|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
fiveeagles

Joined: 19 May 2005 Location: Vancouver
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
doc_ido

Joined: 03 Sep 2007
|
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 1:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
I guess not everybody's as gracious in defeat as McCain was. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
moosehead

Joined: 05 May 2007
|
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 3:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
that's funny - I thought he was elected because people voted for him  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Milwaukiedave
Joined: 02 Oct 2004 Location: Goseong
|
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 4:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Are we talking about the same John Ziegler that when asked about his survey by Nate Silver, he told him to "f*** off". How professional!
Nate Silver [NS]: Were only Obama supporters interviewed for the [Zogby] survey, or was everyone interviewed?
John Ziegler [JZ]: The reason why I interviewed Obama supporters only is because I�m doing a documentary on the media coverage of the campaign and how the media coverage of the campaign impacted what Obama supporters knew or thought they knew about the campaign. I had planned from day one because I knew that no one would take seriously any random sampling of interviewees that I was going to commission a scientific poll of these questions. I also knew that it would be a lot cheaper for me to do a nationwide survey of Obama voters than the nation as a whole because basically I�d only have to do half the number of people to get a representative sample. When I went on FOX last night, I made a deal that if anyone on the left -- you're more than willing to take me up on this -- wants to ask the exact same deal of the McCain supporters and you get examples that are equal to or worse than the Obama supporters, then I�ll pay for your expense. The point here was not to show that Obama supporters were idiots -- there are plenty of idiots on both sides of the aisle -- but what information they got from the media that they were able to consume.
NS: Do you stand by all the statements in the survey as being unambiguously true?
JZ: I stand one hundred percent by the notion that there is absolutely zero ambiguity as to what the right answer is to any of the questions. With the one exception of the Palin-Russia-Alaska question which we asked the way we did for a very specific purpose which was to try and gauge the Tina Fey Effect which I think we did in a very effective manner which was what was actually said by Tina Fey, everyone attributed to Sarah Plain. But for purposes of scoring Obama supporters� answers we counted Palin as a correct response.
NS: What was the right answer to that [Palin] question?
JZ: The technically accurate question [sic] is that none of the four people said that, but we counted it as correct if they said Sarah Palin.
NS: Why would you commission a survey question with no correct response?
JZ: The purpose of the question, you pinhead, was we wanted to determine the Tina Fey Effect.
NS: Were the interviews conducted by telephone or online?
JZ: How can you ask a question like that and pretend that you have any clue what you're writing about! That's unbelievable that someone could write what you did! That is unbelievable that you wouldn't know that it's a telephone or an online poll and that you went on my summaries of the questions before the questions were even released!
NS: We�ve heard reports from our readers that very similar questions had been asked in an online format. There was no online component at all?
JZ: That is correct, which you would have known if you had looked at the information. Before you called this a push poll -- you don't seem to know the definition of a push poll. How do you have this website?
NS: Is the complete interview available anywhere -- complete results for the interview?
JZ: Yeah if you had done your research it is all online, every question, all the cross-tabs. Man, you're never going to post this [transcript], are you?
NS: Were the respondents informed of the 'correct' response during the telephone interviews?
JZ: No.
NS: Did Zogby have a chance to preview the questions before agreeing to accept your business?
JZ: John Zogby himself or the company?
NS: Either/Or.
JZ: I am quite certain that if I asked a question they deemed inappropriate they would have not allowed the question to be asked.
NS: What questions were removed from the survey?
JZ: We didn't remove any, we edited some.
NS: What questions were edited?
JZ: Nothing was substantially edited but there was some wording on some that we went over with them. For instance, I think I had inadvertently said �See Russia from my home� instead of �See Russia from my house�. There was a distinction about Obama talking about energy prices versus electricity prices so we corrected that. That�s all that I can recollect.
NS: What did Zogby charge you -- what did you pay for this survey?
JZ: I'm not going to tell you that, I'm not a ******* idiot.
NS: Did he charge you at his usual rates or did he ask you for extra?
JZ: You'll have to ask them. I'm not going to respond how much money I paid for this. It was substantial but I�m not going to say anything more than that.
NS: In the Youtube video, how were the Obama supporters identified for the Youtube video?
JZ: I had nothing to do with it. I had a person who was working with me who happens to be a black female since you seem to think I�m a racist who was the one that chose all of the respondents based on conversations we�d had prior, people who were well-spoken, thought they were informed, willing to come on camera and [who] voted for Barack Obama.
