Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Foreign pen-friends: how to make K-students look pathetic
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Yu_Bum_suk



Joined: 25 Dec 2004

PostPosted: Fri Feb 06, 2009 9:37 pm    Post subject: Foreign pen-friends: how to make K-students look pathetic Reply with quote

So I did it - after more than three years of teaching at my 'Global School' I finally got off my ass and managed to arrange a pen-friend exchange between my best HS class and a random grade 10 class at a French school. I explained everything to my students and we spent two whole lessons on it, going over example letters and making first and second drafts. After proof-reading their first drafts and making lots of suggestions some of them came up with half-decent letters and at the lower end they at least came up with 100-word collections of drivel such as 'Do you know Dokdo?' and 'What do you think Big Bang?'. Feeling like I had accomplished a lot, I headed off to the post office with a big, brown envelope and, after three weeks, found out that Korea express mail had finally got them to where they needed to go.

Finally, a month later, a Fedex parcel arrived on my desk. Was I ever floored. The worst of the students can write better than any of my co-teachers and most of them are Lebanese who speak English as a third language! I had even written the class a cover letter in French, just because I wasn't certain if they understood exactly what I was hoping for, but it turns out that their English is way better than my French.

It's not that my students aren't smart or don't try. The class I chose is great, consisting of about the top 25% of students you'd find in a small Korean town. Most of them try hard, listen, have great attitudes and are attentive. But when it comes to any kind of practical application of English, they just, well, suck, just like almost every Korean English teacher, professor, school, or university. I knew that already but did this letter exchange ever drive it home. Koreans totally, absolutely, completely suck at English in every possible respect and there seems to be precious little that I or anyone I know can do to change it. A bunch of 15-year-old Lebanese kids, most of whom have never been to an English speaking country and speak Arabic, Armenian, or French at home, could totally kick any random group of Korean teachers' asses at an essay writing contest. And of course so could their teacher, who�s also not a native speaker.

I can only hope that, unlike their teacher, my kids feel more inspired than depressed by this exercise.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ddeubel



Joined: 20 Jul 2005

PostPosted: Fri Feb 06, 2009 11:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

No need to feel depressed. Pat yourself on the back. Nor, is it your "hard working" student's fault.

English is not learned at school despite our pretending otherwise. (we can help in other ways). If you know the research, there just ain't enough hours in the school day, even a hagwon's. (despite the few who can learn a second or 10th language in a week like one idiot savant has).

Nor is English learned at home, at a desk, in isolation.

English is learned through contact with the living, real language. This can happen even in another country. Unfortunately, Korean's like Azerbajanis, Algerians or Albanians, don't get enough contact with the English language in their larger world. That's a failing of governments and leadership (and somewhat geography and history) - not English teachers. Nor students.

Nothing inherently different about Korean's language learning ability (despite this grand myth). Everyone, L1 or L2, has the same potential when it comes to learning a language. Human's can't swim well simply because we don't spend enough time in the water. And not just in the water but in the water and swimming. If we were there adrift, 20 hours a day - we'd all be capable of swimming the Channel.

Great job and do what you can.

DD
http://eflclassroom.ning.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Thunndarr



Joined: 30 Sep 2003

PostPosted: Fri Feb 06, 2009 11:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
The Defense Language Institute in Monterey, California, divides the languages they teach into four groups, from easiest to most difficult, as measured by the number of hours of instruction required to bring students (mainly native English speakers) to a certain level of proficiency. These are listed below: 1 = least difficult and 4 = most difficult.

1. Afrikaans, Danish, Dutch, French, Haitian Creole, Italian, Norwegian, Portuguese, Romanian, Spanish, Swahili, Swedish
2. Bulgarian, Dari, Farsi (Persian), German, (Modern) Greek, Hindi-Urdu, Indonesian, Malay
3. Amharic, Bengali, Burmese, Czech, Finnish, (Modern) Hebrew, Hungarian, Khmer (Cambodian), Lao, Nepali, Pilipino (Tagalog), Polish, Russian, Serbo-Croatian, Sinhala, Thai, Tamil, Turkish, Vietnamese
4. Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, Korean


If Korean is among the most difficult languages to learn for a native English speaker, it stands to reason that English is just as difficult for native Korean speakers.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
runthegauntlet



Joined: 02 Dec 2007
Location: the southlands.

