Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

U.S. scientist in anthrax case kills himself
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
mindmetoo



Joined: 02 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 6:11 am    Post subject: U.S. scientist in anthrax case kills himself Reply with quote

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080801/ts_nm/usa_anthrax_dc_3
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/aug/01/anthrax.terrorism?gusrc=rss&feed=worldnews

Was this the guy responsible or was it a case of Richard Jewell?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Jewell

I would imagine if you're innocent and unfairly fingered by the FBI as bio terrorists, you might find you can't do the job you love and end up taking your own life.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RufusW



Joined: 14 Jun 2008
Location: Busan

PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 8:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I haven't even read the articles - but this is a cover-up right? Fake suicide, I believe, all to get American's nice and scared. Why would an anthrax scientist be stupid enough to post anthrax off to people!? (Unless he was in on the plot).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mindmetoo



Joined: 02 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 9:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

RufusW wrote:
I haven't even read the articles - but this is a cover-up right? Fake suicide, I believe, all to get American's nice and scared. Why would an anthrax scientist be stupid enough to post anthrax off to people!? (Unless he was in on the plot).


I would not read it that way. People do stupid evil things on their own. Just yesterday some guy cut a guy's head off on a bus.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cheonmunka



Joined: 04 Jun 2004

PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 3:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Doesn't it come back to that old adage, 'Live by the sword die by the sword?'
I mean, here you are making a powder that kills people when they touch it. It's madness to conceive such a hideous thing.
We are culpable somewhere along the line. In this case we might assume that the madness becomes malignant and (self) destructive.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 4:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
but this is a cover-up right? Fake suicide, I believe, all to get American's nice and scared. Why would an anthrax scientist be stupid enough to post anthrax off to people!? (Unless he was in on the plot).


This is a good example of paranoia run wild.


An innocent guy hounded to suicide...a guilty man who killed himself because of his guilty conscience...a guilty man who offed himself to escape the humilition of being caught...or maybe his girlfriend dumped him and he was depressed.

So far there is no evidence to support any of those theories. With him dead, it will be even more difficult to find out.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mindmetoo



Joined: 02 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 5:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya-ta Boy wrote:
Quote:
but this is a cover-up right? Fake suicide, I believe, all to get American's nice and scared. Why would an anthrax scientist be stupid enough to post anthrax off to people!? (Unless he was in on the plot).


This is a good example of paranoia run wild.


An innocent guy hounded to suicide...a guilty man who killed himself because of his guilty conscience...a guilty man who offed himself to escape the humilition of being caught...or maybe his girlfriend dumped him and he was depressed.

So far there is no evidence to support any of those theories. With him dead, it will be even more difficult to find out.


We have the following possibilities:

1) he's guilty and he killed himself because he knew he would be found out

2) he's innocent and he knew he'd never get work again in the field he loved, even if found innocent

3) he's innocent and the government is using him as a patsy to create fear and let them exert more control

We have many examples of 1 & 2. I'm not sure I know of any cases where the USA has prosecuted one of its innocent citizens to advance a power grab.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
huffdaddy



Joined: 25 Nov 2005

PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 5:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mindmetoo wrote:
1) he's guilty and he killed himself because he knew he would be found out

2) he's innocent and he knew he'd never get work again in the field he loved, even if found innocent


From Yahoo:
Quote:
The sudden naming of scientist Bruce E. Ivins as the top � and perhaps only � suspect in the anthrax attacks marks the latest bizarre twist in a case that has confounded the FBI for nearly seven years. Last month, the Justice Department cleared Ivins' colleague, Steven Hatfill, who had been wrongly suspected in the case, and paid him $5.8 million.

Ivins worked at the Army's biological warfare defense labs at Fort Detrick, Md., for 35 years until his death on Tuesday. He was one of the government's leading scientists researching vaccines and cures for anthrax exposure. But he also had a long history of homicidal threats, according to papers filed last week in local court by a social worker.


Given that he was 62 and his colleague received a $5.8 million pay off, I'd be unlikely to believe #2. Innocent until proven guilty and all that, but I'd put my money on #1.

Quote:
3) he's innocent and the government is using him as a patsy to create fear and let them exert more control


Oddly enough, they couldn't manage to frame a Muslim or Chinese.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 12:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree with huffdaddy's observation that if they were trying to frame someone in order to make a power grab, they'd be framing someone with a name like Hussein, not Bruce. And they wouldn't have waited 7 years to do it. Just before the Nov. '06 elections would have been more likely.

Besides, without some kind of evidence, I see no reason why this possibility is even being discussed. Chronic anti-gov't clap trap.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RufusW



Joined: 14 Jun 2008
Location: Busan

PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 3:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well the anthrax already served its purpose, now they just need to cover their tracks. 7 years, nice long time for people to forget....

I remember at least some of the envelopes and letters were written to look like they came from a middle-eastern writer.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mindmetoo



Joined: 02 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 4:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

huffdaddy wrote:
mindmetoo wrote:
1) he's guilty and he killed himself because he knew he would be found out

2) he's innocent and he knew he'd never get work again in the field he loved, even if found innocent


From Yahoo:
Quote:
The sudden naming of scientist Bruce E. Ivins as the top � and perhaps only � suspect in the anthrax attacks marks the latest bizarre twist in a case that has confounded the FBI for nearly seven years. Last month, the Justice Department cleared Ivins' colleague, Steven Hatfill, who had been wrongly suspected in the case, and paid him $5.8 million.

Ivins worked at the Army's biological warfare defense labs at Fort Detrick, Md., for 35 years until his death on Tuesday. He was one of the government's leading scientists researching vaccines and cures for anthrax exposure. But he also had a long history of homicidal threats, according to papers filed last week in local court by a social worker.


Given that he was 62 and his colleague received a $5.8 million pay off, I'd be unlikely to believe #2. Innocent until proven guilty and all that, but I'd put my money on #1.

Quote:
3) he's innocent and the government is using him as a patsy to create fear and let them exert more control


Oddly enough, they couldn't manage to frame a Muslim or Chinese.


I simply can't believe a scientist behind unfairly hounded by the government, who possibly loves being a scientist, and knowing this will ruin his career, would take solace that a big pay day waiting for him, if only he spends years in court and out of a lab defending himself.

Many scientists, science is their life, money is less of their concern. I think of my own father who could triple his pay working in private industry but much prefers being an academic scientist.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bacasper



Joined: 26 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 8:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Friday, August 1, 2008

Government Tries to Bury Anthrax Story

The government is trying to bury the 2001 anthrax attack scandal (the anthrax came from a U.S. military base) by claiming that