Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

U.S. beef imports up for Chuseok
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
wylies99



Joined: 13 May 2006
Location: I'm one cool cat!

PostPosted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 5:48 pm    Post subject: U.S. beef imports up for Chuseok Reply with quote

U.S. beef imports up for Chuseok

http://joongangdaily.joins.com/article/view.asp?aid=2893480

August 11, 2008
With just over a month until Chuseok, one of Korea�s biggest national holidays, imports of bone-in U.S. beef are flooding into the country.

Local meat importer E-net Corp. said 60 tons of American beef, including 40 tons of the tender short ribs used in Korean marinated delicacy galbi, arrived at the port of Busan yesterday.

The imported goods from E-net are headed for retailers and online shopping malls later this week after passing through quarantine inspection and customs.

The probable price of tender short ribs will be 1,700 won ($1.6) per 100 grams, and 1,000 won for 100 grams of chuck eye roll.

More meat is on the way. On Aug. 14, E-net is planning on bringing in 80 more tons of beef, and 60 tons will follow four days later.

Another importer, A-meat, is planning to import 100 tons of meat by Aug. 15.

A market insider who wished not to be identified said that the beef is selling better than expected. �Importers are rushing to get orders for U.S. beef because demand is likely to increase sharply with Chuseok coming up,� the insider said.

He added that the imports are likely to exceed 1,000 tons of meat this month.

Meanwhile, California-based beef manufacturer S&S has voluntarily recalled 69 tons of ground beef after the U.S. Food Safety and Inspection Service found Escherichia coli, or E. coli, in its product. Last week a Boy Scout camp in Virginia was shut down after 27 people got sick, possibly from the beef.

Nebraska Beef, another U.S. beef manufacturer, recalled 540 tons of beef products after over 30 people became ill, likely from the product.

The Korean Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fishery said if any imported beef is found to be contaminated with E. coli, it will be returned.


By Kwon Hyuk-joo, Moon Byung-joo JoongAng Ilbo [[email protected]]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
caniff



Joined: 03 Feb 2004
Location: All over the map

PostPosted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 6:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I relish the prospect of bowing to American beef (and my ancestors).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wylies99



Joined: 13 May 2006
Location: I'm one cool cat!

PostPosted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 7:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Those huge numbers sure sound D-E-L-I-C-I-O-U-S.
Very Happy
Lea and Perrins and A1 are available at Costco.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sojourner1



Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Location: Where meggi swim and 2 wheeled tractors go sput put chug alugg pug pug

PostPosted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 7:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kool! So the meat supply crisis will be over by the end of this week or maybe within a month? I've noticed there's hardly no meat. I went to an Emart and they only had one small 200 gram pack of Hanwoo ground beef. There's 3 small butchers in my town, but only one has beef while they mostly deal in pork and chicken. The other 2 that don't have beef have the red cow emblem on the front glass case, but meat is absent in an empty glass case. The one with beef only keeps one rump roast at a time that you can buy slices, chunks, or ground beef off of for 2,160 won per 100 grams. Sometimes they are out of beef so it's hit or miss. That comes out to $10 per pound, but you lose 100 grams in the grinder since they weigh it before grinding it so it's more like $13 a pound. I bet they recover that 100 grams stuck in the grinder after I walk out the door with my short sized pound of ground beef.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cheeseface



Joined: 13 Jan 2008
Location: Ssyangnyeon Shi

PostPosted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 7:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Apart from Costco where I get some cheep US beef?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sojusucks



Joined: 31 May 2008

PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 12:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am salivating while thinking of delicious, tender beef while simultaneously thinking about what tons of cheap meat will do to the market.

By the way, isn't Chuseok "spelled" 추석 in Korean. I noticed at CostCo that a board had English and Korean (a special events plaque by the entrance) and noticed this spelling. If this is the case, then the pronunciation is closer to chusuk or chusuck (look at my user name to understand).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tefain



Joined: 19 Sep 2007
Location: Not too far out there

PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 5:14 am    Post subject: U.S. beef imports up for Chuseok Reply with quote

cheeseface wrote:
Apart from Costco where I get some cheep US beef?

Not sure, but you WON'T get it at Costco. They only sell Australian (Clean & Safe as the sign says) beef. Looks like the independent markets are the only places for awhile.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gollywog



Joined: 14 Jun 2008
Location: Debussy's brain

PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 6:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

They had to get that dig in about e-coli, didn't they?

But are Koreans importing ground beef? Beef ground at the slaughterhouse is where the e-coli contamination occurs. If they import the slabs and grind them here, they aren't likely to get any contamination. Besides, if you cook the ground beef properly, you aren't going to get sick, anyway.

Say, what is up with this fascination with bones Koreans have? I have never seen such expensive bones in my life. They seem to think getting meat with the bones is something really exciting.

And fat. Gotta have lotsa fat, don't they? Why?

I saw some of the plastic wrapped "sets" of beef last year. 140,000 won for what looked like 2-3 kilos of fatty beef to me. How can beef be worth $20-$35 a pound?

