Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Gore compares Obama to Lincoln
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 1:07 am    Post subject: Gore compares Obama to Lincoln Reply with quote

Gore: Obama's "lack of experience" no different than that of Lincoln

INVESCO FIELD -- Al Gore, who lost the closest election in national history to George Bush in 2000, chided criticism of Barack Obama�s short resume of experience by comparing it to the most famous man from Illinois, Abraham Lincoln...

�Before he entered the White House, Abraham Lincoln�s experience in elective office consisted of eight years in his state legislature in Springfield, Ill., and one term in Congress during which he showed the courage and wisdom to oppose the invasion of another country that was popular when it started but later condemned by history.�...

One of the greatest gifts of our democracy is the opportunity it offers us every four years to change course,� Gore said. �It�s not a guarantee, it�s an opportunity. The question facing us is, simply put, will we seize this opportunity for change?

�Eight years ago, some said there was not much difference between the nominees of the two major parties and it didn�t really matter who became president. Our nation was enjoying peace and prosperity. Some assumed we would continue both, no matter the outcome.

�But here we all are in 2008, and I doubt anyone would argue now that election didn�t matter.

�Take it from me, if it had ended differently we would not be bogged down in Iraq, we would have pursued bin Laden until we captured him. We would not be facing a self-inflicted economic crisis; we would be fighting for middle class families.

�We would not be showing contempt for the Constitution, we�d be protecting the rights of every American regardless of race, religion, disability, gender or sexual orientation. And we would not be denying the climate crisis, we would be solving it...

�After they wrecked our economy, it is time for a change. After they abandoned the search for the terrorists who attacked us and redeployed the troops to invade a nation that did not attack us, it�s time for a change.

�After they abandoned the American principle first laid down by General George Washington, when he prohibited the torture of captives because it would bring, in his words, shame, disgrace and ruin to our nation, it�s time for a change.

�When as many as three Supreme Court justices could be appointed in the first term of the next president, and John McCain promises to appoint more Scalias and Thomases and end a woman�s right to choose, it�s time for a change.�

***
A good speech by the man who should now be preparing to retire from the White House.

I liked his statement about change and opportunity. He made a good point about our system of government. We do have an opportunity to change direction every 4 years (you could even say every 2 years) and it is an opportunity. This time we have the opportunity to dump the failed radical policies of this administration in the trash heap of history where they belong.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tjames426



Joined: 06 Aug 2006

PostPosted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 4:54 pm    Post subject: erhmm??? Reply with quote

Does that mean Obama will cause a Civil War in the USA??? With the result that State rights will be eroded further in order to produce a stronger central controlled Government???

Does that mean that Obama will be murdered in office???

****

Interesting stuff.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mises



Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Location: retired

PostPosted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 5:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think he is more like Gandhi, Jesus, Rosa Parks, mohammad, Vishnu, Roh and Canadian Heath Care (it's free!) rolled into an organic and free range burrito.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 6:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Gandhi, Jesus, Rosa Parks, mohammad, Vishnu, Roh and Canadian Heath Care


Hmmmm...the Case of the Missing Upper-Case Letter: Who's the best detective on psychological cases? Miss Marple? Jim Chee and Joe Leaphorn? Siggie Freud? I'll get back to you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 6:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Does that mean Obama will cause a Civil War in the USA??? With the result that State rights will be eroded further in order to produce a stronger central controlled Government???


Good attempt at shifting the treasonous actions of the States Righters onto a near-saint. It won't work, but hey. Ya can't blame a guy for trying to justify treason.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ReeseDog



Joined: 05 Apr 2008
Location: Classified

PostPosted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 6:10 pm    Post subject: Re: erhmm??? Reply with quote

Tjames426 wrote:
Does that mean Obama will cause a Civil War in the USA?


Not a chance.

Tjames426 wrote:
...State rights will be eroded further in order to produce a stronger central controlled Government?


While that's generally the Dems' idea, I say no. Folks wouldn't stand for it. Ah, the Articles of Confederation. Why could that not have lasted?

Tjames426 wrote:
Does that mean that Obama will be murdered in office?


That's possible. It's been tried (and done) with several others. I think, though, that thinking individuals (clich�) would understand that this is not the way to go.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gopher



Joined: 04 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 6:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lincoln was a Republican, thank you very much. We Republicans served with Abe Lincoln, we knew Abe Lincoln, Abe Lincoln was a friend of ours. Ladies and Gentlemen: Barack Obama is no Abe Lincoln.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ReeseDog



Joined: 05 Apr 2008
Location: Classified

PostPosted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 6:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gopher wrote:
Lincoln was a Republican, thank you very much. We Republicans served with Abe Lincoln, we knew Abe Lincoln, Abe Lincoln was a friend of ours. Ladies and Gentlemen: Barack Obama is no Abe Lincoln.