NS: What was the location of the polling place where the interviews were conducted?
JZ: They were both in Los Angeles.
NS: Okay, that's what I kind of guessed. How many Obama supporters did you speak with in total?
JZ: All twelve we spoke with are in the video.
NS: Was there any significance to the fact that in the YouTube video, seven of the twelve Obama supporters were black?
JZ: [Laughs]. The reason why we had more black supporters � that might surprise some of the people that we spoke to -- if we go by your apparent ability to determine race -- the first location happened to be in a black section of town and we were able to get our interviews faster there because of they way that was set up, because of the logistics. We had a second location but it got dark and we didn't have any lights. So, that's it, it was no grand racial conspiracy.
NS: How did you represent yourself to John Zogby?
JZ: As private company, Death-of-Free-Speech-dot-inc which is the name of a book that I wrote.
NS: Did Zogby give you sign-off on the press release that he released on his website?
JZ: I'm not sure what you mean by sign-off. The press release I had input into, yes.
NS: Did you have financing for the project or was it paid for out of pocket?
JZ: It is not self-financed.
NS: Who paid for it?
JZ: You think I'm going to tell you that? When you've already shown yourself to be the enemy?
NS: Was it paid for by the RNC?
JZ: [Laughs]. In your world, the question that I would ask you is what question [in the survey] is there any ambiguity as to what the answer is?
NS: Well, that Obama 'launched his career' at the home of two former members of the Weather Underground --
JZ: That happens to be one of the questions that Obama supporters did the best on! They did better on that question than on any other Obama-related answers! And here you�re telling me that it�s not true?
NS: What do you mean by "launched his career"?
JZ: The first campaign as told by the person whose position he took in the State Senate, as told by her admission, his first campaign event was in the home of Bill Ayers and his wife. [Laughs] Unless you live in the Obama kool-aid world! That is astonishing to me that you would not accept that! And by the way, when you're given four responses to that question, what else was the response going to be? Sarah Palin?
NS: Well, her husband was a member of a secessionist party.
JZ: You are such a hack! That's a very good analogy.
NS: Do you think that certain types of voters are less well informed?
JZ: I think anyone that looks rationally at these poll results would have to conclude that Obama voters are incredibly poorly informed about major issues that occurred during the campaign -- my guess is because McCain voters got their information from different types of media than Obama voters did.
NS: What types of media would you consider credible?
JZ: I think you need a variety of sources, but I do not accept the notion that if it's not in the New York Times it's not true and if it is in the New York Times it is. Just because Sean Hannity says something doesn't mean it�s not true.
NS: What is Barack Obama�s religion?
JZ: You'll have to ask him. But I do know that he never claimed to be a Christian until he met Reverend Wright. And I do believe -- and I�ve never held this against him -- that it would have been highly unlikely for him not to have been registered as a Muslim as a child in Indonsesia but who cares. He did change his website based on that reality �- he was far more ambiguous about that issue on Fight The Smears. I�m an agnostic so I couldn't care less what his religion is. I just care that he lied about it.
NS: When do you think Obama was a Muslim?
JZ: I think he was likely -- registered as a Muslim between the ages of 6 and 10 while he was going to school in Indonesia. It would have been highly unusual for him not to be.
NS: But would you personally consider Obama a Muslim?
JZ: No, because he was a child. We're talking about two totally different things. There's what religion you're born into and there's what religion you become because of your own decisions
NS: Would you consider Obama a Christian?
JZ: You'd have to ask him. There was never any evidence that he was a Christian until he decided to join the church of a racist hate-monger for political purposes.
NS: Would you not believe Barack Obama if he told you he was a Christian?
JZ: Does he believe that Jesus Christ was the son of God who died and was raised from the dead later?
NS: Do you think he�s a believer in Jesus Christ?
JZ: I have no way of knowing that. I don't think there's any evidence that he is, either.
NS: Do you have doubts about Barack Obama's birth certificate?
JZ: I couldn�t care less about that. I accept he was born in Hawaii.
NS: Would you consider yourself well-informed
JZ: I�d consider myself extremely well-informed.
NS: Who are the two senators from South Dakota
JZ: Thune and, uh, Johnson.
NS: Very good. South Carolina?
JZ: Go **** yourself. I'm done with this interview if you're going to ask me stupid questions like that. Obviously I know who Lindsay Graham is.
NS: Well, since you�re running a website calling people misinformed, I�d like to see if -- there are certain things you�ve said that I would consider misinformed.
JZ: Misinformed? You're a piece of work! You are never going to have the guts to post a representative transcript on your website! I thought you actually ran a legitimate website!
NS: Thank you, have a good day.
JZ: Go **** yourself.
http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/11/interview-with-john-ziegler-on-zogby.html |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
VanIslander