I guess if it's expensive, it's gotta be good, right? Just leave the price sticker on.

And then there's the outrageously overpriced cheap scotch and brandy. But I guess that's another thread.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
cheeseface



Joined: 13 Jan 2008
Location: Ssyangnyeon Shi

PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 7:01 am    Post subject: Re: U.S. beef imports up for Chuseok Reply with quote

tefain wrote:
cheeseface wrote:
Apart from Costco where I get some cheep US beef?

Not sure, but you WON'T get it at Costco. They only sell Australian (Clean & Safe as the sign says) beef. Looks like the independent markets are the only places for awhile.


I'm quite far out of Seoul I just thought that US beef was already available in Costco.......

So where is it? Razz
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hyeon Een



Joined: 24 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 3:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

sojusucks wrote:

By the way, isn't Chuseok "spelled" 추석 in Korean. I noticed at CostCo that a board had English and Korean (a special events plaque by the entrance) and noticed this spelling. If this is the case, then the pronunciation is closer to chusuk or chusuck (look at my user name to understand).


I think "Chuseok" is a lot closer than "Chusuck" in terms of romanization. Well, unless you pronounce the "e" and the "o" seperately like "Chu-see-ok". Then your way would be better..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wylies99



Joined: 13 May 2006
Location: I'm one cool cat!

PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 1:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

No one knows for sure when/where it will be sold. If I should find it, I will post the location for others. HOPEFULLY other posters will do the same for the rest of us.



HOPEFULLY.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nolegirl



Joined: 17 Apr 2008

PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 1:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

wylies99 wrote:
No one knows for sure when/where it will be sold. If I should find it, I will post the location for others. HOPEFULLY other posters will do the same for the rest of us.



HOPEFULLY.


OMG, wylies you make me laugh so much, anywhere there is talk of food you are there!! And your obsession with US beef is to the point of psychotic, you are hilarious!!

Costco here we come!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sojusucks



Joined: 31 May 2008

PostPosted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 12:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hyeon Een wrote:
Quote:
sojusucks wrote:
Quote:
By the way, isn't Chuseok "spelled" 추석 in Korean. I noticed at CostCo that a board had English and Korean (a special events plaque by the entrance) and noticed this spelling. If this is the case, then the pronunciation is closer to chusuk or chusuck (look at my user name to understand).


I think "Chuseok" is a lot closer than "Chusuck" in terms of romanization. Well, unless you pronounce the "e" and the "o" seperately like "Chu-see-ok". Then your way would be better..


Here is an excellent website for learning Korean: http://rki.kbs.co.kr/learn_korean/lessons/e_index.htm. On this site, ㅓ, sounds a bit different than in 석. Think about how a sounds different than when it's in the word cape.

Because Korean is not my native language, I asked a couple ladies that work in my office to pronounce the word 추석. The syllable 석 sounded similar to suk (similar to the u in ugh or uck). To complicate matters, ㄱ has a sound inbetween g and k and is unaspirated, unlike c. So chusuck introduces an aspiration not present in the original word, but I added the c to the word chusuk to communicate why I though my transliteration or Romanization or the word 추석 was interesting.

Here is a link to a wikipedia page containing various Romanization systems for Hangeul: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_romanization.

In addition, the first Romanization system used in China was the Wade-Giles system, which was fairly inaccurate. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_romanization) Nowadays, the pinyin system is used and is much closer. Until Koreans, generally speaking, improve their English skills, the Romanization system used in Korea will continue to be somewhat inaccurate. Think about it: Fanta (한탘), internet (인터넷), Gyeonggi (겨기) (close but not very exact).

I implore the next person that corrects my Korean to at least be familiar enough with the language to provide a descent defence of the established Romanizatin system or suggest a logical alternative.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sojusucks



Joined: 31 May 2008

PostPosted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 12:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Need wonderful, tender, delicious beef at reasonable prices, which is what the imported American beef should do to the Korean beef market.

I can't wait.

Must stock up on Lea & Perrins, vegetables, potatoes (mashed potatoes would be great), etc.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bangbayed



Joined: 01 Dec 2005
Location: Seoul

PostPosted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 6:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's Chuseok because according to the current Romanisation system:
ㅊ = Ch
ㅜ = u
ㅅ = s
ㅓ = eo
ㄱ = unpronounced because consonant endings in syllables (not followed by a vowel in the next syllable) are not aspirated.
As you can can see, the letter 'u' is already taken by the vowel ㅜ, which may cause some confusion sometimes but it's better than having a silly double-o 'oo' every time you want that sound.

Sorry to break your hopes of having fun with the language at its expense.

sojusucks wrote:
Until Koreans, generally speaking, improve their English skills, the Romanization system used in Korea will continue to be somewhat inaccurate. Think about it: Fanta (한탘), internet (인터넷), Gyeonggi (겨기) (close but not very exact).


So improving their English skills will add an F to the Korean language? Visions of grandeur much?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International