PostPosted: Fri Feb 06, 2009 11:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I did a similar thing. I had my first and second year middle school students write letters to a fourth grade class in the U.S. to try and help them understand a more practical side of learning English and to expose them to other students.

I think it really went well. Yeah, the kids English isn't super great, but I wasn't seeing anything mind-blowing from the fourth graders from the U.S. either. In the end it fizzled out because there was a one month or so turnaround and kids would drop out of the hagwon, etc. But the kids that did it a few times were absolutely enthralled about the chance to talk to other kids in other countries. A really, really worth-while activity in my opinion and I think it's great you took the time to set it up.

Don't despair! I think the kids really do get a lot out of it, not just from the writing in English thing but the opportunity to talk to other kids and maybe realizing that maybe English can be useful.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
runthegauntlet



Joined: 02 Dec 2007
Location: the southlands.

PostPosted: Fri Feb 06, 2009 11:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thunndarr wrote:
Quote:
The Defense Language Institute in Monterey, California, divides the languages they teach into four groups, from easiest to most difficult, as measured by the number of hours of instruction required to bring students (mainly native English speakers) to a certain level of proficiency. These are listed below: 1 = least difficult and 4 = most difficult.

1. Afrikaans, Danish, Dutch, French, Haitian Creole, Italian, Norwegian, Portuguese, Romanian, Spanish, Swahili, Swedish
2. Bulgarian, Dari, Farsi (Persian), German, (Modern) Greek, Hindi-Urdu, Indonesian, Malay
3. Amharic, Bengali, Burmese, Czech, Finnish, (Modern) Hebrew, Hungarian, Khmer (Cambodian), Lao, Nepali, Pilipino (Tagalog), Polish, Russian, Serbo-Croatian, Sinhala, Thai, Tamil, Turkish, Vietnamese
4. Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, Korean


If Korean is among the most difficult languages to learn for a native English speaker, it stands to reason that English is just as difficult for native Korean speakers.


I've seen this as well and thought it odd that Chinese and Korean were classified at the same level. Mandarin blows my mind, the different tones and what not. Korean seems difficult but not as impossible to me as Mandarin seems.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ed Provencher



Joined: 15 Oct 2006

PostPosted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thunndarr wrote:
Quote:
The Defense Language Institute in Monterey, California, divides the languages they teach into four groups, from easiest to most difficult, as measured by the number of hours of instruction required to bring students (mainly native English speakers) to a certain level of proficiency. These are listed below: 1 = least difficult and 4 = most difficult.

1. Afrikaans, Danish, Dutch, French, Haitian Creole, Italian, Norwegian, Portuguese, Romanian, Spanish, Swahili, Swedish
2. Bulgarian, Dari, Farsi (Persian), German, (Modern) Greek, Hindi-Urdu, Indonesian, Malay
3. Amharic, Bengali, Burmese, Czech, Finnish, (Modern) Hebrew, Hungarian, Khmer (Cambodian), Lao, Nepali, Pilipino (Tagalog), Polish, Russian, Serbo-Croatian, Sinhala, Thai, Tamil, Turkish, Vietnamese
4. Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, Korean


If Korean is among the most difficult languages to learn for a native English speaker, it stands to reason that English is just as difficult for native Korean speakers.


I hear that. Yet I would expect to see more English fluency in Korean teachers of English.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ddeubel



Joined: 20 Jul 2005

PostPosted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 4:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Quote:
The Defense Language Institute in Monterey, California, divides the languages they teach into four groups, from easiest to most difficult, as measured by the number of hours of instruction required to bring students (mainly native English speakers) to a certain level of proficiency. These are listed below: 1 = least difficult and 4 = most difficult.

1. Afrikaans, Danish, Dutch, French, Haitian Creole, Italian, Norwegian, Portuguese, Romanian, Spanish, Swahili, Swedish
2. Bulgarian, Dari, Farsi (Persian), German, (Modern) Greek, Hindi-Urdu, Indonesian, Malay
3. Amharic, Bengali, Burmese, Czech, Finnish, (Modern) Hebrew, Hungarian, Khmer (Cambodian), Lao, Nepali, Pilipino (Tagalog), Polish, Russian, Serbo-Croatian, Sinhala, Thai, Tamil, Turkish, Vietnamese
4. Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, Korean



If Korean is among the most difficult languages to learn for a native English speaker, it stands to reason that English is just as difficult for native Korean speakers.


