View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
pkang0202

Joined: 09 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 6:33 pm Post subject: EU's main weakness exposed |
|
|
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7482197.stm
Quote: |
But the BBC's Hugh Schofield in Paris says last month's Irish rejection of the treaty means once again it is the EU's institutional shape - rather than anything it can actually do - that is in the spotlight.
Speaking on France 3, Mr Sarkozy said: "Something isn't right. Something isn't right at all." |
If it were a 2/3rd or 3/4ths majority then the EU can be more effective. As it stands now, if a single country objects, your SOL. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 10:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jefferson Davis, a man with extensive experience in a similar situation where the local governments held onto almost all the power said that if the Confederacy died, they should carve on the tombstone: "Died of a theory". |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jandar

Joined: 11 Jun 2008
|
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 11:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
European Union is a misnomer.
It should be European Confederacy.
Where each member state has the right to veto.
Even the strength of the US Constitution was not enough to hold the Union together, the concept of states rights is still an issue to this day, even though there was war that was supposed to have settled that. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
blade
Joined: 30 Jun 2007
|
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 11:18 pm Post subject: Re: EU's main weakness exposed |
|
|
pkang0202 wrote: |
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7482197.stm
Quote: |
But the BBC's Hugh Schofield in Paris says last month's Irish rejection of the treaty means once again it is the EU's institutional shape - rather than anything it can actually do - that is in the spotlight.
Speaking on France 3, Mr Sarkozy said: "Something isn't right. Something isn't right at all." |
If it were a 2/3rd or 3/4ths majority then the EU can be more effective. As it stands now, if a single country objects, your SOL. |
Ireland was the country to actually have a vote on the matter, until a majority of European citizens actually get to vote on this issue the idea that Ireland is somehow standing in the way of the European majority is absolutely wrong. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jandar

Joined: 11 Jun 2008
|
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 11:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No actually you are wrong. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
[email protected]

Joined: 25 Feb 2008
|
Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 11:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The treaty would have been shot down in most countries*. Eurocrats need to realise that people dont want further political integration. Europe is far too diverse with too many local stakeholders for something like the constitution or Lisbon treaty to work. Politics should be inherently local, not in some shady bureaucracy with bad accounting like the EU.
As an Irish person (I wasnt at home to vote), I would have been a naysayer too. Im more Interested in getting Irish politicians to do their bloody job for Irish people, rather then let them happily abdicate more power to Brussels. The European diplomatic corps particularly stank. Common EU foreign policy???? No thanks
* edit: If put to plebiscite |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bigverne

Joined: 12 May 2004
|
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Ireland was the country to actually have a vote on the matter, until a majority of European citizens actually get to vote on this issue the idea that Ireland is somehow standing in the way of the European majority is absolutely wrong. |
The French and the Dutch already voted down the Constitution (almost word for word the same as this cleverly constructed 'treaty) and it would almost certainly be rejected in the UK (we were promised a vote but are not getting one) as well as many other European nations. Of course, the people will not be allowed to vote on this.
The EU has gone too far. Such a diverse set of nations, with differing languages, cultures, legal systems and priorities cannot be molded into a single political entity. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Such a diverse set of nations, with differing languages, cultures, legal systems and priorities cannot be molded into a single political entity. |
The Romans might have disagreed with you on that. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
[email protected]

Joined: 25 Feb 2008
|
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
I personally think that Lisbon/The Eu constituation would be a document Napoleon himself would be proud of |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
blade
Joined: 30 Jun 2007
|
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 1:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
bigverne wrote: |
Quote: |
Ireland was the country to actually have a vote on the matter, until a majority of European citizens actually get to vote on this issue the idea that Ireland is somehow standing in the way of the European majority is absolutely wrong. |
The French and the Dutch already voted down the Constitution (almost word for word the same as this cleverly constructed 'treaty) and it would almost certainly be rejected in the UK (we were promised a vote but are not getting one) as well as many other European nations. Of course, the people will not be allowed to vote on this.
The EU has gone too far. Such a diverse set of nations, with differing languages, cultures, legal systems and priorities cannot be molded into a single political entity. |
I have no problem with further integration but I don't think EU citizens should be expected to accept a treaty that (a) nobody understands and (b) is not much different to what they already rejected in 2005. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jvalmer

Joined: 06 Jun 2003
|
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 2:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've always thought that the EU was formed just to rival the US in population and power. Something only the rich favor. I've talked to a few Euros, and most don't like most policies of the EU. Although, they like the free movement of labour part, only if they're the ones allowed to move around and not people from poorer regions going into their countries. Kind of a rich country's "greedy" version of free movement. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Leslie Cheswyck

Joined: 31 May 2003 Location: University of Western Chile
|
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 2:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ya-ta Boy wrote: |
Quote: |
Such a diverse set of nations, with differing languages, cultures, legal systems and priorities cannot be molded into a single political entity. |
The Romans might have disagreed with you on that. |
Rome's problems were legion. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tjames426
Joined: 06 Aug 2006
|
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 2:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ya-ta Boy wrote: |
Quote: |
Such a diverse set of nations, with differing languages, cultures, legal systems and priorities cannot be molded into a single political entity. |
The Romans might have disagreed with you on that. |
China and Russia might have disagreed with you on that, too |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 3:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
China and Russia might have disagreed with you on that, too
|
We could also mention the US, Canada, Australia these days, South Africa...but we probably shouldn't muddy the waters. Some people don't deal well with complexity. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Zenas

Joined: 17 May 2008
|
Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 3:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Politics should be inherently local, not in some shady bureaucracy with bad accounting like the EU. |
Absolutely. Why would an Englishman or a Scot or the Irish want to be told how to think, what to say and how to act by some technobureaucrat in Brussels. Americans are suffering now for letting the federal behemoth get out of control.
When Sarkozy says something is wrong, it just means things are not going the way him and Group A want them to go.
One point for us.
________________________________________ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|