| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	
	
		Beeyee
 
  
  Joined: 29 May 2007
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 3:44 pm    Post subject: Quiting - Legal Question | 
				      | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				I've been at my school for about a year and a half and have decided that I want out. I have another job lined up. The problem is that they want me to start in a months time. My contract states that I must give 90 days notice. This seems very excessive, and frankly, possibly illegal.
 
 
So where am I legally with this? Is there some labor law which states that employees need only give 30 days? | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		lifeinkorea
 
 
  Joined: 24 Jan 2009 Location: somewhere in China
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 4:15 pm    Post subject:  | 
				      | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Is this new school really "the" school you want to run to?  If it's just a school to escape to, I suggest holding out a couple more months and negotiate with your current school.  You could transfer schools, and your current school might like this since they won't have to pay airfare back home.
 
 
You also have severance which you would be losing, so use these things to your advantage before trying to put up a fight.  There will be a lot less stress and fewer headaches down the road. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Beeyee
 
  
  Joined: 29 May 2007
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 9:54 pm    Post subject:  | 
				      | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Not running from anything. The new school has offered me better terms, that is all there is to it.
 
 
Could someone please answer the original question, which was, is it legally possible for my school to keep me 90 days after I quit? | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		kprrok
 
 
  Joined: 06 Apr 2004 Location: KC
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 10:23 pm    Post subject:  | 
				      | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				| I believe the law is 30 days, but if you sign a contract that says 90 days, you're bound by that.  Suck it up and stick it out like a man (or woman) instead of a wimp. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Beeyee
 
  
  Joined: 29 May 2007
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 2:39 am    Post subject:  | 
				      | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				
 
	  | kprrok wrote: | 
	 
	
	  | I believe the law is 30 days, but if you sign a contract that says 90 days, you're bound by that.  Suck it up and stick it out like a man (or woman) instead of a wimp. | 
	 
 
 
 
That doesn't make sense. It's surely one or the other. If it is 30 days by law then the contract is not lawful. 
 
 
Again, I am not unhappy at my job but would like to move to another hagwon because of better pay and working hours. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		wesharris
 
 
  Joined: 10 Oct 2008
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 3:15 am    Post subject:  | 
				      | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				It makes perfect sense. 
 
   Simply put 30 days is the minimum required by law for either side.
 
90 Days is the contractual agreement that you signed. It's perfectly legal, not either or it's both. Use your noggin for more than just a toboggin.
 
 
_+_
 
Wes | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		cruisemonkey
 
  
  Joined: 04 Jul 2005 Location: Hopefully, the same place as my luggage.
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 3:22 am    Post subject:  | 
				      | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				There is no provision in K-law specifying a 'time frame' for an employee's resignation to take effect. Therefore, you are bound by your contract.
 
 
There is provision for an employer to give an employee 30 days advance notice of dismissal.
 
 
Doesn't anybody on 'Dave's' read (and understand) their contract before they sign it?   | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		esglumac
 
 
  Joined: 02 Mar 2007 Location: In the middle of contractual litigation!!!
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 6:45 am    Post subject:  | 
				      | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				I know 
 
 
Iam surprised they find any-one to sign    | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Beeyee
 
  
  Joined: 29 May 2007
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:02 am    Post subject:  | 
				      | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				
 
	  | cruisemonkey wrote: | 
	 
	
	  There is no provision in K-law specifying a 'time frame' for an employee's resignation to take effect. Therefore, you are bound by your contract.
 
 
There is provision for an employer to give an employee 30 days advance notice of dismissal.
 
 
Doesn't anybody on 'Dave's' read (and understand) their contract before they sign it?   | 
	 
 
 
 
Doesn't anyone on Dave's reply to a post without a 'witty' comment at the end? 
 
 
Aside from the last sentence, this is the information I was looking for, so thank you for that at least. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		 |