Man, not even close.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 6:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya-ta Boy wrote:
Quote:
Does that mean Obama will cause a Civil War in the USA??? With the result that State rights will be eroded further in order to produce a stronger central controlled Government???


Good attempt at shifting the treasonous actions of the States Righters onto a near-saint. It won't work, but hey. Ya can't blame a guy for trying to justify treason.


Ya-Ta, they were slaveholders. Don't try to stain the legitimate cause of State autonomy by associating it with people who held men in bonds as if those men were chattel.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 7:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sorry, Kuros. I should have known better than to condemn the political philosophy that has been used to protect slavery, lynching and Jim Crow for decades while people's lives were blighted, destroyed and wasted. I don't know what I could have been thinking. Of course the Bill of Rights should only apply in those states where the majority want it to apply and then only to those the majority want it to apply to. Foolish of me to think that we are a nation of people who happen to have local addresses but all the same rights, rather than a collection of states who have agreed to cooperate only on matters of national defense.

I am sorry for the sarcasm, but I don't know how else to address the most evil and dangerous political philosophy in our body politic when, more than a century after it was discredited, people bring it up as if it deserves respect.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 7:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ya-ta Boy wrote:


I am sorry for the sarcasm, but I don't know how else to address the most evil and dangerous political philosophy in our body politic when, more than a century after it was discredited, people bring it up as if it deserves respect.


I'm very sure you're confused. The Bill of Rights applies to all the States, and always has since the 14th Amendment.

States Rights is a broader question than that. See the improper use of the Commerce Clause.

I would go into detail, but you've already condemned a particular interpretation of the Constitution as evil, simply because of your imperfect understanding of it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
ReeseDog



Joined: 05 Apr 2008
Location: Classified

PostPosted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 7:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kuros wrote:
Ya-ta Boy wrote:
Quote:
Does that mean Obama will cause a Civil War in the USA??? With the result that State rights will be eroded further in order to produce a stronger central controlled Government???


Good attempt at shifting the treasonous actions of the States Righters onto a near-saint. It won't work, but hey. Ya can't blame a guy for trying to justify treason.


Ya-Ta, they were slaveholders. Don't try to stain the legitimate cause of State autonomy by associating it with people who held men in bonds as if those men were chattel.


Quite right. They're separate issues. Secession was the right of the individual states. Clearly those covetous bastards in the north didn't agree. The War of Northern Aggression was a war of dominion - never was it a civil war. Written by the victors, though, as the expression goes...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 7:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ReeseDog wrote:
Kuros wrote:
Ya-ta Boy wrote:
Quote:
Does that mean Obama will cause a Civil War in the USA??? With the result that State rights will be eroded further in order to produce a stronger central controlled Government???


Good attempt at shifting the treasonous actions of the States Righters onto a near-saint. It won't work, but hey. Ya can't blame a guy for trying to justify treason.


Ya-Ta, they were slaveholders. Don't try to stain the legitimate cause of State autonomy by associating it with people who held men in bonds as if those men were chattel.


Quite right. They're separate issues. Secession was the right of the individual states. Clearly those covetous bastards in the north didn't agree. The War of Northern Aggression was a war of dominion - never was it a civil war. Written by the victors, though, as the expression goes...


!!!

No, no. The Right of Secession is not the same as States' Rights! The North had every right to crush slavery, and they were right to establish the 14th Amendment and its Equal Protection Clause.

Eh, nevermind.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 7:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
The Bill of Rights applies to all the States, and always has since the 14th Amendment


Corrected: The Bill of Rights SHOULD apply to all the states and does when states don't dig in their heels and scream about states rights in order to block progressive social legislation like voting rights.

The 14th Amendment was a mere technicality in matters of voting rights since the government would not enforce it-- a whole lot like freedom of speech under Stalin or Mao. It looked good on paper but was not a reality in the lives of people.

There are two legitimate interpretations of the Constitution, broad and narrow. Most people use both interpretations as they see fit, depending on the issue. States Rights goes beyond the narrow interpretation. That issue was settled by Andrew Jackson (Democrat of Tennessee) in the Nullification Crisis with South Carolina and should have been settled for all time on the battlefields of the Civil War under Lincoln. Notice that your ally on this thread automatically associates secession with States Rights. He is correct historically in considering them linked.

(Name of the war: Having long since been disillusioned to find out that the War of Jenkin's Ear was not really about Jenkin's ear, that the Hundred Years War didn't lasted a long longer than a hundred years, and that the 7 Years War lasted 9 years, I have ceased to quibble over the name of any war.)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 8:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
No, no. The Right of Secession is not the same as States' Rights!


Very Happy Very Happy Yes, yes.

You can sell yourself as a strict constructionist and I can respect that, but toss the term States Rights into the argument and you have to take on the burden of what the term has always meant. Just because Libertarian screeds wish the term weren't linked to treason, doesn't mean they can have their way. Leftists aren't rightists, Commies weren't fascist but States Righters did do their best to destroy our nation and I understand it very well.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International