mandate from the people, who hold the sovereign power in this country, we will not hesitate to launch a campaign to drive President Lee Myung-bak out of office," it said in a statement. The association has been acting as if it has been leading the candlelight vigils.
Article 1 of the Constitution of the Republic of Korea says the sovereign authority of the country lies in the public and all power comes from the people. But nowhere in our Constitution is there any reference to the People's Association for Measures Against Mad Cow Disease as representing the public. Yet that association used insolent language to say it is "ordering" the government and would not hesitate to launch a campaign to oust President Lee. Judging from such words, the association must think the participants of the candlelight vigils are its supporters and that it feels empowered beyond imagination. But if you ask the housewives, high school students and office workers who took part in the vigils if that association represents them, most would wave their hands in denial and question just what that group does. Yet this very group is going around shouting out demands as if they own the candles that were carried by the people and have been empowered to be their leader.
A search through the association's Internet homepage reveals that it was launched on May 6 following a proposal by the People's Solidarity for Participatory Democracy and another civic group called the Korea Progressive Coalition. The coalition was created in September of last year after pro-North Korean groups such as Hanchongryun, the Solidarity for the Practice of the South-North Joint Declaration and other civic groups got together. The co-chairperson of the coalition, Oh Jong-ryeol, takes center stage during news conferences or rallies protesting against U.S. beef imports, acting as if he is the head of the People's Association for Measures Against Mad Cow Disease. A search through newspaper archives reveals that Oh had served as co-chair of a citizens' movement to close down a U.S. military bombing range in Maehyang-ri in 2001. He co-chaired another citizens' task force protesting the accidental killings of two Korean schoolgirls by a U.S. armored car in 2002, yet another citizens' task force seeking to nullify an impeachment motion against former President Roh Moo-hyun in 2004, an anti-APEC movement and a group opposed to the expansion of a U.S. military base in Pyeongtaek in 2005, and another movement opposed to the Korea-U.S. free trade agreement in 2006. He is a professional "co-chairperson." And it is obvious what types of groups he has co-chaired.
The people working at the association's briefing room are mostly affiliated with the PSPD or the Korea Progressive Coalition. A PSPD official heads the association's briefing room and he was the one who stood on the stage during a candlelight vigil on May 25 and shouted "Let's go to Cheong Wa Dae!" The person who created the song "Article 1 of the Constitution," a favorite at the candlelight vigils, was arrested during a spy crackdown back in 1992 for creating a song praising the late North Korean leader Kim Il-sung.
The Korean citizens who came out to the candlelight vigils, with their children in strollers, out of genuine concern for the health of their families, will be surprised if they find out such people are acting as their representatives. Moreover, Koreans will be appalled to learn that these people are threatening to nullify the election that even they participated in six months ago within the framework of the Constitution. The members of the association should be held jointly responsible for the mismanagement of the country during the Roh Moo-hyun administration. They are the very people who took this country backwards and divided the people by siding with Roh shouting anti-American and pro-North Korean slogans. And these people, who had been chased away by the public, are now using the crisis facing the Lee administration and hiding behind the mad cow scare to agitate others and calling on them to storm the presidential compound. The public needs to see the true faces of these people who are hiding behind a mask. |
Yep. They were pawns. As Magneto says in X-Men 3:
"Let the pawns go first". |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|