Thundrr,

Can you elaborate on how that logic works? This is not a two headed coin in my opinion. Further, what makes a language "hard" to learn? The field of language transfer is far from a hard science - rather contentious.

Language difficulty is not something set in stone, imo. Very hard to generalize and further - depends on how you judge "fluency". A big problem with notions of fluency has been the fixation on the ability to speak a standard English or an English pronounced a certain way or an English that is test oriented. Who's god?

It depends on a lot of factors and there is no set number of hours of study that detail a barometer of language acquisition. "Average" means nothing or even more than nothing, when it comes to language. The variables are immense when it comes to language and it is a very individualized and obtained skill.

I'd also suggest - The Defense Language Inst. isn't a leading authority Smile

DD
http://eflclassroom.ning.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Thunndarr



Joined: 30 Sep 2003

PostPosted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 7:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ddeubel wrote:
Quote:
Quote:
The Defense Language Institute in Monterey, California, divides the languages they teach into four groups, from easiest to most difficult, as measured by the number of hours of instruction required to bring students (mainly native English speakers) to a certain level of proficiency. These are listed below: 1 = least difficult and 4 = most difficult.

1. Afrikaans, Danish, Dutch, French, Haitian Creole, Italian, Norwegian, Portuguese, Romanian, Spanish, Swahili, Swedish
2. Bulgarian, Dari, Farsi (Persian), German, (Modern) Greek, Hindi-Urdu, Indonesian, Malay
3. Amharic, Bengali, Burmese, Czech, Finnish, (Modern) Hebrew, Hungarian, Khmer (Cambodian), Lao, Nepali, Pilipino (Tagalog), Polish, Russian, Serbo-Croatian, Sinhala, Thai, Tamil, Turkish, Vietnamese
4. Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, Korean



If Korean is among the most difficult languages to learn for a native English speaker, it stands to reason that English is just as difficult for native Korean speakers.


Thundrr,

Can you elaborate on how that logic works?


Absolutely. Very few things in this world are completely equal. Either languages are equally easy to learn or they aren't. One of these possibilities is overwhelmingly likely. One isn't. It's not rocket science. Furthermore, personal experience as well as empirical evidence suggests that certain languages are much easier to learn for English speakers than others, and the opposite is also true.

Furthermore, this explanation also has the benefit of not regarding asian people as particularly hard-headed w/r/t English language fluency.

To be honest, I'm not sure how one could argue that all languages are equally difficult regardless of one's native tongue. Unless that person really hasn't thought about the issue much at all. (And honestly, I really hope you aren't contending that all languages are equally difficult. It's an absurd notion. Logic and reason confirm this, and I really don't want to get into a debate about it since the conclusion is absolutely foregone.)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Draz



Joined: 27 Jun 2007
Location: Land of Morning Clam

PostPosted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 2:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ddeubel wrote:

Further, what makes a language "hard" to learn? The field of language transfer is far from a hard science - rather contentious.

Language difficulty is not something set in stone, imo. Very hard to generalize and further - depends on how you judge "fluency". A big problem with notions of fluency has been the fixation on the ability to speak a standard English or an English pronounced a certain way or an English that is test oriented. Who's god?

It depends on a lot of factors and there is no set number of hours of study that detail a barometer of language acquisition. "Average" means nothing or even more than nothing, when it comes to language. The variables are immense when it comes to language and it is a very individualized and obtained skill.


What is all this doublespeak bull crap about? Confused
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ddeubel



Joined: 20 Jul 2005

PostPosted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 2:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thundrr,

I am not arguing that all languages are equal in terms of acquisition. What I am arguing is that every language can be learned given the time, effort and environment. It is wrong to parade a notion that some languages just can't be learned no matter what or are extraordinarily difficult. That's the only cautionary note I'm trying to add. We all start from the same place. (I'm not talking about the 5% maybe who have significant LD (learning disabilities).

It all depends on the individual. Generalization, and comparing languages or even all the research on language transfer - can't account for how varied people are in HOW they learn a language. I had no trouble learning Czech but much with Korean. A good friend had the opposite problem but we are both of comparable ages and experiences.

