| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Troll_Bait

Joined: 04 Jan 2006 Location: [T]eaching experience doesn't matter much. -Lee Young-chan (pictured)
|
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 4:48 pm Post subject: Korean Version of TOEFL to Debut |
|
|
http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2008/12/117_36346.html
| Quote: |
| The government will introduce a state-certified English proficiency test from 2012 to improve practical English skills of students and eventually replace TOEFL and other foreign exam material. |
A test designed in Konglishorea is going to replace TOEFL? Good luck with that. I'm sure it'll be a smashing success, the way TEPS has completely replaced TOEIC.
Oh wait ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pkang0202

Joined: 09 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 6:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The reason people take these tests is that the results are recognized around the world. Your TOEFL score works in Korea, the US, and a bunch of other countries.
The only way the new test would be popular is if it were easier than the others. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BrianInSuwon

Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Location: Korea
|
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 7:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| It sounds like its a move in the right direction. How can so many people complain about the current test (which places way too much stress on minor grammar points) and then complain when the government wants to replace the test with something that focuses more on practical English? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Smee

Joined: 24 Dec 2004 Location: Jeollanam-do
|
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 8:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LOL.
Since when have Koreans ever favored practical English over minor grammatical points?
Such a transition would undermine the quote-unquote skill set of all the teachers currently employed.
Just like how every class will be taught in English by 2012. Even though nobody is qualified to do that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
marlow
Joined: 06 Feb 2005
|
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 8:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| BrianInSuwon wrote: |
| It sounds like its a move in the right direction. How can so many people complain about the current test (which places way too much stress on minor grammar points) and then complain when the government wants to replace the test with something that focuses more on practical English? |
The TOEFL isn't really focused on grammar. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jandar

Joined: 11 Jun 2008
|
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 10:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Let's see TOEFL has been accepted and a success throughout the world.
Let invent our own test and call it TOEIC.
A failure which may be responsible for the 44% dropout rate of Korean students from US colleges and universities.
We could use the TOEFL?
Let's invent a new test!
Sporkling |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Xuanzang

Joined: 10 Apr 2007 Location: Sadang
|
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 10:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I wonder if they will use a Playboy article in the reading passage section?
Last edited by Xuanzang on Thu Dec 18, 2008 10:47 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Yu_Bum_suk

Joined: 25 Dec 2004
|
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 10:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Jandar wrote: |
Let's see TOEFL has been accepted and a success throughout the world.
Let invent our own test and call it TOEIC.
A failure which may be responsible for the 44% dropout rate of Korean students from US colleges and universities.
We could use the TOEFL?
Let's invent a new test!
Sporkling |
Actually the reading questions on government public school tests are more TOEFL-based than TOEIC-based.
If they plan to do this for the uni-entrance exams where are they ever going to find enough people qualified to grade it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wylies99

Joined: 13 May 2006 Location: I'm one cool cat!
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 12:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Xuanzang wrote: |
| I wonder if they will use a Playboy article in the reading passage section? |
Just imagine some of the sentences they will use . |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
weatherman

Joined: 14 Jan 2003 Location: Korea
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 1:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
| It about money. The local mercantilists hate, and I mean hate to see people spend money that goes to a foreign registered test. About skill sets, expect to see this test a mirror of the toelf, so there is no need to change skill sets. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sojusucks

Joined: 31 May 2008
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 2:20 am Post subject: Re: Korean Version of TOEFL to Debut |
|
|
| Troll_Bait wrote: |
http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2008/12/117_36346.html
| Quote: |
| The government will introduce a state-certified English proficiency test from 2012 to improve practical English skills of students and eventually replace TOEFL and other foreign exam material. |
A test designed in Konglishorea is going to replace TOEFL? Good luck with that. I'm sure it'll be a smashing success, the way TEPS has completely replaced TOEIC.
Oh wait ... |
Yeah, let's continue to inflate English scores to continue misleading the people about the true quality of the educational system here. Yeah.
We are Koreans. We are the best until we leave our country, so block all evil foreign materials that destroy our limitless egos. 파이팅. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
VanIslander

Joined: 18 Aug 2003 Location: Geoje, Hadong, Tongyeong,... now in a small coastal island town outside Gyeongsangnamdo!
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 3:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Smee wrote: |
| Since when have Koreans ever favored practical English over minor grammatical points? |
Exactly. Guess who'll be making up these new indicators of English language proficiency?
Written by Koreans for Korean students applying for Korean jobs in Korea.
Why not have Konglish then?
It makes no difference.
It's all totaly irrelevant to the world around them. Oblivious.
That said, as soon as the big export-dependent chaebols in electronics, engineering, car manufacturing and shipbuilding pan the new Korean-made test, it'll die on the vine. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bassexpander
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Location: Someplace you'd rather be.
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 4:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, I laughed at this too.
It's all about exactly what was said:
1. Students are flopping all over the new/updated test, and it doesn't look good, so let's create a test we can pass. Or more importantly -- a test Korean teachers are capable of teaching for (since so many of them in this confucist society cannot hold an English conversation).
2. They DO NOT like the idea of money leaving the country. The joke of all of this is that it will NOT be accepted internationally. This just opens the floodgates for corruption, bribes, etc., which is really what some people want. This gives them an avenue for a revenue stream to leech off of the public. Some family member of a politician will probably get money from this somehow.
3. Students serious about studying overseas will still have to take the real TOEFL anyway. No way in hell any reputable university is going to allow scores on this test when the rest of the world is required to submit scores for the real TOEFL. This test is an attempted end-run around a very harsh reality: decades of Korean teachers who cannot speak English does not equal students ready to study in an English-speaking country.
This is about Koreans screwing Koreans for more money, bribes, etc. More of the same old same old. In the end, this will cost families MORE.
I got a kick out of Dickey's comment. He was one of my TEFL instructors. I have a feeling he had a lot more to say than what was printed (or perhaps, he held his tongue a bit).
Last edited by bassexpander on Fri Dec 19, 2008 4:20 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
justaguy
Joined: 01 Jan 2008 Location: seoul
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 4:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
| They don't like a constant flow of money going out for these tests. Many of the tests are unfair in my opinion. They often ask obtuse questions designed to limit the number of high scores just to keep the Koreans shoveling the money to them. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bassexpander
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Location: Someplace you'd rather be.
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 4:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| justaguy wrote: |
| They don't like a constant flow of money going out for these tests. Many of the tests are unfair in my opinion. They often ask obtuse questions designed to limit the number of high scores just to keep the Koreans shoveling the money to them. |
Those "obtuse questions" are there for a reason. They test the student's ability to actually think, and prove ability to respond, rather than blindly memorize. Such thinking skills put Koreans at a serious disadvantage, and they know it.
The shoveling of money will now go to some relatives of some politicians. It will prove far more taxing on the everyday Korean family, as they will be forced to pay for both this test and the real TOEFL. Students will have to take more time to study for both, as well.
This is about as logical as when Korean immigration changed the E-2 rules last year, and then informed everyone of what the US, Canadian, Aussie, et. al. embassies were going to have to provide teachers for documentation. Those embassies were like, "WTF? Excuse me? We don't provide those kinds of documents." The US embassy website was the funniest. They printed it right on their website: The US Embassy will continue to be the best place to learn about what documentation we are able to provide. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|