Korean Job Discussion Forums

bucheon bum · Joined: 16 Jan 2003

PRagic · Joined: 24 Feb 2006

And in a related report, all the children look like Principal Joseph Sullivan.

pkang0202 · Joined: 09 Mar 2007

Was it all with one guy?

I wonder if publicizing this all over the news, if there will be a lot of copycat pledges at other high schools.

Where the men involved also involved in the pledge?

matthews_world · Joined: 15 Feb 2003

Read the article.

One of the fathers as mentioned in another article was a 24-year old 'homeless' man.

The aforementioned article also links the act to a copycat of the 'Juno' movie which I also believe that this stemmed from.

Another reason why America sucks. Too many problems at home to be going off fighting wars. Broken levees, higher food and oil prices, single mothers and teen pregnancies. Rubbish.

crusher_of_heads · Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 1:34 am Post subject:

Is a basketball coach part of the equation?

Beej · Joined: 05 Mar 2005 Location: Eungam Loop

No matter how much you hate George Bush, he didnt go and impregnate these girls and there is nothing he could have done to stop this.

Cherbear · Joined: 17 Mar 2008

These girls are obviously emotionally disturbed or crazy, or both. I read the article and it said that having babies was a way for these girls to get status in their little town. I think the only status they should get is being stupid, skanks.

Young FRANKenstein · Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 4:41 pm Post subject:

I'd like to know how the guys were involved:

1) they knew they were getting the girls pregnant, and they were told they wouldn't be responsible for it
2) they knew they were getting the girls pregnant, knew they'd be responsible for it, and went ahead and did it anyway
3) they didn't know the girl's plan, but didn't use protection (idiots)
4) they didn't know the girls plan, DID use protection, but the girls sabotaged it

If (1), they're idiots. The law will make them responsible for it regardless of the wishes of the girl. If (2), they're idiots. Taking responsibility for a kid WITH a kid, and pretty much owning up to a future statutory rape conviction. If (3), they're idiots. Who has sex these days without protection? If (4), sucks to be them, but the law will hold them responsible regardless, and the girl won't be punished for her deception/"oops"ing.

I find (4) reprehensible, but tough luck for them in the other cases. Enjoy their ball-and-chain for the next 18 years. With luck they won't spend it inside prison for statutory rape (if the girls give up their names).

matthews_world · Joined: 15 Feb 2003

[quote="Young FRANKenstein"]I'd like to know how the guys were involved:

1) they knew they were getting the girls pregnant, and they were told they wouldn't be responsible for it
2) they knew they were getting the girls pregnant, knew they'd be responsible for it, and went ahead and did it anyway
3) they didn't know the girl's plan, but didn't use protection (idiots)
4) they didn't know the girls plan, DID use protection, but the girls sabotaged it

Who are you? Sherlock Holmes?

bobranger · Joined: 10 Jun 2008 Location: masan

The parents are responsible but the tax payers and the babies of the baby mamas will suffer.

crusher_of_heads · Posted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 3:29 am Post subject:

Abort them. All of them.

Young FRANKenstein · Posted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 4:04 am Post subject:

cj1976 · Joined: 26 Oct 2005

Don't be shocked. Some young girls in the UK use this as a standard ploy for securing cheap accommodation from the local authorities.
Why bother studying and working when you can get knocked up and get a new flat?

Cornfed · Joined: 14 Mar 2008

Bigfeet · Joined: 29 May 2008 Location: Grrrrr.....

This is a good way to stay poor for life.