I too don't have the time to debate the literature and issues about language transfer (so many myths) but I'll always err on the side of the individual when speaking about languages. Here's a short extract from an interview with Pinker and his thoughts. Worth reading the whole thing if you have time. http://wordsmith.org/chat/pinker.html YBS, note what he says about writing.

Quote:
RBuchheit
What do you think the hardest language to learn is, and why?

Steven Pinker (Guest Speaker)
It depends on whether you're a child or an adult. If you're a child, then all languages are equally easy (at least the spoken vernacular -- the scholarly written versions of course are different). Spoken vernaculars have to stay about the same difficulty, because if they got too complicated, children would simplify them, and the language would change. Now, if you're an adult, the situation is different, because you're no longer able to pick up the patterns of the language instinctively, and have to think about everything. In that case, aspects of language with lots of irregularity or complex declensional patterns, like the Slavic languages (Russian, Polish, etc.) can be quite hard. It also depends on what aspect of language we're talking about -- adults generally learn to read and write a foreign language, not just speak it, and that varies radically across languages, because writing systems are artificial inventions, not systems that evolve naturally through children. English spelling is harder than Spanish
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
fustiancorduroy



Joined: 12 Jan 2007

PostPosted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

...

Last edited by fustiancorduroy on Sat Feb 21, 2015 5:07 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dmbfan



Joined: 09 Mar 2006

PostPosted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 7:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've said it before and I'l say again (and again after this)..........


...make English a course that all public school students are required to pass (well, at least for middle school and high school). Not having the fear of failing certainley does not help the motivation factor. When students see English class as a one hour, once a week break from the daily grind......it is destined to fail or not live up to any expectations.

The kids should be taking English class once a day, everyday. AND...they must pass.

This would save tons of money for the governemtn as well. They would not have to come up with these STUPID English villages and ESL centers (I currently have the misfortune of being suckered into one of these........completely pathetic...students don't even need to bring books).


Once koreans figure that out (and realize that learning English is not about singing meaningless songs, while watching some white dude/dudette juggle around), things WILL improve.

There is a reason why Korea spends so much (if not the most) money on ESL educaiton but has POOR and PATHETIC results.

Y.B.S.........good job! Don't let that experience get you down. You've done your best and that is what counts. I think that was a brilliant idea and if presented to the school in a fair way, they might realize that...."Wow....we need to step up".

dmbfan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Yu_Bum_suk



Joined: 25 Dec 2004

PostPosted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 8:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="Thunndarr"]
Quote:
The Defense Language Institute in Monterey, California, divides the languages they teach into four groups, from easiest to most difficult, as measured by the number of hours of instruction required to bring students (mainly native English speakers) to a certain level of proficiency. These are listed below: 1 = least difficult and 4 = most difficult.

1. Afrikaans, Danish, Dutch, French, Haitian Creole, Italian, Norwegian, Portuguese, Romanian, Spanish, Swahili, Swedish
2. Bulgarian, Dari, Farsi (Persian), German, (Modern) Greek, Hindi-Urdu, Indonesian, Malay
3. Amharic, Bengali, Burmese, Czech, Finnish, (Modern) Hebrew, Hungarian, Khmer (Cambodian), Lao, Nepali, Pilipino (Tagalog), Polish, Russian, Serbo-Croatian, Sinhala, Thai, Tamil, Turkish, Vietnamese
4. Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, Korean


But most of the kids in the class that responded speak Arabic as a first language.

Oh well, I suppose that a collection of crappy letters is a collection of real-life communication more that most Korean English classes will ever produce.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Xuanzang



Joined: 10 Apr 2007
Location: Sadang

PostPosted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 11:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kudos YBS for caring enough and establishing some sort of outreach program. They might have been crappybut at least you can say you motivated them to do SOMETHING besides "Nobody, Nobody but you"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
soul rebels



Joined: 19 Nov 2008

PostPosted: Sun Feb 08, 2009 4:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i set up a pen pal lesson as my parents teach in nigeria so i got my students to write letters to students at thier school. was probly the best lesson i ever did most of the students were very interested in writing to someone in another country. out of a couple of hundred student three students wrote some offensive stuff but you would get that anywhere in the world.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International