View previous topic :: View next topic |
Shakespeare is |
The Man. |
|
83% |
[ 26 ] |
overrated. |
|
12% |
[ 4 ] |
good, but __________ is better. |
|
3% |
[ 1 ] |
|
Total Votes : 31 |
|
Author |
Message |
BreakfastInBed

Joined: 16 Oct 2007 Location: Gyeonggi do
|
Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 5:26 am Post subject: Shakespeare |
|
|
I'm becoming fixated. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
itaewonguy

Joined: 25 Mar 2003
|
Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 5:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
A Legend!!
They say he smoked pot! Doesn�t surprise me really how else could you conceive the amount of brilliant characters in your head as he did...
An amazing guy truly gifted... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 5:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
I voted 'overrated'. Because he is. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
peppermint

Joined: 13 May 2003 Location: traversing the minefields of caddishness.
|
Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 6:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
There are others I like as much or more, but none that are as accessible today, nor produced the sheer volume of great work. That's not to say that Shakespeare didn't have a few duds, Cymbeline was slow going at best. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
crusher_of_heads
Joined: 23 Feb 2007 Location: kimbop and kimchi for kimberly!!!!
|
Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 6:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
On the strength of the sonnets alone, he's The Man.
Jonson and Marlowe are the moons to his Sun. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MollyBloom

Joined: 21 Jul 2006 Location: James Joyce's pants
|
Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 6:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
I agree that he was a genius. The wonderful thing about him is that really not too much is known about his personal life, except his family and his acquaintances with Marlowe and other contemporaries, so critics always have lot of things to write about.
I have to say that I honestly enjoy all of his works, even his sonnets, because there is so much to everything he writes!
Last year I took this class called Shakespeare and Modern Culture. My professor, Marjorie Garber, is one of the world's best Shax scholars out there, and she based the class around how Shax shaped modernity and how modernity shaped Shax. It's amazing when you think about it how often times you will know a quote without realizing it came from Shax. Then you see the play where it is quoted, and you realize," Ah! That's where that came from!" It's worth it to look up Marjorie Garber, so I encourage people who love Shakespeare to do so. If you are looking for a good supplementary guide to all of his plays, Garber wrote a book called Shakespeare After All.
My favorites: Hamlet, King Lear, Measure for Measure, Pericles, The Merchant of Venice, Titus Andronicus, Troilus and Cressida, Richard III, Antony and Cleopatra, Henry V (sorry..hard for me to pick ONE)
Do you prefer Elizabethan or Jacobean Shakespeare?
P.s. I do want to add, thought, that Marlowe's Dr. Faustus was AWESOME. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BreakfastInBed

Joined: 16 Oct 2007 Location: Gyeonggi do
|
Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 7:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
I ordered the Garber book from Amazon last week. That must have been a great class. I'm not to the point that I have a favorite period of Shakespeare. I've been through the complete works once and many of the major plays numerous times. He really does feel inexhaustable. I'm gearing up to start working through them all again with a bit more focus and lots more supplementary material this time.
The big favorites that first spring to mind have to be King Lear, Hamlet, Macbeth, As You Like It, and the two parts of Henry IV. Can't escape Falstaff. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
the boy next door
Joined: 08 Jun 2008 Location: next door
|
Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 7:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
existential Shakespeare at its best, baby...this insignificant thread is sheer testimony to the man / woman's? immotality...
as an undergraduate creative writing major and English drama minor, i performed in a variety of Shakespearean plays in the park... if a native of Montreal and an alumni of McGill U. you may have seen my histronic handsome ass wooing the bilingual masses on a hot summer night's elucidated lawn somewhere in La Belle Province...
anyhoot, i have always bought into the theory that Shakespeare wasn't Shakespeare but in fact Edward de Vere, the 17th Earl of Oxford...it's a lengthy tale but only those trusting that The Bard was actually Queen Elizabeth I would disagree...(i also buy into the notion that Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford was in reality Queen Elizabeth's illegitimate son but that's another existential Shakespearean thread, n'est-ce pas?) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 10:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ya-ta Boy wrote: |
I voted 'overrated'. Because he is. |
No he isn't. Some of his plays are overrated. But take his top 10, or even top 5 plays, and those are some of the best pieces written in the English language.
P.S. Theories on who Shakespeare actually was kind of bore me and sometimes even irritate me. Shakespeare was the guy(s) who wrote the plays bearing Shakespeare's name. Just like Homer was the guy(s) who wrote the epics bearing his name. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 12:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, he is. I'm not saying he isn't very good, just not as good as his reputation. No one is as good as Shakespeare's reputation. Not even Shakespeare.
There is a terrific social history book, "A Year in the Life of William Shakespeare: 1599" by James Shapiro that I would recommend, though. From the back cover: Shakespeare wrote four of his most famous plays: Henry the Fifth, Julius Caesar, As You Like It, and, most remarkably, Hamlet; Elizabethans sent off an army to crush an Irish rebellion, weathered an Armada threat from Spain, gambled on a fledgling East India Company, and waited to see who would succeed their aging and childless queen.
James Shapiro illuminates both Shakespeare's staggering achievement and what Elizabethans experienced in the course of 1599, bringing together the news and the intrigue of the times with a wonderful evocation of how Shakespeare worked as an actor, businessman, and playwright. The result is an exceptionally immediate and gripping account of an inspiring moment in history. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
PBRstreetgang21

Joined: 19 Feb 2007 Location: Orlando, FL--- serving as man's paean to medocrity since 1971!
|
Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 1:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think not all, but a lot of "he is overrated" opinions that crop up trend to originate from fatigue as much as anything else.
I think if someone where to lock all of Shakespeare's works away for a hundered years and then bring them back out with fresh eyes and ears people would probably be in awe. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Czarjorge

Joined: 01 May 2007 Location: I now have the same moustache, and it is glorious.
|
Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 6:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Make sure to check it all out. The big stuff like MacBeth (which I think is a bit overrated) and Hamlet (which is so good it can never be lauded enough) is worth reading, but so is the 'lesser' stuff. Titus is one of my favorites. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
eamo

Joined: 08 Mar 2003 Location: Shepherd's Bush, 1964.
|
Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 6:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've enjoyed many other writers more than Shakey, but his prolific output of quality material marks him out as 'The Man'. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hossenfeffer

Joined: 07 Oct 2006
|
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 4:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
I wrote my master's thesis on Machiavelli's influence on Shakespeare's Henriad (Henry IV Parts 1 and 2, Richard II, and Henry V). Saying that Shakespeare is "overrated" is like saying that Mozart is "overrated." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BreakfastInBed

Joined: 16 Oct 2007 Location: Gyeonggi do
|
Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 7:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ya-ta Boy wrote: |
I'm not saying he isn't very good, just not as good as his reputation. No one is as good as Shakespeare's reputation. Not even Shakespeare. |
I follow you. Seems like a reasonable, defensible position. Then I try to think of Shakespeare's nearest rival and all the extravagant praise seems justified. Tough call.
PBRstreetgang21 wrote: |
I think if someone where to lock all of Shakespeare's works away for a hundered years and then bring them back out with fresh eyes and ears people would probably be in awe. |
I agree.
Last edited by BreakfastInBed on Wed Sep 24, 2008 3:20 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|