Joined: 18 Aug 2003 Location: Geoje, Hadong, Tongyeong,... now in a small coastal island town outside Gyeongsangnamdo!
|
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 4:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
12 stupid people who voted for McCain-Palin wouldn't be hard to find either.
It would be interesting to look at WHAT was widely known and what wasn't, what got through and what didn't.
But that "media malpractice" show doesn't seem primarily focussed on that |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
moosehead

Joined: 05 May 2007
|
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 5:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
so let me see if I understand this correctly -
there's good reporting, bad reporting, and a whole slew of in-between reporting
but if people are ill informed, ignorant or just plain, well, stupid - it's the media's fault?
ok, yeah, uh huh. got it.
and just because people don't have to pass an iq test or literacy test, or, say, a current events test, in order to vote -
that's also the media's fault?!!
and now that the first African-American president has been elected - that's also supposed to be somehow - a fluke of bad media - !
oh I understand now!! how silly of me!!
someone should document all the excuses that are going to be made about Obama's election - bet they'll continue for 8 long years !! 
Last edited by moosehead on Wed Nov 19, 2008 9:53 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bibbitybop

Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 8:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
At least all the poor, ignorant voters elected someone who will better represent their interests this time around. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
khyber
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Compunction Junction
|
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 9:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks M. Dave
Nice transcript.
It could also be argued that since McCain concentrated all his firepower on attempting to slay Obama's character, it's no wonder that his supporters concentrated their defense on "minor issues" like WU.
Quote: |
At least all the poor, ignorant voters elected someone who will better represent their interests this time around. |
Hasn't almost every president promised to help the poor? Boy, I really hope all (or even some) of his talk comes to fruition. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fiveeagles

Joined: 19 May 2005 Location: Vancouver
|
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 10:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I would say 80 percent of the media in NA is left leaning while 15 percent is on target and 5 percent leans right. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bucheon bum
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 10:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fiveeagles wrote: |
I would say 80 percent of the media in NA is left leaning while 15 percent is on target and 5 percent leans right. |
I would say 99% of us on this forum believe you pulled those "stats" out of your ass. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
canuckistan Mod Team


Joined: 17 Jun 2003 Location: Training future GS competitors.....
|
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 11:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fiveeagles wrote: |
I would say 80 percent of the media in NA is left leaning while 15 percent is on target and 5 percent leans right. |
This is new?
Most journalists are by their very natures centrist/liberal leaning and naturally suspicious of any political/religious extremes-- in this case George Bush & Co.
Get over it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
moosehead

Joined: 05 May 2007
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
canuckistan wrote: |
fiveeagles wrote: |
I would say 80 percent of the media in NA is left leaning while 15 percent is on target and 5 percent leans right. |
This is new?
Most journalists are by their very natures centrist/liberal leaning and naturally suspicious of any political/religious extremes-- in this case George Bush & Co.
Get over it. |
you guys are joking, right? what with all the spit and polish newscasters on tv? and the repetitive mantras broadcast night after night? and the almost total lack of dissenting voices on radio - if not for community stations?? you're kidding, right??
PLEASE TELL ME YOU'RE KIDDING!!
when major corporations like Disney, Time Warner, GE have control of the media - when laws governing our airwaves are constantly being challenged, modified and bent to suit the whims of the corporate media -
oh, my oh my - I can't go on.....can't... the ignorance is swallowing me up....gurgle gurgle....  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
canuckistan Mod Team


Joined: 17 Jun 2003 Location: Training future GS competitors.....
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 6:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
moosehead wrote: |
canuckistan wrote: |
fiveeagles wrote: |
I would say 80 percent of the media in NA is left leaning while 15 percent is on target and 5 percent leans right. |
This is new?
Most journalists are by their very natures centrist/liberal leaning and naturally suspicious of any political/religious extremes-- in this case George Bush & Co.
Get over it. |
you guys are joking, right? what with all the spit and polish newscasters on tv? and the repetitive mantras broadcast night after night? and the almost total lack of dissenting voices on radio - if not for community stations?? you're kidding, right??
PLEASE TELL ME YOU'RE KIDDING!!
when major corporations like Disney, Time Warner, GE have control of the media - when laws governing our airwaves are constantly being challenged, modified and bent to suit the whims of the corporate media -
oh, my oh my - I can't go on.....can't... the ignorance is swallowing me up....gurgle gurgle....  |
I'm not kidding. And I also didn't mean journalists who work for corporate media.
There is life beyond the US. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kikomom

Joined: 24 Jun 2008 Location: them thar hills--Penna, USA--Zippy is my kid, the teacher in ROK. You can call me Kiko
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 3:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
moosehead wrote: |
...
there's good reporting, bad reporting, and a whole slew of in-between reporting
|
And then there's American Idol.
Quote: |
...and just because people don't have to pass an iq test or literacy test, or, say, a current events test, in order to vote - |
Nope, they just have to be fans of American Idol.
Quote: |
...
and now that the first African-American president has been elected - that's also supposed to be somehow - a fluke of bad media - ! |
If you want to consider American Idol 'bad media', I'll go with that.
Quote: |
...someone should document all the excuses that are going to be made about Obama's election |
I, myself, don't watch, never watched it (well, maybe a whole five minutes when it first came out), but this was actually an excuse I heard made by a bitter loser. That Obama won because he got the American Idol vote.
Like you said, Moosehead, "because people don't have to pass an iq test or literacy test, or, say, a current events test, in order to vote", I guess they just need to know talent when they see it? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bangbayed

Joined: 01 Dec 2005 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 5:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bucheon bum wrote: |
fiveeagles wrote: |
I would say 80 percent of the media in NA is left leaning while 15 percent is on target and 5 percent leans right. |
I would say 99% of us on this forum believe you pulled those "stats" out of your ass. |
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|