View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Dukey77777

Joined: 28 Jun 2007 Location: Chungcheongbuk-do
|
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 2:25 am Post subject: 7200 RPM vs 10000 RPM |
|
|
I'm going to be buying a new HD...probably Western Digital - my Seagate Barracuda 500 GB just died, along with all my stuff....so it's time to change to WD, I've heard good things.....
Anyway,
Does anyone have experience with 10,000 RPMs? Specifically, the WD VelociRaptor 150GB??
http://blog.danawa.com/prod/702937/C/861/877/977/0
Are 10,000 RPM drives significantly faster than 7,200s? Considering startup times, and game loading - I'm wondering if there's a noticeable difference. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jeff's Cigarettes

Joined: 27 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 2:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
What about the warranty? Lifetime is it not?
Sure there's a speed difference but not a tremendous one. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bassexpander
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Location: Someplace you'd rather be.
|
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 4:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I thought I read they were faster, but it's not as big of a jump as it once was. Guys going for speed generally put two in a RAID configuration, anyway.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redundant_array_of_independent_disks
I'd go with two 7,200 drives in a RAID 1 configuration. You'll still get the read speed increase (which is where you need it anyway), and have redundancy if one drive goes bad. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
I_Am_The_Kiwi

Joined: 10 Jun 2008
|
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 5:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thats a whole lot of money your prepared to spend on a 150GB drive simply cos it is 10,000RPM.
Yes they are faster, but for gaming etc you wont really notice it too much.
It is unecessary for what you want. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|